https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061310
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d0d90a6d22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d0d90a6d22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061310
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-6b21853779 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6b21853779
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061310
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
5.20220313 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases` that you are following:
``
5.20220313 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
5.20220313 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062963
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases` that you are following:
``
5.20220313 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10` that you are following:
``
0.18 bump and package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10/pull-request/1
___
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
5.20220313 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases` that you are following:
``
5.20220313 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
5.20220313 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases` that you are following:
``
5.20220313 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl` that you are
following:
``
5.34.1 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On 15. 03. 22 22:27, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi Dmitry.
It seems since the openssl 3 GA release back in September there's not
been a single successful openssl build[1], and a number of bugs [2],
and even more CVEs [3][4]. Why aren't these being dealt with in a semi
reasonable fashion? The last
On 15/03/2022 22:45, Robert Relyea wrote:
1) in fedora 37, provide a policy that turns SHA-1 off. in our testing,
we encourage people to run with that policy and write bugs against
components.
That policy already exists in Fedora 34 and 35 where the FUTURE policy
does not allow SHA1 in
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 4:43 PM Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> I interpreted this to mean that, while this Java proposal and
> Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval both have to do with i686 removals:
>
> - the Java change should not be seen as part of
> Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval
> - the Java change
On 3/9/22 1:56 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 10:20 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 07:40:15PM +0100, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
We've been disabling it in TLS, but its usage is much
On 3/16/22 01:13, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 15/03/2022 01:25, Ian Laurie wrote:
Sadly it's not able to boot graphically, but I think the issue is
with my RPMFusion NVIDIA drivers. I can login fine to a virtual
console however, and lightdm is running, just not working. The
startx
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064054
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-9cc10cb703 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-9cc10cb703
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064054
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-897a7321e9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-897a7321e9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064054
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
Hi Dmitry.
It seems since the openssl 3 GA release back in September there's not
been a single successful openssl build[1], and a number of bugs [2],
and even more CVEs [3][4]. Why aren't these being dealt with in a semi
reasonable fashion? The last actual successful build is now over 6
months
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 4:13:26 AM EDT Dan Callaghan wrote:
> I've decided to orphan all the packages
> which I no longer use:
...
> linenoise
I am taking this one.
--
Garry T. Williams
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-Parser` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
3.77 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Parser/pull-request/6
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-Parser` that
you are following:
``
3.77 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Parser/pull-request/6
___
perl-devel mailing list --
>
>
> ===
> #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2022-03-15)... (full message at
>
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (x86_64), 4/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220313.0):
ID: 1176577 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1176577
ID: 1176588 Test:
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-Parser` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
3.77 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Parser/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063950
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-907e07a5bc has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-Parser` that
you are following:
``
3.77 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Parser/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 01:21:09PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 March 2022 at 11:39, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Hello!
> > Has anyone else seen this?
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84213778
> > failed on armv7hl:
> >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061310
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
I have completed mock builds of roughly 70% of the Boost dependent packages
in Fedora rawhide as of today. There have been no FTBFS issues related to
the upgrade to Boost 1.78.0.
Fesco approved the change proposal last week, I have confidence that this
version of Boost is stable enough to proceed
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-Parser` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
3.77 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Parser/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061310
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-Parser` that
you are following:
``
3.77 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Parser/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-Parser` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
3.77 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Parser/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064353
Bug ID: 2064353
Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20220313 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Module-CoreList
Keywords:
I interpreted this to mean that, while this Java proposal and
Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval both have to do with i686 removals:
- the Java change should not be seen as part of Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval
- the Java change was written without knowledge of
Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-03-15 18:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 14/229 (x86_64), 11/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220314.n.0):
ID: 1175932 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1175932
ID: 1175935
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 1:08 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> Small clarification. I had jsut lerned abotu
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval . This java
> proposal have nothig to do with that and was asctually done without anybody
> from JDK maintainers beeing aware.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:31 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> You have valid points.
> The non transitive list is indeed not somehow immense[1]. Will add it to wiki
> page. Will also provide few recursive iterations. Ty for reminder.
> As for the java-arches macro, I have no objections to it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063950
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
MongoDB was retired from Fedora and epel7 a couple of years ago, due
to the license issues.
Thus there is no longer a mongodb-server in
epel7.https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855725
Problem:
nodejs had a major update in epel7, and mongodb relies on the v8 in nodejs.
Why the major
Hi,
With the major bump to nodejs, I believe a conflict has been created
between nodejs-libs and mongodb:
[root@services26 ~]# yum install mongodb-server
Loaded plugins: clearcenter-marketplace, fastestmirror
ClearCenter Marketplace: fetching repositories...
Loading mirror speeds from cached
On 15/03/2022 01:25, Ian Laurie wrote:
Sadly it's not able to boot graphically, but I think the issue is with
my RPMFusion NVIDIA drivers. I can login fine to a virtual console
however, and lightdm is running, just not working. The startx command
also fails.
1. You need to disable UEFI
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-Parser` that
you are following:
``
3.77 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Parser/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list --
OLD: Fedora-36-20220314.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220315.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 70
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064172
Product Security DevOps Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064174
--- Comment #2 from Product Security DevOps Team ---
This CVE Bugzilla entry is for community support informational purposes only as
it does not affect a package in a commercially supported Red Hat product. Refer
to the dependent bugs for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064174
Product Security DevOps Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064172
--- Comment #2 from Product Security DevOps Team ---
This CVE Bugzilla entry is for community support informational purposes only as
it does not affect a package in a commercially supported Red Hat product. Refer
to the dependent bugs for
On 18. 02. 22 1:37, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
Can someone help me ?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/opencv/blob/rawhide/f/opencv.spec
have py_provides but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054951
Hi Sérgio,
for some reason, you message ended in my Spam box. Sorry for a delayed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064054
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |mspa...@redhat.com
On Tuesday, 15 March 2022 at 11:39, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hello!
> Has anyone else seen this?
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84213778
> failed on armv7hl:
>
> Error:
> Problem 1: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides /bin/sh needed by
I corrected a license declaration in perl-PerlX-Maybe-1.202 from
"(GPL+ or Artistic) and CC-BY-SA and Public Domain" to
"(GPL+ or Artistic) and Public Domain".
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list --
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 11/231 (x86_64), 18/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220314.n.0):
ID: 1175237 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
Works fine on a scratch build for me:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84218959
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:39 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> Hello!
> Has anyone else seen this?
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84213778
> failed on armv7hl:
>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 2:59 PM Dan Čermák
wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> Adam Williamson writes:
>
> > snip
>
> > That could obviously have pretty significant consequences for Fedora.
> > Bugzilla isn't only an issue tracker for Fedora; we run some
> > significant processes through it, notably the
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 2:59 PM Dan Čermák
wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> Adam Williamson writes:
>
> > snip
>
> > That could obviously have pretty significant consequences for Fedora.
> > Bugzilla isn't only an issue tracker for Fedora; we run some
> > significant processes through it, notably the
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:12 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 12:44 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
> >
> > As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release
> > cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:12 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 12:44 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
> >
> > As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release
> > cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with
Hello!
Has anyone else seen this?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84213778
failed on armv7hl:
Error:
Problem 1: conflicting requests
- nothing provides /bin/sh needed by dnf-4.10.0-2.fc36.noarch
Problem 2: package dnf-plugins-core-4.0.24-2.fc36.noarch requires
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220314.0):
ID: 1175626 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220314.0):
ID: 1175218 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064175
Marian Rehak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2064174 (CVE-2021-44962)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064174
--- Comment #1 from Marian Rehak ---
Created slic3r tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 2064175]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
On 3/12/22 04:43, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
I've done 2 upgrades from 35 -> 36 (real, not tests) on native systems.
On one, as explained earlier in this thread , I had to migrate
VirtualBox from the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064175
--- Comment #1 from Marian Rehak ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure that all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064175
Bug ID: 2064175
Summary: CVE-2021-44962 slic3r: specially crafted stl file
could lead to information disclosure [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 35
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064174
Marian Rehak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2064175
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064172
--- Comment #1 from Marian Rehak ---
Created slic3r tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 2064173]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064172
Bug ID: 2064172
Summary: CVE-2021-44961 slic3r: specially crafted stl files can
exhaust available memory
Product: Security Response
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064174
Bug ID: 2064174
Summary: CVE-2021-44962 slic3r: specially crafted stl file
could lead to information disclosure
Product: Security Response
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064173
--- Comment #1 from Marian Rehak ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure that all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064173
Marian Rehak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2064172 (CVE-2021-44961)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064173
Bug ID: 2064173
Summary: CVE-2021-44961 slic3r: specially crafted stl files can
exhaust available memory [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 35
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064172
Marian Rehak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2064173
Referenced Bugs:
On Monday, March 14, 2022 10:22:19 PM CET Thomas Rodgers wrote:
> These are the CMake related issues I've encountered thus far -
>
> FlightCrew: FTBFS # CMake Error: The source directory
> "/builddir/build/BUILD/FlightCrew-0.9.1/build" does not appear to contain
> CMakeLists.txt.
> csdiff:
On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 12:18:02 AM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
> I bent over backwards to get the macros working all the way back to EPEL 7.
>
> I updated the cmake3 package in EPEL 7[1] and I got RHEL to update
> CMake[2] and sync the macros from Fedora[3] for RHEL 8.
>
> The only difference for
On Monday, 14 March 2022 16.53.18 WET José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> I copied and pasted and while changing the option I left one of those rogue
> characters, keeping always the preffix. :-(
>
>
> I will try and see your suggestion.
After a reboot:
# update-crypto-policies --show
83 matches
Mail list logo
