https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116144
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Fixed In
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 8:56 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Dear maintainers.
>
> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
> will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (next
> week).
>
The F37 schedule says the retirement occurs on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075768
Jeff Fearn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |VERIFIED
--- Comment #3 from Jeff
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
dateutils-0.4.10-1.el9
Details about builds:
dateutils-0.4.10-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-32e3b90a20)
Command-line date and time
Per the unresponsive package maintainer policy I'm checking if anyone has a
way to contact Haïkel Guémar (FAS hguemar).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116206
Lack of updates to one of his packages, python-pyperclip is holding up
other packages.
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> One more concern I see is that, since CC0 by design does not require
> attribution, there is actually no way to know that the package does not
> contain unattributed CC0 code that was unilaterally relicensed by a third
> party.
That is true [1] although the point
Richard Fontana wrote:
> We plan to classify CC0 as allowed-content only, so that CC0 would no
> longer be allowed for code.
One more concern I see is that, since CC0 by design does not require
attribution, there is actually no way to know that the package does not
contain unattributed CC0 code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116190
Bug ID: 2116190
Summary: perl-DateTimeX-Easy-0.090 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTimeX-Easy
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116190
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details below:
BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116188
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Text-CSV-2.02-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90587918
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116188
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1904182
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1904182=edit
Update to 2.02 (#2116188)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116188
Bug ID: 2116188
Summary: perl-Text-CSV-2.02 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-CSV
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 12:10:44PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> TL;DR: It seems like armv7hl koji builders are locking up, most often
> when running dnf to install the buildroot or to install dependencies.
Yeah. ;(
> I've seen many people getting hit by this issue:
>
On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 10:05:40PM +0200, Maxwell G via epel-devel wrote:
> Hi EPEL folks,
>
> In the past couple EPEL SCo meetings, we have been discussing adding a
> new package retirement policy for EPEL packages.
That reads amusingly to me... to be clear 'new policy' not 'new packages'.
On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 3:23 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 10:11 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > >
> > As the maintainer of rpmdevtools, I will probably not accept changes
> > upstream to change to rpmautospec in the templates, since rpmautospec
> > doesn't work outside of
Thanks for attending this talk session! Now the recording is available
on the event platform Hopin. And I created the detailed chapters
(timecodes) of the video. You can see the link below to find it.
https://pagure.io/flock/issue/389#comment-809656
Jun
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 6:23 PM Jun Aruga
On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 05:46 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 06/08/2022 01:49, Richard Fontana wrote:
> > CC0 has been listed by Fedora as a 'good' license for code and content
> > (corresponding to allowed and allowed-content under the new system).
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116150
Bug ID: 2116150
Summary: perl-Email-Address-XS-1.05 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Email-Address-XS
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116144
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-IPC-Run-20220807.0-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90574045
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116144
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1904131
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1904131=edit
Update to 20220807.0 (#2116144)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116144
Bug ID: 2116144
Summary: perl-IPC-Run-20220807.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IPC-Run
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 10:11 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>
> As the maintainer of rpmdevtools, I will probably not accept changes
> upstream to change to rpmautospec in the templates, since rpmautospec
> doesn't work outside of Fedora and there's been no advocacy to make
> rpmautospec a
On 07/08/2022 12:21, Fabio Valentini wrote:
I think you're confusing the %forge macros with rpmautospec here.
rpmautospec is actively (though, at times, slowly) maintained by
nphilipp and other CPE members:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/rpmautospec
Oops, my bad. +1 from me then.
--
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220806.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220807.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 90
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 11:37 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 06/08/2022 16:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > During the FESCo panel during Nest one of the conclusions was that FESCo
> > should
> > take a more proactive role in pushing changes in Fedora. We talked about
> >
Hi all,
TL;DR: It seems like armv7hl koji builders are locking up, most often
when running dnf to install the buildroot or to install dependencies.
I've seen many people getting hit by this issue:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10833
So, if your build takes unusually long time on
On 06/08/2022 01:49, Richard Fontana wrote:
CC0 has been listed by Fedora as a 'good' license for code and content
(corresponding to allowed and allowed-content under the new system).
Fedora has enforced this CC0 for many years and now it is "not allowed".
This is so ridiculous.
This is a
On 06/08/2022 16:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
During the FESCo panel during Nest one of the conclusions was that FESCo should
take a more proactive role in pushing changes in Fedora. We talked about
enabling
koschei by default and other similar things. Here's my attempt to start with
Hey Again!
Got all the extras background showing up with this package but the default
wallpaper, did not get installed or changed at all
On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 10:21 AM Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Will help test later today, coming back with results during the day
>
> On 8/7/22, Luya
Hi Barry,
Hau idatzi du Barry Scott (ba...@barrys-emacs.org) erabiltzaileak
(2022 abu. 7, ig. (10:40)):
>
> I want to build my packages for epel9. But that branch is not setup in git.
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pycxx
>
> How do I add epel9?
You need to request the branch to be
I want to build my packages for epel9. But that branch is not setup in git.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pycxx
How do I add epel9?
Barry
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hey!
Will help test later today, coming back with results during the day
On 8/7/22, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> f37-backgrounds is ready for review for the incoming Fedora 37 Beta.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2116103
>
>
> Reviewer welcome.
>
> --
>
Youtube TWIL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGJlQPUmVoo=PLbFVcOQ-YH_LRP687N0YeN78YZmBp5wq
Brodie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYOl20SCdr8
On 8/6/22, Richard Fontana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted the following recently to the Fedora legal list, but it was pointed
> out by Fabio Valentini that
33 matches
Mail list logo
