https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182563
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-ddbe264c1a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ddbe264c1a
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182563
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-ddbe264c1a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ddbe264c1a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-768e906db7
chromium-111.0.5563.110-1.el7
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9a3db4278b
openbgpd-7.9-1.el7
The following builds
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
14 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e00c3d01e
cutter-re-2.2.0-1.el8 rizin-0.5.1-1.el8
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-347df5dde7
netconsd-0.2-1.el8
5
I have been maintaining spyder in Fedora for sometime now. Since the
time I took up maintaining spyder, the dependencies have expanded
considerably (I have packaged several of these dependencies in the
past). Unfortunately, I am not able to devote as much as time as needed
to maintain this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180367
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180370
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178064
Bug 2178064 depends on bug 2179977, which changed state.
Bug 2179977 Summary: Add perl-DateTimeX-Easy to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179977
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180541
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179977
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179977
Bug 2179977 depends on bug 2180050, which changed state.
Bug 2180050 Summary: Add perl-DateTime-Format-Natural to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180050
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180050
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180101
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181578
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.59 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.59
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181308
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.58 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.58
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180986
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179198
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 |perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180367
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180370
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180370
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180367
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181308
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181578
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
Hello Python packagers.
RPM 4.19 introduces this feature:
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/dynamic_specs.html
I decided to write this email to gather my thoughts. I believe that with this,
we can turn manual Python extras subpackages like this:
%package -n python3-...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.19
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.19
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
Hi folks,
Thank you for the answers!
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 1:16 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I wonder what the "do something" is, because comparing versions is almost
> always the wrong choice IMHO.
>
When the server package upgrades to the next major version, there are
upgrade instructions that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170647
--- Comment #1 from gan...@yahoo.com ---
Will you be able to branch and build perl-Net-Telnet in epel9?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170647
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 10:09 AM Jonathan Wright wrote:
> I just retired python-acme this morning in F38/39. It's now built by the
> certbot package.
Great, thank you for letting me know.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing
I just retired python-acme this morning in F38/39. It's now built by the
certbot package.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:02 AM Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:28 PM Jerry James wrote:
> > The maintainers of the packages I am about to mention are BCCed on this
> email.
>
> And that
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:28 PM Jerry James wrote:
> The maintainers of the packages I am about to mention are BCCed on this email.
And that is true of this email as well.
> A couple of months ago, I talked about updating the fontawesome-fonts
> package to version 6.x. I want to give an update
I've grabbed this package. I'll keep an eye on the GH issue and get an
update released once upstream releases patches/updates for the kernel
issues.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 5:59 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
> I have orphaned hstr today.
>
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hstr
>
> It is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181971
--- Comment #16 from Petr Pisar ---
I modified perl-Glib-Object-Introspection in dist-git. Tomorrow I will change
perl-Gtk3, hook perl-Gtk3 into perl-Glib-Object-Introspection gating, and build
them in a side tag.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181971
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|berra...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com
It doesn't look like they've done their merge yet, so I'll see if I can get
your change in.
How does this sound?
Subject:
Notice: will be automatically retired from EPEL when RHEL
. is released
Comment:
This issue is purely informational, you do not need to take any action.
Thank you for your
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182319
Lukas Ruzicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|NEW
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230329.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230330.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:9
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 93
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 565.75 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 2:33 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 02:25:33PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 2:10 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 12:08:03AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 02:25:33PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 2:10 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 12:08:03AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 4:09 AM Alexander Ploumistos
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 2:10 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 12:08:03AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 4:09 AM Alexander Ploumistos
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > TL;DR:
> > > DNF memory usage during upgrades from F37 to F38
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 12:08:03AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 4:09 AM Alexander Ploumistos
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > TL;DR:
> > DNF memory usage during upgrades from F37 to F38 on a couple of Fedora
> > Cloud images (with 2 GB of RAM each) led to oomd kicking in
OLD: Fedora-38-20230329.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230330.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:9
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 22
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 138
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.86 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, at 6:08 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> I don't really want to throw money out the window just because DNF
> eats up all the memory it can :(
Everyone needs to internalize: This has nothing to do with DNF, really.
It's about the *size of the repository metadata*.
Every
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181971
--- Comment #15 from Sergio Basto ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #13)
> Would you mind if I changed perl-Gtk3 and perl-Glib-Object-Introspection
> packages in a way that whenever a new perl-Glib-Object-Introspection goes
> through
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181971
--- Comment #14 from Daniel Berrangé ---
Yes, sounds like a good idea to have some testing of this combination.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181971
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||GNOME Gitlab
|
I have orphaned hstr today.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hstr
It is currently non-functional due to kernel-6.2 changes, see
https://github.com/dvorka/hstr/issues/478
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181971
--- Comment #12 from Petr Pisar ---
It segfaults even when running (on Fedora 39) against a real X server (on
Fedora 36):
(gdb) bt
#0 g_callable_info_get_closure_native_address
(callable_info=callable_info@entry=0x56d6cfd0,
Hello,
does anyone know how to contact *jkaluza*?
I’m trying to get python-prometheus_client updated[1], but its
maintainer jkaluza is unresponsive. Thus, I have opened the
corresponding non-responsive maintainer issue[2]. I’d be okay with
taking maintainership of the package if needed.
Dne 30. 03. 23 v 10:16 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
During `%preun servers`:
export OLD_VERSION="$(rpm -qa openldap | awk -F- '/^openldap/ && split($2,ver,/\./) >= 1 {print ver[1] "." ver[2]
"." ver[3]}')"
Then, during `%post servers`
if [ $1 -lt 2 ] || [
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 10:49:33AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 30. 03. 23 v 0:08 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> > Additionally, the smallest offerings of popular VPS providers have
> > just 1 or 2 GB of RAM, is Fedora Server no longer supported on systems
> > like these?
>
> At first place -
Dne 30. 03. 23 v 0:08 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
Additionally, the smallest offerings of popular VPS providers have
just 1 or 2 GB of RAM, is Fedora Server no longer supported on systems
like these?
At first place - upgrades in cloud environment should be discouraged. The standard should be 1)
Yes, I've figured this out meanwhile. I still see it as the proven packager's
job to give some information before or at least while pushing a change that was
neither announced, nor called for by a change proposal.
As you point out correctly, the new syntax just landed in rpm 4.18 (F37 up), so
Dne 30. 03. 23 v 2:54 Simon Pichugin napsal(a):
Hi folks,
I've spent some time experimenting and trying to implement something
like this ($subject):
During `%preun servers`:
export OLD_VERSION="$(rpm -qa openldap | awk -F- '/^openldap/ &&
split($2,ver,/\./) >= 1 {print ver[1] "."
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 04:04:42 -
"Luya Tshimbalanga" wrote:
> Hello team,
> Blender 3.5.0 got released today at this time of writing. Unfortunately,
> failure occurred with the following link possibly related to cycles:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=99301805
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182563
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On 3/29/23 18:58, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Florian Festi wrote:
On 3/29/23 10:31, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Has `%patchN` been deprecated in favour of `%patch N`?
Yes, see %patch section on
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/spec.html
Quoting that:
%patch is used to
On 30/03/2023 02:54, Simon Pichugin wrote:
I understand that it's not the correct way... Could you please suggest
how something like this can be achieved? (during the upgrade - check if
the old and the new package versions are the same)
You should use %triggerun instead:
%triggerun --
Il 30/03/23 01:26, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
> On 28. 03. 23 10:57, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>> Most of the updates which have notes longer than 10k characters are
>> rawhide automatic updates which copies the RPM changelog over and over,
> What will happen now, when an automatic rawhide like
60 matches
Mail list logo
