On 2023-02-17 20:14, John Reiser wrote:
On 2023-02-18 @ 03:03 UTC, Gordon Messmer wrote:
use libtool-style versions collected from library filenames to provide
versioned library requirements
How does this affect the output from "readelf --symbols --version-info
foo.o"
which displays
On 2023-02-18 @ 03:03 UTC, Gordon Messmer wrote:
use libtool-style versions collected from library filenames to provide
versioned library requirements
How does this affect the output from "readelf --symbols --version-info foo.o"
which displays symbols and symbol versions? How much more
Following a recent thread discussing a reproducible failure caused by
mismatched library interfaces, I proposed a change to the RPM ELF
dependency generator. After discussion in the PR, I've provided an
implementation suggested by keszybz@ which would use libtool-style
versions collected from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169950
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-637174bcd6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-637174bcd6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169950
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-28b5f542cc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-28b5f542cc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169950
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f886d16bfb has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f886d16bfb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169950
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168141
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168132
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125015
Bug 2125015 depends on bug 2168141, which changed state.
Bug 2168141 Summary: Add perl-Cairo to EPEL9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168141
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125015
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
On Fri, 2023-02-17 at 14:45 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> The F38 Beta freeze begins on 21 February. The current target release
> date is the early target date (2023-03-14).
>
> Action summary
>
>
> Accepted blockers
> -
>
> 1. distribution — Workstation boot
The F38 Beta freeze begins on 21 February. The current target release
date is the early target date (2023-03-14).
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. distribution — Workstation boot x86_64 image exceeds maximum size — ASSIGNED
ACTION: Workstation WG to
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 10:17 AM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> On Fri Feb 17, 2023 at 08:37 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 7:51 AM Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > > It downloads packages from the internet and doesn't use system rust
> > > packages.
>
> > ansible-core and awscli
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 38 RC 20230217.2. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
Hi,
I would like to update libcmocka [1] to version 1.1.6. This autogenerates the
find_package() files for CONFIG mode now.
This means the projects which don't have their on FindCMocka.cmake module but
rely on the CONFIG mode, need 3 lines of code to still compile with 1.1.6. You
need to add
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 1:48 AM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> During the weekend I can write down a script reusing partial code from
> the find_inactive_packagers script and purge the ticket list from users
> that showed activity in RH bugzilla, let me know if you want me to
> proceed. Or I
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Coro` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Fedora don't support arm32, we could use fortify for all architectures
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Coro/pull-request/4
___
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Coro` that you are
following:
``
Fedora don't support arm32, we could use fortify for all architectures
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Coro/pull-request/4
On Fri Feb 17, 2023 at 08:37 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 7:51 AM Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > It downloads packages from the internet and doesn't use system rust
> > packages.
> ansible-core and awscli also install internal versions of what should
> be separately
On 07. 02. 23 15:12, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 01. 23 17:44, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
FTBFS bugs will be filed shortly.
Is there an estimated date when this will happen?
There is now a ticket with the same question:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11295
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
Hello Pythonistats and packaging folks.
Tomáš (CCed) approached me today with an interesting question.
A Python package he is packaging into RPM (python3-rapidfuzz) installs some
development files (.h and .pxd).
Tomáš queried upstream about those files to figure out if they should be
Hi all,
I intend to un-retire arptools, which is a small collection of Ethernet ARP
tools.
The package used to be in Fedora repos, but was retired somewhere between F31
and F32 due to being orphaned.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/arptools
I looked through the devel list, but couldn't find
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 7:51 AM Andreas Schneider wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 30 November 2022 18:43:50 CET Mauricio Teixeira wrote:
> > Fabio,
>
> Hi Fabio,
>
> > What is so bad about the COPR package that can't be used in the main repo?
>
> It downloads packages from the internet and doesn't use
On Wednesday, 30 November 2022 18:43:50 CET Mauricio Teixeira wrote:
> Fabio,
Hi Fabio,
> What is so bad about the COPR package that can't be used in the main repo?
It downloads packages from the internet and doesn't use system rust packages.
___
OLD: Fedora-38-20230216.n.1
NEW: Fedora-38-20230217.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 19
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.63 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230216.n.3
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230217.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 32
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 16.91 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125015
--- Comment #7 from Sergio Basto ---
(In reply to Fedora Update System from comment #6)
> FEDORA-EPEL-2023-24188f7578 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
> 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-24188f7578
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125015
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168132
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|Fedora |Fedora EPEL
CC|
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:04 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> V Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 07:29:07PM +, Kenneth Goldman napsal(a):
> > I think I followed all those steps - identifying the package, announcing
> > that
> > I want to be the packager, making an account, etc.
> >
> > What's next?
>
> Submit
V Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 07:29:07PM +, Kenneth Goldman napsal(a):
> I think I followed all those steps - identifying the package, announcing that
> I want to be the packager, making an account, etc.
>
> What's next?
Submit an updated tss2 package for a package review. As far as I can see,
32 matches
Mail list logo
