Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> ABI incompatible updates are against the Updates Policy for stable
> releases:
>
>> ABI changes in general are very strongly discouraged, they force
>> larger update sets on users and they make life difficult for
>> third-party packagers.
>
> --
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144550
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154340
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153171
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 4:08 PM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
> ABI incompatible updates are against the Updates Policy for stable
> releases:
>
> > ABI changes in general are very strongly discouraged, they force
> > larger update sets on users and they make life difficult for
> > third-party
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> I managed to download the Muse Sounds, and they work. Only the basic
> sounds are broken. It seems that they are not loaded. Just in case
> this rings any bell.
I think I know what the problem is. How to fix it is another matter...
> Other
* Miro Hrončok [19/12/2022 16:43] :
>
> perl-Mail-Procmailorphan 0 weeks ago
Taken.
Emmanuel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
* Miro Hrončok [19/12/2022 16:43] :
>
> perl-Mail-Procmailorphan 0 weeks ago
Taken.
Emmanuel
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 23:17, Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 3:36 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > Unfortunately, the playback seems to be broken. The mixer doesn't show
> > SoundFonts and there's no audio at all. :(
>
> Yes, my attempt at unbundling fluidsynth seems to be at fault.
On Mon Dec 19, 2022 at 15:56 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 3:54 PM Maxwell G via devel
> wrote:
> > On Mon Dec 19, 2022 at 14:10 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> > > If all goes well, I will do the same for F37.
> >
> > I don't think this soname bump should happen in a stable
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 3:54 PM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
> On Mon Dec 19, 2022 at 14:10 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> > If all goes well, I will do the same for F37.
>
> I don't think this soname bump should happen in a stable release.
Because ... ? The new version is backwards API compatible
On Mon Dec 19, 2022 at 14:10 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> If all goes well, I will do the same for F37.
I don't think this soname bump should happen in a stable release.
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
___
devel mailing list --
In one week (2022-12-26), or slightly later, I plan to complete the
following updates in a side tag for Rawhide:
• Update c4core to 0.1.11, bumping its .so version[1].
• Rebuild dependent packages c4fs and c4log as maintainer. These and
rapidyaml are the only packages that depend directly on
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 3:36 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> Unfortunately, the playback seems to be broken. The mixer doesn't show
> SoundFonts and there's no audio at all. :(
Yes, my attempt at unbundling fluidsynth seems to be at fault. Drat.
I may or may not have time to debug this before I
Thanks for doing that, Swift builds correctly on Rawhide now:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95546843
On 16 Dec 2022, at 5:24, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 09:55:11AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Miroslav, we may have to revert the versioning change
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/xfce-4.18
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Pyramid2.0
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/xfce-4.18
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Pyramid2.0
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
I'm going to build polymake 4.8 for Rawhide, which bumps the soname.
I will also rebuild the only library consumer, python-jupymake. If
all goes well, I will do the same for F37.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144550
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
On Mon, 2022-12-19 at 19:45 +, Smith, Stewart via devel wrote:
> > On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:43 AM, Miro Hrončok
> > wrote:
> >
> > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
> > for sure
> > that the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144550
--- Comment #4 from Troy Dawson ---
Thank You.
Branch has been requested.
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/49906
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
> On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:55 AM, Gwyn Ciesla via devel
> wrote:
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
> links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
> content is safe.
>
>
>
> I've taken abiword and libgnomeui. As
> On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:43 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 05:47:52PM +, Barry Scott wrote:
>
>
> > On 19 Dec 2022, at 17:40, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:36 PM Barry wrote:
> >>
> >> Why is pysvn on the list? I the pysvn maintainer and i am active.
> >> I am also the upstream maintainer.
> >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144550
--- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
(In reply to Troy Dawson from comment #2)
> Please branch and build perl-Net-Domain-TLD in epel9.
>
> If you do not wish to maintain perl-Net-Domain-TLD in epel9,
> or do not think you will be able
I'm also interested.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
Hi Troy,
thanks a lot, the package seems to be a general purpose managed list of
categorised TLDs used by other modules. In our case this is a dependency for
'Data::Validate::Domain' module required again by 'Kafka' module
(https://metacpan.org/pod/Kafka).
Best regards
Vladimir
> On 19.
> On 19 Dec 2022, at 17:40, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:36 PM Barry wrote:
>>
>> Why is pysvn on the list? I the pysvn maintainer and i am active.
>> I am also the upstream maintainer.
>
> The "main admin" is orphan. You should be able to go to
>
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:36 PM Barry wrote:
>
> Why is pysvn on the list? I the pysvn maintainer and i am active.
> I am also the upstream maintainer.
The "main admin" is orphan. You should be able to go to
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pysvn and click the "Take" button
on the left-hand
Why is pysvn on the list? I the pysvn maintainer and i am active.
I am also the upstream maintainer.
Barry
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144550
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
I'll probably take it.
I generally avoid perl due to dependencies, but this looks fairly
straightforward.
What is this ultimately for?
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 7:16 AM Vladimir Pachnik <
vladimir.pach...@gooddata.com> wrote:
> Any takers?
>
>
> > On 13. 12. 2022, at 15:23, Troy Dawson wrote:
> >
On Mon, 2022-12-19 at 16:43 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> golang-github-mitchellh-cli, golang-github-hanwen-fuse
I took these , because they are needed to docker
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Browser-Open` that
you are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Browser-Open/pull-request/2
> I am still very much against the `dnf5` package name and I have uneasy
> feelings reading (in my words) "`/usr/bin/dnf` symlink will change from
> `/usr/bin/dnf-3` to `/usr/bin/dnf5`". This name change is going to break
> so basic assumption such as `rpm -q dnf`. It won't really work even
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 4:44 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> seahorse-nautilus gnome-sig, orphan, stefw 2 weeks ago
Taken, though I'm wondering if someone from the GNOME SIG wants it (I
wouldn't mind giving it up).
___
devel mailing
I am still very much against the `dnf5` package name and I have uneasy
feelings reading (in my words) "`/usr/bin/dnf` symlink will change from
`/usr/bin/dnf-3` to `/usr/bin/dnf5`". This name change is going to break
so basic assumption such as `rpm -q dnf`. It won't really work even when
`rpm
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, December 19th, 2022 at 9:57 AM, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
> eurekaorphan 2 weeks ago
I have a soft spot for classic DOOM, so I took this one.
A.FI.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
I've taken abiword and libgnomeui. As always, co-maintainers welcome.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Thx for heads up. I assume this is the diff:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes%2FReplaceDnfWithDnf5=revision=663558=655776
Vít
Dne 16. 12. 22 v 12:11 Jaroslav Mracek napsal(a):
I've rewritten the proposal to make it clear what it is about including
additional information
Any takers?
> On 13. 12. 2022, at 15:23, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 7:35 AM Vladimir Pachnik
> wrote:
> > would anyone be able to take over the build of 'perl-Net-Domain-TLD'
> > package for EPEL9 as per
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144550 ?
>
>
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 9:33 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Demi Marie Obenour:
>
> > On 12/17/22 05:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> >> On 17/12/2022 06:29, Bob Hepple wrote:
> >>> Now that we have ffmpeg-free we have an opportunity to move wf-recorder
> >>> to the mainstream and change the
* Demi Marie Obenour:
> On 12/17/22 05:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
>> On 17/12/2022 06:29, Bob Hepple wrote:
>>> Now that we have ffmpeg-free we have an opportunity to move wf-recorder
>>> to the mainstream and change the default codec to the non-proprietary
>>> libopenh264.
>>
>> You
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Data-ICal-TimeZone`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Data-ICal-TimeZone/pull-request/1
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Data-ICal-TimeZone` that you are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Data-ICal-TimeZone/pull-request/1
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project:
`perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601/pull-request/2
___
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-DynaLoader-Functions`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DynaLoader-Functions/pull-request/1
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601` that you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601/pull-request/2
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-DynaLoader-Functions` that you are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DynaLoader-Functions/pull-request/1
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Devel-CallChecker`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Devel-CallChecker/pull-request/2
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221218.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221219.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 48
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 41.22 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Devel-CallChecker`
that you are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Devel-CallChecker/pull-request/2
mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Devel-CallChecker` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Devel-CallChecker/pull-request/1
mspacek commented on the pull-request: `Package tests and update license to
SPDX format` that you are following:
``
pretty please pagure-ci rebuild
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Devel-CallChecker/pull-request/1
59 matches
Mail list logo
