https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102597
Bug 2102597 depends on bug 2102647, which changed state.
Bug 2102647 Summary: Add perl-Data-GUID to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102647
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103511
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Finance-Quote-1.52-1.f |perl-Finance-Quote-1.52-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102671
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102631
Bug 2102631 depends on bug 2102671, which changed state.
Bug 2102671 Summary: Add perl-Class-C3 to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102671
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102655
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102661
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102597
Bug 2102597 depends on bug 2102655, which changed state.
Bug 2102655 Summary: Add perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102655
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102635
Bug 2102635 depends on bug 2102661, which changed state.
Bug 2102661 Summary: Add perl-Time-Piece-MySQL to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102661
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102597
Bug 2102597 depends on bug 2102661, which changed state.
Bug 2102661 Summary: Add perl-Time-Piece-MySQL to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102661
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102597
Bug 2102597 depends on bug 2102644, which changed state.
Bug 2102644 Summary: Add perl-Config-Any to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102644
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102644
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103511
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Finance-Quote-1.52-1.f |perl-Finance-Quote-1.52-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102647
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
As a reminder, the Fedora Linux 37 Self-Contained Change proposal
deadline is Tuesday 2022-07-19. By the end of that day, new F37
Self-Contained Change proposals should be in the
ChangeReadyForWrangler category.
For the full schedule, see
As a reminder, the Fedora Linux 37 Self-Contained Change proposal
deadline is Tuesday 2022-07-19. By the end of that day, new F37
Self-Contained Change proposals should be in the
ChangeReadyForWrangler category.
For the full schedule, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103511
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Finance-Quote-1.52-1.f |perl-Finance-Quote-1.52-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103511
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
authbind-2.1.2-1.el9
f36-backgrounds-36.1.1-1.el9
fluidsynth-2.2.8-1.el9
koji-1.29.1-1.el9
suricata-6.0.6-1.el9
Details about builds:
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7ac96d02aa
seamonkey-2.53.13-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
cekit-4.2.0-1.el8
f36-backgrounds-36.1.1-1.el8
On 22/07/04 03:00PM, Maxwell G wrote:
> Later this week, I will be a doing a mass rebuild in F35 for all packages
> that
> require `golang` and provide binaries to mitigate the following CVEs
I completed the rebuild this weekend, but I realized that I probably
should provide an update.
Here is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106528
Bug ID: 2106528
Summary: perl-File-MimeInfo-0.33 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-File-MimeInfo
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Both bear and fmidi are now rebuilt into the side tag. I defined the
preprocessor macro FMT_DEPRECATED_OSTREAM as a temporary workaround
(noting that this will not be available in fmt 10.0). I filed an issue
upstream with fmidi: https://github.com/jpcima/fmidi/issues/5
On 7/11/22 12:50, Ben
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
amcta...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|CVE-2022-31082 |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
amcta...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been
crossposting to infra list to keep folks there in the loop...
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 02:53:24PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 15:06, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > That said, IRC is actually one of the fastest ones we can push to.
>
> Is
On 22/07/12 01:03PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> golang-github-apparentlymart- textseg-12 eclipseo, go-sig
I have successfully rebuilt this:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-07d3083c35
--
Thanks,
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 11:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks!
>
[snip]
> How can we debug this and hopefully get it fixed? Can anyone give me
> any pointers? Thanks!
It looks like Matt Fagnani already ran into this and filed some bug
reports:
On Mon, 2022-07-11 at 07:02 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 12:34 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
> >
> > Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS,
> > which have their own somewhat different
Hi, folks!
openQA tests on Rawhide are currently failing quite often, especially
on KDE, apparently because llvmpipe is crashing and taking down the
desktop environment. In the system logs, it looks like this:
2022-07-12T06:26:09.804990-04:00 fedora audit[1304]: ANOM_ABEND auid=1000
uid=1000
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCo (2022-07-12)
===
Meeting started by decathorpe at 17:00:53 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-07-12/fesco.2022-07-12-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Anybody?
Dave
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 02:58:47PM +, Dave Dykstra via devel wrote:
> I am looking for someone to review adding fuse2fs to only epel7:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104533
> It is already a standard part of e2fsprogs everywhere else.
>
> Let me know what
Hey,
I've just orphaned owncloud-client, as I was clearly not maintaining it well.
I've originally took this because of our university OwnCloud, but it seems I
lost access to that anyway :/
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
Hi Vitaly,
Will try and take care of folly ASAP - thanks!
--
Michel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106394
Bug ID: 2106394
Summary: perl-Chart-2.403.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Chart
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220707.0):
ID: 1322816 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1322816
Old failures (same test
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 15:06, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> That said, IRC is actually one of the fastest ones we can push to.
Is https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/ really still sending
notifications to freenode though?
Hasn't everybody moved to libera?
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 10/236 (x86_64), 8/165 (aarch64)
New failures
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 01:03:59PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching
(August 2022).
Policy:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (August
2022).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
The packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106321
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Yes, I requested the branches but then it slipped my mind. Thanks for
the reminder; I’m preparing the initial updates for F36 and F35 now.
– Ben
On 7/11/22 21:23, Maxwell G wrote:
On 22/07/12 12:28AM, chedi toueiti wrote:
I'm looking for help review the following python packages needed by
Hello,
I've just updated Python from 3.11.0b3 to 3.11.0b4 in rawhide.
Let me know if you encounter any problems.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Hello,
I've just updated Python from 3.11.0b3 to 3.11.0b4 in rawhide.
Let me know if you encounter any problems.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 18:52, Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have just create(d/ not finished yet, started 15 minutes ago) a ~2.5
> GB rpm and found, that rpmbuild is an extrem bottleneck.
>
>
At that size, is RPM actually a good fit for the data inside it? Building
it is going to be slow
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 18:02, Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> > While notifications is a great idea, it is also a hard problem. Please
> help
> > the team who will be working on it.
>
> In the case of email, is it possible to offload everything to a mail
> server like Postfix? That should be able
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106321
Bug ID: 2106321
Summary: perl-Digest-CRC-0.24 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Digest-CRC
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (August
2022).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
The packages
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220711.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220712.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 96
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.12 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106293
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106292
Bug 2106292 depends on bug 2106293, which changed state.
Bug 2106293 Summary: CVE-2022-1955 perl-SNMP_Session: lack of adequate security
controls may lead to information disclosure [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106292
Marian Rehak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2106295
Petr Pisar changed:
The only coincidence is "large files" the rest is different but may
worth check , if you are talking about rawhide.
https://pagure.io/copr/copr/issue/2241
On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 00:52 +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have just create(d/ not finished yet, started 15 minutes ago) a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106293
--- Comment #1 from Marian Rehak ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure that all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106293
Marian Rehak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2106292 (CVE-2022-1955)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106293
Bug ID: 2106293
Summary: CVE-2022-1955 perl-SNMP_Session: lack of adequate
security controls may lead to information disclosure
[fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106292
--- Comment #1 from Marian Rehak ---
Created perl-SNMP_Session tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 2106293]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106292
Bug ID: 2106292
Summary: CVE-2022-1955 perl-SNMP_Session: lack of adequate
security controls may lead to information disclosure
Product: Security Response
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106292
Marian Rehak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2106293
Referenced Bugs:
* Miroslav Lichvar:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 09:26:14AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Marius Schwarz:
>> > and I don't think, this tasks needs to read the clock that often too.
>>
>> strace shouldn't see a system call here because clock_gettime should be
>> handled in the vDSO. This
On 12. 07. 22 11:25, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Or pytest-xdist could be taught to check an environment variable for `auto`,
making this seamless for packagers?
This could work, except that sometimes pytest-xdist is installed and we don't
want to run tests in parallel because they are not
On 07. 07. 22 14:44, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 07. 07. 22 14:00, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 07. 07. 22 11:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello Pythonistats, packagers,
A handful of Fedora Python packages uses pytest-xdist to run tests in
parallel like this:
%pytest -n auto
-n auto means pytest
On 7/12/22 11:02, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Am 12.07.22 um 10:55 schrieb Marius Schwarz:
>>
>> The rpmbuild process for this one rpm was single thread. With a
>> lsof-loop, I could see "bytes" getting attached to the resulting file
>> with an awful slow progression rate. Which is very frustrating
Am 12.07.22 um 10:55 schrieb Marius Schwarz:
The rpmbuild process for this one rpm was single thread. With a
lsof-loop, I could see "bytes" getting attached to the resulting file
with an awful slow progression rate. Which is very frustrating to see
on a 8 core system.
The thing is, I do
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220711.0):
ID: 1322170 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Am 12.07.22 um 09:47 schrieb Kamil Dudka:
On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 12:52:13 AM CEST Marius Schwarz wrote:
Multicore use would also be helpful i.e. while packing the files.
What do you mean by packing? Creation of the resulting RPM packages?
I believe this phase already runs in parallel in
Am 12.07.22 um 10:30 schrieb Miroslav Lichvar:
be selected by the kernel, or it could be a VM which doesn't have one
that would work with migrations, etc.
I think your right, it's a vm on xen base.
best regards,
Marius
___
devel mailing list --
Am 12.07.22 um 09:26 schrieb Florian Weimer:
* Marius Schwarz:
I have just create(d/ not finished yet, started 15 minutes ago) a ~2.5
GB rpm and found, that rpmbuild is an extrem bottleneck.
IMHO, this is caused by a fileread function which reads files in 32k
blocks, which is very slow and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102614
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|emman...@seyman.fr |jples...@redhat.com
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 09:26:14AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Marius Schwarz:
> > and I don't think, this tasks needs to read the clock that often too.
>
> strace shouldn't see a system call here because clock_gettime should be
> handled in the vDSO. This suggests something is wrong with
On So, 2022-07-10 at 10:36 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 7/10/22 04:38, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > Have you rebuilt all system packages with -fno-omit-frame-pointer or
> > just tested packages?
>
>
> No. Early in the thread, Tomasz Torcz posted a link to a Phoronix
> article as
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 05:16:00PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RaspberryPi4
It's nice to have official support for such a prominent device.
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102614
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(emmanuel@seyman.f
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220711.0):
ID: 1322154 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 12:52:13 AM CEST Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have just create(d/ not finished yet, started 15 minutes ago) a ~2.5
> GB rpm and found, that rpmbuild is an extrem bottleneck.
>
> IMHO, this is caused by a fileread function which reads files in 32k
> blocks,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105954
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
* Marius Schwarz:
> I have just create(d/ not finished yet, started 15 minutes ago) a ~2.5
> GB rpm and found, that rpmbuild is an extrem bottleneck.
>
> IMHO, this is caused by a fileread function which reads files in 32k
> blocks, which is very slow and extrem IO intensive. The result is a
>
Hello,
> Setting up a copr repo to find all other breakages sounds like a good
idea.
I'm actually working on a tool to help with such use cases.
It may be a bit early since I only made an internal alpha release, and only
planned to go public by the end of this month with it, but since that may
77 matches
Mail list logo
