OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221013.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221014.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:9
Upgraded packages: 95
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.15 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 11-10-2022 22:22, Sandro wrote:
On 11-10-2022 16:20, Ben Beasley wrote:
This is the classic issue where the “un-built” package gets imported
instead of the “built” one in the buildroot that you are trying to test.
I had some luck executing the tests, but ran into a BLAS linking issue
that I
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022, at 3:08 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OstreeNativeContainerStable
I know there's a lot going on here, so I put together
https://github.com/cgwalters/dnfimage-config
as a demonstration system to show this all works today. (Though there's a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134967
Bug ID: 2134967
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-9.28 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Rebuilds are done except for blender and openshadinglanguage
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 09:34:33PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 9:23 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 09:10:48PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 8:57 PM Richard W.M. Jones
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It
There has been a schedule update to the epel8 modularity removal.
October 31, 2022
- The updated epel-release will be pushed to epel8 stable
-- This sets "enabled = 0" for epel-modular, if you haven't already changed
your config.
February 15, 2023
- The EPEL 8 modules will be archived and
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 18:28:01 +0200,
Simo Sorce wrote:
> At this time, as far as I know, there is no OpenPGP work of any kind on
> supporting PQC algorithms.
The German BSI contracted MTG AG to design and implement PQC for
OpenPGP. They presented their work at IETF 113, and at the OpenPGP
email
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_image_for_aarch64
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_image_for_aarch64
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
On 22/10/06, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecatePythonToml
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 9:23 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 09:10:48PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 8:57 PM Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > It looks like "fedpkg update" in Fedora 37 requires you to copy some
> > > string
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. abrt — Abrt does not report a segfault which is reported in
journalctl. — ON_QA
ACTION: QA to verify FEDORA-2022-7cf3cad7c7
2. glibc — glibc 2.36+ breaks EAC with removal of DT_HASH (and other
game libraries), making
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 09:10:48PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 8:57 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >
> > It looks like "fedpkg update" in Fedora 37 requires you to copy some
> > string into a browser. I'm pretty sure it used to use Kerberos or ssh
> >
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 8:57 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> It looks like "fedpkg update" in Fedora 37 requires you to copy some
> string into a browser. I'm pretty sure it used to use Kerberos or ssh
> authentication which was somewhat more sensible.
>
> I've got a bunch of scripts that now
It looks like "fedpkg update" in Fedora 37 requires you to copy some
string into a browser. I'm pretty sure it used to use Kerberos or ssh
authentication which was somewhat more sensible.
I've got a bunch of scripts that now require manual interaction and a
browser. How do I make this work
On Fri, 2022-10-14 at 10:14 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 10/13/22 15:14, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 4:24 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/13/22 10:53, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 3:29 AM Panu Matilainen
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
f37-build-side-59395 has been created and OIIO has been built.
Thanks,
Richard
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi,
I have released libxc 6.0.0 today, and intend to update the package in Fedora as
well. As a major release update, the soversion will change; however, the changes
in the API should not affect any dependent packages so simple rebuilds will
suffice.
The list of dependent packages is
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 4:29 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> The current Fedora Rawhide kernels are too slow to run libguestfs
> tests when doing Koji builds. These run in a qemu VM, running the
> Rawhide kernel, emulated using software virtualization (ie. TCG).
> They now time out because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134212
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Ok, the status quo works for me as well. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134212
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134185
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-79189ab269 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
OLD: Fedora-37-20221013.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20221014.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 190
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Fri, 2022-10-14 at 03:39 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have generated a new 20-character random password with "pwgen -s 20
> 1",
please try `pwgen -s 20 1 -cny`
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list --
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c5646c5693
apptainer-1.1.2-1.el9
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs-2.39-1.el9
On 10/11/22 23:36, Zamir SUN wrote:
Hi,
I'm updating libtraceevent, libtracefs to newer versions and rebuilding
the dependencies libtracecmd, trace-cmd, kernelshark. This caused soname
bump as the following
libtraceevent.so to 1.6.3
libtracefs.so to 1.5.0
And also the following from
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> I have generated a new 20-character random password with "pwgen -s 20 1",
See how easy that was. And your using random passcodes tells me that
you keep them in a password manager, which means that you don't need to
type the passcode, so you have no need to limit
Hi Kevin,
I've created the issue https://pagure.io/koji/issue/3554 for the problem.
I agree with docs update (maybe it would be nice as well mention the
side tag disappears once the packages are in stable, so users don't have
to try removing it :) ) and the script update (adding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134185
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134212
--- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth ---
OK, we'll use 1. until the major version number gets bumped to more than 1.
Something similar is done in the perl-Test-Differences package, for the same
reason:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134723
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134723
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
W dniu 14.10.2022 o 03:39, Kevin Kofler via devel pisze:
today, Red Hat Bugzilla forced me to change my password because
apparently a password of 9 random alphanumeric+symbol characters (1
symbol, 8 mixed-case alphanumeric) is suddenly no longer considered
secure enough. This is absolutely
V Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 03:39:32AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel napsal(a):
> today, Red Hat Bugzilla forced me to change my password because apparently a
> password of 9 random alphanumeric+symbol characters (1 symbol, 8 mixed-case
> alphanumeric) is suddenly no longer considered secure enough.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 09:24:05AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 13. 10. 22 v 14:41 Kevin Kofler via devel napsal(a):
> > At least allow the opt-out per maintainer.
> >
> > I would suggest to add the permanent opt-out checkbox, mark it "(BETA)", and
> > then evaluate how many maintainers
On 14-10-2022 03:39, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
It is not like that password is for
a bank account or for a build system (I believe FAS and thus Koji actually
has less stringent password security requirements than that!), so how secure
does the password really have to be?
You basically
Hello maintainers!
I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock v3.2.
The -–list-chroots option is now faster, directories in /var/cached and /var/lib
dropped SGID bit, rpmbuild --noclean (cleanup_on_success=False) is not used
while building for EL6 chroots. See full release
Dne 13. 10. 22 v 16:24 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
Would you be willing to pay for that feature?
BTW I have been seriously probing for some time whether people would be willing to pay for private repositories. And
this is my first time mentioning it in public space :)
Miroslav
Dne 13. 10. 22 v 17:18 PGNet Dev napsal(a):
Another option is to get the containerized COPR efforts polished & available. Then, any/all could spin them up easily
(aka, far easier than now), and deploy locally, &/or make available ...
and, charge some reasonable fee for those downloads.
Dne 13. 10. 22 v 14:41 Kevin Kofler via devel napsal(a):
At least allow the opt-out per maintainer.
I would suggest to add the permanent opt-out checkbox, mark it "(BETA)", and
then evaluate how many maintainers actually check that checkbox and how much
resource usage is actually caused by it.
Dne 13. 10. 22 v 15:27 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
The problem is that they HAVE been running out of disk space quite regularly. This is not a new problem as COPR has
bounced off of zero storage over time as various 'newer' hardware is moved over for their usage. Currently, the
storage they are
On 10/13/22 15:14, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 4:24 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 10/13/22 10:53, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 3:29 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 10/13/22 07:18, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
For the last 20 years or so, RPM has used a home-grown
Dne 13. 10. 22 v 17:06 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
Considering services like packagecloud.io and others exist and do
manage to make money storing repositories and builds, I think it's
pretty workable for COPR too. It would require some advertising and
such to get it out there, but it'd be workable.
On 10/13/22 17:31, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 9:58 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
Neal Gompa wrote:
No, because when you do things like mirror repositories (especially
for private mirrors), that signature is the only way to verify the
integrity. HTTPS is only transport
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134723
Bug ID: 2134723
Summary: perl-MCE-1.881 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-MCE
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 2022-10-12 07:14, Ben Beasley wrote:
Since we are in the final freeze for F37, and the update breaks ABI (and API),
the Updates Policy for stable releases applies, and an exception request would
need to be submitted and approved first.
On 10/13/22 19:35, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On 10/13/22 04:23, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 10/13/22 10:53, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 3:29 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 10/13/22 07:18, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
For the last 20 years or so, RPM has used a home-grown OpenPGP
47 matches
Mail list logo
