Any background? This is the first I've seen this. I don't see any forwarded
email chains.
Respectfully,
Noah
On December 10, 2021 9:51:03 PM EST, Reon Beon via devel
wrote:
>I had to disable it for it to boot. Anyone else?
>___
>devel mailing list --
I had to disable it for it to boot. Anyone else?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030287
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030984
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030725
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030283
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584474
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-95153b56f6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030889
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-95153b56f6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030889
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-9b12028eb5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584474
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-9b12028eb5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030889
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-9ae76aaec7 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584474
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-9ae76aaec7 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031330
Bug ID: 2031330
Summary: Please branch and build perl-HTtP-BrowserDetect in
epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031329
Bug ID: 2031329
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Log-Log4perl in epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Log-Log4perl
Assignee:
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-d5e825b208
isync-1.3.6-1.el7
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-bc5821ce86
libmysofa-1.2.1-1.el7
1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584474
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030889
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
On 10. 12. 21 21:12, Troy Dawson wrote:
What are other's thoughts about if/when to remove the epel8-playground repo?
My thoughts: Sunset the contributing ways for Playground ASAP. Remove the repo
with the next RHEL 8.x release.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On 10. 12. 21 22:30, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
I'm packaging python-mistune as a dependency for hyperkitty (so we can
finally pull off a Mailman3/Hyperkitty migration from the current
RHEL7+custom repo setup - tracked in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2030061)
Image upscaling, image super resolution, image enhancing, has always been a hot
topic since the age of sci-fi movies. The only difference is that we expect to
see the true details when enhanced in sci-fi, but in real life, we are only
able to estimate what it COULD look like. But it is also
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 3:45 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 10:53:23AM -0800, Alan Dunn wrote:
> > alt-ergo
> > coq
> > gappa
> > ocaml-lablgtk
> > ocaml-mlgmpidl
> > ocaml-ocamlgraph
>
> You can reassign these to me.
>
> Comaintainers definitely welcome. Especially for
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 4:25 AM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
>
> I am forwarding this to devel@, because I am reviewing this package and would
> also like a response.
>
> Thanks,
> Maxwell
I remember a similar problem. Can you try adding an empty %build scriptlet?
Last time, that worked around
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 9:15 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 09. 12. 21 18:34, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:57 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 09. 12. 21 13:54, Michal Konecny wrote:
> >>> Hello everyone,
> >>>
> >>> The New Hotness 1.0.0 is now live in Fedora infra
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 10:53:23AM -0800, Alan Dunn wrote:
> alt-ergo
> coq
> gappa
> ocaml-lablgtk
> ocaml-mlgmpidl
> ocaml-ocamlgraph
You can reassign these to me.
Comaintainers definitely welcome. Especially for coq which is a
daunting package.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031237
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
I'm packaging python-mistune as a dependency for hyperkitty (so we can
finally pull off a Mailman3/Hyperkitty migration from the current
RHEL7+custom repo setup - tracked in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2030061)
python-mistune review:
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 7/208 (x86_64), 15/142 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211209.n.0):
ID: 1083571 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL:
On 10.12.21 22:05, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:57 PM Sandro Mani wrote:
On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
This does not
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:57 PM Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>
> On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >> On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> >>> On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
> This does not appear to be accurate for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031237
Bug ID: 2031237
Summary: Please branch and build perl-HTTP-Cache-Transparent in
epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031236
Bug ID: 2031236
Summary: Please branch and build perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined
in epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031234
Bug ID: 2031234
Summary: Please branch and build perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite in
epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030285
Gary Buhrmaster changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Missing expected images:
Soas live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/67 (x86_64), 1/18 (aarch64)
ID: 1076199 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1076199
ID: 1083870 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 10:21 AM Davide Cavalca via epel-devel <
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 05:29 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > We (The EPEL Steering Committee) are following up on EPEL issue
> > 136[1] regarding the status of EPEL8 Playground.
> >
> >
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211209.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211210.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 114
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 1.19 GiB
Size of dropped packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030287
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 36 Rawhide 20211210.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 12/10/21 09:13, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 10:40:33AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
What happens if these libraries are not installed an cannot be dl-opened?
The functionality that requires those libraries will not be available.
This is quite
Hi,
I'm listed as a maintainer for the following packages:
alt-ergo
coq
emacs-common-proofgeneral
gappa
ocaml-lablgtk
ocaml-mlgmpidl
ocaml-ocamlgraph
stp
I haven't done any packaging work in a while, and I'd like to orphan
my packages/relinquish my maintainership of all my packages. Jerry
On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 05:29 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> We (The EPEL Steering Committee) are following up on EPEL issue
> 136[1] regarding the status of EPEL8 Playground.
>
> Looking through the logs we see that there are still people building
> against playground on a regular basis. But as I
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 07:34:42AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Also, I moved more stuff into the -udev subpackage:
> systemd-integritysetup, systemd-veritysetup, systemd-binfmt,
> systemd-sysctl, systemd-coredump. IIUC, none of those are useful
> in containers, so they fit better
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 1:09 PM Link Dupont via devel
wrote:
>
> On Friday, December 10, 2021 2:35:45 AM EST Rémi Lauzier wrote:
> > Hi everyone. I will update rust-palette and rust-palette_derive to version
> > 0.6.0 in a sidetag. If there is no objection i will push it in a week. The
> > only
My mistake, i tought that it depend on a specific version of palette. Will
update soon.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
Le vendredi 10 décembre 2021 à 07:08, Link Dupont via devel
a écrit:
> On Friday, December 10, 2021 2:35:45 AM EST Rémi Lauzier wrote:
Hello all,
The odoc (OCaml documentation) project has started releasing its
version 2.x series. They come with a small tree of new dependencies.
Here are the first few. I am willing to swap for reviews of these
packages. Let me know what I can review for you.
ocaml-logs:
水电费试点范围速度
--》点击后面地址进入看午@夜大片: 没有广告
--》点击后面地址进入看午@夜视频: 没有广告
水电费试点范围速度这就是真正的幸福——珍惜自己拥有的。如果你是雄鹰就不要羡慕无垠的大海，因为你有你自由的蓝天；【形】水电费试踽踽独行,点范围速度谢天谢地海的女儿说：幸福就是要让自己爱的人幸福，即使自己失去生命；水电费试点范围速度
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Am 10.12.21 um 15:13 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
Some other replies in this thread assumed that the programs will crash.
I have no idea why you would assume that.
If properly implemented, such programs typically won't crash, they will
"just not work" oder "error out".
Functionally,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030279
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2031117
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031123
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2031117
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031117
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2030279
Depends On|
== Detailed Description ==
The feature is designed to prevent an install of removed weak
dependencies from the system by users and to not install weak
dependencies missing after system deployment. It will change the
behavior of DNF, microdnf, and PackageKit. The feature will be
backported to all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031005
--- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth ---
(In reply to Jitka Plesnikova from comment #4)
> perl-XML-SAX-Writer and perl-XML-SemanticDiff are not distributed by CentOS
> Stream. If you want it in EPEL 9, the branch epel9 has to be created.
Indeed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030725
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030984
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031005
--- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
perl-XML-SAX-Writer and perl-XML-SemanticDiff are not distributed by CentOS
Stream. If you want it in EPEL 9, the branch epel9 has to be created.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031123
Bug ID: 2031123
Summary: perl-XML-Filter-BufferText for EPEL-9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-XML-Filter-BufferText
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031005
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth ---
Looks like koji is finding packages that are not part of the compose:
https://composes.stream.centos.org/production/latest-CentOS-Stream/compose/metadata/rpms.json
perl-XML-SAX-Writer and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031117
Bug ID: 2031117
Summary: perl-XML-SAX-Writer for EPEL-9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-XML-SAX-Writer
Assignee: andr...@bawue.net
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 10:50 PM Maxwell G via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> On Thu, 2021-09-16 at 15:17 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeakAutodetect
> >
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > exclude_from_weak_autodetect
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031005
--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth ---
Hmm, you're right. If I try to build it locally I get a missing dependency of
perl(XML::SAX::Writer) (which I though was part of perl-XML-SAX but is actually
packaged separately). Looking at the root.log
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 10:40:33AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 10/12/2021 08:34, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >We also changed various libraries to be dlopened when actually used,
> >instead of being dynamically linked. The goal is to reduce the
> >required dependencies.
>
On Fr, 10.12.21 10:40, Fedora Development ML (devel@lists.fedoraproject.org)
wrote:
> On 10/12/2021 08:34, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > We also changed various libraries to be dlopened when actually used,
> > instead of being dynamically linked. The goal is to reduce the
> > required
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:16:37PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > This means that various libraries that were
> > previously always pulled in, are not listed as Recommends by the various
> > subpackages:
> [...]
> > Recommends are normally installed, but if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030984
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031005
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030279
Bug 2030279 depends on bug 2031005, which changed state.
Bug 2031005 Summary: perl-XML-SAX for EPEL-9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031005
What|Removed |Added
On 10/12/2021 13:34, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Programs will fail at run-time.
Openly said, I feel this is a massive regression and design flaw.
+1. And crash on init-system level will fail the whole system.
All library dependencies should be tracked by linker.
dlopen() should be used only for
We (The EPEL Steering Committee) are following up on EPEL issue 136[1]
regarding the status of EPEL8 Playground.
Looking through the logs we see that there are still people building
against playground on a regular basis. But as I look into each of those
packages, the same package is built in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031079
Bug ID: 2031079
Summary: perl-Crypt-DES for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-DES
Assignee: jpazdzi...@redhat.com
Am 10.12.21 um 10:40 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
On 10/12/2021 08:34, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
We also changed various libraries to be dlopened when actually used,
instead of being dynamically linked. The goal is to reduce the
required dependencies.
dl-opening instead of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977273
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jfe...@redhat.com
On Friday, December 10, 2021 2:35:45 AM EST Rémi Lauzier wrote:
> Hi everyone. I will update rust-palette and rust-palette_derive to version
> 0.6.0 in a sidetag. If there is no objection i will push it in a week. The
> only dependency that somebody else will have to update is
>
On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
This does not appear to be accurate for nodejs packages - take i.e.
node-svgo, which compliant with the guidelines
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 14:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FsVerityRPM
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Enable the use of fsverity for installed RPM files validation.
>
> == Owners ==
>
> * Name: [[User:Dcavalca|Davide Cavalca]], [[User:Borisb|Boris
> Burkov]],
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> This means that various libraries that were
> previously always pulled in, are not listed as Recommends by the various
> subpackages:
[...]
> Recommends are normally installed, but if you're using 'dnf --setopt
> install_weak_deps=False'
> or similar, please
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030725
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
Dne 10. 12. 21 v 0:08 Davide Cavalca via devel napsal(a):
On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 22:08 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm unclear about the threat model - this is an attacker who is
someone able to overwrite single files (eg. /bin/ls) but cannot turn
off the fs-verity system as a whole?
Also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030279
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031005
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2030279
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030283
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
On 10/12/2021 08:34, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
We also changed various libraries to be dlopened when actually used,
instead of being dynamically linked. The goal is to reduce the
required dependencies.
What happens if these libraries are not installed an cannot be dl-opened?
--
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211209.0):
ID: 1082897 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031005
Bug ID: 2031005
Summary: perl-XML-SAX for EPEL-9
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-XML-SAX
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211209.0):
ID: 1082881 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030984
Peter Georg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2030867
Referenced Bugs:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 03:29:43PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Is there a contact for the virtio-win repos? I looked to see if there
> was anything in Bugzilla that looked relevant, but didn't find anything.
> I'm talking about this:
>
> https://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virtio-win/repo/
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030984
Bug ID: 2030984
Summary: Please branch and build perl-AnyEvent-I3 in epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-AnyEvent-I3
Assignee:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 10:44:37 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi Petr,
> These are generated from Python metadata, e.g. install_requires in
> setuptools:
> https://github.com/uqfoundation/ppft/blob/a4dd5832103512f6df717637b03fb507a00efd84/setup.py#L200
>
> If you only add the RPM
90 matches
Mail list logo
