The package I need is redhat-lsb-core.
I built the package, and its dependencies on RHEL 9 from SRPMs
downloaded from an RHEL 8 instance.
I am using a developer subscription of Red Hat.
Thanks
---
Lee
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 1:57 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Kevin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088118
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-540d328b79 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088118
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088673
Bug ID: 2088673
Summary: perl-Mail-DKIM-1.20220520 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mail-DKIM
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Sorry, for the spam, but I realized I accidentally added `pti=on` into the list
of arguments that do not impact performance. `pit=on` can significantly impact
performance, by up to 30% in some cases.
___
devel mailing list --
I thought vsyscalls were obsolete, but leaving them, enabled doesn't really
impact security too much. Regarding performance, `page_alloc.shuffle=1` can
increase performance, and `slab_nomerge init_on_alloc=1 init_on_free=1 pti=on
randomize_kstack_offset=on` do not have a very noticeable
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have anything much for the agenda again, and it's a public holiday here
in Canada so I won't be around.
If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week,
and you want to run a meeting, you can send out a
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 23/161 (aarch64), 5/231 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220518.n.0):
ID: 1273930 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088118
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-540d328b79 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-540d328b79
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.66 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/38
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088118
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that
you are following:
``
6.66 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/38
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.66 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/37
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that
you are following:
``
6.66 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/37
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 07:37:46AM +0200, Branislav Náter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:15 AM Thomas Stephen Lee
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am trying to request a package for RHEL 9, but I cannot find RHEL
> >
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 07:37:46AM +0200, Branislav Náter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:15 AM Thomas Stephen Lee
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am trying to request a package for RHEL 9, but I cannot find RHEL
> >
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.66 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/36
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 07:37:46AM +0200, Branislav Náter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:15 AM Thomas Stephen Lee
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to request a package for RHEL 9, but I cannot find RHEL
> > under Projects at issues.redhat.com.
> > What is the correct project
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220518.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220519.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:7
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 84
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 1.32 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 07:37:46AM +0200, Branislav Náter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:15 AM Thomas Stephen Lee
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to request a package for RHEL 9, but I cannot find RHEL
> > under Projects at issues.redhat.com.
> > What is the correct project
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that
you are following:
``
6.66 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/36
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.66 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/35
___
perl-devel mailing list --
This depends on the state of the package.
1. Has an active maintainer? They must go to the package's repo, and in the
settings, grant you commit/admin access. [1]
2. Has a maintainer, but they're inactive? You must fire up the non-responsive
maintainer policy. [2]
3. Package is orphaned, but not
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that
you are following:
``
6.66 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/35
___
perl-devel mailing list --
* Steve Dickson [19/05/2022 14:21] :
>
> How is this done these days?
The package is first orphaned then claimed by the new maintainer.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Orphaning_Process/#claiming_ownership_of_an_orphaned_package
Emmanuel
Hello,
I'm taking over the maintainership of a package.
In the past I would access the pkgdb via a link
similar to [1] to change ACLs that link
no longer exists How is this done these days?
tia,
steved.
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088118
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088574
Bug ID: 2088574
Summary: perl-SVG-2.87 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-SVG
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On 5/19/22 01:00, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> If Fedora legally cannot ship a version of OpenJDK that hasn’t
>> passed the TCK, but which is still compatible with the vast majority
>> of Java code, then OpenJDK isn’t free software and Fedora cannot
>> ship it at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2086381
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-2956da30eb has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087276
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 9:51 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/rawhide-kernel-nodebug/
>
> At time of writing the nodebug kernels have a lower NVR than the ones
> in Koji and Rawhide. In fact, this is quite often the case.
>
> Now I understand why this
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/rawhide-kernel-nodebug/
At time of writing the nodebug kernels have a lower NVR than the ones
in Koji and Rawhide. In fact, this is quite often the case.
Now I understand why this happens, and I'm not complaining about that
process. But I wonder if we could
On Thu, 2022-05-19 at 17:05 +0800, 邓景元 wrote:
> Bug of NsCDE of Fedora
> Former report of update (not responded)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036232
> Bug reported (now NsCDE dose not work anymore due to no catching up
> with update)
>
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 6:09 PM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
>
> You write five seats, but that wiki page says four seats.
> Which is correct?
> Either way, the math does not work out.
The wiki page is correct. There are four seats up for election this cycle.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088300
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007039
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
May 16, 2022 8:32:58 PM Maxwell G :
On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 3:14:56 PM CDT Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> In epel8 I will be converting the 'ansible' epel8 package into the
> upstream ansible-5 meta collections package (which also pulls in
> ansible-core).
>
Hi everyone,
I have rebased ansible to
* Hellosway Here via devel:
> Add `slab_nomerge init_on_alloc=1 init_on_free=1 page_alloc.shuffle=1
> pti=on randomize_kstack_offset=on vsyscall=none ` as default kernel
> command line arguments. This can help prevent local exploits by making
> it harder to exploit the kernel. I do not think
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088300
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Math-NumSeq-74-10.fc37
Hi,
I filed on Bugzilla.
I wondered why there is no such option on issues.redhat.com (Jira ?).
Thanks
---
Lee
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 11:08 AM Branislav Náter wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:15 AM Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to request a package for
Hi,
I filed on Bugzilla.
I wondered why there is no such option on issues.redhat.com (Jira ?).
Thanks
---
Lee
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 11:08 AM Branislav Náter wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:15 AM Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to request a package for
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 03:15:16AM -, Hellosway Here via devel wrote:
> Add `slab_nomerge init_on_alloc=1 init_on_free=1 page_alloc.shuffle=1 pti=on
> randomize_kstack_offset=on vsyscall=none ` as default kernel command line
> arguments. This can help prevent local exploits by making it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088300
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||CPAN 142817
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055954
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088300
Bug ID: 2088300
Summary: perl-Math-NumSeq-74-9.fc37 FTBFS: t/Fibonacci.t fails
with Math-BigInt1.999831: Argument "-" isn't numeric
in numeric eq (==) at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997118
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088266
Bug ID: 2088266
Summary: Upgrade perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize to 1.58
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize
Assignee:
48 matches
Mail list logo
