https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168377
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168376
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
wxGTK should have that...
It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X
series as far as I can tell. 3.2.1 in F37 at least builds, but for some
reason liblibnyquist.so is missing. F38 / Rawhide has some lisp issue
with the
Hello team,
I filed an exemption[1] for f38-backgrounds packaging review[2] as
suggestion from desktop team on discussion last year. The spec file
remains virtually unchanged other than an updated default wallpaper.
Thamks.
Ref:
[1] https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/51051
wxGTK should have that...
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 18:14, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Dear maintainers.
>
> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
> should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.
>
> 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will
On 2/7/23 07:52, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lokesh Mandvekar
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:56 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>>> There are still active users of Fedora IoT 36 on armhfp using
>>> containers so I suspect they may be unhappy of they go away
On 2/8/23 08:41, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> (*) I know this term ("lowest common denominator") is mathematically
> nonsense. There is only a least/lowest common multiple and a greatest common
> denominator in mathematics. :-)
I mean there *is* a lowest common denominator: 1 :)
--
On 2/8/23 10:59 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
stan via devel writes:
As they say in the BUILDING.md file,
though, fedora lacks wxWidgets 3.1.5 or greater. That stops the
configuration, cmake -G Ninja -S . -B build when it errors out.
That's odd; as far as I can see, F36 has 3.1.5 and F37
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125015
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168408
Bug ID: 2168408
Summary: perl-IO-Compress-2.204 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IO-Compress
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 1:19 PM Michel Alexandre Salim <
sali...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 14:09 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:37 PM Troy Dawson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:21 AM Michel Alexandre Salim
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168401
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details below:
BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
'/var/tmp/thn-7hl2whv9/perl-Dancer.spec']'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168401
Bug ID: 2168401
Summary: perl-Dancer-1.3521 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Dancer
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
I'm finally circling back around to MuseScore 4.0. The COPR
(https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/MuseScore4/) has been
updated with a new build, of version 4.0.1.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> I managed to download the Muse Sounds, and they work. Only the basic
On 2/8/23 09:51, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:43:19AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:35 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
...
Checked with the team and I'm told 32-bit containers on 64-bit arch
should not be impacted.
More generally podman can run
On 2/9/23 07:38, Richard Shaw wrote:
I know upgrades are not supported but its for a small home server that
really only does two things:
For a home server you can use RHEL, the real deal, why mess with
downstream rebuilds?
Just a thought.
Ian
--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
TZ:
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 14:09 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:37 PM Troy Dawson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:21 AM Michel Alexandre Salim
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Per the incompatible upgrade policy[1] I'm proposing upgrading
> > >
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 3:40 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> I know upgrades are not supported but its for a small home server that really
> only does two things:
>
> BackupPC and Unifi (which I both maintain)
>
> Anyone had success doing manual upgrades or did you start with a reinstall?
>
I think
I know upgrades are not supported but its for a small home server that
really only does two things:
BackupPC and Unifi (which I both maintain)
Anyone had success doing manual upgrades or did you start with a reinstall?
Thanks,
Richard
___
epel-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168377
Bug ID: 2168377
Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.204 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168376
Bug ID: 2168376
Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.204 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168141
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(spo...@gmail.com) |
--- Comment #3 from Tom
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:37 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:21 AM Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Per the incompatible upgrade policy[1] I'm proposing upgrading
>> libkdumpfile from 0.4.1 to the latest 0.5.1 in both EPEL 8 and 9.
>>
>> Bugzilla issues:
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168141
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168132
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168132
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius ---
Feel free to do it yourself. I am not interested in supporting EPEL.
I made you collaborator and BZ contact for epel*.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 06:43:02PM +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Tuesday, 2023-02-07 16:24:16 +0100, Michal Konecny wrote:
>
> > [0] - https://forms.gle/J2HWDkw1UNuj8HYD8
>
> Don't be surprised if you don't get the number of answers you hoped for,
> on
>
> a) a Google form
> b)
Hi Michal,
On Tuesday, 2023-02-07 16:24:16 +0100, Michal Konecny wrote:
> [0] - https://forms.gle/J2HWDkw1UNuj8HYD8
Don't be surprised if you don't get the number of answers you hoped for,
on
a) a Google form
b) that requires a Google account
c) to be logged in
Eike
--
GPG key
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:21 AM Michel Alexandre Salim <
sali...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per the incompatible upgrade policy[1] I'm proposing upgrading
> libkdumpfile from 0.4.1 to the latest 0.5.1 in both EPEL 8 and 9.
>
> Bugzilla issues:
> -
Hi all,
Per the incompatible upgrade policy[1] I'm proposing upgrading
libkdumpfile from 0.4.1 to the latest 0.5.1 in both EPEL 8 and 9.
Bugzilla issues:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162866 (for 0.5.1 in
general)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168301 (for EPEL)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168141
Sergio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ser...@serjux.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125015
Sergio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2168141
Referenced Bugs:
> stan via devel writes:
> As they say in the BUILDING.md file,
> though, fedora lacks wxWidgets 3.1.5 or greater. That stops the
> configuration, cmake -G Ninja -S . -B build when it errors out.
That's odd; as far as I can see, F36 has 3.1.5 and F37 has 3.2.1.
- J<
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 09:02:47 -0700
stan wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 08:44:30 -0700
> stan wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 06:25:07 +1100
> > Philip Rhoades via devel wrote:
> >
> > > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going
> > > for Fedora? - I would prefer that
On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 15:24:47 +
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 12:03 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 04:45:37PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:42:10AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-
> > > Szmek wrote:
> > > > On
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 08:44:30 -0700
stan wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 06:25:07 +1100
> Philip Rhoades via devel wrote:
>
> > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going
> > for Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage
> > version .
>
> I knew about the
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:22 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 7:26 PM Philip Rhoades via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > People,
> >
> > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for
> > Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . .
> >
On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 06:25:07 +1100
Philip Rhoades via devel wrote:
> Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for
> Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version .
I knew about the corporate takeover of audacity, but I didn't know
about this fork.
On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 12:03 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 04:45:37PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:42:10AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-
> > Szmek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:52:30PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > On
okay, thanks for your advice.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
update: I also plan to claim nqp and rakudo packages.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:43:19AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:35 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> ...
> > > Checked with the team and I'm told 32-bit containers on 64-bit arch
> > > should not be impacted.
> >
> > More generally podman can run containers of foreign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125015
Sergio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|dd...@cpan.org |ser...@serjux.com
--
You are
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:35 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
...
> > Checked with the team and I'm told 32-bit containers on 64-bit arch
> > should not be impacted.
>
> More generally podman can run containers of foreign architectures using
> qemu-user emulation, albeit with an obvious speed penalty.
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 07:17:16PM +0530, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:01 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
> > Does dropping the 32-bit i686 build also imply you cannot use 32-bit
> > containers on a 64-bit architecture? If so, will anybody notice? Since you
> > did not
V Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 02:09:10PM -, Felix Wang napsal(a):
> I had planned to pick `moarvm` package up when I saw it was already
> orphaned. I am very willing to maintain or comaintain it. My FAS name is
> topazus.
Great to read it. You can follow this procedure for unretiring a package
Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> Checked with the team and I'm told 32-bit containers on 64-bit arch
> should not be impacted.
Good to know. Then I think nobody will miss the i686 build or even notice
its absence (considering that it is not a shared library and that pure i686
installations of Fedora
I had planned to pick `moarvm` package up when I saw it was already orphaned. I
am very willing to maintain or comaintain it. My FAS name is topazus.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:01 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
> Does dropping the 32-bit i686 build also imply you cannot use 32-bit
> containers on a 64-bit architecture? If so, will anybody notice? Since you
> did not use any special naming tricks (both package naming and file naming)
> to allow
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 11:06 PM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
>
> As for i686, you don't need extra paperwork thanks to exclude packages
> thanks to
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval.
> You just need to properly handle dependent packages. You cannot
> ExcludeArch a
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Looking at Flatpaks with both my upstream author hat and distro maintainer
> hat, the main advantages I see is not the isolation. It is that they have
> the potential to eliminate the massive amount of duplicated work between
> every distro re-packaging the same app,
On 08-02-2023 03:38, Joe Doss wrote:
On 2/7/23 8:28 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
I've got a few useful Nagios monitoring plugins I'd like to add to
Fedora/EPEL. I'm rather unimaginative at naming, so the Github repo for
them is "nagios-plugins-cmadams"... while I wouldn't mind having a
package with
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230207.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230208.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 129
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.19 MiB
Size of dropped packages
After my updates to several jaxb packages, some of the licenses changed:
Source package jaxb:
jaxb-rngom: BSD -> (MIT and BSD)
jaxb-xjc: BSD -> (BSD and ASL 2.0)
Source package jaxb-fi:
jaxb-fi-tests (previously known as FastInfosetRoundTripTests): (ASL 2.0
and BSD and ASL 1.1) -> (ASL 2.0 and
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 06:01:17PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this particular case,
> > > but the push towards (upstream) Flatpaks is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125015
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2168131
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168014
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Sereal-5.003-1.fc38
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168014
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168016
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168016
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 5:06 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:00:22AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > No, that's the promise of Fedora Flatpaks, which is an effort with a
> > distinct identity and philosophy (but which is, uh, not being its best
> > possible self so far, I
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:00:22AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> No, that's the promise of Fedora Flatpaks, which is an effort with a
> distinct identity and philosophy (but which is, uh, not being its best
> possible self so far, I think everyone would agree). It's not the
Joining this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168015
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168015
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 38 Rawhide 20230208.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168142
Bug ID: 2168142
Summary: Add perl-Carp-Always to EPEL9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Carp-Always
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168141
Bug ID: 2168141
Summary: Add perl-Cairo to EPEL9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Cairo
Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125015
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2168128
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168135
Bug ID: 2168135
Summary: perl-URI-Title-1.904 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-URI-Title
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168132
Bug ID: 2168132
Summary: Add perl-Set-IntSpan to EPEL9
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Set-IntSpan
Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will
be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds
submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you
can reply off-list to indicate you should still be in the
provenpackager group.
Note
In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will
be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds
submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you
can reply off-list to indicate you should still be in the
provenpackager group.
Note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125015
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
Blocks|
74 matches
Mail list logo
