On 11/30/21 01:53, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 11/29/21 15:01, Mat Booth wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 13:16, Jiri Vanek wrote:
I would kindly ask you to search yourself in this list:
https://github.com/judovana/FedoraSystemJdkBump/blob/main/scritps/fillCopr/exemplarResults/maintainers.jbump
T
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:08:19AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30 2021 at 10:57:37 AM -0500, Colin Walters
> wrote:
> > https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/commit/eb74f2ea3e9b453902315539e4f327481162c4f8
>
> Should we be using this on other Fedora variants too...? At
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 22:39 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 16:03 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:13:19AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > I don't use sudo , and I'm against the use of sudo , Fedora
> > > tradition
> > > do things as root .
> >
> > I
On Wed, Dec 1 2021 at 12:27:35 AM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman
wrote:
How do people using this setup prevent people from submitting PR and
issues to the Github mirror where they cannot be applied/fixed?
For GNOME we just set up a bot that autocloses every PR.
___
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 12:27:35AM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Michel Alexandre Salim [30/11/2021 15:22] :
> >
> > At the risk of straying off-topic, an approach I really like (which is
> > in the spirit of Git being distributed) is to use an open source forge
> > primarily, with GitHub only
* Michel Alexandre Salim [30/11/2021 15:22] :
>
> At the risk of straying off-topic, an approach I really like (which is
> in the spirit of Git being distributed) is to use an open source forge
> primarily, with GitHub only as backup.
How do people using this setup prevent people from submitting P
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:58:09PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Whenever this topic has come up, I've see lots of this, except people don't
> say the first part out loud: "Of course _I_ use GitHub for most of my stuff,
> because of all of the advantages — but Fedora, Fedora should never." We
> ca
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 16:03 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:13:19AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > I don't use sudo , and I'm against the use of sudo , Fedora
> > tradition
> > do things as root .
>
> I hope we don't! Doing things with least required privilege is an
> im
Blaise Pabon kirjoitti 29.11.2021 klo 18.38:
Hi Otto
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 7:17 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
The first link is about other docs than the Package Maintainer Docs,
with some critical comments from you about the use of Antora in
docs.fp.o. The latter two are about Pagure. So if
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:41 PM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
>
> Have you considered submitting a link to this to the Koji docs? A while
> ago, I tried to set up a dev Koji environment just by following the
> docs. Having a pointer to this would have been very useful.
No, but that's a good idea!
__
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:13:19AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I don't use sudo , and I'm against the use of sudo , Fedora tradition
> do things as root .
I hope we don't! Doing things with least required privilege is an important
security principle, one which was actually pioneered here with th
Ken Dreyer kirjoitti 30.11.2021 klo 20.56:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 2:33 PM Dan Čermák
wrote:
Maybe we can make a VM image (for KVM/qemu + VirtualBox) with a small
set of Fedora infra, including Koji+Bodhi.
How about a vagrant box or a docker-compose file :)
However, I'm a little worried that
On 11/30/21 10:30, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:07:52PM -0800, Tom Stellard wrote:
Hi,
I've tagged 13.0.1-rc1. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries.
There is still time to submit fixes for the final 13.0.1. I'll give more
details about timelines and how to do thi
Could be useful for me to do too, I'm new to infra as an apprentice.
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 18:57, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 2:33 PM Dan Čermák
> wrote:
> > > Maybe we can make a VM image (for KVM/qemu + VirtualBox) with a small
> > > set of Fedora infra, including Koji+Bodhi.
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 2:33 PM Dan Čermák
wrote:
> > Maybe we can make a VM image (for KVM/qemu + VirtualBox) with a small
> > set of Fedora infra, including Koji+Bodhi.
>
> How about a vagrant box or a docker-compose file :)
>
> However, I'm a little worried that this might be too fat or not too
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:07:52PM -0800, Tom Stellard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tagged 13.0.1-rc1. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries.
>
> There is still time to submit fixes for the final 13.0.1. I'll give more
> details about timelines and how to do this once the bugzilla migration
This is your reminder that the F35 release retrospective is open
through 4 December.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 3:56 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Now that we've released F35, I'd like to share the first semi-annual
> release retrospective survey:
> https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/23
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:49:24 +0100
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I think it would be more constructive if you enumerated pros/cons of
> sudo to support your argument then the tradition.
Not the original poster, but I find that I like the separation of roles
into two. When I do things as root, I mentall
On Tue, Nov 30 2021 at 10:57:37 AM -0500, Colin Walters
wrote:
https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/commit/eb74f2ea3e9b453902315539e4f327481162c4f8
Should we be using this on other Fedora variants too...? At least for
Workstation, where root is always locked?
_
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Also bear in mind you can't actually forbid source git repositories
> on any platforms.
>
> Some maintainers already use source git repositories, they just don't
> happen to be blessed by the Fedora project. If what Fedora offers
> is kneecapped, the maintainers can ign
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021, at 9:49 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Ben Cotton said:
>> Further, this change of defaults complements the default for root
>> account. The redesign of root setup screen in Fedora 35 makes it clear
>> that root should be left locked.
>
> So, not directly relate
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> It is more than just sysadmin time involved though. One of the most
> compelling parts of GitLab is its CI framework and the free runners it
> provides projects.
Any kind of CI support should be considered nice-to-have and not a required
feature of a git forge. You can
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> The second issue has been the general rule that Fedora systems run by
> infrastructure use Fedora Linux or RHEL. Packaging up all the ruby
> gems and various services needed is a large task and usually falls on
> someone like Neal Gompa to try a stab at it.
Even if it
Matthew Miller wrote:
> Nope! The Packit Service bot works just like a human packager and syncs
> back changes other packagers have made.
I do not see how that can work for things like conditionally-applied
patches. Unless you just drop them into src-git as patches, which entirely
defeats the po
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you
> support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on
> gitlab.com, which a proprietary software git forge?
IMHO (as a non-candidate), it is sad that this question has to be asked at
all: Fedora
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 04:22:42PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29 2021 at 04:42:18 PM -0500, Matthew Miller
wrote:
Nope! The Packit Service bot works just like a human packager and
syncs
back changes other packagers have made.
Well that would be what I was missing. I guess th
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:25:29PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29 2021 at 03:15:24 PM -0500, Matthew Miller
wrote:
source-git is intended to be
distributed and close to upstreams.
Interesting. Why? What you and David are both saying seems so weird to
me, I suddenly wonder if
Once upon a time, Ben Cotton said:
> Further, this change of defaults complements the default for root
> account. The redesign of root setup screen in Fedora 35 makes it clear
> that root should be left locked.
So, not directly related to the proposal, but jumping in here because it
goes with the
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:06:13PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you support
> allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on gitlab.com, which a
> proprietary software git forge?
>
> Fedora Council has already effectively st
This seems like it was fairly comprehensively answered already:
RHEL 8 doesn't support btrfs.
However about XFS, we are in fact going to backport the two missing
features (bigtime and inobtcnt) to RHEL 8. The bugs are unfortunately
private but for reference they are:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
On 30. 11. 21 9:54, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 30. 11. 21 v 2:00 Maxwell G via devel napsal(a):
On Monday, November 29, 2021 5:12:22 PM CST Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 5:52 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 4:16 PM Mohan Boddu wrote:
Hello all,
Fedora 33 will go en
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 3/208 (x86_64), 5/142 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211129.n.0):
ID: 1074237 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi
U
I think it would be more constructive if you enumerated pros/cons of
sudo to support your argument then the tradition.
Vít
Dne 30. 11. 21 v 12:13 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
I don't use sudo , and I'm against the use of sudo , Fedora tradition
do things as root .
On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 14:33 -
I don't use sudo , and I'm against the use of sudo , Fedora tradition
do things as root .
On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 14:33 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Users_are_admins_by_default_in_Anaconda
>
> = Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI =
>
>
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211129.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211130.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:8
Upgraded packages: 90
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 22.15 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi Brandon, this applies to all variants that display the user screen.
Looking at the profiles we have, that means Server, KDE, Kinoite, IoT.
Where this does *not* apply is Workstation and Silverblue. I believe the
anaconda repository has all the relevant profiles, so hopefully that list
is comple
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 36 Rawhide 20211130.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:17 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> I would kindly ask you to search yourself in this list:
> https://github.com/judovana/FedoraSystemJdkBump/blob/main/scritps/fillCopr/exemplarResults/maintainers.jbump
> If you are here, please check status of your package in
> https://github.co
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211129.0):
ID: 1074104 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 8:55 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 30. 11. 21 v 2:00 Maxwell G via devel napsal(a):
> > On Monday, November 29, 2021 5:12:22 PM CST Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 5:52 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 4:16 PM Mohan Boddu wrote:
> >>>
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:25:29PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29 2021 at 03:15:24 PM -0500, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > source-git is intended to be
> > distributed and close to upstreams.
>
> Interesting. Why? What you and David are both saying seems so weird to me, I
> sudden
On 11/29/21 15:48, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 29/11/2021 14:22, Jun Aruga wrote:
You can use `%bcond_with foo` (foo is not set as "false") or
`%bcond_without foo` (foo is set as "true") syntax.
%bcond_with{,out} has very ugly reverse syntax. I recently got rid of
them in all my packag
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:15:24PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:06:13PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you
> > support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on
> > gitlab.com, which a propri
On 11/27/21 16:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 9:02 AM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Adam Williamson writes:
[...]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/UsersAndGroups/#_dynamic_allocation
say:
"Create a .sysusers file with the user definition and add
where us
Dne 30. 11. 21 v 2:00 Maxwell G via devel napsal(a):
On Monday, November 29, 2021 5:12:22 PM CST Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 5:52 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 4:16 PM Mohan Boddu wrote:
Hello all,
Fedora 33 will go end of life for updates and support on 30t
On 11/29/21 15:01, Mat Booth wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 13:16, Jiri Vanek wrote:
I would kindly ask you to search yourself in this list:
https://github.com/judovana/FedoraSystemJdkBump/blob/main/scritps/fillCopr/exemplarResults/maintainers.jbump
This list contains dead/retired packages.
awesome ty!
On 11/30/21 04:50, Jerry James wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 6:16 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
Thank you very much for your help, there are 107 failures, and 270 java
packagers, but only 2 active members of java sig. Without your help, the JDK
bump will be very hard.
All of the packa
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211129.0):
ID: 1074088 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
48 matches
Mail list logo
