https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187598
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1957933
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1957933=edit
Update to 1.17 (#2187598)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187598
Bug ID: 2187598
Summary: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.17 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187440
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187440
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185669
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-2fa29d5522 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186946
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-2fa29d5522 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186944
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-fca191b57e
libyang-2.0.164-2.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
pspg-5.7.5-1.el7
Details about builds:
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
32 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e00c3d01e
cutter-re-2.2.0-1.el8 rizin-0.5.1-1.el8
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8c1df52e87
chromium-112.0.5615.49-1.el8
5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-97d6b10e34
rnp-0.16.3-1.el9
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4894f94aaa
dr_libs-0^20230324git4b3d078-0.1.el9
4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-84d06718aa has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185669
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-84d06718aa has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185669
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-a0cddb239c has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187550
Bug ID: 2187550
Summary: perl-XML-Generator-1.11 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-XML-Generator
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
That's great Justin, thanks.
John
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 5:01 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 2:45 PM John Kacur wrote:
> >
> > There is a new tool that is dependent on these libs too. Also from
> Daniel Bristot (rtla)
> > tools/verification/rv
> >
> > I was wondering if we
Dne 17. 04. 23 v 17:55 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
+ %py3_build
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.XYSHTs: line 44: fg: no job control
And that error in turn usually means there is a syntax error in the
spec file. In this case I'd guess the package may be missing a build
dependency on whatever package includes
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/releases/tag/rpm-4.19.0-alpha
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/releases/tag/rpm-4.19.0-alphaf
5 days ago.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 12:42 PM David Cantrell wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 04:49:13PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > A license of "indent" package was corrected from
> >
> > GPLv3+ and BSD and Verbatim
> >
> > to
> >
> > GPL-3.0-or-later AND BSD-3-Clause AND BSD-4.3TAHOE AND
> >
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 2:45 PM John Kacur wrote:
>
> There is a new tool that is dependent on these libs too. Also from Daniel
> Bristot (rtla)
> tools/verification/rv
>
> I was wondering if we could get this into rawhide?
Yes, I will get it in before the 6.3 release next Monday, that way it
There is a new tool that is dependent on these libs too. Also from Daniel
Bristot (rtla)
tools/verification/rv
I was wondering if we could get this into rawhide?
John Kacur
On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 12:12 AM Zamir SUN wrote:
>
> On 4/5/23 23:49, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at
Jakub Kadlcik kirjoitti 17.4.2023 klo 18.53:
I want to thank you all for the feedback.
Everything was already mentioned in the discussion so I am not going
to dig into details again. Just a quick summary for anyone who wants
TL;DR for this thread:
- I am not going to implement the original
I went through the ticket queue for FESCo and couldn't find any agenda items
for tomorrow's meeting, so we can skip it and go for next week, April 25th.
I'll chair that meeting for the group. 晴
Just as a reminder if you need to put something on the agenda:
*
If you would like to add
Time corrections from the original announcement:
14:00 - 18:00 UTC
10:00 - 14:00 EDT
16:00 - 20:00 CEST
Thanks,
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:35:36AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> Fedora Legal will be conducting a hackfest on April 26, 2023 during a four
> hour block. Information is on the SIGs
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_webkit2gtk-4.0_API_Version
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CloudEC2ImagesNoStandardStorage
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CloudEC2ImagesNoStandardStorage
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_webkit2gtk-4.0_API_Version
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187440
Bug ID: 2187440
Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-9.2.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sys-Virt
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
As previously proposed on the epel-devel mailing list, and in accordance
with the EPEL Retirement Policy: Process: Security Reasons[1], I will be
retiring the flintqs package in EPEL7, EPEL8, and EPEL9 today.
When I took over maintenance of the flintqs package[2]—which contains
William Hart’s
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 04:49:13PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> A license of "indent" package was corrected from
>
> GPLv3+ and BSD and Verbatim
>
> to
>
> GPL-3.0-or-later AND BSD-3-Clause AND BSD-4.3TAHOE AND
> Latex2e-translated-notice.
BSD-4.3TAHOE and Latex2e-translated-notice are
Il 17/04/23 17:39, Jakub Kadlcik ha scritto:
> Hello,
> per the Non-responsive maintainer policy
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> I am sending this email. We (copr-sig) would like to (co)maintain the
> python-flask-whooshee package but
On 17/04/2023 17:53, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
- Instead, I am going to automatically open an issue in the
package-sponsors tracker for new contributors after they receive
fedora-review+ on their first ticket.
LGTM now. Thank you for working on this.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev
On Mon, 2023-04-17 at 11:52 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm getting a very strange mock error [1] on a package [2]
> > that was recently ported to python 3.
> >
> > The package builds fine locally... only fails in a
> > scratch
I want to thank you all for the feedback.
Everything was already mentioned in the discussion so I am not going
to dig into details again. Just a quick summary for anyone who wants
TL;DR for this thread:
- I am not going to implement the original proposal or any variation of it
- Instead, I am
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting a very strange mock error [1] on a package [2]
that was recently ported to python 3.
The package builds fine locally... only fails in a
scratch build... and that function that the error is c
complaining about does not exist in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
Fedora Legal will be conducting a hackfest on April 26, 2023 during a four
hour block. Information is on the SIGs calendar:
https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/SIGs/2023/4/26/
We will be focusing on the ELN package set in Fedora and preparing pull
requests for those packages to convert the
Fedora Legal will be conducting a hackfest on April 26, 2023 during a four
hour block. Information is on the SIGs calendar:
https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/SIGs/2023/4/26/
We will be focusing on the ELN package set in Fedora and preparing pull
requests for those packages to convert the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Hello,
per the Non-responsive maintainer policy
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
I am sending this email. We (copr-sig) would like to (co)maintain the
python-flask-whooshee package but @rkuska can't give us permission
because he lost access
Hello,
I'm getting a very strange mock error [1] on a package [2]
that was recently ported to python 3.
The package builds fine locally... only fails in a
scratch build... and that function that the error is c
complaining about does not exist in the package...
Not clear what to do... tia!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 12:55:28PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> There are a couple more disadvantages to using Discourse:
>
> * Several of the replies are lower-quality and are not contributing
> to the conversation.
That happens here too, of course. I think it's really a consequence of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 12:56:55PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On the downside, spam limits on new posters have gotten in the way in some
> cases, and people have had some trouble figuring out how to use the quoting
> features, resulting in disconnected responses.
I have bumped some of the
Now that Blender 3.5 has landed, I can update the usd package in Rawhide
to version 23.02[1]. I plan to build it in one week, 2023-04-24, or
slightly later.
The .so version is bumped (as with every release) and the monolithic
library is renamed from libusd_usd_ms.so to libusd_ms.so. I am also
A license of "indent" package was corrected from
GPLv3+ and BSD and Verbatim
to
GPL-3.0-or-later AND BSD-3-Clause AND BSD-4.3TAHOE AND
Latex2e-translated-notice.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list --
A bug was found in /usr/bin/crb [1] dealing with how crb determines if you
are on a RHEL system or not. A fix was made and tested on every RHEL
compatible distro I could find. So I'm very confident about those.
But for real RHEL systems that use subscription-manager, I only have access
to a few
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-84d06718aa has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-84d06718aa
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-2fa29d5522 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-2fa29d5522
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275
--- Comment #5 from Sergio Basto ---
I forgot give one information, we only need it for tests
BTW I found one src.rpm of perl-Hash-Ordered ,
http://repo.openfusion.net/srpms/perl-Hash-Ordered-0.009-1.of.el7.src.rpm
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
Mea culpa. My understanding was that this would not impact the sorts
of use cases that were broken. Clearly that's not the case.
Regardless, this should have been better communicated and tested. I
take full responsibility for that; I should know better.
I'll work with the Bugzilla developers to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-IO-Interactive-1.023-8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jples...@redhat.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275
Sergio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
> On 2023-04-14 01:28, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
>
> The boot time improvements came from removing iscsi from the critical
> path. There's no longer a dependency on network-online in the path to
> graphical.target.
>
> The memory improvements came from allowing packagekitd to shut down on
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186946
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-2f88fcefcb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-2f88fcefcb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186946
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-Locale-1.38-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291
Bug ID: 2187291
Summary: Add perl-IO-Interactive to EPEL9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IO-Interactive
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2187291
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2187286
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286
Bug ID: 2187286
Summary: Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet to EPEL9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283
Bug ID: 2187283
Summary: Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple to EPEL9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177873
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2187283
Referenced Bugs:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230416.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230417.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 266
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 143.20 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186944
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-18f776e7ba has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-18f776e7ba
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-User-Identity-1.02-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100055645
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1957821
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1957821=edit
Update to 1.02 (#2187275)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275
Bug ID: 2187275
Summary: perl-User-Identity-1.02 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-User-Identity
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
* Miro Hrončok:
> Apparently, the RHEL 9 product still has the old form, so Fedor amust
> have opted into this. I wonder, where was this change coordinated? How
> did I miss it?
It was coordinated here:
Default Fedora bug creation to Guided bug entry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186944
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Time-Progress-2.14-1.f
On 17. 04. 23 9:19, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 17. 04. 23 8:40, Florian Weimer wrote:
Guided bug filing in Bugzilla was rolled out today.
Is there a way to get back the old entry form? ...
We have a workflow that generates links like this:
url_prefix =
On 17. 04. 23 9:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 17. 04. 23 8:40, Florian Weimer wrote:
Guided bug filing in Bugzilla was rolled out today.
Is there a way to get back the old entry form? It doesn't look it's
possible, specifying ?format=FORMAT gives this error:
| file error - cannot find file -
|
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On 17. 04. 23 8:40, Florian Weimer wrote:
Guided bug filing in Bugzilla was rolled out today.
Is there a way to get back the old entry form? ...
We have a workflow that generates links like this:
url_prefix = 'https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?'
params = {
On 17. 04. 23 8:40, Florian Weimer wrote:
Guided bug filing in Bugzilla was rolled out today.
Is there a way to get back the old entry form? It doesn't look it's
possible, specifying ?format=FORMAT gives this error:
| file error - cannot find file -
|
Guided bug filing in Bugzilla was rolled out today.
Is there a way to get back the old entry form? It doesn't look it's
possible, specifying ?format=FORMAT gives this error:
| file error - cannot find file -
| bug/create/create-FORMATguided-Fedora.html.tmpl ()
So it looks like the server just
89 matches
Mail list logo
