On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 00:15 +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> Leigh Scott kirjoitti 9.3.2022 klo 18.15:
> > > Sérgio Basto kirjoitti 7.3.2022 klo 18.17:
> > > Crossfire and freedroidrpg are games, so "is it needed?" and
> > > "does it
> > > have a replacement?" are not good questions to ask. A
Hello team, it looks like 'pkgconfig(portaudiocpp) >= 12' is missing in
EPEL9 repository while available in EPEL8.
See https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84302098
Could someone port that dependency and rebuild xournalpp please?
Thanks in advance.
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 9:34 PM laolux laolux via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could you just post some magic dnf command to check which i686 packages
> are currently installed? Then many less savvy users could simply check what
> packages are currently installed on
Hi,
could you just post some magic dnf command to check which i686 packages are
currently installed? Then many less savvy users could simply check what
packages are currently installed on their systems.
Maybe something like `dnf repoquery --installed |grep i686` works, but I think
I have no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642
--- Comment #12 from Miro Hrončok ---
Folks, please use a side tag next time:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220315.0):
ID: 1178884 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1178884
ID: 1178896 Test: x86_64
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], we do not have an updated F36 Beta
RC. As a result, F36 Beta is NO-GO by default and Thursday's Go/No-Go
meeting is cancelled.
The next Fedora Linux 36 Beta Go/No-Go meeting[2] will be held at 1700
UTC on Thursday 24 March in #fedora-meeting. We will aim for
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], we do not have an updated F36 Beta
RC. As a result, F36 Beta is NO-GO by default and Thursday's Go/No-Go
meeting is cancelled.
The next Fedora Linux 36 Beta Go/No-Go meeting[2] will be held at 1700
UTC on Thursday 24 March in #fedora-meeting. We will aim for
On 3/16/22 10:35, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> David Cantrell writes:
>
>> Why? Since the removal of the i686 kernel in Fedora, we want to
>> reduce the number of i686 packages provided in the repo. As time
>> marches on, the ability to build a lot of things for i686 becomes
>> unrealistic or even
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 2:40 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 01:55:03PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:45 PM Neal Becker wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:38 PM Neal Becker
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I believe it is failing on the line:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 02:11:23PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 12:54:23PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:55 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642
--- Comment #11 from Paul Howarth ---
Steps after updating perl in f36:
1. Create buildroot override for perl-5.34.1-486.fc36
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/perl-5.34.1-486.fc36
2. Wait for koji to regenerate the fc36 buildroot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-cea638ebd4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-cea638ebd4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 01:45:52PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:38 PM Neal Becker <[1]ndbeck...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
> I believe it is failing on the line:
> File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line
> 298, in upload
>
Sorry for the late reply, domain issue affected my email reception. The macros
don't change between F36 and F37; I've filed
https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/issues/23334 to see if upstream can
shed a light on this.
--
Michel
___
devel
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-03-16/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-03-16-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-03-16/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-03-16-16.30.txt
Log:
On Wed, 2022-03-16 at 07:17 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
> One more package that FTBFS due to CMake issues -
>
> grive2: FTBFS # Error: /builddir/build/BUILD/grive2-0.5.1/redhat-
> linux-build is not a directory
remove the dot and I bet that will work
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 2:22 PM
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 01:55:03PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:45 PM Neal Becker wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:38 PM Neal Becker wrote:
> >
> >> I believe it is failing on the line:
> >> File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py",
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007039
--- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-SNMP-Info-3.82-1.fc34.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84284351
--
You are
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 12:54:23PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:55 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 09:54:12AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> > > > If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007039
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-SNMP-Info-3.81 is |perl-SNMP-Info-3.82 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007039
--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1866252
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1866252=edit
Update to 3.82 (#2007039)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642
--- Comment #9 from Paul Howarth ---
(In reply to Michal Josef Spacek from comment #7)
> (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Michal Josef Spacek from comment #5)
> > > @p...@city-fan.org Could you, please, merge this
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:45 PM Neal Becker wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:38 PM Neal Becker wrote:
>
>> I believe it is failing on the line:
>> File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 298,
>> in upload
>> if self.remote_file_exists(name, filename,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:38 PM Neal Becker wrote:
> I believe it is failing on the line:
> File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 298,
> in upload
> if self.remote_file_exists(name, filename, hash):
> File
I believe it is failing on the line:
File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 298,
in upload
if self.remote_file_exists(name, filename, hash):
File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 259,
in remote_file_exists
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 12:54:23PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:55 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 09:54:12AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> > > If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this thread.
> >
> > I
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
19 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-17ae719cb2
syncthing-1.18.6-3.el8
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d431be322b
zabbix40-4.0.39-1.el8
2
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e1430e72de
wordpress-5.1.13-1.el7
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-bd2c412d62
zabbix40-4.0.39-1.el7
2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064054
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-897a7321e9 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062023
Pat Riehecky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 8:54 AM David Cantrell wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Our most recent FESCo meeting involved discussing the proposal to drop i686
> builds of jdk8,11,17 from Fedora 37 onward. The topic quickly changed to the
> larger question of "what do people use i686 packages for?"
As it turns
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642
--- Comment #8 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #6)
> (In reply to Michal Josef Spacek from comment #5)
> > @p...@city-fan.org Could you, please, merge this PR:
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061467
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061013
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test2-Suite-0.000145-1 |perl-Test2-Suite-0.000145-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061310
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-6b21853779 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061469
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Event-1.28-1.el9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642
--- Comment #7 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #6)
> (In reply to Michal Josef Spacek from comment #5)
> > @p...@city-fan.org Could you, please, merge this PR:
> >
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:55 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 09:54:12AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> > If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this thread.
>
> I use i686 versions of libraries to do local 32-bit builds of C
> software I'm
I have a bunch of old Loki game ports I'd prefer keep working. I also
have some backburner projects that need enough 32-bit userspace to run
old binary drivers, but tbh it's probably easier to just use like el7
for that at this point.
To the extent we keep i686 builds [1] I really think they need
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Red Hat Bugzilla 2064808
--
Felix Schwarz writes:
> I use wine and lutris (+ 32bit mingw packages).
Yes, same here
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064353
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a66e3e59dc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a66e3e59dc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064054
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-9cc10cb703 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 12/229 (x86_64), 8/152 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220315.n.0):
ID: 1177619 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1177619
ID: 1177723 Test: x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061310
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d0d90a6d22 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(p...@city-fan.org |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064353
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-c7fab5f521 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-c7fab5f521
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-PAR-Packer` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Rebuild for Perl 5.34.1
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PAR-Packer/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061013
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Test2-Suite-0.000145-1
Hi Python-devel,
we are considering splitting the alternative Python versions from a
single-package format (e.g. python3.11) to multiple subpackages (e.g.
python3.11{,-libs,-devel,-tkinter,-test,-idle}). We do this already with
the main `python3` package: it requires less disk space to install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064353
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-PAR-Packer` that
you are following:
``
Rebuild for Perl 5.34.1
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PAR-Packer/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 09:54:12AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this thread.
I use i686 versions of libraries to do local 32-bit builds of C
software I'm developing. (Something like 'sudo dnf install
lib{one,two}-devel.i686 &&
meson
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064808
--- Comment #2 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
Minor release of 5.34 version of Perl.
For f35, f36 and rawhide
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064808
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:28 AM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 10:46:43 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> > Sorry if this is a duplicate message, previous one was held for
> moderation.
> >
> > $ fedpkg new-sources ~/Downloads/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz
> > Could not execute new_sources: Fail to
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Module-CoreList` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
5.20220313 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-CoreList/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064808
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064808
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |mspa...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064808
Bug ID: 2064808
Summary: Update perl to 5.34.1
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 10:46:43 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> Sorry if this is a duplicate message, previous one was held for moderation.
>
> $ fedpkg new-sources ~/Downloads/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz
> Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns status 403
>
> I haven't been
On Wed, 2022-03-16 at 15:24 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 09:54:12AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> > If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this thread.
>
> I use {glibc{,-devel,-static},{gmp,mpfr,libmpc}{,-devel}}.i686 for
> development and testing
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:57 AM Alexander Sosedkin
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 3:47 PM Neal Becker wrote:
> >
> > Sorry if this is a duplicate message, previous one was held for
> moderation.
> >
> > $ fedpkg new-sources ~/Downloads/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz
> > Could not execute new_sources:
If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this thread.
I use glibc.i686 and libgcc.i686 to support customers whose i686 machines
have not yet died. (Some are about 12 years old, and expected live another
3 years. The ability to use almost 4GB of address space when running
I'm not sure if I use any i686 executables, but I sure do use
i686 builds of libraries for cross-compiling. By which I mean
both i686-linux and i686-win32.
A.FI.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061310
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064054
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 3:47 PM Neal Becker wrote:
>
> Sorry if this is a duplicate message, previous one was held for moderation.
>
> $ fedpkg new-sources ~/Downloads/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz
> Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns status 403
>
> I haven't been active in
Sorry if this is a duplicate message, previous one was held for moderation.
$ fedpkg new-sources ~/Downloads/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz
Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns status
403
I haven't been active in packaging for some time, did I miss something?
--
*Those who
OLD: Fedora-36-20220315.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220316.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:574.63 KiB
Size
David Cantrell writes:
> Why? Since the removal of the i686 kernel in Fedora, we want to
> reduce the number of i686 packages provided in the repo. As time
> marches on, the ability to build a lot of things for i686 becomes
> unrealistic or even impossible. Remember it goes beyond providing
>
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 09:54:12AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this thread.
I use {glibc{,-devel,-static},{gmp,mpfr,libmpc}{,-devel}}.i686 for
development and testing of GCC, even in Fedora packages I'd strongly prefer
to keep the
One more package that FTBFS due to CMake issues -
grive2: FTBFS # Error:
/builddir/build/BUILD/grive2-0.5.1/redhat-linux-build is not a directory
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 2:22 PM Thomas Rodgers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:37 AM Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at
On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 14:54, David Cantrell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our most recent FESCo meeting involved discussing the proposal to drop i686
> builds of jdk8,11,17 from Fedora 37 onward. The topic quickly changed to the
> larger question of "what do people use i686 packages for?"
>
>
On 16. 03. 22 14:54, David Cantrell wrote:
Hi,
Our most recent FESCo meeting involved discussing the proposal to drop i686
builds of jdk8,11,17 from Fedora 37 onward. The topic quickly changed to the
larger question of "what do people use i686 packages for?"
Rather than guess, we wanted to
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Module-CoreList`
that you are following:
``
5.20220313 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-CoreList/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel mailing
On 3/16/22 09:57 AM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
I use wine and lutris (+ 32bit mingw packages).
wine is also the big one for me. On my system, roughly 1000 executables (exe
and dll) are PE32 (32 bit), and another 1000 executables are PE32+ (64 bit).
Steve
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 09:54:12AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this thread.
Steam requires some i686 libs, but frankly I haven't run it recently due to
Stadia.
--
Tomasz Torcz “God, root, what's the difference?”
I use wine and lutris (+ 32bit mingw packages).
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi,
Our most recent FESCo meeting involved discussing the proposal to drop i686
builds of jdk8,11,17 from Fedora 37 onward. The topic quickly changed to the
larger question of "what do people use i686 packages for?"
Rather than guess, we wanted to ask the community what you use i686 packages
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 08:06:34AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 7:50 AM Kamil Dudka wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 10:01:10 AM CET Paul Howarth wrote:
> > > On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 12:00:06 -0500
> > > Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064753
Bug ID: 2064753
Summary: perl-PDL-2.077 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PDL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 10/231 (x86_64), 16/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
As per:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/
Does anyone know how to reach Linux Walleij (snirkel)? This bug and
pull request opened two years ago is still not addressed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800905
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from
mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Test2-Suite` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
0.000145 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/19
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 7:50 AM Kamil Dudka wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 10:01:10 AM CET Paul Howarth wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 12:00:06 -0500
> > Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CurlMinimal_as_Default
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Module-CoreList` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
5.20220313 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-CoreList/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051034
Michele Baldessari changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||shorewall-5.2.8-9.fc35
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mspa...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Module-CoreList`
that you are following:
``
5.20220313 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-CoreList/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing
On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 10:01:10 AM CET Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 12:00:06 -0500
> Ben Cotton wrote:
>
>
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CurlMinimal_as_Default
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > `libcurl-minimal` and `curl-minimal` will be installed by default
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-PAR-Packer-1.054-2.fc3
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220315.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220316.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 123
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 30.76 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 15/03/2022 23:29, Ian Laurie wrote:
Maybe the NVIDIA drivers were never working as such before, but somehow
it was gracefully "falling back" to default drivers with the old kernel
but not the new one?
Enabled Secure Boot prevents the Linux kernel from loading all unsigned
kernel modules
> On 16. Mar 2022, at 00:04, Tom Hughes via devel
> wrote:
>
> On 15/03/2022 22:45, Robert Relyea wrote:
>
>> 1) in fedora 37, provide a policy that turns SHA-1 off. in our testing, we
>> encourage people to run with that policy and write bugs against components.
>
> That policy already
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642
Bug ID: 2064642
Summary: F37FailsToInstall: perl-PAR-Packer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PAR-Packer
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Dear Peter,
We have created a bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047295
It doesn't look like an upstream OpenSSL bug for me.
Personally I don't expect much effort in this direction because armv7
architecture looks to be deprecating.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:11 AM Peter Robinson
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
