On 3/15/22 11:25, Ian Laurie wrote:
On 3/14/22 20:55, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 14/03/2022 10:49, Ian Laurie wrote:
Yeah I'm thinking I should, and not just because of this. Mainly
for on-time kernel support.
Also, since Fedora 36 the NVIDIA and VirtualBox kmods can be
On 3/14/22 18:18, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have submitted a review request [1] which passed ("fedora-review +") but
> somehow the package git repo was not created. For Fedora packages this
> happens
> pretty quickly after approval.
>
> Any idea who I should ping about this?
Did
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061471
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060900
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ebc4a1ef2f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
18 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-17ae719cb2
syncthing-1.18.6-3.el8
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d431be322b
zabbix40-4.0.39-1.el8
1
On 3/14/22 20:55, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 14/03/2022 10:49, Ian Laurie wrote:
Yeah I'm thinking I should, and not just because of this. Mainly for
on-time kernel support.
Also, since Fedora 36 the NVIDIA and VirtualBox kmods can be
automatically signed after the build to support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061502
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061467
Bug 2061467 depends on bug 2061502, which changed state.
Bug 2061502 Summary: Add perl-Tie-Hash-Method to EPEL9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061502
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063936
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Hi,
I have submitted a review request [1] which passed ("fedora-review +") but
somehow the package git repo was not created. For Fedora packages this
happens pretty quickly after approval.
Any idea who I should ping about this?
Felix
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064054
Bug ID: 2064054
Summary: perl-HTML-Parser-3.77 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTML-Parser
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 5:33 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:15 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> >
> > If you mean the Fedora 33 change page, it only describes the change
> > from Fedora 33+ perspective. It does not take compatibility with EPEL
> > buildroots into
On 3/14/22 15:23, John Reiser wrote:
On 3/14/22 12:23, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 3/14/22 09:34, John Reiser wrote:
Just setting `deltarpm` to False in dnf.conf do the same. Just saying.
The deltarpm option has low discoverability. The information is
available,
but the discovery chain is too
Hi
As per [1] I'll be landing mingw-gcc-12.0.1 and mingw-binutils-2.38
towards the end of the week. I've completed test-builds here [2].
Sandro
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F37MingwEnvToolchainUpdate
[2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smani/mingw-gcc-12/
Works widely fine with me.
But some downgrades in dnf:
Downgrading:
python3-cffi x86_64 1.15.0-2.fc36
fedora 244 k
thunderbird x86_64 91*.4*.0-1.fc36
fedora 96 M
thunderbird-librnp-rnp x86_64
On 3/14/22 12:23, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 3/14/22 09:34, John Reiser wrote:
Just setting `deltarpm` to False in dnf.conf do the same. Just saying.
The deltarpm option has low discoverability. The information is available,
but the discovery chain is too long and not explicit enough.
The main
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
Hi,
I have submitted a review request [1] which passed ("fedora-review +") but
somehow the package git repo was not created. For Fedora packages this happens
pretty quickly after approval.
Any idea who I should ping about this?
Felix
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063950
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-907e07a5bc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-907e07a5bc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063950
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-DAVTalk` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.22 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-DAVTalk/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:37 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 14:26, Steven A. Falco
> wrote:
> >
> > There is a new FTBFS for KiCad [1]. I filed an issue with KiCad [2] and
> got a comment from the project leader:
> >
> > This looks like cmake issue to me. For some
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 2:17 PM Diego Herrera wrote:
> I've been checking the packages that won't install on EPEL [1] and found
> out that drbd-pacemaker cant get installed
> because of a missing dependency (pacemaker). While researching why, I saw
> that pacemaker exists on EPEL7 because it's
>
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-DAVTalk` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.22 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-DAVTalk/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-DAVTalk` that
you are following:
``
0.22 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-DAVTalk/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-DAVTalk` that
you are following:
``
0.22 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-DAVTalk/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-DAVTalk` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.22 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-DAVTalk/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-DAVTalk` that
you are following:
``
0.22 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-DAVTalk/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
> On 13 Mar 2022, at 21:59, Cătălin George Feștilă
> wrote:
>
> I asked because I don't think arm development is well implemented. An answer
> would be as correct as possible from a developer who has worked with
> something like this, considering that it is not very well documented and I
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061471
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063950
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060995
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
On 3/14/22 09:34, John Reiser wrote:
Just setting `deltarpm` to False in dnf.conf do the same. Just saying.
The deltarpm option has low discoverability. The information is available,
but the discovery chain is too long and not explicit enough.
The main configuration file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf
Hi Adam,
Adam Williamson writes:
> snip
> That could obviously have pretty significant consequences for Fedora.
> Bugzilla isn't only an issue tracker for Fedora; we run some
> significant processes through it, notably the Change process, the
> blocker/FE bug process, and the prioritized bug
Hi Adam,
Adam Williamson writes:
> snip
> That could obviously have pretty significant consequences for Fedora.
> Bugzilla isn't only an issue tracker for Fedora; we run some
> significant processes through it, notably the Change process, the
> blocker/FE bug process, and the prioritized bug
On 3/14/22 13:37, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 3/14/22 12:09 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> Fortunately this bug was caught in our `testing` stream. Unfortunately,
>> we do need to proceed promoting this kernel into our `stable` stream
>> because the update will fix CVE-2022-0847 (known as "dirty
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 09:36:08AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:14:31AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:01:20AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:48AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > I'll
On 14.03.22 14:13, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 01:06:34PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 10:13:18PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
Following recent discussions and to reduce the maintenance burden, I'm
planning to start merging native and mingw
On 14.03.22 14:02, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 2/20/22 3:13 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Following recent discussions and to reduce the maintenance burden,
I'm planning to start merging native and mingw packages.
What do you feel about native packages depending on MinGW packages?
As far as I
On 3/14/22 12:09 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Fortunately this bug was caught in our `testing` stream. Unfortunately,
we do need to proceed promoting this kernel into our `stable` stream
because the update will fix CVE-2022-0847 (known as "dirty pipe").
This CVE should have been fixed in 5.16.11.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063950
Bug ID: 2063950
Summary: perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.22 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-DAVTalk
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
The most recent kernel update to 5.16.13-200.fc35 has been reported
to cause failures for NFS clients connecting to some QNAP NAS systems.
Details of the issue as well as links to upstream forum posts and
downstream bug reports can be found in our issue tracker:
On Monday, 14 March 2022 16.46.39 WET Simo Sorce wrote:
> If you have actually copy/pasted from the terminal it looks to me you
> used an incorrect character when trying to pass a long option, at least
> my MUA shows me you prepend long option names with "–-" instead of
> using the correct "--",
On Mon, 2022-03-14 at 16:35 +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Monday, 14 March 2022 11.04.56 WET Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Have you tried setting crypto policies to LEGACY in case the server is
> > old and supports only bad cryptography?
> >
> > Simo.
>
> How do I do that?
>
> Running
On Monday, 14 March 2022 10.49.38 WET Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> What's the version of openssl?
The version on F36, that I am using is 3.0.0.
> Is there a public server which you can tell us the name of which gives
> this error?
I am connecting to an exchange email server (2010) using imap
On Monday, 14 March 2022 11.04.56 WET Simo Sorce wrote:
> Have you tried setting crypto policies to LEGACY in case the server is
> old and supports only bad cryptography?
>
> Simo.
How do I do that?
Running update-crypto-policies always returns an error saying that the
argument is not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063936
Bug ID: 2063936
Summary: perl-Text-MultiMarkdown-1.35-21.fc37 FTBFS: No
package found for: perl(HTML::Tidy)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
Just setting `deltarpm` to False in dnf.conf do the same. Just saying.
The deltarpm option has low discoverability. The information is available,
but the discovery chain is too long and not explicit enough.
The main configuration file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf does not list
each option, its default
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063934
Bug ID: 2063934
Summary: perl-Text-Markdown-1.31-23.fc37 FTBFS: No package
found for: perl(HTML::Tidy)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063919
Bug ID: 2063919
Summary: Packages Perl tests should not generate Provides
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-generators
Assignee:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 11/229 (x86_64), 12/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220313.n.0):
ID: 1173796 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1173796
ID: 1173850 Test:
On my F35 machine, there are no transaction errors, but the following packages
get downgraded:
- binutils-x86_64-linux-gnu and cross-binutils-common - from 2.37-3.fc35 to
2.37-2.fc36 (same version, release downgrade)
- thunderbird and thunderbird-librnp-rnp - from 91.5.0-1.fc35 to 91.4.0-1.fc36
On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 12:44 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
>
> As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release
> cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with the spring
> 2022 release coming soon. That means planning for the
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 21/231 (x86_64), 25/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063824
Bug ID: 2063824
Summary: perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.14-1.fc37 has a build cycle with
perl-libwww-perl-6.61-1.fc37
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 01:06:34PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 10:13:18PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Following recent discussions and to reduce the maintenance burden, I'm
> > planning to start merging native and mingw packages. Initially, I'll be
> >
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 10:13:18PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> Following recent discussions and to reduce the maintenance burden, I'm
> planning to start merging native and mingw packages. Initially, I'll be
> looking at these packages where I maintain both variants:
Thanks for driving
On 2/20/22 3:13 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Following recent discussions and to reduce the maintenance burden, I'm planning to
start merging native and mingw packages.
What do you feel about native packages depending on MinGW packages?
Upstream wine has begun to depend on .dll files. Wine 7.3
Dne 07. 03. 22 v 6:29 Gary Buhrmaster napsal(a):
One of the first things I did on a new install was remove
deltarpm, and add it to the global exclude list so it would
not get installed on a system/package upgrade. It was a
pure win for my systems. Obviously your experience will
vary.
Why so
OLD: Fedora-36-20220313.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220314.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:43 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf module
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 17:43, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf module
Small clarification. I had jsut lerned abotu
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval . This java
proposal have nothig to do with that and was asctually done without anybody
from JDK maintainers beeing aware.
Still ti remains valid.
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA
On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 14:26, Steven A. Falco wrote:
>
> There is a new FTBFS for KiCad [1]. I filed an issue with KiCad [2] and got
> a comment from the project leader:
>
> This looks like cmake issue to me. For some reason cmake is creating an
> incorrect build folder:
>
> -- Build
V Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:32:51PM +0100, Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:15 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 09:26:04AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> > > There is a new FTBFS for KiCad [1]. I filed an issue with KiCad [2] and
> > > got
> Am 13.03.2022 um 22:10 schrieb Samuel Sieb :
>
> ...
> qemu-kvm is a metapackage which points to qemu-system-x86. That is also a
> metapackage which brings in all the qemu packages including the graphical
> parts. If you don't want that, then you have to install just the packages
> that
> There's not a companion libvirt-daemon-kvm-core though, so I think you
> just have to pick and chose the libvirt-daemon-* packages you want
> manually (libvirt-daemon-kvm is another virtual package that pulls in,
> among other things, the qemu-kvm virtual package).
>
> So, a package set that
Have you tried setting crypto policies to LEGACY in case the server is
old and supports only bad cryptography?
Simo.
On Sun, 2022-03-13 at 09:43 +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> In one, and just one, of my email accounts the upgrade to F36 failed with
> this:
>
> The underlying socket is
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 09:59:09PM -, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
> I asked because I don't think arm development is well
> implemented.
Arm development on Fedora works very well. I suggest joining one of
these lists where beginner questions can be answered:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220313.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220314.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 25
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:234.42
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 09:43:43AM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> In one, and just one, of my email accounts the upgrade to F36 failed with
> this:
>
>
> The underlying socket is having troubles when processing connection to
> imap.xxx.xx.xx:993: Error during SSL handshake:
Hi!
You have valid points.
The non transitive list is indeed not somehow immense[1]. Will add it to wiki
page. Will also provide few recursive iterations. Ty for reminder.
As for the java-arches macro, I have no objections to it. It is PR to
jpackages-tools? But maybe one note against - it
Upgrade tested from fedora 34 test system:
Error:
Problem 1: package python3-argh-0.26.1-19.fc34.noarch requires python(abi) =
3.9, but none of the providers can be installed
- python3-3.9.10-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package
On Mon, 2022-03-14 at 08:10 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-03-13 at 11:30 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > Recommendation: Third-party applications should limit themselves to
> > depending on standard icon names listed at
> >
On 3/14/22 20:55, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 14/03/2022 10:49, Ian Laurie wrote:
Yeah I'm thinking I should, and not just because of this. Mainly for
on-time kernel support.
Also, since Fedora 36 the NVIDIA and VirtualBox kmods can be
automatically signed after the build to support
On 14/03/2022 10:49, Ian Laurie wrote:
Yeah I'm thinking I should, and not just because of this. Mainly for
on-time kernel support.
Also, since Fedora 36 the NVIDIA and VirtualBox kmods can be
automatically signed after the build to support UEFI Secure Boot.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041074
Fabio Alessandro Locati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(m...@fale.io) |
--- Comment #11 from
On 3/14/22 19:15, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 14/03/2022 04:39, Ian Laurie wrote:
Problem: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.32_149290_fedora33-1.x86_64
requires libvpx.so.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
Use VirtualBox from the RPM Fusion repository.
Yeah I'm
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220313.0):
ID: 1173111 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Dne 13. 03. 22 v 22:50 Otto Urpelainen napsal(a):
py0xc3 kirjoitti 13.3.2022 klo 22.12:
Hi all,
I'm Chris, I'm currently mostly active in ask.fedora and since some
time in the Docs. I just started to check out the mailing list to
find out if I can support here or at testing as well :)
I
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 14th
March(today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Libera.chat) or
Matrix. The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to
attend. You can join us over:
Matrix:
Hey!
Have a hospital visit and some other stuff in 14 minutes, but will help to
do some testing when i get back home or later during the week
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 6:43 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run:
>
> #
On 14/03/2022 04:39, Ian Laurie wrote:
Problem: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.32_149290_fedora33-1.x86_64
requires libvpx.so.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
Use VirtualBox from the RPM Fusion repository.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
I have the following errors:
Error:
Problem 1: package avogadro-libs-1.2.0-35.fc35.x86_64 requires
libGLEW.so.2.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- libGLEW-2.1.0-10.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220313.0):
ID: 1172924 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Sun, 2022-03-13 at 11:30 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Recommendation: Third-party applications should limit themselves to
> depending on standard icon names listed at
> https://specifications.freedesktop.org/icon-naming-spec/icon-naming-spec-latest.html
>
> only.
Hi,
for what
86 matches
Mail list logo
