https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161311
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
* Daniel Colascione:
> See, both pro-FP and anti-FP camps think that it's the kernel that has
> to do the unwinding unless we copy whole stacks into traces.
Well, I think we should explore hardware-assisted backtraces (shadow
stacks), which hopefully are going to get merged in Linux 6.2.
> Why
On 1/17/23 14:28, Till Hofmann wrote:
Hi all,
Someone (rightfully) suggested that we should build glfw twice, once
with wayland support and once without:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152319
Is there any best practice how to build the same package in two
different flavors, in
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 2:28 PM Till Hofmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Someone (rightfully) suggested that we should build glfw twice, once
> with wayland support and once without:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152319
>
> Is there any best practice how to build the same package in two
On 1/17/23 14:37, Björn Persson wrote:
So as things stand, these rebuilds need to be done by a human who knows
the dependency graph.
Requiring "a human who knows the dependency graph" is *severely* broken.
There should be a shell script which computes an acceptable order from the
old
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a884ce2c71
tor-0.4.7.13-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
mimedefang-3.3-1.el7
singularity-ce-3.10.5-1.el7
On 2023-01-17 07:22, Arthur Bols wrote:
On 15/01/2023 03:44, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
draco package is ready for review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160996
The spec file was originally from UnitedRPM [1] which only needs a
clean up to adhere to the packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158853
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
On 1/17/23 19:21, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:30:21PM -, Daniel Colascione wrote:
>> As mentioned in [1], instead of finding a way to have the kernel
>> unwind user programs, we can create a protocol through which the
>> kernel can ask usermode to unwind
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:30:21PM -, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> As mentioned in [1], instead of finding a way to have the kernel
> unwind user programs, we can create a protocol through which the
> kernel can ask usermode to unwind itself.
I like this idea and was discussing and
> Am 17.01.2023 um 22:30 schrieb Chris Murphy :
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023, at 11:51 AM, Peter Boy wrote:
>>> Am 16.01.2023 um 13:23 schrieb Lennart Poettering :
>>>
>>> Just to say this cleary btw: when we introduced the time-out initially
>>> we were coming from sysvinit where no such
Pavel Zhukov wrote:
> Yes, that happens every year because of koji limitation.
> Ada rebuild is not just mass-rebuild thing.
> Because of circular dependencies: gprbuild buildrequires xmlada and
> xmlada build requires gprbuild and both of them requires
> gcc-gnat.so. they were built with
>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023, at 11:51 AM, Peter Boy wrote:
>> Am 16.01.2023 um 13:23 schrieb Lennart Poettering :
>>
>> Just to say this cleary btw: when we introduced the time-out initially
>> we were coming from sysvinit where no such time-out existed at
>> all. Hence we picked a conservative (i.e.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IoTSimplifiedInstaller
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
Hi all,
Someone (rightfully) suggested that we should build glfw twice, once
with wayland support and once without:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152319
Is there any best practice how to build the same package in two
different flavors, in this case cmake-based? I vaguely
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IoTSimplifiedInstaller
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
Yay! Thank you!
--
Bojan
-Original Message-
From: Mattia Verga
Reply-To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Bodhi 7.0.1 deployed to prod
Date: 17/01/23 16:39:49
- Frozen releases updates will now be forced into testing before being
pushed
Fabio Valentini writes:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:39 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:24:45PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> > Hello. GCC was updated to 13 in rawhide while the Fedora change was still
>> > being voted about by FESCo.
>> >
>> > Apparently, the following
Vít Ondruch kirjoitti 17.1.2023 klo 13.34:
Dne 16. 01. 23 v 21:59 Otto Liljalaakso napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch kirjoitti 16.1.2023 klo 16.50:
I don't oppose to change of the defaults.
However, I am also using `fedpkg scratch-build --srpm some.rpm`. So
how would the proposed change influence this
On 1/17/23 09:48, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 1/17/23 10:15 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
It sounds like the option is not relevant for Windows. See
https://reviews.llvm.org/D116484
Thanks, Tom. Do you think modifying the wine configure to not use -Wl,WX is the
best option?
Yes, I think
Thank you
On 16/01/23 06:19, Lumír Balhar wrote:
Hi Antonio.
The problem is in the project metadata. When I open the SRPM this
package is built from and the take a look at the source tarball, I find
this in the src/future/__init__.py:
__ver_major__ = 0
__ver_minor__ = 18
__ver_patch__ = 2
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 09:36:39AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> Ideally, we'd have a mechanism to define timeouts like this somehow
> relative to system speed (throughput) not simple wall clock time.
That's a nice idea. Meson has '-t' that is a multiplier for test
timeouts and it's quite useful.
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-01-17/fesco.2023-01-17-17.01.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-01-17/fesco.2023-01-17-17.01.txt
Log:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:05 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Il 17/01/23 12:54, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
> >
> > Is it possible that bodhi no longer automatically recognizes the changelog
> > of
> > Rawhide updates?
> >
> > See before the update:
> >
> >
Il 17/01/23 12:54, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
>
> Is it possible that bodhi no longer automatically recognizes the changelog of
> Rawhide updates?
>
> See before the update:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9090058f62
>
> And after:
>
>
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 09:04, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 09:36:39PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > elaborated-type-specifier for a scoped enum must not use the 'class' keyword
> >33 | enum class EndiannessType : std::uint8_t
> > | ^
>
> The actual bug is
On 1/17/23 10:15 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
It sounds like the option is not relevant for Windows. See
https://reviews.llvm.org/D116484
Thanks, Tom. Do you think modifying the wine configure to not use -Wl,WX is the best
option?
___
devel mailing
> Am 16.01.2023 um 13:23 schrieb Lennart Poettering :
>
> Just to say this cleary btw: when we introduced the time-out initially
> we were coming from sysvinit where no such time-out existed at
> all. Hence we picked a conservative (i.e. overly long) value to not
> upset things too badly. And
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 8:59 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> llvm10 petersen, sergesanspaille
>
Probably okay to drop at this point.
> llvm11 jistone, petersen,
> sergesanspaille,
> tstellar
> llvm12
On 1/17/23 07:57, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 1/17/23 06:17, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 1/16/23 11:30 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
-WX means treat warnings as errors. It's possible the configure
check is failing for other reasons. Is that the first check run
with -target aarch64-windows? Do you
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-01-18 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#topic aloha
On 1/17/23 06:17, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 1/16/23 11:30 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
-WX means treat warnings as errors. It's possible the configure
check is failing for other reasons. Is that the first check run
with -target aarch64-windows? Do you have the full config.log?
Yes. I do
On 11. 01. 23 15:59, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Successfully waited 0:00 for python-tox-4.2.6-1.fc38 to appear in the
f38-build repo.
If you hit unexpected issues with %tox, let us know here or in Bugzilla.
First gotcha:
tox 4 no longer fails without configuration:
$ tox --print-deps-to -
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 10:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 16. 01. 23 21:37, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Isn't the problem here that building Python extensions needs to work
> > correctly in two - possibly conflicting - scenarios:
> >
> > - in RPM packages, where using system compiler flags is a
On 17/01/2023 16:15, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 4:13 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 8:18 AM Arthur Bols wrote:
On 17/01/2023 14:57, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
So bodhi and pagure are at different datacenters with hopefully different
network paths. Could
On 15/01/2023 03:44, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
draco package is ready for review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160996
The spec file was originally from UnitedRPM [1] which only needs a
clean up to adhere to the packaging guideline. The library itself is
useful for
On 17. 01. 23 15:53, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
Hi Miro
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 8:18 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
[…]
---
Packages are told not to conditionalize Sources definitions
(e.g. on %fedora or %rhel).
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 4:13 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 8:18 AM Arthur Bols wrote:
>>
>> On 17/01/2023 14:57, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>> > So bodhi and pagure are at different datacenters with hopefully different
>> > network paths. Could people do some mtr or traceroutes
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 8:18 AM Arthur Bols wrote:
> On 17/01/2023 14:57, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > So bodhi and pagure are at different datacenters with hopefully different
> > network paths. Could people do some mtr or traceroutes from their
> locations
> > so we can see if this can be ironed
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 03:24:16PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:24:45PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > Hello. GCC was updated to 13 in rawhide while the Fedora change was still
> > > being voted about by FESCo.
> > >
> > > Apparently, the
Hi Miro
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 8:18 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> […]
>
> ---
>
> Packages are told not to conditionalize Sources definitions
> (e.g. on %fedora or %rhel).
>
>
Ben Cotton wrote:
== Summary ==
Remove pam_console as it is not enabled by default, can be replaced by
systemd and has security issues.
Just to make sure -- pam_console provided an "auth" feature (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=137802 ), which allows to
log just once when
V Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:18:09PM +0100, Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> Hello packagers,
>
> the Fedora Packaging Committee has been asked to send summaries of changes
> in the Fedora Packaging Guidelines. Here is my attempt to do that. Since
> this hasn't been done in years, this first announcement
On 1/16/23 12:31, Björn Persson wrote:
Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
The admin can implement CUPS
authentication but an ipp://localhost:6 open port entirely open to
anyone on the local machine to submit print jobs directly bypassing CUPS.
In that case it's also accessible to all the
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 8:21 AM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 09:19, Arthur Bols wrote:
>
>> On 17/01/2023 14:57, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>> > So bodhi and pagure are at different datacenters with hopefully
>> different
>> > network paths. Could people do some mtr or
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:24:45PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello. GCC was updated to 13 in rawhide while the Fedora change was still
> > being voted about by FESCo.
> >
> > Apparently, the following packages now don't install:
>
> There is a mass rebuild tomorrow.
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 09:19, Arthur Bols wrote:
> On 17/01/2023 14:57, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > So bodhi and pagure are at different datacenters with hopefully different
> > network paths. Could people do some mtr or traceroutes from their
> locations
> > so we can see if this can be ironed
On 17/01/2023 14:57, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
So bodhi and pagure are at different datacenters with hopefully different
network paths. Could people do some mtr or traceroutes from their locations
so we can see if this can be ironed out. Currently the limited tools we
have in Fedora Infra for
On 1/16/23 11:30 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
-WX means treat warnings as errors. It's possible the configure
check is failing for other reasons. Is that the first check run
with -target aarch64-windows? Do you have the full config.log?
Yes. I do not have the full log. This is from a Koji ARM
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:58 AM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 08:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:49:48AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:42 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>> >
>> > > V Tue, Jan 17,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 08:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:49:48AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:42 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > > V Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:28:32AM -0600, Richard Shaw napsal(a):
> > > > Is anyone but me experiencing
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:49:48AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:42 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> > V Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:28:32AM -0600, Richard Shaw napsal(a):
> > > Is anyone but me experiencing this? I want to know before I call C Spire.
> > >
> > Since yesterday I
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:42 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:28:32AM -0600, Richard Shaw napsal(a):
> > Is anyone but me experiencing this? I want to know before I call C Spire.
> >
> Since yesterday I randomly experience long delays between sending a query
> and
> receiving the
Hi everybody,
TL;DR; Check if you have correct e-mail in Red Hat Bugzilla Mail field
in Fedora Accounts [0]. Empty mail is also OK.
the Red Hat Bugzilla Email field in Fedora Accounts [0] was till now
ignored by most of the apps.
This was changed now with the latest update to toddlers [1],
Hi everybody,
TL;DR; Check if you have correct e-mail in Red Hat Bugzilla Mail field
in Fedora Accounts [0]. Empty mail is also OK.
the Red Hat Bugzilla Email field in Fedora Accounts [0] was till now
ignored by most of the apps.
This was changed now with the latest update to toddlers [1],
V Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:28:32AM -0600, Richard Shaw napsal(a):
> Is anyone but me experiencing this? I want to know before I call C Spire.
>
Since yesterday I randomly experience long delays between sending a query and
receiving the response. However, no HTTP errors.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Is anyone but me experiencing this? I want to know before I call C Spire.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161639
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||CPAN 145945
--
You are receiving this
Hello folks,
I'd like to announce that Bodhi 7.0.1 has been deployed to production.
Apart from a webUI new look, due to the switch to fedora-bootstrap 2.x,
these are the main changes that may interest you:
- Bodhi client now autenticates using Kerberos by default and falls back
to browser-based
Hello folks,
I'd like to announce that Bodhi 7.0.1 has been deployed to production.
Apart from a webUI new look, due to the switch to fedora-bootstrap 2.x,
these are the main changes that may interest you:
- Bodhi client now autenticates using Kerberos by default and falls back
to browser-based
> What about the new SFrame unwind info?
We're closely following up on this new format and will compare it against frame
pointers if a patch introducing a kernel unwinder for sframe is proposed and
likely to be merged. It's still very early days for SFrame though so we'll have
to see what
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161639
Bug ID: 2161639
Summary: Pregenerated File-RsyncP-0.76/FileList/configure is
missing a source
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:39 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:24:45PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello. GCC was updated to 13 in rawhide while the Fedora change was still
> > being voted about by FESCo.
> >
> > Apparently, the following packages now don't install:
>
>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:24:45PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello. GCC was updated to 13 in rawhide while the Fedora change was still
> being voted about by FESCo.
>
> Apparently, the following packages now don't install:
There is a mass rebuild tomorrow. The Ada soname changes every year
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160887
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
Hello. GCC was updated to 13 in rawhide while the Fedora change was still being
voted about by FESCo.
Apparently, the following packages now don't install:
$ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide --whatrequires 'libgnat-12.so()(64bit)'
--whatrequires 'libgnarl-12.so()(64bit)'
Hi Robert,
On 1/13/23 15:12, Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
Nothing against driverless printing, this is something I really like,
bit I think all the move to HTTP is ignoring the feature that is being
removed, and that I have an use for. There is not possible to have a
printer connected to a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160887
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160856
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161364
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.34
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161364
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
Hi everyone!
Currently, golang ships the golang-race package, but this process is
going to get trickier with Go 1.20 due to this change:
The directory $GOROOT/pkg no longer stores pre-compiled package
archives for the standard library: go install no longer writes them,
the go build no longer
On 17. 01. 23 1:07, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Hey folks, just a heads up that bodhi has been updated to 7.0.1 now.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org
See:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases
for a full list of bugs fixed/enhancements.
Note that this adds the concept of 'frozen' releases,
Dne 16. 01. 23 v 21:59 Otto Liljalaakso napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch kirjoitti 16.1.2023 klo 16.50:
I don't oppose to change of the defaults.
However, I am also using `fedpkg scratch-build --srpm some.rpm`. So
how would the proposed change influence this command?
I do not intend to change that
Same here. To be honest, most older games still use 32-bit binaries (even
some more recent ones). That's one of the reasons why Windows will prolly
never remove WoW64. Or at least for an extremely long time still.
Le lun. 16 janv. 2023, 18 h 13, Arthur Bols a écrit :
> On 17/03/2022 10:49,
On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 18:54 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Petr Pisar wrote on 2023/01/17 18:29:
> > V Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:11:48AM +0100, Dan Horák napsal(a):
> > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 21:21:39 -0700
> > > Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > >
> > > > How the #$@! do I get fedpkg local to not cleanup
I opened an issue for a mailing list to be created in case someone wants to
follow/provide feedback.
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11087
Zuzka
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 4:34 PM Michael Dawson wrote:
> It's the new year and we are going to get things going.
>
> Zuzana is going to
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2023-01-17 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230116.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230117.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 38
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 340.74 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:33:10AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> Haven't planned on this originally, but it seems like a good idea.
>
> Never really used Obsoletes before, so I have to ask:
> what's the dnf behaviour when a package is obsoleted by multiple packages?
> If it tries to
Haven't planned on this originally, but it seems like a good idea.
Never really used Obsoletes before, so I have to ask:
what's the dnf behaviour when a package is obsoleted by multiple packages?
If it tries to install all of them, then that'd be okay. I'd like to
avoid a situation where dnf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161420
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161420
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Petr Pisar wrote on 2023/01/17 18:29:
V Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:11:48AM +0100, Dan Horák napsal(a):
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 21:21:39 -0700
Orion Poplawski wrote:
How the #$@! do I get fedpkg local to not cleanup the local build
directory after a successful build? This is the most annoying
V Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:11:48AM +0100, Dan Horák napsal(a):
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 21:21:39 -0700
> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> > How the #$@! do I get fedpkg local to not cleanup the local build
> > directory after a successful build? This is the most annoying change to
> > come around in a
PSA: I've updated the license of tintin from GPLv2+ to GPL-3.0-only in
its 2.02.30 update. This should have been done a while ago, in 2.01.8;
Bodhi updates submitted.
P
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 21:21:39 -0700
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> How the #$@! do I get fedpkg local to not cleanup the local build
> directory after a successful build? This is the most annoying change to
> come around in a long time IMHO.
hmm, it doesn't clean the build directory here
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 09:36:39PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> elaborated-type-specifier for a scoped enum must not use the 'class' keyword
>33 | enum class EndiannessType : std::uint8_t
> | ^
The actual bug is shown in later errors.
> 'int32_t' is not a member of 'std';
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 3:38 PM Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 13:55 +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> > So I plan to go ahead with this rebase and rebuilding these packages
> > after the mass rebuild if that's okay.
>
> Hi,
> does the new version change any API and/or
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 02:06:20PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F38-FPC-repackaging
> == Detailed Description ==
> The `fpc` package will be split into three packages:
> * `fpc` - the compiler itself, plus utility programs
> * `fpc-ide` - the terminal-based
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158089
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
Any progress? If you don't have time maintaining this package in EPEL, please
give me access to this package or to EPEL branches and I will add this package
into EPEL9.
--
You are receiving this mail
The License for glances changed from GPLv3 to LGPL-3.0-only AND MIT
https://github.com/nicolargo/glances/blob/develop/LICENSES/LGPL-3.0-only.txt
https://github.com/nicolargo/glances/blob/develop/glances/outputs/static/css/bootstrap.less
--
Ali Erdinc Koroglu
Linux OS Systems Engineering
92 matches
Mail list logo
