Update: Porting to Modern C

I'm still in the process of setting thigs up. I've created a wiki page separately from the change proposal that documents some project procedures: It has some instructions how to test things locally. Thanks to Kevin's help, we

[Bug 2143423] Please branch and build perl-Net-Pcap in epel9.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143423 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

Re: metadata of updateinfo.xml

> Is there any guide that explains fields of the updateinfo.xml files > which are generated in repositories? I very much wish there was, but alas, no. Pretty much everything to do with rpm metadata is effectively implementation-defined, and the implementations are all different, especially

Re: SPDX Statistics

Miroslav Suchý wrote: > abattis-cantarell-fonts warning: not valid as calaway nor as SPDX, please > check The name Callaway has 2 'l's in it. Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f2840cccbe ntfs-3g-2022.10.3-1.el9 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing glances-3.3.0.4-1.el9 qvge-0.6.3-1.el9

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-15e4c3606e ntfs-3g-2022.10.3-1.el8 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-be3947859f heimdal-7.7.1-1.el8 The following builds have

[Bug 2130616] Please branch and build perl-Inline-C in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130616 Bug 2130616 depends on bug 2130625, which changed state. Bug 2130625 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Inline in epel9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130625 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2130625] Please branch and build perl-Inline in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130625 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

Re: FF 107.0 scratch builds - just for fun

On 11/20/22 17:40, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 17:22 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: >> On 11/20/22 07:24, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: >>> Now that nss 3.85 has been built, I thought I'd have a go at building >>> FF 107.0, given that's been out for a few days and original builds

Re: FF 107.0 scratch builds - just for fun

On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 17:22 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > On 11/20/22 07:24, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: > > Now that nss 3.85 has been built, I thought I'd have a go at building > > FF 107.0, given that's been out for a few days and original builds > > failed in koji, because nss was too

Re: FF 107.0 scratch builds - just for fun

On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 5:23 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 11/20/22 07:24, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: > > Now that nss 3.85 has been built, I thought I'd have a go at building > > FF 107.0, given that's been out for a few days and original builds > > failed in koji, because nss was too

Re: FF 107.0 scratch builds - just for fun

On 11/20/22 07:24, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: > Now that nss 3.85 has been built, I thought I'd have a go at building > FF 107.0, given that's been out for a few days and original builds > failed in koji, because nss was too old at the time. Has switching to bundled NSS been considered? For

[Bug 2144345] New: perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07050 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144345 Bug ID: 2144345 Summary: perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07050 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader

Re: FF 107.0 scratch builds - just for fun

Everything except F38 completed fine. -- Bojan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: SPDX Statistics

Am 20.11.22 um 17:38 schrieb Miroslav Suchý: Dne 19. 11. 22 v 12:37 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): On 18. 11. 22 15:09, Miroslav Suchý wrote: |Fun fact: the script with the checks runs on my notebook for 32 hours.| That sounds pretty bad. What is the biggest bottleneck? Do you clone the

Re: SPDX Statistics

Dne 19. 11. 22 v 12:37 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): On 18. 11. 22 15:09, Miroslav Suchý wrote: |Fun fact: the script with the checks runs on my notebook for 32 hours.| That sounds pretty bad. What is the biggest bottleneck? Do you clone the repositories from dist-git, or use

Re: metadata of updateinfo.xml

Il 20/11/22 11:05, Neal Gompa ha scritto: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 4:32 AM Mattia Verga via devel > [](mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org) > wrote: > >> Is there any guide that explains fields of the updateinfo.xml files >> which are generated in repositories? >> >> I'm trying to figure out >>

[Bug 2144291] New: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20221120 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144291 Bug ID: 2144291 Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20221120 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Module-CoreList Keywords:

[Bug 2144280] New: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20221120 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144280 Bug ID: 2144280 Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20221120 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases Keywords:

FF 107.0 scratch builds - just for fun

Now that nss 3.85 has been built, I thought I'd have a go at building FF 107.0, given that's been out for a few days and original builds failed in koji, because nss was too old at the time. No idea how this is going to end up, but the tasks for F3{8,7,6,5} are here, if anyone is interested:

Re: metadata of updateinfo.xml

On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 4:32 AM Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > Is there any guide that explains fields of the updateinfo.xml files > which are generated in repositories? > > I'm trying to figure out > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/2487 and I think we > currently have weird data

metadata of updateinfo.xml

Is there any guide that explains fields of the updateinfo.xml files which are generated in repositories? I'm trying to figure out https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/2487 and I think we currently have weird data in updates. For example, looking to the 'issued' and 'modified' dates of few