On 5/17/22 12:05, Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote:
Am 17.05.22 um 18:08 schrieb Maxwell G:
On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 9:58:33 AM CDT Leon Fauster via epel-devel
wrote:
https://paste.centos.org/view/06187bdb
adapts
On 12/3/20 14:06, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Apart from the usual package-not-available story (which I want to fix
as part of my work bringing up the EPEL Packagers SIG), my current
snag is that python-tox-current-env uses
On 12/3/20 14:06, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Apart from the usual package-not-available story (which I want to fix
as part of my work bringing up the EPEL Packagers SIG), my current
snag is that python-tox-current-env uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062562
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from
On 5/23/22 14:50, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 11:15:16 PM EDT Hellosway Here via devel wrote:
>> Add `slab_nomerge init_on_alloc=1 init_on_free=1 page_alloc.shuffle=1
>> pti=on randomize_kstack_offset=on vsyscall=none ` as default kernel
>> command line arguments.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088927
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088927
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-fd4630d0bc has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
This thread was accidentally reposted, please reply to this one
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/YJ4HKHMLBGCSXZ3S3NSTSARTJNAG7NXC/
.
I think it would be useful is there was a centralized CLI and GUI intyerface
for these, but it doesn't exist
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089521
Bug ID: 2089521
Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-1.999834 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Math-BigInt
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220520.0):
ID: 1276950 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1276950
ID: 1276957 Test: x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089213
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
As something of a typography enthusiast, I'm very much in support of
this. For English, the consistent fonts on Fedora Workstation make a
noticeable and positive effect on the general aesthetic, so anything
that can widen that benefit would be advantageous.
I did notice that the 'How to Test'
Hi,
> Il giorno 10 mag 2022, alle ore 15:29, Ben Cotton ha
> scritto:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/JdkInTreeLibsAndStdclibStatic
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062562
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
Hello,
On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 11:15:16 PM EDT Hellosway Here via devel wrote:
> Add `slab_nomerge init_on_alloc=1 init_on_free=1 page_alloc.shuffle=1
> pti=on randomize_kstack_offset=on vsyscall=none ` as default kernel
> command line arguments. This can help prevent local exploits by making
So, just replying here since this is a nice monster of a thread. ;(
First, just to clear up some previous coments, shim does build against
the oldest stable Fedora in koji and then is manually tagged into newer
ones. This is not at all a good process. It only gets a bodhi update for
the one
On Mon, May 23 2022 at 11:54:30 AM -0400, Ben Cotton
wrote:
Default Persian font will be changed automatically on upgrades.
Good, but how will you achieve this? We finally noticed that noto fonts
don't get installed when upgrading F35 -> F36 and should avoid making
the same mistake again.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089424
Bug ID: 2089424
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-9.26 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
As a reminder, the F36 release retrospective survey is open through 27 May:
https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/36
It should only take a few moments of your time. No matter how you
participated in the development and release of F36, I'd like your
input. (Remember, this is about the process of
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnhancePersianFontSupport
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnhancePersianFontSupport
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering
On behalf of the Docs team, I want to share that we'll be moving the
repos that the Docs team maintains to GitLab. Note that this does not
require any other teams to move their repos. For more details, see our
Community Blog post:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088927
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Pod-Parser-1.64 is |perl-Pod-Parser-1.65 is
A colleague suggested me to use
http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml
so I no longer need help for the Copr build.
Best regards
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088927
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-b55dc94b32 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-b55dc94b32
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088927
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 46/231 (x86_64), 30/152 (aarch64)
New failures
Good day,
on Fedora Copr I am trying to build kernel 4.x [1] for EL7.
The problem is that the build [2] fails on "No Package found for
llvm-toolset-7.0"
I checked the srpm and devtoolset for llvm are present and also enabled
(line 1110), so I really wonder what is wrong.
Thank you for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062562
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Parser` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.65 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Parser/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On 5/2/22 08:56, Ian Pilcher wrote:
IMO, there's a rather desperate need to be able to override the system-
wide policy for individual processes, maybe via some sort of wrapper
around one of the containerization technologies.
Just FYI, I managed to bang out a proof of concept of a "wrapper"
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Parser` that
you are following:
``
1.65 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Parser/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Parser` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.65 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Parser/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Parser` that
you are following:
``
1.65 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Parser/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Sandro Mani wrote on 2022/05/23 3:39:
Hi
- gazebo fails to build due to "cannot convert 'ALCdevice*' to 'ALCdevice_struct*'
in assignment", which looks like an openal-soft-1.21 incompatibility. Possibly
updating gazebo from the currently packaged v10.1.0 to current upstream version 11.10.2
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220522.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220523.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 204
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:17.58
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Parser` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.65 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Parser/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Parser` that
you are following:
``
1.65 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Parser/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089213
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220522.0):
ID: 1276382 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088927
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089213
Bug ID: 2089213
Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-1.999833 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Math-BigInt
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 5/16/22 13:39, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 5/13/22 21:54, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
So I went to do a dnf system-upgrade from F35 to F36 on a test machine,
as part of my usual testing. In the middle of the process, it appears
that /var filled up and that left the system in an unfortunate
Hi,
another experiment proposal for Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski:
Zeroize the GPT of a copy of boot-grub2-f36.iso and adjust MBR partition 1.
Do this in bash for the $'\x...' gestures:
# Create the playground
cp boot-grub2-f36.iso test.iso
# Zeroize the main GPT
dd if=/dev/zero bs=1
Owen Taylor writes:
> For years, Red Hat Linux / Fedora systems have had a umask of 0002 for
> regular users as part of the "user private group" scheme [*]. Basically the
> idea is that
> you can set a directory group-sticky and use it as a common work area for a
> group of users.
>
> A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
Hi Fedora users, developers, and friends!
It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 37.
For anyone who isn't aware, a Test Day is an event usually focused
around IRC for interaction and a Wiki page for instructions and results,
with the aim being to get a bunch of interested users
On Fri, 2022-05-20 at 12:18 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Now that FESCo has decided (1) that Fedora will keep supporting BIOS
> booting, the people working on Fedora's bootloader stack will need
> help from the Fedora community to keep Fedora booting on systems which
> require Legacy
48 matches
Mail list logo
