ELN build failures

If there is a build failure for a package on ELN, does anything need to be added to a package spec file? Currently reviewing a package where there is a missing dependency, but helpful to also know if anything should be done in general. The documentation at [0] is not clear on this. Unclear

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

Ian Laurie wrote: > On 11/2/22 04:22, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > I've just pushed the updates for OpenSSL fixing 2 CVEs evaluated as HIGH. > Could you please check the freshly pushed builds to get necessary karma > ASAP? > > Are we not fixing Fedora 35? 

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On 11/2/22 04:22, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: Dear colleagues, I've just pushed the updates for OpenSSL fixing 2 CVEs evaluated as HIGH. Could you please check the freshly pushed builds to get necessary karma ASAP?

Re: systemd 252 feature: SUPPORT_END in /etc/os-release

Cosign. We'd definitely want to set it to the "EOL date if we hit the early target" so that way we're never EOL less than we say. I do like the idea of updating it when the EOL date moves out, but if that gets forgotten it's not a big deal. I'm happy to make this the Fedora Program Manager's

Re: systemd 252 feature: SUPPORT_END in /etc/os-release

On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 07:02:33PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > See: > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-October/048519.html > >Systemd will set the taint flag 'support-ended' if it detects that >the OS image is past its end-of-support date. This date is

Re: systemd 252 feature: SUPPORT_END in /etc/os-release

Matthew Miller writes: > See: > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-October/048519.html > >Systemd will set the taint flag 'support-ended' if it detects that >the OS image is past its end-of-support date. This date is declared >in a new /etc/os-release field

Re: systemd 252 feature: SUPPORT_END in /etc/os-release

On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 7:09 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > See: > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-October/048519.html > >Systemd will set the taint flag 'support-ended' if it detects that >the OS image is past its end-of-support date. This date is declared >

systemd 252 feature: SUPPORT_END in /etc/os-release

See: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-October/048519.html Systemd will set the taint flag 'support-ended' if it detects that the OS image is past its end-of-support date. This date is declared in a new /etc/os-release field SUPPORT_END= described below.

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 02:55:34PM -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > On 11/1/22 11:16 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > That said, the packages *are* signed in Koji, because as soon as it's > > submitted to Bodhi, the packages are signed in-place in Koji. > > Is that really in-place? Bodhi says these are

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On 01/11/2022 19:16, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: Still, what would it take to push them to testing right away? 24 hours. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 01/11/2022 17:16, Ben Beasley wrote: In fact, I think the new NodeJS guidelines are effectively unusable, because people then point out bundled fonts, web assets and minified sources not built from their original sources, and other issues in the prescribed pile of bundled dependencies.

[EPEL-devel] Re: Are there any plans to rebuild ClamAV in EPEL7 following CVE-2022-37434?

On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 10:50 +, Nick Howitt via epel-devel wrote: >  Yesterday, ClamAV announced CVE-2022-37434 as critical > (https://blog.clamav.net/2022/10/new-packages-for-clamav-01037-01044. > html). Redhat only seem to classify the issue as Moderate in EL7 - >

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On 11/1/22 11:16 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > That said, the packages *are* signed in Koji, because as soon as it's > submitted to Bodhi, the packages are signed in-place in Koji. Is that really in-place? Bodhi says these are signed, but when I download from koji, "rpm -qip" still shows "Signature:

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Prioritized bugs and issues

On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 6:00 AM wrote: > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Prioritized bugs and issues on 2022-11-02 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 > America/Indiana/Indianapolis >At fedora-meetin...@irc.libera.chat > > More information available at: >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Are there any plans to rebuild ClamAV in EPEL7 following CVE-2022-37434?

On 01/11/2022 18:36, Stephen Smoogen wrote: On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 at 13:44, Nick Howitt via epel-devel > wrote: On 01/11/2022 15:46, Tuomo Soini wrote: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 10:50:02 + > Nick Howitt via epel-devel

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 at 14:18, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > On 11/1/22 13:59, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 6:53 PM Demi Marie Obenour > wrote: > >> > >> On 11/1/22 13:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden > writes: > >>> > Right now you

Re: musings on rust packaging [was Re: F38 proposal: RPM Sequoia (System-Wide Change proposal)]

Matthew Miller wrote: > Rust tends to be more fine-grained. I don't think this is necessarily > rust-specific _really_ — I think it's a trend as people get more used to > this way of doing things. And this is inherently a PITA to package, unfortunately. It is indeed not Rust-specific, other new

[EPEL-devel] Re: Are there any plans to rebuild ClamAV in EPEL7 following CVE-2022-37434?

On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 at 13:44, Nick Howitt via epel-devel < epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > On 01/11/2022 15:46, Tuomo Soini wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 10:50:02 + > > Nick Howitt via epel-devel wrote: > > > >> Yesterday, ClamAV announced CVE-2022-37434 as critical > >> ( >

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

Just tested and added karma to f36 and f37. Thanks! On 01/11/2022 18:22, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: Dear colleagues, I've just pushed the updates for OpenSSL fixing 2 CVEs evaluated as HIGH. Could you please check the freshly pushed builds to get necessary karma ASAP? Many thanks! -- Dmitry

Re: musings on rust packaging [was Re: F38 proposal: RPM Sequoia (System-Wide Change proposal)]

On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 7:07 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 11/1/22 10:40, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:04:39PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> For intra-project dependencies (i.e. bevy components depending on > >> exact versions of bevy components), this is kind of

Re: musings on rust packaging [was Re: F38 proposal: RPM Sequoia (System-Wide Change proposal)]

Hi all, Just a note that over the summer, our intern did a project to try and address some of these issues (namely, that while it's trivial to convert a single crate to an RPM, trying to automate packaging all the dependencies and making sure that you don't break anything else while doing so is

Re: musings on rust packaging [was Re: F38 proposal: RPM Sequoia (System-Wide Change proposal)]

On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 3:40 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:04:39PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > I'll respond inline. > > Me too -- and apologies for the delay. > > > > > I fundamentally disagree with Kevin on a deep level about "entirely > > > useless", but ... find

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 6:17 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 11/1/22 13:59, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 6:53 PM Demi Marie Obenour > > wrote: > >> > >> On 11/1/22 13:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden > writes: > >>> >

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 5:53 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 11/1/22 13:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >> Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden writes: > > > >> Right now you can't test them since they haven't been migrated to > >> testing yet. > > > > You can download the packages directly from

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 1:53 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 11/1/22 13:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >> Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden writes: > > > >> Right now you can't test them since they haven't been migrated to > >> testing yet. > > > > You can download the packages directly from

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On 11/1/22 13:59, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 6:53 PM Demi Marie Obenour > wrote: >> >> On 11/1/22 13:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden writes: >>> Right now you can't test them since they haven't been migrated to testing yet. >>>

Re: musings on rust packaging [was Re: F38 proposal: RPM Sequoia (System-Wide Change proposal)]

On 11/1/22 10:40, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:04:39PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: >> I'll respond inline. > > Me too -- and apologies for the delay. > > >>> I fundamentally disagree with Kevin on a deep level about "entirely >>> useless", but ... find myself kind of

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 6:53 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 11/1/22 13:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >> Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden writes: > > > >> Right now you can't test them since they haven't been migrated to > >> testing yet. > > > > You can download the packages directly from

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On 11/1/22 13:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden writes: > >> Right now you can't test them since they haven't been migrated to >> testing yet. > > You can download the packages directly from koji. From the relevant > update page, you can clock the "Builds" tab

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 12:30:31PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden writes: Right now you can't test them since they haven't been migrated to testing yet. You can download the packages directly from koji. From the relevant update page, you can clock the

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

Dear Peter, On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 6:44 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > > I've just pushed the updates for OpenSSL fixing 2 CVEs evaluated as > HIGH. Could you please check the freshly pushed builds to get necessary > karma ASAP? > > Is there a reason we're note rebasing to 3.0.7 or

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

Hi Dmitry, > I've just pushed the updates for OpenSSL fixing 2 CVEs evaluated as HIGH. > Could you please check the freshly pushed builds to get necessary karma ASAP? Is there a reason we're note rebasing to 3.0.7 or generally updating in Fedora with 3.x? It looks like 3.0.6 had CVE-2022-3358

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

> Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden writes: > Right now you can't test them since they haven't been migrated to > testing yet. You can download the packages directly from koji. From the relevant update page, you can clock the "Builds" tab which will give you a link. You can down exactly the

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

Karma given On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 6:23 PM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > I've just pushed the updates for OpenSSL fixing 2 CVEs evaluated as HIGH. > Could you please check the freshly pushed builds to get necessary karma ASAP? > > Many thanks! > > -- > Dmitry Belyavskiy >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Are there any plans to rebuild ClamAV in EPEL7 following CVE-2022-37434?

On 01/11/2022 15:46, Tuomo Soini wrote: On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 10:50:02 + Nick Howitt via epel-devel wrote: Yesterday, ClamAV announced CVE-2022-37434 as critical (https://blog.clamav.net/2022/10/new-packages-for-clamav-01037-01044.html). Redhat only seem to classify the issue as Moderate

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 06:22:27PM +0100, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: Dear colleagues, I've just pushed the updates for OpenSSL fixing 2 CVEs evaluated as HIGH. Could you please check the freshly pushed builds to get necessary karma ASAP? Many thanks! These would be:

[Bug 2138492] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138492 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-84c675319d has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

Karma for OpenSSL needed

Dear colleagues, I've just pushed the updates for OpenSSL fixing 2 CVEs evaluated as HIGH. Could you please check the freshly pushed builds to get necessary karma ASAP? Many thanks! -- Dmitry Belyavskiy ___ devel mailing list --

CalcMySky soname bump

The latest Stellarium needs the latest CalcMySky, and for this release CalcMySky has reworked their soname scheme. Stellarium is the only user but heads up anyway. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing cekit-4.4.0-1.el7 centpkg-0.6.8-1.el7 scitokens-cpp-0.7.3-1.el7 Details about builds: cekit-4.4.0-1.el7

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

I don’t think the change in NodeJS guidelines was a success, but a cautionary tale. In fact, I think the new NodeJS guidelines are effectively unusable, because people then point out bundled fonts, web assets and minified sources not built from their original sources, and other issues in the

[Bug 2137401] perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137401 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.19-1.f |perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.19-1.f

[Bug 2138492] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138492 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-1ee607d850 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2022-11-02 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #topic aloha

[Bug 2137401] perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137401 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[EPEL-devel] Re: Are there any plans to rebuild ClamAV in EPEL7 following CVE-2022-37434?

On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 10:50:02 + Nick Howitt via epel-devel wrote: > Yesterday, ClamAV announced CVE-2022-37434 as critical > (https://blog.clamav.net/2022/10/new-packages-for-clamav-01037-01044.html). > Redhat only seem to classify the issue as Moderate in EL7 - >

Re: %set_build_flags, clang/flang-new and FC/FCFLAGS

On 10/31/22 20:35, Orion Poplawski wrote: While poking at building openmpi with clang, I started wondering about flang and some things: * Should %set_build_flags set FC?  I think it should since it sets FCFLAGS. * Is flang-new even worth bothering with?  See the following configure check:

Re: Could we have Portmaster (an open source application firewall)?

On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 10:26 AM Ben Beasley wrote: > I haven’t looked deeply into Portmaster, but in general: > To add to Ben's nice summary, I'm potentially interested but TBH I have two $DAYJOBS and have never packaged a GO project to date. Hopefully someone else will chime in? Thanks,

Re: Could we have Portmaster (an open source application firewall)?

I haven’t looked deeply into Portmaster, but in general: - Getting something into Fedora requires an interested volunteer to do the work, or, more rarely, someone’s job to pay them do package maintenance. - We can’t just redistribute the upstream RPM. For a number of good reasons, Fedora

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fac3491880 xerces-c-3.2.3-5.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing arm-none-eabi-gcc-cs-12.2.0-4.el8

[Bug 2139135] New: Upgrade perl-Email-MIME-Encodings to 1.316

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139135 Bug ID: 2139135 Summary: Upgrade perl-Email-MIME-Encodings to 1.316 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Email-MIME-Encodings Status: NEW

[Bug 2139134] New: Upgrade perl-Email-MessageID to 1.407

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139134 Bug ID: 2139134 Summary: Upgrade perl-Email-MessageID to 1.407 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Email-MessageID Status: NEW

[Bug 2139132] New: Upgrade perl-Email-Date-Format to 1.006

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139132 Bug ID: 2139132 Summary: Upgrade perl-Email-Date-Format to 1.006 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Email-Date-Format Status: NEW

[Bug 2138561] perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.95 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138561 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2138492] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138492 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 2139129] New: perl-HTML-Parser-3.80 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139129 Bug ID: 2139129 Summary: perl-HTML-Parser-3.80 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-HTML-Parser Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: musings on rust packaging [was Re: F38 proposal: RPM Sequoia (System-Wide Change proposal)]

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:04:39PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > I'll respond inline. Me too -- and apologies for the delay. > > I fundamentally disagree with Kevin on a deep level about "entirely > > useless", but ... find myself kind of agreeing about the "unpackagable" > > part. I mean:

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL2RHEL - New Wording? - New Workflow?

On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 10:55 AM Davide Cavalca via epel-devel < epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 12:12 -0500, Maxwell G via epel-devel wrote: > > I think this whole process should be automated. File bugs that say > > "Heads up: > > your package will be

Re: Advice on packaging Python with Rust dependency

On 01. 11. 22 14:01, Ondrej Pohorelsky wrote: Hi, I'm a package maintainer of Breezy [0] in Fedora. Recently in the newest version (3.3.0), which I'm trying to update to, upstream started requiring python-setuptools-rust as a BuildRequire, because they are shipping rio-py package [1]. This is

Re: miniz-3.0.0 brings a SONAME bump

V Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 01:07:55PM +0100, Petr Pisar napsal(a): > V Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 11:04:20AM +, Paul Howarth napsal(a): > > On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:40:45 +0100 > > Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > just a notification that miniz-3.0.0 will bump libminiz.so.0.2 SONAME > > >

Re: F38 proposal: Ostree Native Container (Phase 2, stable) (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022, at 5:14 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 09:00:40AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: >> Two things: >> >> - This proposal is explicitly trying to tie everything together. I think >> without the "bigger picture", it's actually *more* confusing. For example,

Advice on packaging Python with Rust dependency

Hi, I'm a package maintainer of Breezy [0] in Fedora. Recently in the newest version (3.3.0), which I'm trying to update to, upstream started requiring python-setuptools-rust as a BuildRequire, because they are shipping rio-py package [1]. This is a simple rust input output library, which

Fedora 37 compose report: 20221101.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-37-20221031.n.0 NEW: Fedora-37-20221101.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 11/1/22 07:38, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Daan De Meyer via devel wrote on Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 11:26:13AM -: >> I've added a new section to the proposal with the benchmark results of >> some benchmarks we performed against a Fedora 37 system built with >> frame pointers and a regular

[EPEL-devel] Re: Are there any plans to rebuild ClamAV in EPEL7 following CVE-2022-37434?

On 01/11/2022 11:57, Stephen Smoogen wrote: On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 at 07:48, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Tue, 1 Nov 2022, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 at 06:59, Nick Howitt via epel-devel < > epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> Yesterday,

Re: miniz-3.0.0 brings a SONAME bump

V Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 11:04:20AM +, Paul Howarth napsal(a): > On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:40:45 +0100 > Petr Pisar wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > just a notification that miniz-3.0.0 will bump libminiz.so.0.2 SONAME > > in Fedora 38. As far as I know there is no other package depending on > > it. >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Are there any plans to rebuild ClamAV in EPEL7 following CVE-2022-37434?

On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 at 07:48, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2022, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 at 06:59, Nick Howitt via epel-devel < > > epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > >> Yesterday, ClamAV announced CVE-2022-37434 as critical ( > >> >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Are there any plans to rebuild ClamAV in EPEL7 following CVE-2022-37434?

On Tue, 1 Nov 2022, Stephen Smoogen wrote: On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 at 06:59, Nick Howitt via epel-devel < epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: Yesterday, ClamAV announced CVE-2022-37434 as critical ( https://blog.clamav.net/2022/10/new-packages-for-clamav-01037-01044.html). Redhat only seem

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

Daan De Meyer via devel wrote on Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 11:26:13AM -: > I've added a new section to the proposal with the benchmark results of > some benchmarks we performed against a Fedora 37 system built with > frame pointers and a regular Fedora 37 system. The impact on most > benchmarks

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20221101.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221031.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221101.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:7 Upgraded packages: 57 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 3.75 MiB Size of dropped packages:2.54

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

I've added a new section to the proposal with the benchmark results of some benchmarks we performed against a Fedora 37 system built with frame pointers and a regular Fedora 37 system. The impact on most benchmarks seems limited aside from the CPython benchmark suite (pyperformance). See the

[EPEL-devel] Re: Are there any plans to rebuild ClamAV in EPEL7 following CVE-2022-37434?

On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 at 06:59, Nick Howitt via epel-devel < epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Yesterday, ClamAV announced CVE-2022-37434 as critical ( > https://blog.clamav.net/2022/10/new-packages-for-clamav-01037-01044.html). > Redhat only seem to classify the issue as Moderate in EL7

Re: miniz-3.0.0 brings a SONAME bump

On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:40:45 +0100 Petr Pisar wrote: > Hello, > > just a notification that miniz-3.0.0 will bump libminiz.so.0.2 SONAME > in Fedora 38. As far as I know there is no other package depending on > it. It's used at least by perl-Sereal-{De,En}coder: $ rpm -qp --requires

Non-Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-11-01)

There are no topics to be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. Hence I decided to cancel it. I will chair the next meeting. = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = #2882 Change: PostgreSQL 15 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2882 APPROVED

[EPEL-devel] Are there any plans to rebuild ClamAV in EPEL7 following CVE-2022-37434?

Yesterday, ClamAV announced CVE-2022-37434 as critical (https://blog.clamav.net/2022/10/new-packages-for-clamav-01037-01044.html). Redhat only seem to classify the issue as Moderate in EL7 - https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2022-37434. It looks like that, unless Redhat classify it as

[rpms/perl-PDF-Reuse] PR #1: Package tests

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-PDF-Reuse` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Package tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PDF-Reuse/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Could we have Portmaster (an open source application firewall)?

https://github.com/safing/portmaster it is a firewall app with nice gui just like glasswire but it is opensource with some vpn features also hence it can be included they provide a .rpm app so it can easily published in fedora repo

miniz-3.0.0 brings a SONAME bump

Hello, just a notification that miniz-3.0.0 will bump libminiz.so.0.2 SONAME in Fedora 38. As far as I know there is no other package depending on it. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-PDF-Reuse] PR #1: Package tests

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-PDF-Reuse` that you are following: `` Package tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PDF-Reuse/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: libxml2-2.10.3-1.fc36 breaks (part of) GraphicsMagick

V Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 05:31:08PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): > Michael J Gruber wrote on 2022/10/29 5:19: > > With this libxml2 update: > > ``` > > gm convert -list format > > ... > > gm convert: Unable to load module > > ("/usr/lib64/GraphicsMagick-1.3.38/modules-Q16/coders/url.la: file not

Re: libxml2-2.10.3-1.fc36 breaks (part of) GraphicsMagick

Michael J Gruber wrote on 2022/10/29 5:19: With this libxml2 update: ``` gm convert -list format ... gm convert: Unable to load module ("/usr/lib64/GraphicsMagick-1.3.38/modules-Q16/coders/url.la: file not found") ``` In fact, `url.so` is there but cannot be dlopen'ed. This works after

Re: ailed to install packages: Cannot download Packages/v/vim-minimal-9.0.412-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm: All mirrors were tried; Last error: Status code: 404 for http://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/fedora/li

V Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 12:14:11AM -, Reon Beon via devel napsal(a): > ailed to install packages: Cannot download > Packages/v/vim-minimal-9.0.412-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm: All mirrors were tried; > Last error: Status code: 404 for >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 31/10/2022 16:45, Kalev Lember wrote: Right now when someone mentions that something was rewritten in rust, that sounds a lot like a death sentence for the Fedora package. Yes it is. I don't think it should be like that; and I'd like to fix that. Me to. That's why we need to drop all

Re: FontAwesome 6

On 31/10/2022 19:23, Jerry James wrote: Hi all, One hurdle is that the current fontawesome-fonts maintainer doesn't seem to have time to work on the package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857488#c9. I'm willing to help out with that, but would prefer to see somebody with more