On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 02:34:07PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> An issue was filed earlier today:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11192
Amd fixed. ;)
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list --
On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 00:34, Ben Beasley wrote:
> Thank you for helping dig into the details. What you’ve written makes
> sense, and is consistent with the comments in absl/base/options.h regarding
> ABSL_OPTION_USE_STD_STRING_VIEW:
>
> A value of 2 means to detect the C++ version being used
Thank you for helping dig into the details. What you’ve written makes
sense, and is consistent with the comments in absl/base/options.h
regarding ABSL_OPTION_USE_STD_STRING_VIEW:
A value of 2 means to detect the C++ version being used to compile
Abseil,
and use an alias only if a
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 22:17, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 22:14, Ben Beasley wrote:
>
>> Thank you for prompting me to look at this more closely. A quick
>> investigation reveals:
>>
>> “Abseil libraries require C++14 as the current minimum standard. When
>> compiled
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 22:14, Ben Beasley wrote:
> Thank you for prompting me to look at this more closely. A quick
> investigation reveals:
>
> “Abseil libraries require C++14 as the current minimum standard. When
> compiled with C++17 (either because it is the compiler's default or
>
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 15, 2023, Ben Beasley wrote:
>> In one week (2023-03-22), or slightly later, I plan to update
abseil-cpp[1] in Rawhide/F39 to the latest LTS release, which is currently
20230125.1. Release notes are available[2].
>>
Thank you for prompting me to look at this more closely. A quick investigation
reveals:
“Abseil libraries require C++14 as the current minimum standard. When compiled
with C++17 (either because it is the compiler's default or explicitly
requested), then Abseil requires C++17.”
djdelorie opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-DES` that
you are following:
``
Fix C99 compatibility issue
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-DES/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
An issue was filed earlier today:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11192
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
URLs such as https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/ocaml-dune started
returning an HTTP 403 Forbidden a few days ago. Is that permanent? I
personally find those URLs very useful and have used them a lot in the
past.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
Thanks for the suggestion, but I do not use Twitter and don't want to create an
account.
On March 15, 2023 5:13:43 PM GMT+02:00, Fabio Valentini
wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:04 PM Mark E. Fuller
>wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> This is a non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo.
>> I am trying
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 11:09 AM Jerry James wrote:
> I see the same with a couple of my packages. A look at
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs suggests that we shouldn't
> be using BuildRequires: nodejs-devel anymore, but rather
> nodejsXX-devel for an appropriate value of XX. It
I see the same with a couple of my packages. A look at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs suggests that we shouldn't
be using BuildRequires: nodejs-devel anymore, but rather
nodejsXX-devel for an appropriate value of XX. It looks like "20" is
the only currently appropriate value for XX.
Hi,
RStudio (which depends on nodejs-devel) is FTBFS since the latest
nodejs update. I see this in F37 and F38:
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib64/libv8.so.10 conflicts between attempted installs of
nodejs-libs-1:18.14.2-5.fc37.x86_64 and
nodejs20-libs-1:19.7.0-13.fc37.x86_64
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:04 PM Mark E. Fuller wrote:
>
> Hi,
> This is a non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo.
> I am trying to contact him as the owner of
> golang-github-masterminds-semver[0].
> There is one other open non-responsive maintainer check, filed ~2 weeks
> ago[1].
> Does
Hi,
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo.
I am trying to contact him as the owner of
golang-github-masterminds-semver[0].
There is one other open non-responsive maintainer check, filed ~2 weeks
ago[1].
Does anyone know how to contact eclipseo?
Thanks,
fuller
[0]
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230314.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230315.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 144
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:1.42 GiB
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023, Ben Beasley wrote:
> In one week (2023-03-22), or slightly later, I plan to update
abseil-cpp[1] in Rawhide/F39 to the latest LTS release, which is currently
20230125.1. Release notes are available[2].
>
> The most significant breaking change is that dependent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178063
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-fa06873253 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-fa06873253
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178063
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-MooseX-StrictConstruct
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178063
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|emman...@seyman.fr |ppi...@redhat.com
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178067
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-40c1e35c83 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-40c1e35c83
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
In one week (2023-03-22), or slightly later, I plan to update
abseil-cpp[1] in Rawhide/F39 to the latest LTS release, which is
currently 20230125.1. Release notes are available[2].
The most significant breaking change is that dependent packages are
required to compile with C++14 or later, and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178067
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-VM-EC2-Security-Creden
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178067
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/51982
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178067
OLD: Fedora-38-20230314.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230315.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 57
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 171.71 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178068
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-26dedf30bf has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-26dedf30bf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178068
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178068
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/51981
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178068
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-Writer` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Fix SPDX license
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-Writer/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Wed, 2023-03-15 at 07:54 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 6:32 AM Sandro wrote:
> >
> > On 15-03-2023 00:34, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 7:17 PM Sandro
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Apologies for my late response. I have been swamped with other
> > > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177939
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-c8206f5054 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c8206f5054
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177939
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-42d65071b5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-42d65071b5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177939
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 6:32 AM Sandro wrote:
>
> On 15-03-2023 00:34, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 7:17 PM Sandro wrote:
> >>
> >> Apologies for my late response. I have been swamped with other things...
> >>
> >> On 27-02-2023 16:05, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Feb 27,
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 38 Branched 20230315.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-Writer` that
you are following:
``
Fix SPDX license
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-Writer/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-Writer` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Fix SPDX license
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-Writer/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-Writer` that
you are following:
``
Fix SPDX license
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-Writer/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On 15-03-2023 01:04, Leigh Scott wrote:
I can give sponsorship and acl's for the rpmfusion package.
Thanks, Leigh. I take it that would be needed for updating the current
libheif, of which you are one of the maintainers.
I do have an RPMFusion Bugzilla account already and I will join the
On 15-03-2023 00:34, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 7:17 PM Sandro wrote:
Apologies for my late response. I have been swamped with other things...
On 27-02-2023 16:05, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:04 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 10:27 -0500,
41 matches
Mail list logo
