[Bug 2091242] New: perl-Devel-REPL-1.003029 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091242 Bug ID: 2091242 Summary: perl-Devel-REPL-1.003029 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Devel-REPL Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2090500] [EPEL9] Please branch and build perl-Cache-FastMmap in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2090500 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2090501] [EPEL9] Please branch and build perl-Number-Format in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2090501 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

Re: Fwd: ImageMagick in EPEL 8

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 3:01 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > I'm going change this thread to epel-devel , > > On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 11:40 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > Shared message to address an issue below. > > > Forwarded Message > Subject: ImageMagick in EPEL 8 > Date: Wed,

[Bug 2088118] perl-libwww-perl-6.66 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088118 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-libwww-perl-6.66-1.fc3 |perl-libwww-perl-6.66-1.fc3

[Bug 2088118] perl-libwww-perl-6.66 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088118 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Live USB rescue mode, do we still have one? Does it work?

On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 13:13 -0400, Robert Marcano via devel wrote: > On 5/27/22 12:52 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:38:43AM -0400, Stephen Snow wrote: > > > On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 14:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > > > The rescue mode has always been on the

Re: Live USB rescue mode, do we still have one? Does it work?

On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 09:52 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:38:43AM -0400, Stephen Snow wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 14:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > The rescue mode has always been on the traditional installer > > > images, > > > not the lives. It's

[EPEL-devel] Cleaning up EPEL9 duplicate packages

There are 4 packages that are in epel9 that were also released with RHEL 9.0. This isn't that big of a surprise, we knew about them. Three managed to get branched and built before we had the check in place. One had a race condition with the build in RHEL. Two are easy to remove: ** pybind11 -

[EPEL-devel] Re: Fwd: ImageMagick in EPEL 8

ImageMagick now provides libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.7()(64bit)  and not provides anymore  libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.6()(64bit) , that is called soname bump So I'm sorry , ImageMagick-6.9.10 -97 was release more than 2 years ago (2020-02-29 09:40) while ImageMagick-6.9.12 still supported by ImageMagick

[EPEL-devel] Re: Fwd: ImageMagick in EPEL 8

yes, now its provide libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.7()(64bit) [2] , you need rebuild your packages ImageMagick soname bump was approved [0] in EPEL Steering Committee meeting. and I'm continuing with the process for incompatible upgrades from step 4 forward [1]. and 81 security bugs will be fixed [0]

Re: Fwd: ImageMagick in EPEL 8

I'm going change this thread to epel-devel ,  On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 11:40 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Shared message to address an issue below. > > > Forwarded Message Subject: ImageMagick in EPEL 8 > Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 15:20:54 -0700 From: Patrick J. LoPresti > To:

Fwd: ImageMagick in EPEL 8

Shared message to address an issue below. Forwarded Message Subject:ImageMagick in EPEL 8 Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 15:20:54 -0700 From: Patrick J. LoPresti To: l...@fedoraproject.org Hi. I just noticed that ImageMagick in EPEL for RHEL8 uses major version

[EPEL-devel] Re: Rhel 9 + Epel 9 - Amavis can't install

Hello, I make temporary build of perl net libidn via copr - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/filbar/Amavis/package/perl-Net-LibIDN/ - FIY st 18. 5. 2022 v 13:37 odesílatel Petr Pisar napsal: > V Wed, May 18, 2022 at 06:49:48AM -0400, Josh Boyer napsal(a): > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 6:21

[Bug 2091187] New: Please build perl-File-Tail for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091187 Bug ID: 2091187 Summary: Please build perl-File-Tail for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-File-Tail Assignee: spo...@gmail.com

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From 20f26bb71fe0b3b28e7683dd3f6aef46e6f5cd02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jan 21 2022 01:24:56 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From 5be1c0c2e40925969ac90452973e2d4d786664dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 28 2020 15:25:17 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "Perl 5.34 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From 6065512ba56ca9a6e80f1f1d53a1958c42929245 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: May 21 2021 22:22:50 + Subject: Perl 5.34 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec b/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec index

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "Perl 5.32 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From a6be3135949216cfa58d566999361feb753c0900 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 23 2020 08:12:24 + Subject: Perl 5.32 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec b/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec index

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From afb44d7d3207a52f60ef6df79aa20886c29f33ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jan 29 2020 23:56:23 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From 784cf9448263c233381d233503a5a49976a9ba4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jan 27 2021 01:07:27 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From 585d19d41e3bd0d3961c541c5beb834b74529dd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 22 2021 20:05:35 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From 7765365c6cd4272385f1b7a94885f77a3076899d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 13 2018 17:12:28 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "Perl 5.30 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From 6cddf4b024ef1efa0cc6339aea717d52ba7abf97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: May 31 2019 05:01:58 + Subject: Perl 5.30 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec b/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec index

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From f3edab4c7d0a0f9dde15dccf4b9b16136669d1f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:43:47 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From 94b84b57cd57a7c4ffb2f2660db614c3f36404c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Feb 01 2019 20:27:17 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "Perl 5.28 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From e8b13c9ec0f81b403793e064c5e21294bf9ffd15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 28 2018 10:29:25 + Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec b/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec index

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From 47771aa8c0c75f1e6d7ddcfac31718cf02b1323a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 26 2019 02:42:18 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From 28a22af4b27bd9e8d72856b2f38a7618fe9d22a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 27 2017 03:46:27 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild --- diff --git

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From d8f8560f4b2b16d69317ba4b4407275925a36693 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Feb 11 2017 02:53:36 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild --- diff --git

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "Perl 5.26 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From 842869d5b0a259892784f3dcf0fb0fb6272c00b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 04 2017 19:32:30 + Subject: Perl 5.26 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec b/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec index

[Bug 2091186] New: Please build perl-PAR-Packer for epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091186 Bug ID: 2091186 Summary: Please build perl-PAR-Packer for epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-PAR-Packer Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "Initial spec and sources import."

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From 27bceff70f472202375e19e7d79996a992532666 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Tibbitts Date: Nov 11 2016 01:02:24 + Subject: Initial spec and sources import. --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index e69de29..6cf6477 100644 ---

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "Tweak .gitignore."

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From 0b386f3a26b2d06fe1f1a6b0146b58f91e5b3cff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Tibbitts Date: Nov 14 2016 15:37:42 + Subject: Tweak .gitignore. --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 6cf6477..d981021 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From e6957e3841181ffa4b0b9dbb256b95796ecd3dd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Feb 08 2018 20:54:48 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel9). "perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter "

Notification time stamped 2022-05-27 17:59:04 UTC From 8d4722e7598a3338c72154d75bec86b3dabc3e5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jul 12 2017 12:52:20 + Subject: perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter

Re: Live USB rescue mode, do we still have one? Does it work?

On 5/27/22 12:52 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:38:43AM -0400, Stephen Snow wrote: On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 14:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: The rescue mode has always been on the traditional installer images, not the lives. It's still there. Unfortunately there is no

Re: Live USB rescue mode, do we still have one? Does it work?

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:38:43AM -0400, Stephen Snow wrote: > On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 14:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > The rescue mode has always been on the traditional installer images, > > not the lives. It's still there. > > > Unfortunately there is no rescue option on the Fedora

Feedback on New Anaconda Installer

Hi everyone, The User Experience Research team at Red Hat is conducting a study on Anaconda Installer's new interface. If you are interested in an opportunity to influence the future of Anaconda Installer, please fill out this brief survey

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

> Am 27.05.2022 um 17:37 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > : > > On 27/05/2022 15:30, Peter Boy wrote: >> Really sorry, but such a statement is simply intellectual bullshit. >> Unfortunately, it is not possible to formulate this in a more friendly yet >> unambiguous way. And in this thread

Re: Retiring Python 3.7 before Python 3.6?

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 11:35 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 27. 05. 22 14:34, Neal Gompa wrote: > > While unfortunate, I think it makes sense to retire Python 3.7 when > > Debian 10 goes EOL. > > I don't understand why do you consider this unfortunate. > The situation is unfortunate, not the

Fedora-Rawhide-20220527.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 11/231 (x86_64), 14/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220526.n.0): ID: 1280864 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 27/05/2022 15:30, Peter Boy wrote: Really sorry, but such a statement is simply intellectual bullshit. Unfortunately, it is not possible to formulate this in a more friendly yet unambiguous way. And in this thread in particular, the many allegations, unclouded by any expertise but made all

Re: Retiring Python 3.7 before Python 3.6?

On 27. 05. 22 14:34, Neal Gompa wrote: While unfortunate, I think it makes sense to retire Python 3.7 when Debian 10 goes EOL. I don't understand why do you consider this unfortunate. I think the larger question is how do we write down a multi-Python maintenance policy to codify this? It

Re: remove-retired-packages feedback

On Thu, 26 May 2022 15:52:06 +0200 Miroslav Suchý wrote: > If you already upgraded to Fedora 36 - what is your feedback about > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/latest/release-notes/sysadmin/System_Utilities/#remove-retired-packages > > Did you run the command

Re: remove-retired-packages feedback

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 1:52 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > If you already upgraded to Fedora 36 - what is your feedback about > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/latest/release-notes/sysadmin/System_Utilities/#remove-retired-packages > > Did you run the command

[EPEL-devel] Re: How to remove builds from EPEL 9 Next?

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 5:38 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 8:00 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > Hey EPEL folks, > > > > The python-Rtree package was unable to build in EPEL 9 before RHEL 9.0 > GA, as > > the frozen set of packages from CentOS Stream made it segfault during >

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

> Am 27.05.2022 um 14:00 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > : > > Bundled libraries are always outdated and even vulnerable. Really sorry, but such a statement is simply intellectual bullshit. Unfortunately, it is not possible to formulate this in a more friendly yet unambiguous way. And

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

> Am 27.05.2022 um 14:00 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > : > > Bundled libraries are always outdated and even vulnerable. Really sorry, but such a statement is simply intellectual bullshit. Unfortunately, it is not possible to formulate this in a more friendly yet unambiguous way. And

Re: Live USB rescue mode, do we still have one? Does it work?

On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 14:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 16:40 -0400, Stephen Snow wrote: > > Hello, > > I was doing my usual round of reading comments on ask.fp.o and came > > across an individual having difficulty getting their system > > (?back?) up > > and running,

[EPEL-devel] Re: How to remove builds from EPEL 9 Next?

Thanks for asking this question (and for the heads-up that the problem is fixed). I’ll do as Neal suggested for python-Rtree, as well as a couple of other packages (python-mapbox-earcut, iml) that were in a similar situtation. – Ben On 5/27/22 08:37, Neal Gompa wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2022

[EPEL-devel] Re: How to remove builds from EPEL 9 Next?

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 8:00 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hey EPEL folks, > > The python-Rtree package was unable to build in EPEL 9 before RHEL 9.0 GA, as > the frozen set of packages from CentOS Stream made it segfault during build. > > So it was build in EPEL 9 Next instead, as

Re: Retiring Python 3.7 before Python 3.6?

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 6:07 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hey Pythonistas, > > let me include you in my dilemma I have wrt different Python versions we > support in Fedora for testing. > > tl;dr Should we retire Python 3.7 before Python 3.6? 3.6 will stick around for > RHEL 8, but 3.7 will no

Re: SPDX identifiers in old branches?

On 26. 05. 22 17:16, Maxwell G via devel wrote: On Thursday, May 26, 2022 9:14:14 AM CDT Petr Pisar wrote: Does a marker of the conversion need to be visible in the binary packages? I think it should be. According to the Change Proposal, "the use of a standardized identifier for license will

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 26/05/2022 20:29, Stephen Snow wrote: Libraries are bundled into jars not the source, etc... this all snowballs across what 4 version now supported? OpenJDK is a native ELF binary, not a JAR. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

CPE Weekly Update – Week 21 2022

Hi everyone, This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat (https://libera.chat/). Week: 23rd May - 27th May 2022 If you wish to read this in

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 26/05/2022 19:31, drago01 wrote: But bundled libs and properly tested / certified vs dynamic linking and less testing / no certification. Bundled libraries are always outdated and even vulnerable. We should avoid bundling as much as possible. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev

[EPEL-devel] How to remove builds from EPEL 9 Next?

Hey EPEL folks, The python-Rtree package was unable to build in EPEL 9 before RHEL 9.0 GA, as the frozen set of packages from CentOS Stream made it segfault during build. So it was build in EPEL 9 Next instead, as python-Rtree-1.0.0-2.el9.next. Now, it builds in regular EPEL 9 successfully

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 26/05/2022 17:40, drago01 wrote: Why would we do that? Is the build process really more important than shipping tested software? Yes. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 2090500] [EPEL9] Please branch and build perl-Cache-FastMmap in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2090500 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220527.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220526.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220527.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 39 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 61.65 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: libsoup 2 -> 3 migration plan and timeline (action required if you depend on libsoup)

On Thu, 2022-05-26 at 14:37 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Still, hopefully we can manage this transition without applications > winding up broken in stable Fedoras. Hi, for what it's worth, I have a COPR repo for Fedora 36, which includes several packages to use/build with/...

[Test-Announce] Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220527.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220527.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Retiring Python 3.7 before Python 3.6?

Hey Pythonistas, let me include you in my dilemma I have wrt different Python versions we support in Fedora for testing. tl;dr Should we retire Python 3.7 before Python 3.6? 3.6 will stick around for RHEL 8, but 3.7 will no longer be "needed". However, retiring mid-order might be confusing.

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220527.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220526.0): ID: 1280791 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: libsoup 2 -> 3 migration plan and timeline (action required if you depend on libsoup)

On 26. 05. 22 21:42, Ben Cotton wrote: Thanks for the long lead time. If you submit this as an F39 Change proposal now, you'll be the very first for that release (and perhaps even break churchyard's unofficial "most in-advance Change proposal submission). You can, of course, wait a while to do

Re: Go-Sig spring cleaning

On Thursday, 26 May 2022 at 23:01, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: [...] > I would ask of all of you to make sure all your packages have been > added to the @go-sig group on src.fedoraproject.org (at least with > "commit" access), unless there is a very good reason not to do so (and > if that is

Re: remove-retired-packages feedback

> On 26 May 2022, at 14:52, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > If you already upgraded to Fedora 36 - what is your feedback about > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/latest/release-notes/sysadmin/System_Utilities/#remove-retired-packages > >

[rpms/perl-CPAN-FindDependencies] PR #2: Debug gating

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-FindDependencies` that you are following: `` Debug gating `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-FindDependencies/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 5/26/22 14:17, Stephen Snow wrote: Also, it may be good to take a look at what AdoptOpenJDK is doing with the Eclipse Foundation based Adoptium Project, specifically the Eclipse Temurin subproject https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-temurin-compliance which is going to handle the

[Bug 2090501] [EPEL9] Please branch and build perl-Number-Format in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2090501 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from