Re: Mystery fedpkg srpm failure

On 12/1/22 23:18, Aleksei Bavshin wrote: On 12/1/22 22:28, Florian Weimer wrote: I don't see what spec file aspect is causing this failure: $ fedpkg clone -a cups-bjnp Cloning into 'cups-bjnp'... remote: Enumerating objects: 278, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (278/278), done. remote:

Re: Mystery fedpkg srpm failure

On 12/1/22 22:28, Florian Weimer wrote: I don't see what spec file aspect is causing this failure: $ fedpkg clone -a cups-bjnp Cloning into 'cups-bjnp'... remote: Enumerating objects: 278, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (278/278), done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (222/222), done.

Re: Mystery fedpkg srpm failure

Hi, Florian Weimer wrote: > I don't see what spec file aspect is causing this failure: > > $ fedpkg clone -a cups-bjnp > Cloning into 'cups-bjnp'... > remote: Enumerating objects: 278, done. > remote: Counting objects: 100% (278/278), done. > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (222/222), done. >

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

- rpms/ruby-ncurses Taken - rpms/ucx Taken ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: OpenCOLLADA dead upstream

On 2022-11-30 17:55, Richard Shaw wrote: So it looks like the last commit was in 2018: https://github.com/KhronosGroup/OpenCOLLADA Before we go ripping it out of Fedora, is anyone aware of another active upstream we can port to? A fork version is available on

Mystery fedpkg srpm failure

I don't see what spec file aspect is causing this failure: $ fedpkg clone -a cups-bjnp Cloning into 'cups-bjnp'... remote: Enumerating objects: 278, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (278/278), done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (222/222), done. remote: Total 278 (delta 112), reused 96

[Bug 2150184] perl-Net-Server-2.012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150184 --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Net-Server-2.012-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94818804 -- You are

[Bug 2150184] perl-Net-Server-2.012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150184 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Net-Server-2.011 is|perl-Net-Server-2.012 is

[Bug 2150184] perl-Net-Server-2.012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150184 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1929244 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1929244=edit Update to 2.012 (#2150184) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

Re: Openvdb 10.0.1 failed on ppc64 architecture

On 2022-12-01 17:51, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Hello team, openvdb only failed on ppc64 architecture due to this error: -- [ 75%] Building CXX object openvdb/openvdb/CMakeFiles/openvdb_static.dir/instantiations/Composite.cc.o cd

[Bug 2150184] perl-Net-Server-2.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150184 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Net-Server-2.011-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94814788 -- You are

[Bug 2150184] perl-Net-Server-2.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150184 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1929231 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1929231=edit Update to 2.011 (#2150184) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 2150184] New: perl-Net-Server-2.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150184 Bug ID: 2150184 Summary: perl-Net-Server-2.011 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-Server Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Openvdb 10.0.1 failed on ppc64 architecture

Hello team, openvdb only failed on ppc64 architecture due to this error: -- [ 75%] Building CXX object openvdb/openvdb/CMakeFiles/openvdb_static.dir/instantiations/Composite.cc.o cd /builddir/build/BUILD/openvdb-10.0.1/redhat-linux-build/openvdb/openvdb && /usr/bin/g++

Re: Need help with disappeared update from repository

On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 04:51:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 13:21 +0800, yanq...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > It seems update fcitx5-qt-5.0.16-2.fc37 from [1] somehow did not make > > it to stable repository while other package in same update did. This >

Re: Self Introduction: Gary Mann

Hello Gary, And welcome aboard! On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 6:17 PM Gary Mann wrote: > > […] > > My goal here is to contribute to Fedora/Redhat by > becoming a package maintainer. I've noticed that the 'mylvmbackup' > package is a simple package that currently has been retired in EL8 > that could

Re: [HEADS UP] gpgme rebase to 1.17.1 and libqgpgme SONAME bump

On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 13:59 +0100, Jiri Kucera wrote: > Thanks for the reminder Petr. I will do the rebase in rawhide only then. Thanks for taking care of these dependencies and announcing the bump. For extra bonus points :D, if it's not too much trouble, it would be great if you could do this

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Mon, 2022-11-28 at 15:00 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2022-11-28 at 19:24 +, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > > > - rpms/fpc > > > - rpms/lazarus > > I've been a co-admin on those, so I took 'em. > > > > Several of the orphaned packages are dependencies of stuff I > > currently

Review swap

Hi all, I have a perl package (diff-so-fancy) up for review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150097 I'd be happy to review something in return. -- Arthur Bols fas/irc: principis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[rpms/perl-Module-Pluggable] PR #2: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Module-Pluggable` that you are following: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-Pluggable/pull-request/2

[rpms/perl-Module-Pluggable] PR #1: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Module-Pluggable` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-Pluggable/pull-request/1

Re: moby-engine (also known as Docker) maintenance in Fedora

On 01.12.22 23:16, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 19:31 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 19:10 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi everyone, The moby-engine package [1] (also known as Docker) has been orphaned in Fedora and is looking for a new maintainer. The waiting

[rpms/perl-Module-Pluggable] PR #1: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Module-Pluggable` that you are following: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-Pluggable/pull-request/1

Re: moby-engine (also known as Docker) maintenance in Fedora

On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 19:31 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 19:10 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > The moby-engine package [1] (also known as Docker) has been > > > > orphaned in Fedora and is looking for a new maintainer. The > > > > waiting

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On 28/11/2022 19:20, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: - rpms/thefuck Took it since I was a co-admin - rpms/vim-latex Took this as well -- Arthur Bols fas/irc: principis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

and the orphans packages ? Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 10:04 -0600, Nick Bebout wrote: > For some reason a few people weren't processed - I ran the script > over them again and most were successful. > For some reason, mmorsi causes the script to traceback (and zodbot > errors trying to .fasinfo them as well).  I processed mmorsi

[rpms/perl-Net-Stomp] PR #1: Package test and update license to SPDX format

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-Stomp` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Package test and update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-Stomp/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel

Re: [INPUT REQUESTED] Re: F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)

I have now submitted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150093 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150094 for the `nodejs16` and `nodejs18` packages for Fedora. You can test them with `dnf copr enable sgallagh/nodejs-alternatives`. The final approach I

Re: [SONAME BUMP] capnproto 0.10.2

On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 2:59 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 7:57 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > If you need help with any of the rebuilds, feel free to ping me. > > > I'm currently handling the same CVE for the capnp Rust crate (where > > > thankfully only one application

Re: F38 proposal: Ostree Native Container (Phase 2, stable) (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Nov 30, 2022, at 8:11 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > > BTW I wanted to give an update here specifically regarding the "dnf > image" bit - as of late, I've been working on a fresh new "bootc" CLI, > see https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree-rs-ext/pull/412 and >

Re: [SONAME BUMP] capnproto 0.10.2

On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 7:57 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > If you need help with any of the rebuilds, feel free to ping me. > > I'm currently handling the same CVE for the capnp Rust crate (where > > thankfully only one application needs to be rebuilt). > > > > Help would very much be appreciated,

Re: OpenCOLLADA dead upstream

On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 1:49 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > No, but it will become more and more difficult to maintain. Right now it > needs to be ported from pcre to pcre2 which is beyond my capabilities. I believe it will also be broken with gcc-13 default compiler options (although there is a

Re: [SONAME BUMP] capnproto 0.10.2

On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 12:50 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:17 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 9:25 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > capnproto 0.10.2 is being upgraded in Rawhide. As part of this, I'll > > > be rebuilding its

Re: memtest86plus v6.00

Hello, Richard! On Friday, 07 October 2022 at 14:59, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: [...] > So my question is are we planning to move to v6.00 in future? > > I did attempt to build a Fedora RPM, but it basically involves > removing large sections of the existing RPM (eg. the downstream script > we

[Bug 2150051] New: perl-Log-Dispatchouli-3.001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150051 Bug ID: 2150051 Summary: perl-Log-Dispatchouli-3.001 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Log-Dispatchouli Keywords: FutureFeature,

[rpms/perl-Net-Stomp] PR #1: Package test and update license to SPDX format

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-Stomp` that you are following: `` Package test and update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-Stomp/pull-request/1 ___

Re: [SONAME BUMP] capnproto 0.10.2

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:17 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 9:25 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > capnproto 0.10.2 is being upgraded in Rawhide. As part of this, I'll > > be rebuilding its reverse dependencies: > > > > * fastnetmon > > * librime > > * rr > > *

F38 proposal: libpinyin 2.8 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/libpinyin_2.8 This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering

F38 proposal: Fedora Sway Spin (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_Sway_Spin This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering

F38 proposal: Fedora Sway Spin (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_Sway_Spin This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering

F38 proposal: libpinyin 2.8 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/libpinyin_2.8 This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering

F38 proposal: Golang 1.20 (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.20 This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

[EPEL-devel] Update of minor version of golang coming to EPEL7

golang-1.18.4 is now available in epel-testing for EPEL7, an update of a minor version from 1.17.12. I expect it to be promoted in about a week unless karma changes that. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-96dbad9cd3 My policy for updating golang is to follow the

F38 proposal: Golang 1.20 (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.20 This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

Self Introduction: Gary Mann

Hello All, This post will serve as my introduction into the devel community. I've been around in the linux/redhat world for some time. My professional experience includes well over 15 years in the telecom and enterprise industries, with each year becoming more and more involved in the open

Re: musings on rust packaging [was Re: F38 proposal: RPM Sequoia (System-Wide Change proposal)]

On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 00:41 +, Daniel Alley wrote: > I'm quite not sure how one would go about empirically measuring > something like that - at least in the general case. It might be an > interesting research topic. So no, unfortunately I don't really have > hard evidence for this. We did

Re: Need help with disappeared update from repository

On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 13:21 +0800, yanq...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > Hi all, > > It seems update fcitx5-qt-5.0.16-2.fc37 from [1] somehow did not make > it to stable repository while other package in same update did. This > caused broken dependences during update [2]. > > Seems that bodhi is

Re: SPDX Statistics

On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 10:14:04AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > The list of packages needed to be converted is again here: > > https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt > > Any question? Please check >

Re: OpenCOLLADA dead upstream

On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:28 PM Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Richard Shaw wrote: > > Before we go ripping it out of Fedora, > > Just because a project is dead upstream does not mean it has to be removed > from Fedora. > No, but it will become more and more

[rpms/perl-Test-Mock-LWP] PR #4: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Mock-LWP` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Mock-LWP/pull-request/4 ___

[Bug 2144904] perl-App-cpm for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144904 --- Comment #3 from Jitka Plesnikova --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/49605 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144904

[rpms/perl-Test-Mock-LWP] PR #4: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Mock-LWP` that you are following: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Mock-LWP/pull-request/4

[rpms/perl-Test-Mock-LWP] PR #3: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Mock-LWP` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Mock-LWP/pull-request/3

[rpms/perl-Net-HTTP] PR #5: Update license to SPDX format

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-HTTP` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-HTTP/pull-request/5 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: Orphaned package "scratch"

On Wednesday, 30 November 2022 at 15:15, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > I have orphaned package "scratch" [...] > If anyone wants to maintain the 1.x version feel free to take it. But > be aware that the upstream is not maintained. Picked up, thanks for the notice. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2022-12-02 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10133/ ___ devel

[rpms/perl-Net-HTTP] PR #5: Update license to SPDX format

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-HTTP` that you are following: `` Update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-HTTP/pull-request/5 ___ perl-devel mailing

[Bug 2149881] Can't install perl on i*86 due to missing dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149881 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- A proposed gating enablement for xz . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[rpms/perl-Test-Mock-LWP] PR #3: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Mock-LWP` that you are following: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Mock-LWP/pull-request/3

[rpms/perl-Test-Mock-LWP] PR #2: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Mock-LWP` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Mock-LWP/pull-request/2

[rpms/perl-WWW-RobotRules] PR #2: Remove Requires for bash, it's autogenerated

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-WWW-RobotRules` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Remove Requires for bash, it's autogenerated `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-WWW-RobotRules/pull-request/2 ___

[rpms/perl-Test-Mock-LWP] PR #2: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Mock-LWP` that you are following: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Mock-LWP/pull-request/2

[rpms/perl-Test-Mock-LWP] PR #1: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Mock-LWP` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Mock-LWP/pull-request/1

[Bug 2149881] Can't install perl on i*86 due to missing dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149881 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- This issue was observed by Fedora CI . It would be great if Bodhi respected the tests results by default. Alternatively we can

[rpms/perl-Test-Mock-LWP] PR #1: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Mock-LWP` that you are following: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Mock-LWP/pull-request/1

[Bug 2149881] Can't install perl on i*86 due to missing dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149881 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|p...@city-fan.org |jples...@redhat.com Fixed In

[Bug 2134183] Can't install perl on i*86 due to missing dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134183 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|2149881 | Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2149881] Can't install perl on i*86 due to missing dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149881 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|2134183 | Referenced Bugs:

Re: qt6ct: warning: source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing

Dne 30. 11. 22 v 16:56 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 15:32 +, Martin Gansser wrote: Sorry, I forgot to set the month in the changelog. you can use rpmdev-bumpspec that make changelog entry for you for example: rpmdev-bumpspec -c "Fix something " clamav.spec Or: * `c`

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Negotiate] PR #1: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Negotiate` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Negotiate/pull-request/1 ___

[Bug 2149881] New: Can't install perl on i*86 due to missing dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149881 Bug ID: 2149881 Summary: Can't install perl on i*86 due to missing dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: i686 Status: NEW Component: perl

[Bug 2149881] Can't install perl on i*86 due to missing dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149881 Frantisek Sumsal changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |p...@city-fan.org

[Bug 2149881] Can't install perl on i*86 due to missing dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149881 Frantisek Sumsal changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been

[Bug 2134183] Can't install perl on i*86 due to missing dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134183 Frantisek Sumsal changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2149881 Referenced Bugs:

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Negotiate] PR #1: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Negotiate` that you are following: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Negotiate/pull-request/1

Re: SPDX Statistics

Dne 18. 11. 22 v 15:09 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): 1. As of 2022-10-27: 1. There are 23302 spec files in Fedora 2. 264 mentions "SPDX" in the spec changelog 3. out of the remaining, 173 packages mention "SPDX" in dist-git log 4. 22865

[rpms/perl-Pod-Plainer] PR #1: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Plainer` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Plainer/pull-request/1 ___

[rpms/perl-Pod-Plainer] PR #1: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Plainer` that you are following: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Plainer/pull-request/1

Announcing libkiwix soversion bump

Hello all. libkiwix 12.0.0 will include a soversion bump from .11 to .12. I will take care of all dependent packages. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send