Re: CPE Weekly Update - Week 34 2022

Aug 26, 2022 7:02:06 AM Michal Konecny : If you want to receive weekly reports by emails in the future, please subscribe to either https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/ or https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/c/news/commblog/61. We will stop sending them in the future. Why is that? I

[Bug 2099988] Please branch and build perl-Parallel-ForkManager in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099988 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Brunckhorst --- Thanks for this offer but I'm not a packager. Anyone else on this list who can take care or do you know one? /Ralf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Re: GTK 2 removal from RHEL 10+

Tomáš Popela wrote: > This is an early heads-up about GTK 2 removal from RHEL 10+ (the gtk2 > package was marked as unwanted in ELN with > https://github.com/minimization/content-resolver-input/commit/b6d44e496f46bd2444e8e24dd3e9113b326817ac). I suppose it could be carried in EPEL if needed. Or

Re: Test gating: missing required test results

On Fri, 2022-08-26 at 14:58 -0400, Ben Beasley wrote: > When a Bodhi update is gated on required tests that seem to remain > “missing” indefinitely, is there anything I can do to re-try them? Or do > I just have to attempt to waive the missing test results? > >

Re: Test gating: missing required test results

On Fri, 2022-08-26 at 14:58 -0400, Ben Beasley wrote: > When a Bodhi update is gated on required tests that seem to remain > “missing” indefinitely, is there anything I can do to re-try them? Or do > I just have to attempt to waive the missing test results? > >

[Test-Announce] Fedora 37 Branched 20220826.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 37 Branched 20220826.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: sqlcipher soname change in rawhide

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022, 21:20 Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > On 8/26/22 06:12, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 3:12 AM Carl George wrote: > >> > >> sqlcipher has been requested to be built in epel9 [0]. Rather than > >> branching it from the current rawhide version, I plan to

Re: F37 Beta blocker status email

Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. osinfo-db — failed to install server iso with virt-install due to the missing of isolinux in the media — NEW ACTION: Maintainers to create update with upstream MR 501 2. sddm — Logout from KDE session on Rawhide goes to

Re: Let's enable Koschei for all packages automatically

On 8/26/22 09:22, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 03:58, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> Hello folks, >> >> during our Nest FESCo session, we've talked about enabling Koschei [1] for >> all >> packages automatically. >> >> There seem to be a consensus by FESCo members, that it would be

Re: sqlcipher soname change in rawhide

On 8/26/22 06:12, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 3:12 AM Carl George wrote: >> >> sqlcipher has been requested to be built in epel9 [0]. Rather than >> branching it from the current rawhide version, I plan to update >> rawhide to the latest upstream version first [1]. This

Test gating: missing required test results

When a Bodhi update is gated on required tests that seem to remain “missing” indefinitely, is there anything I can do to re-try them? Or do I just have to attempt to waive the missing test results? https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-014e78ee9d

Re: liburing update

On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 08:07:13AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > io_uring (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Io_uring) is an important > kernel facility, essentially an alternate way of dispatching system > calls more efficiently. It's used in a lot of high performance > situations. Although

Re: Users with commit rights in src.fp.o but no more in packager group

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 05:30:35PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Following my comment in > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2856#comment-812870 I wrote a simple > script to check how many users have commit rights onto some project in > src.fp.o, but aren't (anymore) members of the `packager`

Re: hardened memory allocate port to linux-fedora system for secutiry

On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 07:39:46PM -0700, John Reiser wrote: > On 8/13/22, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 8/13/22, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > > martin luther wrote: > > > > should we implement https://github.com/GrapheneOS/hardened_malloc/ > > > > it is hardened memory allocate it will

Re: Check out the Fedora Packager Dashboard!

Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:43 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki > wrote: > > I'll forget the meaning and the numbers will go back to being visual > > clutter. It would be immensely helpful > > to have some symbolic icons next to the numbers, which would allow to > > easily guess

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] More Ansible license changes

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:32 PM Maxwell G wrote: > > Hi Fedorians, > > I'm back with more ansible license updates. Upstream, some of the community > Ansible Collections have adopted the REUSE specification, which makes it much > easier to determine the overall license. For collections that have

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:25 AM Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 5:09 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:12 AM Alexander Sosedkin > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 4:06 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 6:55 AM Alexander

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 5:09 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:12 AM Alexander Sosedkin > wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 4:06 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 6:55 AM Alexander Sosedkin > > > wrote: > > >> Not a full-blown meeting prompt, > > >>

Re: Confused about what to do about a ticket

Il 26/08/22 16:02, Vít Ondruch ha scritto: > If you included `Resolves: rhbz#2114563` in the changelog, the > automatically created bodhi update would resolve the ticket. Since you > have not done this, then you have to close the ticket yourself and > possibly include the NVR in 'Fixed In Versoin'

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:12 AM Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 4:06 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 6:55 AM Alexander Sosedkin > > wrote: > >> Not a full-blown meeting prompt, > >> but I recall complaining about `fipscheck` missing from ELN

Re: Confused about what to do about a ticket

Thanks for that info, I actually did not know about that particular feature of the changelog. I’ll try to use that from now on. On 26 Aug 2022, at 9:02, Vít Ondruch wrote: > If you included `Resolves: rhbz#2114563` in the changelog, the automatically > created bodhi update would resolve the

Re: Confused about what to do about a ticket

Hi, Usually for Rawhide updates CLOSED RAWHIDE + add NVR into `fixed in version` if only Rawhide fixes that bug (e.g., a new software version), that should be enough. But it seems auto updates can take care of the tickets if you specify the bugs via the `Resolves: rhbz#1234` references as

Re: Confused about what to do about a ticket

Thanks for the info, I did just that. Do you or anyone knows if there is a webpage that describes how to handle Rawhide updates specifically? I haven’t found anything useful about what to do in this particular situation. Ron On 26 Aug 2022, at 9:04, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 26/08/2022 14:48,

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 4:06 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 6:55 AM Alexander Sosedkin > wrote: >> Not a full-blown meeting prompt, >> but I recall complaining about `fipscheck` missing from ELN repositories, >> and IIRC it was blocked on something that time. >> If you could

Re: Let's enable Koschei for all packages automatically

Dne 26. 08. 22 v 15:22 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a): On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 03:58, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello folks, during our Nest FESCo session, we've talked about enabling Koschei [1] for all packages automatically. There seem to be a consensus by FESCo members, that

Re: Confused about what to do about a ticket

On 26/08/2022 14:48, Ron Olson wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2114563 was reported against Swift on Rawhide. I fixed the issue and responded on 8/4 that the Koji build was successful, but I got two additional, presumably automated, notes from Ben Cotton and Miro that

Re: Confused about what to do about a ticket

If you included `Resolves: rhbz#2114563` in the changelog, the automatically created bodhi update would resolve the ticket. Since you have not done this, then you have to close the ticket yourself and possibly include the NVR in 'Fixed In Versoin' field. Vít Dne 26. 08. 22 v 15:48 Ron

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 2:54 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > >ELN SIG on 2022-08-26 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern > >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > > > The meeting will

Confused about what to do about a ticket

Hey all, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2114563 was reported against Swift on Rawhide. I fixed the issue and responded on 8/4 that the Koji build was successful, but I got two additional, presumably automated, notes from Ben Cotton and Miro that suggest something else needs to be

Re: Packages silently dropping approved changes

The policies specifying use of FlexiBLAS[1] are full of MUSTs; you can’t just opt out and reject all prospective PRs out of hand. If someone can get the package working with FlexiBLAS, you should accept a PR. If you think freefem++ needs to be exempt from the requirement, you should open an FPC

Re: Let's enable Koschei for all packages automatically

On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 03:58, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello folks, > > during our Nest FESCo session, we've talked about enabling Koschei [1] for > all > packages automatically. > > There seem to be a consensus by FESCo members, that it would be a good > thing. > > What would it take? > > 1) Koji

Fedora 37 compose report: 20220826.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-37-20220825.n.0 NEW: Fedora-37-20220826.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 3 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:145.67 KiB Size

[Bug 1934532] EPEL8 Request: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934532 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d6bb4559c9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1934532] EPEL8 Request: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934532 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 2116587] perl-Bencode-1.502 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116587 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Bencode-1.502-1.fc38 |perl-Bencode-1.502-1.fc38

[Bug 2102597] Add perl-DBIx-Class to EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102597 Bug 2102597 depends on bug 2102646, which changed state. Bug 2102646 Summary: Add perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch to EPEL 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102646 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2112904] Add perl-Ima-DBI to EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112904 Bug 2112904 depends on bug 2102646, which changed state. Bug 2102646 Summary: Add perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch to EPEL 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102646 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2103389] Please branch and build perl-Monitoring-Plugin in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103389 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2115573] Please build perl-Data-Entropy for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2102685] Add perl-Graph to EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102685 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Graph-0.97.25-3.el9

[Bug 2102659] Add perl-SQL-Translator to EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102659 Bug 2102659 depends on bug 2102685, which changed state. Bug 2102685 Summary: Add perl-Graph to EPEL 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102685 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2102646] Add perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch to EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102646 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch-1

[Bug 2102597] Add perl-DBIx-Class to EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102597 Bug 2102597 depends on bug 2102659, which changed state. Bug 2102659 Summary: Add perl-SQL-Translator to EPEL 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102659 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2102659] Add perl-SQL-Translator to EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102659 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-SQL-Translator-1.62-8.

Re: [Dev] Check out the Fedora Packager Dashboard!

On 8/25/22 03:32, Miro Hrončok wrote: > this is just a reminder that there is a Fedora Packager Dashboard that > you might not know about: > > Go to https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ I randomly discovered this application earlier this year and it saves me so much time. I wish I had

CPE Weekly Update - Week 34 2022

Hi everyone, This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team. The report could be found at https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/ cpe-weekly-update---week-34-2022/. If you want to receive weekly reports by emails in the future, please subscribe to either

Re: Packages in repo not signed: fedora-cisco-openh264 repository

On 26/08/2022 01:28, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Everything should be back to working. Try a 'dnf --refresh...' or a 'dnf clean all'. Yes, the packages are no longer in the update list. So the errors are gone for now. Thanks! It's not fully clear yet some of the events. ;( The person who used to

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220826.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220825.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220826.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 15 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 104 Downgraded packages: 22 Size of added packages: 412.83 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: sqlcipher soname change in rawhide

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 3:12 AM Carl George wrote: > > sqlcipher has been requested to be built in epel9 [0]. Rather than > branching it from the current rawhide version, I plan to update > rawhide to the latest upstream version first [1]. This involves an > soname change from

GTK 2 removal from RHEL 10+

Hi everyone, This is an early heads-up about GTK 2 removal from RHEL 10+ (the gtk2 package was marked as unwanted in ELN with https://github.com/minimization/content-resolver-input/commit/b6d44e496f46bd2444e8e24dd3e9113b326817ac). The toolkit served us gratefully, but it starts to show its age

Re: libpq-devel and postgresql-private-devel providing conflicting libpq.so symlink

filed "postgresql-private-devel conflicts with libpq-devel over pkgconfig(libpq), blocks rebuild of LibreOffice flatpak" ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: F37 proposal: Supplement of Server distributables by a KVM VM disk image (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Hi, I tried to use the image, and I have a small suggestion: please add links to where the resulting images can be found to the Change page. W/o that it's entirely non-obvious where to look for it. Zbyszek On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 03:28:21PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: >

[Bug 2051034] Removal of gethostbyname2 breaks Shorewall6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051034 Michele Baldessari changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE

Re: Packages silently dropping approved changes

On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 at 00:44, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > > > Am 25.08.22 um 23:00 schrieb Iñaki Ucar: > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 19:15, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 18:34, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > >>> > >>> Am 25.08.22 um 13:19 schrieb Iñaki Ucar: > >>> > I assume their

Re: Let's enable Koschei for all packages automatically

Dne 25. 08. 22 v 16:38 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 4:34 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 15:58:12 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: Yeah that should be pretty simple. Get list of source packages in $release, paste it into the "Add packages" page, set release

Re: how to update rpms/vile?

thanks - I'll use this information ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List

[Bug 2115572] Please build perl-Number-Bytes-Human for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115572 --- Comment #6 from Robert Scheck --- Feel free to follow up the "non-responsive maintainer policy". Personally, I only care about the EPEL part of this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.