Re: Update of catch to Catch2 v3

On 22/02/2023 12:37, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: I have now added catch2 (for Catch2 v2.x) and upgraded the catch package to Catch2 v3.x in rawhide and f38. All my catch-dependent packages are now failing due to the missing catch.hpp header: tests.cpp:32:10: fatal error: catch.hpp: No such

Bodhi_enabled ? Re: F38 Change complete (100% complete) deadline today

On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:40 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > As of today, F38 Changes should be 100% complete. Change owners can > indicate this by setting the Bugzilla tracker to the ON_QA state. F38 > enters beta freeze today. Any updates that need to land in the beta > release will require an

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

Are you saying that DNF does an exact version match instead of making the assumption that packages with version >= X contain a fix for a security bug which the updateinfo declares to be fixed in X? Or that the updateinfo itself gets purged of advisories that don't apply to the latest versions

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-66548f784b openssl11-1.1.1k-5.el7 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-acd256a168 gssntlmssp-1.2.0-1.el7 The following builds have

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing ansible-lint-3.5.1-2.el8 onedrive-2.4.23-2.el8 python-pylero-0.0.7-1.el8 Details about builds: ansible-lint-3.5.1-2.el8

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I'm not sure what a solution could be. Keep every update in updateinfo > so dnf could tell you that there's 2 updates and 1 is security and the > other bugfix? but then we would need to also keep those updates around > to update to. Add a repodata field "last security update

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24 2023 at 12:00:40 AM +0100, Björn Persson > wrote: >> There are also other dangers with installing only security fixes. If a >> bugfix is released and packaged, and later it's discovered that the >> bug >> had security implications, then no security update

Re: Changes to Bugzilla API key requirements

Matthew Miller wrote: > The "good news" is that Red Hat has announced a move away from Bugzilla > for future products. (They're going to Jira.) Ah right, I had forgotten about that issue. I do not think I will ever understand the fascination some projects have for JIRA. It is proprietary, and

[Bug 2172670] perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172670 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2173127] New: perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173127 Bug ID: 2173127 Summary: perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-HTTP-Daemon Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

Looks good here too: Downgrading:  Lmod x86_64 8.7.18-1.fc38 fedora 258 k  festival-data    noarch 2.5.0-16.fc38 fedora 1.2 M  fwupd    x86_64 1.8.10-1.fc38 fedora 1.8 M  fwupd-plugin-flashrom  

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

On Fri, 2023-02-24 at 10:17 +1100, Ian Laurie wrote: > On 2/22/23 20:30, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 38 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > > and try to run: > > Looked good here, just some downgrades as follows: > > Downgrading: > fwupd

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

Should it be replaced with rsync? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:30:40AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f38 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync F36 snowflake

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

Thanks for the heads up. Looks like the update got stuck. I've kicked it. Now need to wait for the freeze to end. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-fa1d678565 On 2/22/23 06:12, Steve Cossette wrote: I just tried on a second PC, and I see this too on this one: Lmod  

[Bug 2173116] New: perl-SQL-Translator-1.63 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173116 Bug ID: 2173116 Summary: perl-SQL-Translator-1.63 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-SQL-Translator Keywords: FutureFeature,

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

On 2/24/23 10:17, Ian Laurie wrote: On 2/22/23 20:30, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 38 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: Looked good here, just some downgrades as follows: Downgrading:  fwupd    x86_64 1.8.10-1.fc38  

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 2:48 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > I was asked to weigh in on https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a > priority. Last time we talked about this we didn't really get anywhere... > > >

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On 2/23/23 18:00, Björn Persson wrote: > Gordon Messmer wrote: >> Contrary-wise: Because Fedora updates only contains the latest built, >> once a build marked as a security fix is obsoleted by another build, >> there is no longer any indication that a security issue existed in any >> version,

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On 2/23/23 12:52, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:33:27AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Just FYI, we do not produce drpms for rawhide/branched at all (since >> 2017 ish). > [...] >> Its one line in bodhi pungi config: >> createrepo_deltas = False >>> If shut off, can it be turned

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Fri, Feb 24 2023 at 12:00:40 AM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: There are also other dangers with installing only security fixes. If a bugfix is released and packaged, and later it's discovered that the bug had security implications, then no security update will be made because the fix is

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

On 2/22/23 20:30, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 38 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: Looked good here, just some downgrades as follows: Downgrading: fwupdx86_64 1.8.10-1.fc38 fwupd-plugin-flashromx86_64

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

Gordon Messmer wrote: > Contrary-wise: Because Fedora updates only contains the latest built, > once a build marked as a security fix is obsoleted by another build, > there is no longer any indication that a security issue existed in any > version, at which point "dnf update --security" no

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #20: 6.15 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 6.15 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/20 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 2172742] perl-Geo-ShapeFile-3.03 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172742 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Geo-ShapeFile-3.02 is |perl-Geo-ShapeFile-3.03

Re: Help with systemd/cgroup task limits in koji

Am 23.02.23 um 20:05 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 11:11:49AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Giuseppe Scrivano: Florian Weimer writes: It could be an old kernel bug: Task exit is signaled before task resource deallocation, leading to bogus EAGAIN errors

Re: webkitgtk6.0 soname bump season

On Thu, Jan 19 2023 at 06:02:53 PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: The webkitgtk6.0 package (for GTK 4, not GTK 3) will be doing several soname bumps over the next two months in preparation for stabilizing the GTK 4 API. I won't announce individual bumps since they will be frequent. I will

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #20: 6.15 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you are following: `` 6.15 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/20 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 2172670] perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172670 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #19: 6.15 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 6.15 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/19 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: Update of catch to Catch2 v3

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 6:38 AM Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > As discussed a few weeks ago the Catch testing framework has > a slightly weird naming scheme, namely: > > * Catch (v1.x, actually a branch in Catch2 repository) > * Catch2 v2.x > * Catch2 v3.x > > Since Catch2 was released we have

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #19: 6.15 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you are following: `` 6.15 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/19 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

google-chrome rpm caused issues due to it's SHA1 signature. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #18: 6.15 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 6.15 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/18 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: Self Introduction: Dalton Hubble

On 2/23/23 00:19, Dalton Hubble wrote: > Hey folks, > > I'm an engineer working in the Go, cloud, and infrastructure space. I've been > a Linux user for a while, a Fedora user for the last ~8 years, and used to > work for CoreOS. I maintain a few open source Go libraries, maintain a >

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #18: 6.15 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you are following: `` 6.15 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/18 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 2172670] perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172670 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

The current target release date is the early target date (2023-03-14). Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. distribution — Workstation boot x86_64 image exceeds maximum size — ASSIGNED ACTION: Workstation WG to reduce image size or increase the limit 2.

Re: Changes to Bugzilla API key requirements

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 6:48 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > I have a survey prepared that will be opened once the F37 > retrospective survey is done. This will give us a basis for evaluating > our requirements as we look for possible replacements. Thanks for planning on the followup.

Re: Help with systemd/cgroup task limits in koji

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 11:11:49AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Giuseppe Scrivano: > > > Florian Weimer writes: > >> It could be an old kernel bug: > >> > >> Task exit is signaled before task resource deallocation, leading to > >> bogus EAGAIN errors > >>

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:15:42AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 2023-02-23 10:05, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > Contrary-wise: Because Fedora updates only contains the latest built, > > once a build marked as a security fix is obsoleted by another build, > > there is no longer any indication that

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:46:03AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 22. 02. 23 v 5:38 Kevin Kofler via devel napsal(a): > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > I fear the only way to fix it is to get pungi to merge entire repos, and > > > I don't think thats anything that pungi wants to be on the hook for

Re: Fwd: fedmsg notification

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 11:10:20AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > What does this notification mean, and how do I turn it off? > > The filter UI for notifications is impossible to understand. yes, it is. ;( It's currently being re-written. The current janky version sends emails like: > >

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 09:34:14AM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 10:30 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f38 \ > >  --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > >  $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo -- > >

Re: Changes to Bugzilla API key requirements

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 1:42 PM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > I seem to recall that some of the Fedora people were > talking about creating a document that would show > what "we" use bugzilla for so that a future issue/bug > tracker solution (whatever that might be) could be > evaluated and any prep

Re: Changes to Bugzilla API key requirements

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 5:54 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > The "good news" is that Red Hat has announced a move away from Bugzilla for > future products. (They're going to Jira.) RH Bugzilla isn't officially shut > down, but its days are numbered. We need to come up with something else. "Good" is

Re: Update of catch to Catch2 v3

On 2/22/23 14:37, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > As discussed a few weeks ago the Catch testing framework has > a slightly weird naming scheme, namely: > > * Catch (v1.x, actually a branch in Catch2 repository) > * Catch2 v2.x > * Catch2 v3.x > > Since Catch2 was released we have had catch1 and

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

systemtap is FTBFS because dyninst is FTBFS, see PR2173030 for dyninst. On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 2:49 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > boost 1.81.0 (side tag f39-boost) was merged into Fedora earlier this week: > >

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

Dne 23. 02. 23 v 12:41 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: I think you got something wrong with your repoquery. Perhaps it picked up older

[Bug 2172819] perl-SQL-Statement-1.414-10.fc39 tests produce a lot of warnings: Use of uninitialized value $unkpos in subtraction (-) at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Text/Balanced.pm line 1008

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172819 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||CPAN 146697 --- Comment #3

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On 2023-02-23 10:05, Gordon Messmer wrote: Contrary-wise: Because Fedora updates only contains the latest built, once a build marked as a security fix is obsoleted by another build, there is no longer any indication that a security issue existed in any version, at which point "dnf update

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On 2023-02-22 10:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 05:38:23AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: I remember that in ancient times (pre Core-Extras Merge), some Fedora repository (IIRC, the old Fedora Extras) used to ship not only the latest build for each package, but the TWO

Re: Changes to Bugzilla API key requirements

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 05:35:36AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > IMHO, Fedora really needs its own bug tracker that is not driven by this > kind of enterprise-grade security requirements. The "good news" is that Red Hat has announced a move away from Bugzilla for future products.

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:33:27AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Just FYI, we do not produce drpms for rawhide/branched at all (since > 2017 ish). [...] > Its one line in bodhi pungi config: > createrepo_deltas = False > > If shut off, can it be turned back on again (in case of Regrets)? > Just

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:56:53AM -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > Could we do this as a two-step approach? First change the default to > > not use deltas but still allow people to opt-in to it. Then (assuming > > we can track this, which maybe we can't) see how much they're used > > before

Re: Announced pkgconf soname change

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 8:02 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 7:55 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > pkgconf-1.9.4-1.fc39, comparing to 1.8.0-6.fc39, changed a soname without > > a notice on this list. Affected packages: > > > > # dnf -q --repoid f39-build repoquery --whatrequires >

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 01:41:43PM +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote: > Dislike -1 This kind of "vote" isn't really very helpful. Of course not everyone is going to like everything. As I said initially, it's unfortunate that we aren't in a better place here. But we're in the place we're in. If you have

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

PR2173019 has been created. The file in question was updated within the last three days, but not to fix this issue. On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 7:47 AM Thomas Rodgers wrote: > ceph is FTBFS due to a change in Boost Asio. I'll file a PR this

Heads up - squashfs-tools prelease in rawhide

Phillip is really close to releasing 4.6 and I want to get some testing in rawhide before that happens. If we do find a problem, it will be easier on him if we find it before the release. I ran a test script that tests the features we mostly use, so I'm not expecting any problems.

Re: Self Introduction: Dalton Hubble

On 2/22/23 11:19 PM, Dalton Hubble wrote: I'm an engineer working in the Go, cloud, and infrastructure space. I've been a Linux user for a while, a Fedora user for the last ~8 years, and used to work for CoreOS. I maintain a few open source Go libraries, maintain a Kubernetes distro, and operate

Re: Feedback wanted for a proposed improvement to RPM's ELF dependency generator

I wanted to sum up my understanding of the thread so far, and changes I intend to work on: The current implementation generates a version if the library's full name ends with ".so." followed by numbers separated by dots. After discussion, it seems like a more logical approach is to ensure

Re: Unannounced .so version bump (F38/F39): openexr2

My apologies, I was fixing the FTBFS and apparently mistyped my repoquery. :/ --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. --- Original Message

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Boost 1.81 rebuilds starting Monday 2022-02-20

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 5:14 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 20:52, Thomas Rodgers wrote: > > > > The f39-boost side tag builds have finished. > > > > The following packages are new FTBFS likely due to the Boost update - > [...] > > - usd [[ >

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

ceph is FTBFS due to a change in Boost Asio. I'll file a PR this morning. usr/include/boost/asio/async_result.hpp:651:9: error: no type named 'completion_handler_type' in 'class boost::asio::async_result, void(boost::system::error_code, ceph::buffer::v15_2_0::list)>' 651 |

Re: Self Introduction: Dalton Hubble

Yes, but only distantly :) Dalton ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List

[Bug 2172742] perl-Geo-ShapeFile-3.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172742 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

Another system success: Installing weak dependencies: ipp-usb x86_64 0.9.23-2.fc38 fedora 2.1 M oneVPL-intel-gpu x86_64

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

Success: Installing weak dependencies: ipp-usb x86_64 0.9.23-2.fc38 fedora 2.1 M oneVPL-intel-gpu x86_64 22.5.3-1.fc38

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 8:19 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 01:11:13PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 13:03, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > Do you know anything about what's happening with Ceph? > > > > No idea, sorry. > > Ceph is likely #2169364 aka

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 01:11:13PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 13:03, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Do you know anything about what's happening with Ceph? > > No idea, sorry. Ceph is likely #2169364 aka https://gcc.gnu.org/PR108773 , still unresolved GCC bug.

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Boost 1.81 rebuilds starting Monday 2022-02-20

On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 20:52, Thomas Rodgers wrote: > > The f39-boost side tag builds have finished. > > The following packages are new FTBFS likely due to the Boost update - [...] > - usd > [[https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5975/97845975/build.log][build.log]] The correct log for

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 13:03, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Do you know anything about what's happening with Ceph? No idea, sorry. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 11:35:15AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 11:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 10:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > boost 1.81.0 (side tag f39-boost) was merged into Fedora earlier this > > > week: > > > > > >

Re: Announced pkgconf soname change

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 7:55 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > pkgconf-1.9.4-1.fc39, comparing to 1.8.0-6.fc39, changed a soname without > a notice on this list. Affected packages: > > # dnf -q --repoid f39-build repoquery --whatrequires > 'libpkgconf.so.3()(64bit)' --source | sort -u >

Announced pkgconf soname change

pkgconf-1.9.4-1.fc39, comparing to 1.8.0-6.fc39, changed a soname without a notice on this list. Affected packages: # dnf -q --repoid f39-build repoquery --whatrequires 'libpkgconf.so.3()(64bit)' --source | sort -u build2-0.15.0-1.fc37~bootstrap.src.rpm

Re: Feedback wanted for a proposed improvement to RPM's ELF dependency generator

On 2/21/23 14:01, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 9:40 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 10:56:30AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 2023-02-20 10:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Does it have to be something which looks so much like it might be a version

[Bug 2172714] F39FailsToInstall: perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172714 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Github |

[Bug 2172713] F39FailsToInstall: perl-Alien-pkgconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172713 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|---

Fedora 38 compose report: 20230223.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-38-20230222.n.0 NEW: Fedora-38-20230223.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 4 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 10.92 MiB Size of dropped packages:173.92 KiB

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 11:41, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > I think you got something wrong with your repoquery. Perhaps it

Re: FTBFS bug filed, build already deleted

On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 14:21, Scott Talbert wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Feb 2023, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > > Julian Sikorski wrote: > >> FTBFS bug was filed against mame [1]. Unfortunately, the corresponding > >> build [2] has already been deleted. This is not ideal from maintainer > >>

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > I think you got something wrong with your repoquery. Perhaps it picked up > older packages from a published rawhide compose that were still

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Boost 1.81 rebuilds starting Monday 2022-02-20

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 11:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 23. 02. 23 11:50, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 09:34, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 23. 02. 23 2:37, Thomas Rodgers wrote: > >>> imath is listed as a prerequisite for OpenImageIO, but not openvdb. Fixed > >>> now. >

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 11:29, Kalev Lember wrote: > I think you got something wrong with your repoquery. Perhaps it picked up > older packages from a published rawhide compose that were still linked with > older boost? > > My list of things needing rebuild is much shorter: This list is what

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 11:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 10:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > boost 1.81.0 (side tag f39-boost) was merged into Fedora earlier this week: > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1074 > > > > These are the

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 10:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > boost 1.81.0 (side tag f39-boost) was merged into Fedora earlier this week: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1074 > > These are the builds in the side tag: > > >

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > The problem is more widespread :( > > $ (dnf5 repoquery --whatrequires 'libboost_thread.so.1.78.0()(64bit)'; > dnf5 repoquery --whatrequires 'libboost_iostreams.so.1.78.0()(64bit)'; dnf5 > repoquery

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

On 23. 02. 23 12:16, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:49:30AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: boost 1.81.0 (side tag f39-boost) was merged into Fedora earlier this week: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1074 These are the builds in the

Fwd: fedmsg notification

What does this notification mean, and how do I turn it off? The filter UI for notifications is impossible to understand. -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 10:25 Subject: fedmsg notification Notification time stamped 2023-02-23 10:25:03 UTC

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:49:30AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > boost 1.81.0 (side tag f39-boost) was merged into Fedora earlier this week: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1074 > > These are the builds in the side tag: > > >

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Boost 1.81 rebuilds starting Monday 2022-02-20

On 23. 02. 23 11:50, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 09:34, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 23. 02. 23 2:37, Thomas Rodgers wrote: imath is listed as a prerequisite for OpenImageIO, but not openvdb. Fixed now. Listed where? It's not necessary to construct a dependency tree, it was

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Boost 1.81 rebuilds starting Monday 2022-02-20

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 09:34, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 23. 02. 23 2:37, Thomas Rodgers wrote: > > imath is listed as a prerequisite for OpenImageIO, but not openvdb. Fixed > > now. > > Listed where? It's not necessary to construct a dependency tree, it was > entirely possible to keep restarting

Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

boost 1.81.0 (side tag f39-boost) was merged into Fedora earlier this week: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1074 These are the builds in the side tag: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0=63053=-build_id=1 However I think some packages didn't

[Bug 2172819] perl-SQL-Statement-1.414-10.fc39 tests produce a lot of warnings: Use of uninitialized value $unkpos in subtraction (-) at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Text/Balanced.pm line 1008

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172819 --- Comment #2 from Michal Josef Spacek --- Triggered by commit: https://github.com/steve-m-hay/Text-Balanced/commit/744f78ff9566e3720860f830dc0b21facae9e648 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Re: Help with systemd/cgroup task limits in koji

* Giuseppe Scrivano: > Florian Weimer writes: >> It could be an old kernel bug: >> >> Task exit is signaled before task resource deallocation, leading to >> bogus EAGAIN errors >> >> >> There have been recent namespace optimizations

Re: Unannounced .so version bump (F38/F39): openexr2

On Thursday, 23 February 2023 09:48:36 CET Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > > - kde-runtime > > - kdebase3 > > - kdelibs I created a side-tag: f39-build-side-63924 and rebuilt kdelibs and kde- runtime. However, it turns out I don't have commit access to kdebase3. I submitted a PR here:

[Bug 2172819] perl-SQL-Statement-1.414-10.fc39 tests produce a lot of warnings: Use of uninitialized value $unkpos in subtraction (-) at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Text/Balanced.pm line 1008

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172819 --- Comment #1 from Michal Josef Spacek --- Triggered by perl-Text-Balanced 2.05. The issue exists in 2.06 still. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

Dne 22. 02. 23 v 5:38 Kevin Kofler via devel napsal(a): Kevin Fenzi wrote: I fear the only way to fix it is to get pungi to merge entire repos, and I don't think thats anything that pungi wants to be on the hook for doing. But there are more things than just DeltaRPMs it could be useful for.

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 8: %__python3 == /usr/bin/python3 creates runtime problems with alternatives

On 30. 01. 23 21:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 30. 01. 23 20:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11. 12. 22 15:48, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 21. 11. 22 12:56, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 09. 11. 22 20:07, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 08. 11. 22 22:36, Troy Dawson wrote: Hi Miro, You have explained the problem very

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Boost 1.81 rebuilds starting Monday 2022-02-20

On 23. 02. 23 2:37, Thomas Rodgers wrote: imath is listed as a prerequisite for OpenImageIO, but not openvdb. Fixed now. Listed where? It's not necessary to construct a dependency tree, it was entirely possible to keep restarting the failures until nothing else built the last time I run a

  1   2   >