Re: Self Introduction: Kate Hsuan

On 6/21/22 12:42 AM, Kate Hsuan wrote: Hi Folks, My name is Kate Hsuan. I'm a software engineer from Red Hat. Currently, I'm working on integration with fwupd, gnome-shell, and gnome settings. They can be used to show the firmware security details and warnings to the user to reduce the risk of

Self Introduction: Kate Hsuan

Hi Folks, My name is Kate Hsuan. I'm a software engineer from Red Hat. Currently, I'm working on integration with fwupd, gnome-shell, and gnome settings. They can be used to show the firmware security details and warnings to the user to reduce the risk of the security event. Before joining Red

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8d638fabd8 restic-0.13.1-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing remmina-1.4.27-1.el8 Details about builds:

[headsup] ghc-8.10.7 + Stackage lts-18.28 landed in Rawhide

Hi, Just a heads-up to say that Haskell ghc in Rawhide has been updated from 8.10.5 to 8.10.7, and Haskell package versions have been updated to the final versions in Stackage lts-18.28. See https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-3ae019aee4 These package versions should act as a

[Bug 2099430] New: perl-HTTP-Tinyish-0.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099430 Bug ID: 2099430 Summary: perl-HTTP-Tinyish-0.18 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-HTTP-Tinyish Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: F37 proposal: Supplement of Server distributables by a KVM VM disk image (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 8:19 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I'm definitely in favor, but a couple of questions... > > What format image is to be produced? qcow2? or raw.xz? or something > else? > > I assume this will not be release blocking at least at first? > If it's for regular KVM, I assume

Re: F37 proposal: Supplement of Server distributables by a KVM VM disk image (Self-Contained Change proposal)

I'm definitely in favor, but a couple of questions... What format image is to be produced? qcow2? or raw.xz? or something else? I assume this will not be release blocking at least at first? Thanks, kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[Bug 2099422] New: perl-Specio-Library-Path-Tiny-0.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099422 Bug ID: 2099422 Summary: perl-Specio-Library-Path-Tiny-0.05 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Specio-Library-Path-Tiny Keywords:

Re: Making Fedora faster (was Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal))

On 6/20/22 13:17, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Actually, in the cases in the past where I looked at Phoronix benchmarks, Clear got most of it's performance advantage from defaulting to "Performance" setting of the CPU, while almost everyone else defaults to "Balanced". I'd be surprised

Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 6:28 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:15 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 3:48 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > > > The most visible

Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:15 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 3:48 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > > The most visible impact of the proposal would be the filename change: > > > > > >

Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 3:48 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > We'd like to introduce Build Number/Tag/Id in the rpm metadata. > > I agree with Vitaly: %rpmautospec+%rpmautorelease seem to cover > most of this

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

That makes total sense. We're looking at doing exactly this. Are there any particular benchmarks the community would be interested in? Our idea was to take the phoronix test suite and run some of the relevant suites from that with and without the updated packages and compare the results. On a

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 07:10:01PM -, Daan De Meyer via devel wrote: > > Regressions of such magnitude can veto such changes, especially when > > they hit everyone, not just those who are highly dependent on the > > profiling tools the proposal is concerned about. > > The kernel benchmarks

[Bug 2099392] New: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20220620 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099392 Bug ID: 2099392 Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20220620 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Module-CoreList Keywords:

Re: Making Fedora faster (was Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal))

On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 01:36:22PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 6/17/22 12:15, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 6/17/22 01:41, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > > I can only concur. Say what you want about Phoronix benchmark, but > > > they consistently benchmark different distributions And Fedora > >

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

On 20/06/2022 14:45, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > ## Where to get help > > Reply to this thread or find us (thrnciar, mhroncok) on #fedora-python IRC channel (libera.chat)or Matrix (#python:fedoraproject.org ). > > --- > > Let us know if you have other questions. >

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

On 20/06/2022 14:45, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > ## Where to get help > > Reply to this thread or find us (thrnciar, mhroncok) on #fedora-python IRC channel (libera.chat)or Matrix (#python:fedoraproject.org ). > > --- > > Let us know if you have other questions. >

[Bug 2099388] New: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20220620 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099388 Bug ID: 2099388 Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20220620 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases Keywords:

Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB

On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > We'd like to introduce Build Number/Tag/Id in the rpm metadata. I agree with Vitaly: %rpmautospec+%rpmautorelease seem to cover most of this functionality in a reasonable way. Maybe there are other motivations / use-cases that

Re: F37 proposal: Golang 1.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 06:18:35AM +0200, Alejandro Sáez Morollón wrote: > > > > On 16 Jun 2022, at 23:24, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 9:16 PM Richard W.M. Jones > > wrote: > > > >> Why is this small language bump classified as a system-wide change? > > > > I

side-tag including other side-tag ?

Hi, When I started side-tag for opencv I notice that opencv haven't compiled with python 3.11 (beta something) because python 3.11 rebuild was in another side-tag. Is is possible include builds of one side-tag into other side-tag ? Thank you. -- Sérgio M. B.

mupdf 1.20.0 coming to rawhide

mupdf 1.20.0 is coming to rawhide in side-tag f37-build-side-54574. As always, I coordinate this with the maintainers of zathura-pdf-mupdf and python-PyMuPDF directly via PRs (but I may have missed some indirect dependency). ___ devel mailing list --

mupdf 1.20.0 coming to rawhide

mupdf 1.20.0 is coming to rawhide in side-tag f37-build-side-54574. As always, I coordinate this with the maintainers of zathura-pdf-mupdf and python-PyMuPDF directly via PRs (but I may have missed some indirect dependency). ___ devel mailing list --

Re: fedpkg request-side-tag: I don't understand "allowed_suffixes"

On Mon, 2022-06-20 at 12:02 +0200, Lubomír Sedlář wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones píše v So 18. 06. 2022 v 12:08 +0100: > > I thought I'd be nice and use a suffix for my side tag so it would > > be > > clear (not least to me!) which side tag was being used for the > > OCaml > > rebuild in Rawhide, but

[Bug 2098448] perl-Imager-1.018 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098448 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Imager-1.018-1.fc37

Re: Fedora Hatch Cork, Ireland - July 13th & 14th

Hi all! If you would like to attend the Fedora Hatch event in Cork, Ireland on July 13th & 14th, you can register your attendance here https://www.eventbrite.ie/e/fedora-hatch-cork-ireland-tickets-365808792947 If you would like to attend and give a talk at the event, please submit your talk

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

On 20. 06. 22 15:30, José Abílio Matos wrote: On Monday, 20 June 2022 12.45.07 WEST Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > python-doit  immanetize jamatos Looking in to src I search for the build to understand why did it failed: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1989134

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

On Monday, 20 June 2022 12.45.07 WEST Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > python-doit immanetize jamatos Looking in to src I search for the build to understand why did it failed: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1989134 as far as I can see it built without any issue. Does that

[Bug 2098396] perl-Chart-2.402.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098396 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

On 20. 06. 22 13:45, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: ## My package fails to build because it has broken build dependencies Please try to track the missing build dependencies in Bugzilla. If possible, help the maintainers of your dependencies to get them rebuilt. When in need of escalation, ask us for

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

On 20. 06. 22 13:45, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: ## My package fails to build because it has broken build dependencies Please try to track the missing build dependencies in Bugzilla. If possible, help the maintainers of your dependencies to get them rebuilt. When in need of escalation, ask us for

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

* Ben Cotton: > === Where’s the catch? === > > The frame pointer register is not necessary to run a compiled binary. > It makes it easy to unwind the stack, and some debugging tools rely on > frame pointers, but the compiler knows how much data it put on the > stack, so it can generate code that

[Bug 2098396] perl-Chart-2.402.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098396 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

On 20/06/2022 13:45, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: xvitaly    piper meson.build:89: WARNING: Project targeting '>= 0.42.0' but tried to use feature introduced in '0.46.0': Python Module. Program python3 (lxml, evdev, cairo, gi) found: NO modules: lxml, cairo, gi meson.build:91:8: ERROR: python is

[Bug 2098396] perl-Chart-2.402.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098396 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|---

Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB

On 20/06/2022 10:47, Petr Pisar wrote: I think Aleksandra wants to (non-scratch) build all pull requestes before merging. Official non-scratch builds for non-merged pull requests? Looks very dangerous. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

[EPEL-devel] Re: Request for fence-agents-pve package

was this the right place to open the bug or can it be moved to the right spot please? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098360 On 2022-06-17 16:28, Carl George wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:31 AM Alex Talaran wrote: would anyone be willing to package this in epel or help get

Media codecs big SONAME bump

Hello everyone, I am planning a soname bump of various media codecs I take care of. In order to minimize the rebuilds, all are going through in a single update. The codecs I plan to bump are the following: - AOM - libavif - dav1d - rav1e - svt-av1 - jpegxl Many of you will be affected

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Python 3.11 rebuilds to start in a side tag early next week

On 20. 06. 22 12:40, Michael J Gruber wrote: Am Mo., 20. Juni 2022 um 12:08 Uhr schrieb Miro Hrončok : On 20. 06. 22 11:57, Michael J Gruber wrote: I recently took over py3status from orphanage and tried a scratch build against the side tag. The results are somewhat surprsing (to me): ```

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Python 3.11 rebuilds to start in a side tag early next week

Am Mo., 20. Juni 2022 um 12:08 Uhr schrieb Miro Hrončok : > > On 20. 06. 22 11:57, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > I recently took over py3status from orphanage and tried a scratch build > > against the side tag. The results are somewhat surprsing (to me): > > > > ``` > > DEBUG util.py:443: Error: >

Re: Heads up: openjpeg2-2.5.0 and gdal-3.5.0 coming to rawhide

Hi > I've now merged the side tag. Remarks: ... > - python-PyMuPDF test fail due to a corrupted double-linked list > assertion. I've disabled the test for now, and will investigate further. > - python-fiona test fail due to a segmentation fault. I've disabled the > test for now, and will

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Python 3.11 rebuilds to start in a side tag early next week

On 20. 06. 22 11:57, Michael J Gruber wrote: I recently took over py3status from orphanage and tried a scratch build against the side tag. The results are somewhat surprsing (to me): ``` DEBUG util.py:443: Error: DEBUG util.py:443: Problem: conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:443:-

Re: fedpkg request-side-tag: I don't understand "allowed_suffixes"

Richard W.M. Jones píše v So 18. 06. 2022 v 12:08 +0100: > I thought I'd be nice and use a suffix for my side tag so it would be > clear (not least to me!) which side tag was being used for the OCaml > rebuild in Rawhide, but ... > > $ fedpkg request-side-tag --help > usage: fedpkg

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Python 3.11 rebuilds to start in a side tag early next week

I recently took over py3status from orphanage and tried a scratch build against the side tag. The results are somewhat surprsing (to me): ``` DEBUG util.py:443: Error: DEBUG util.py:443: Problem: conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:443:- nothing provides python(abi) = 3.10 needed by

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Python 3.11 rebuilds to start in a side tag early next week

Hello everyone, f37-python side tag was merged a few hours ago. From now on you can build in rawhide as usually. We will follow up later with another email with instructions on what to do with packages that failed to build. Have a nice day. Tomáš On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 11:33 AM Tomas Hrnciar

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Python 3.11 rebuilds to start in a side tag early next week

Hello everyone, f37-python side tag was merged a few hours ago. From now on you can build in rawhide as usually. We will follow up later with another email with instructions on what to do with packages that failed to build. Have a nice day. Tomáš On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 11:33 AM Tomas Hrnciar

[Bug 2098448] perl-Imager-1.018 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098448 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 2098108] Upgrade perl-Class-MakeMethods to 1.01

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098108 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC|iarn...@gmail.com, |

Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB

V Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 01:57:30PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel napsal(a): > On 18/06/2022 13:43, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > And, for example, rpmautospec will not help in the case we need to > > update a build on pull request update: When you work with > > pull-requests you don’t

Re: hp printer installation

Hi Roger, your printer supports Airprint, so there is no need to install it with HPLIP or, if you allow mDNS in your local network, you don't have to install it at all and work via temp queue (in case you are happy with printer defaults or you don't mind checking the printing options before

Fedora-Cloud-36-20220620.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/8 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220619.0): ID: 1303098 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1303098 ID: 1303102 Test: aarch64

Re: Suggestion: Use a unified kernel image by default in the future.

On 19/06/2022 22:54, Sharpened Blade via devel wrote: This can allow for the local installation to sign the kernel and the initrd, so the boot chain can be verified until after the uefi. Currently, the initrd can be modified by attackers, so even if the / partition is encrypted, the systems

Re: [Container-sig] About Fedora containers

Hello. Because we had a lot of troubles with Fedora infra for container images (I can provide more details, if you want), we have decided to move our containers to https://quay.io/organization/fedora. With quay.io, we are able to produce new container images directly from Github CI and