Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2023-03-07 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that
you are following:
``
3.73 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/22
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175955
Colin Macdonald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
3.73 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/21
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 11:57 AM Nick Howitt via epel-devel
wrote:
>
> On 03/03/2023 15:33, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 06:55:46AM -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> We are currently in the middle of changing the workflow of retiring these
> packages. We are changing it so
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 9:33 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 06:55:46AM -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > We are currently in the middle of changing the workflow of retiring these
> > packages. We are changing it so that the package maintainer doesn't do the
> > removing. It
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 9:16 AM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 at 06:42, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>
>> A few weeks back there was a little snafu (since resolved) with the
>> capstone package in EPEL.
>>
>> This package is being introduced to RHEL 9.2, and thus has been added
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 5:42 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> A few weeks back there was a little snafu (since resolved) with the
> capstone package in EPEL.
>
> This package is being introduced to RHEL 9.2, and thus has been added
> to CentOS 9 Stream repos. A bug was filed against capstone in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175432
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-7d1dc1739a has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142502
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-4873a45d1e has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142502
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-2c9039d9a0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
perl-Image-ExifTool-12.50-1.el7
Details about builds:
perl-Image-ExifTool-12.50-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-2c9039d9a0)
Utility for reading
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142502
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-525376725d has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155156
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158128
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142502
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1f52066011 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158132
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175432
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-e4041fe3de has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e4041fe3de
See also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175305
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174891
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142502
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-cb7c541418 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-cb7c541418
See also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175585
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-0ac3058d9c has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0ac3058d9c
See also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175591
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142502
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175432
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
On 3/6/23 13:38, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 12:18:18AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>> David Michael wrote:
>>> - Firecracker can be built with Fedora's libc (glibc), but it is
>>> officially unsupported upstream[3]. Functionality would be harmed by
>>> not using
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175955
Bug ID: 2175955
Summary: biber-2.19 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: biber
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Hi!
Good to know that time will diff between US and EU for 2 weeks, this
email is always helpful every year :)
On 3/6/23, Ben Cotton wrote:
> As a reminder to the community, we've reached the point in the year
> where jurisdictions around the world begin or end summer time. Be sure
> to check
As a reminder to the community, we've reached the point in the year
where jurisdictions around the world begin or end summer time. Be sure
to check your recurring meetings on Fedocal[1] to make sure you know
when you're meeting. Some meetings are set to a fixed time UTC and
others are set to a
As a reminder to the community, we've reached the point in the year
where jurisdictions around the world begin or end summer time. Be sure
to check your recurring meetings on Fedocal[1] to make sure you know
when you're meeting. Some meetings are set to a fixed time UTC and
others are set to a
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> And since we're talking hypervisors, qemu also manages to use glibc &
> implement a seccomp filter.
Good to know. I was not aware that qemu has a seccomp filter, that is nice.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that
you are following:
``
3.73 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/21
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175914
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Sub-Name` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Name/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Sub-Name` that you
are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Name/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175914
Bug ID: 2175914
Summary: perl-Locale-Codes-3.73 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Locale-Codes
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 12:18:18AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> David Michael wrote:
> > - Firecracker can be built with Fedora's libc (glibc), but it is
> > officially unsupported upstream[3]. Functionality would be harmed by
> > not using musl, e.g. seccomp filters are not used.
>
>
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-SOAP-Lite` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-SOAP-Lite/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-SOAP-Lite` that
you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-SOAP-Lite/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175432
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-64b6de55c4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-64b6de55c4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175432
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-7d1dc1739a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-7d1dc1739a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175432
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.000148 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/26
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Since python-versioneer was updated to 0.28 in Rawhide, its license changed
from Public Domain (which really should have been CC0-1.0) to Unlicense. This
reflects an upstream relicensing decision in version 0.24.
While the comments in versioneer-generated _version.py files mention only that
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that
you are following:
``
0.000148 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/26
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.000148 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/25
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Unicode-Collate`
that you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Unicode-Collate/pull-request/3
___
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that
you are following:
``
0.000148 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/25
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.000148 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/24
___
perl-devel mailing list --
=
#fedora-meeting: Fedora Flatpak Packaging SIG
=
Meeting started by kalev at 15:00:19 UTC. The full logs are available at
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 38 RC 20230306.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175807
Bug ID: 2175807
Summary: perl-Git-Repository-1.325-7.fc39 FTBFS: t/20-simple.t
fails EDITOR tests
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142502
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142502
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-cb7c541418 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-cb7c541418
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142502
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-cb7c541418 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-cb7c541418
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142502
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-7d950084d8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-7d950084d8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174891
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-0ea83b3e72 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0ea83b3e72
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 04:19:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 03. 23 12:32, Lumír Balhar wrote:
> > Fedora 39 now contains JupyterLab 4.0.0 alpha 34 which allows me to
> > update Jupyter Notebook to 7.0.0 alpha 14.
...
> > Any help testing the prereleases is appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 04:19:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 03. 23 12:32, Lumír Balhar wrote:
> > Fedora 39 now contains JupyterLab 4.0.0 alpha 34 which allows me to
> > update Jupyter Notebook to 7.0.0 alpha 14.
...
> > Any help testing the prereleases is appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
Dne 06. 03. 23 v 14:27 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 06. 03. 23 v 12:49 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
While rubygem-openscap is retired in Fedora, the Foreman project
still packages it.
For context: rubygem-openscap can load libopenscap.so.8 and
libopenscap.so.25 through FFI. Today we
Dne 06. 03. 23 v 12:49 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
While rubygem-openscap is retired in Fedora, the Foreman project still
packages it.
For context: rubygem-openscap can load libopenscap.so.8 and
libopenscap.so.25 through FFI. Today we depend on a specific version,
but every time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155156
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-88b95affd6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-88b95affd6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155156
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Devel-REPL-1.003029-5.
OLD: Fedora-38-20230305.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230306.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155156
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/51804
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155156
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 01:27:18PM +0100, Jarek Prokop wrote:
Interesting situation.
On 3/6/23 12:49, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
While rubygem-openscap is retired in Fedora, the Foreman project
still packages it.
For context: rubygem-openscap can load libopenscap.so.8 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175591
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-e1a369bf26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e1a369bf26
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
Interesting situation.
On 3/6/23 12:49, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
While rubygem-openscap is retired in Fedora, the Foreman project still
packages it.
For context: rubygem-openscap can load libopenscap.so.8 and
libopenscap.so.25 through FFI. Today we depend on a specific version,
but
On 06/03/2023 12:49, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
so what is the correct approach here?
Requires: openscap%{?_isa}
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175591
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-DBD-Pg-3.16.1-1.fc39
While rubygem-openscap is retired in Fedora, the Foreman project still
packages it.
For context: rubygem-openscap can load libopenscap.so.8 and
libopenscap.so.25 through FFI. Today we depend on a specific version,
but every time it's bumped we go through a verification to see if the SO
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that
you are following:
``
0.000148 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/24
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158132
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-01f6e74c04 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-01f6e74c04
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
Hello, just a small update. We have verified recently that Packit staging
correctly creates F38 updates now:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-b3613064bf
This will land in production tomorrow, so as of March 7th, Packit will
correctly create F38 dist-git PRs and everything else.
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Requires` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Requires/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.000148 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/23
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158132
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Sys-SigAction-0.23-21.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158132
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Requires`
that you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Requires/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that
you are following:
``
0.000148 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/23
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175432
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230304.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230306.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 12
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 272
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 295.41 MiB
Size of dropped packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175585
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-0ac3058d9c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0ac3058d9c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158128
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-641c41da45 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-641c41da45
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175591
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|dev...@gunduz.org, |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175585
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173865
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175585
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175305
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-f802ff5e54 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-f802ff5e54
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158128
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-App-Nopaste-1.013-12.e
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 09:29:02 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> - shaneallcroft contacted since January 11th 2023
> shaneallcroft is main admin of rpms/pyplane
> shaneallcroft has a bugzilla override on rpms/pyplane
We've not seen Shane at the Neuro-SIG meetings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175305
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169300
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Clipboard-0.28-7.el9
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158128
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar
Hi everyone,
this survey will be closed tomorrow, so you have last day to fill it. We
will share the results once the survey will be closed. Thanks everybody
for helping us decide.
On behalf of I Team,
Michal
On 07. 02. 23 16:24, Michal Konecny wrote:
Hi everyone,
it came to Infra &
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172713
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|MODIFIED
Good Morning Everyone,
The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to
either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS
matches an existing bugzilla account.
Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:
98 matches
Mail list logo
