[Bug 2187598] perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.17 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187598



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1957933
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1957933=edit
Update to 1.17 (#2187598)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187598
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187598] New: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.17 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187598

Bug ID: 2187598
   Summary: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.17 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: or...@nwra.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jakub.jedel...@gmail.com, or...@nwra.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
scitech-b...@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 1.17
Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.17
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.16-1.fc38
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Astro-FITS-CFITSIO/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/11580/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187598
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187440] perl-Sys-Virt-9.2.0 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187440

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Sys-Virt-9.2.0-1.fc39
Last Closed||2023-04-18 05:52:47




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187440
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187440] perl-Sys-Virt-9.2.0 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187440

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC|berra...@redhat.com,|
   |crobi...@redhat.com,|
   |jples...@redhat.com,|
   |st...@silug.org |




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187440
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2185669] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230410 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185669



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-2fa29d5522 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-2fa29d5522`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-2fa29d5522

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185669
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2186946] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.38 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186946

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-2f88fcefcb has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-2f88fcefcb`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-2f88fcefcb

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186946
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2186030] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230416 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-2fa29d5522 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-2fa29d5522`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-2fa29d5522

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2186944] perl-Time-Progress-2.14 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186944

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-18f776e7ba has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-18f776e7ba`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-18f776e7ba

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186944
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2023-04-17 Thread updates 
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-fca191b57e   
libyang-2.0.164-2.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

pspg-5.7.5-1.el7

Details about builds:



 pspg-5.7.5-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f06016c451)
 A unix pager optimized for psql

Update Information:

new upstream release, per release notes:
https://github.com/okbob/pspg/releases/tag/5.7.5
https://github.com/okbob/pspg/releases/tag/5.7.4
https://github.com/okbob/pspg/releases/tag/5.7.3

ChangeLog:

* Mon Apr 17 2023 Pavel Raiskup  - 5.7.5-1
- new upstream release, per release notes:
  https://github.com/okbob/pspg/releases/tag/5.7.5
  https://github.com/okbob/pspg/releases/tag/5.7.4
  https://github.com/okbob/pspg/releases/tag/5.7.3

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2127115 - pspg-5.7.5 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127115


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2023-04-17 Thread updates 
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  32  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e00c3d01e   
cutter-re-2.2.0-1.el8 rizin-0.5.1-1.el8
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8c1df52e87   
chromium-112.0.5615.49-1.el8
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-73a16276bd   
python-twisted-19.10.0-4.el8
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-78b54db021   
rnp-0.16.3-1.el8
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7f77917637   
dr_libs-0-0.20.20230412git4b3d078.el8
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e5c5d6dbdb   
suricata-6.0.11-1.el8


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

epel-release-8-19.el8
opendkim-2.11.0-0.34.el8
pdns-4.7.4-1.el8
pspg-5.7.5-1.el8

Details about builds:



 epel-release-8-19.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-dde49fb620)
 Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux repository configuration

Update Information:

Tweak crb script, check os-release for RHEL (#2186721)

ChangeLog:

* Mon Apr 17 2023 Troy Dawson  - 8-19
- Tweak crb script, check os-release for RHEL (#2186721)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2186721 - /usr/bin/crb does not work as intended
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186721




 opendkim-2.11.0-0.34.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-feb4530d88)
 A DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) milter to sign and/or verify mail

Update Information:

Fedora 38: fix failure due to over-restrictive systemd configuration. All
releases: Fix PID startup race by using systemd to manage the daemon process.
Better than the fix in BZ#2056209.

ChangeLog:

* Sun Apr 16 2023 Matt Domsch  2.11.0-0.34
- remove failing systemd protections
* Thu Jan 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
2.11.0-0.33
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon Sep  5 2022 Matt Domsch  2.11.0-0.32
- fix systemd service type=simple patch to apply cleanly
- Use systemd RuntimeDirectory for socket file
* Fri Jul 22 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
2.11.0-0.30
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue May 24 2022 Matt Domsch  2.11.0-0.29
- Use systemd service type=simple rather than forking, avoids PID race

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2056209 - systemd complains sometimes that opendkim PID file can't 
be opened on restart
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056209
  [ 2 ] Bug #2186635 - can't create temporary file at 
/tmp/dkim.5DB339C5A4.HhZiSg: Read-only file system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186635




 pdns-4.7.4-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b0ac6987c9)
 A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver

Update Information:

- Update to 4.7.4  Release notes:
https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/changelog/4.7.html#change-4.7.4

ChangeLog:

* Mon Apr 17 2023 Morten Stevens  - 4.7.4-1
- Update to 4.7.4




 pspg-5.7.5-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-59d861bd9c)
 A unix pager optimized for psql

Update Information:

new upstream release, per release notes:
https://github.com/okbob/pspg/releases/tag/5.7.5
https://github.com/okbob/pspg/releases/tag/5.7.4
https://github.com/okbob/pspg/releases/tag/5.7.3

ChangeLog:

* Mon Apr 17 2023 Pavel Raiskup  - 5.7.5-1
- new upstream release, per release notes:
  https://github.com/okbob/pspg/releases/tag/5.7.5
  https://github.com/okbob/pspg/releases/tag/5.7.4
  https://github.com/okbob/pspg/releases/tag/5.7.3

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2127115 - pspg-5.7.5 is

[Bug 2187291] Add perl-IO-Interactive to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187286] Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

2023-04-17 Thread updates 
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-97d6b10e34   
rnp-0.16.3-1.el9
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4894f94aaa   
dr_libs-0^20230324git4b3d078-0.1.el9
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e5d244075e   
suricata-6.0.11-1.el9


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing

hyperscan-5.4.1-2.el9
opendkim-2.11.0-0.34.el9
pdns-4.7.4-1.el9
perl-IO-Interactive-1.023-8.el9
perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet-0.31-28.el9
perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple-0.03-28.el9
pspg-5.7.5-1.el9
python-soupsieve-2.4-2.el9
rust-async-io-1.13.0-1.el9
rust-async-stream-0.3.5-1.el9
rust-async-stream-impl-0.3.5-1.el9
rust-bytemuck_derive-1.4.1-1.el9
rust-futures-lite-1.13.0-1.el9
rust-goblin-0.6.1-1.el9
rust-goblin0.5-0.5.4-1.el9
rust-grep-matcher-0.1.6-1.el9
rust-grep-pcre2-0.1.6-1.el9
rust-iana-time-zone-0.1.56-1.el9
rust-openssl-0.10.50-1.el9
rust-openssl-macros-0.1.1-1.el9
rust-openssl-sys-0.9.85-1.el9
rust-rustc-demangle-0.1.23-1.el9
rust-serde-1.0.160-1.el9
rust-serde_derive-1.0.160-1.el9
rust-serde_test-1.0.160-1.el9
rust-spin-0.9.8-1.el9
rust-textwrap-0.16.0-1.el9
rust-textwrap0.15-0.15.2-1.el9
rust-zeroize_derive-1.4.2-1.el9

Details about builds:



 hyperscan-5.4.1-2.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-3d6df313d8)
 High-performance regular expression matching library

Update Information:

Patch broken validity check introduced upstream in release

ChangeLog:

* Fri Apr 14 2023 Jason Taylor  - 5.4.1-2
- Patch broken validity check introduced upstream in release




 opendkim-2.11.0-0.34.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e8c7feeb3a)
 A DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) milter to sign and/or verify mail

Update Information:

Fedora 38: fix failure due to over-restrictive systemd configuration. All
releases: Fix PID startup race by using systemd to manage the daemon process.
Better than the fix in BZ#2056209.

ChangeLog:

* Sun Apr 16 2023 Matt Domsch  2.11.0-0.34
- remove failing systemd protections
* Thu Jan 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
2.11.0-0.33
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon Sep  5 2022 Matt Domsch  2.11.0-0.32
- fix systemd service type=simple patch to apply cleanly
- Use systemd RuntimeDirectory for socket file
* Fri Jul 22 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
2.11.0-0.30
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue May 24 2022 Matt Domsch  2.11.0-0.29
- Use systemd service type=simple rather than forking, avoids PID race

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2056209 - systemd complains sometimes that opendkim PID file can't 
be opened on restart
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056209
  [ 2 ] Bug #2186635 - can't create temporary file at 
/tmp/dkim.5DB339C5A4.HhZiSg: Read-only file system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186635




 pdns-4.7.4-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a132d494bb)
 A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver

Update Information:

- Update to 4.7.4  Release notes:
https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/changelog/4.7.html#change-4.7.4

ChangeLog:

* Mon Apr 17 2023 Morten Stevens  - 4.7.4-1
- Update to 4.7.4




 perl-IO-Interactive-1.023-8.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47)
 Utilities for interactive I/O

Update Information:

This update brings new packages: perl-IO-Interactive package (subroutines for
developing interactive applications), perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet (a progress
meter if run interactively), and perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple (a simple progress
bar).

[Bug 2187283] Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2186030] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230416 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-84d06718aa has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-84d06718aa`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-84d06718aa

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2185669] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230410 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185669



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-84d06718aa has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-84d06718aa`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-84d06718aa

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185669
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2186030] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230416 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-a0cddb239c has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-a0cddb239c`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a0cddb239c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2185669] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230410 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185669



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-a0cddb239c has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-a0cddb239c`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a0cddb239c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185669
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187550] New: perl-XML-Generator-1.11 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187550

Bug ID: 2187550
   Summary: perl-XML-Generator-1.11 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-XML-Generator
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, mspa...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 1.11
Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.11
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.09-4.fc38
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-Generator/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3522/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-Generator


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187550
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: soname bump: libtraceevent and libtracefs

2023-04-17 Thread John Kacur 
That's great Justin, thanks.

John

On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 5:01 PM Justin Forbes  wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 2:45 PM John Kacur  wrote:
> >
> > There is a new tool that is dependent on these libs too. Also from
> Daniel Bristot (rtla)
> > tools/verification/rv
> >
> > I was wondering if we could get this into rawhide?
>
> Yes, I will get it in before the 6.3 release next Monday, that way it
> will automatically follow into stable Fedora as they get the 6.3
> rebase.
>
> Justin
>
> > John Kacur
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 12:12 AM Zamir SUN 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4/5/23 23:49, Justin Forbes wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 5:05 AM Zamir SUN 
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm working on libtraceevent and libtracefs update. There will be
> soname
> >> >> bump happening to them. Namely,
> >> >>
> >> >> libtraceevent.so 1.6.3 -> 1.7.2
> >> >> libtracefs.so 1.5.0 -> 1.6.4
> >> >>
> >> >> IIRC only kernel-tools (for perf and rtla) and trace-cmd depends on
> >> >> them. So I'm also copying their corresponding contacts.
> >> >>
> >> >> As for libtraceevent, I've tried running trace-cmd/perf/rtla with the
> >> >> new version and they still works. So I've updated it in Rawhide,
> Fedora
> >> >> 38 and Fedora 37. They are now in Bodhi.
> >> >>
> >> >> As for libtracefs I've built it in side tag f39-build-side-65890. I
> plan
> >> >> to update it in both Rawhide and Fedora 38 this week.
> >> >
> >> > Given that we are in a freeze for F38, it might be better to wait
> >> > until GA, but I have rebuilt kernel-tools in the sidetag.  Please let
> >> > me know when this is merged back as we rebuild kernel-tools weekly in
> >> > rawhide.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Hi Justin,
> >>
> >> I think this is a good point. I will coordinate with you when I do it
> >> for Fedora 38.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Zamir SUN
> >> GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
> >> Want to know more about Fedora?
> >> Visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
> >> Ready to contribute? See https://whatcanidoforfedora.org/
> >> 想了解更多中文资讯，访问 https://zh.fedoracommunity.org/
> >> ___
> >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> >> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: strange python3 mock error

2023-04-17 Thread Miroslav Suchý 

Dne 17. 04. 23 v 17:55 Adam Williamson napsal(a):

+ %py3_build
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.XYSHTs: line 44: fg: no job control

And that error in turn usually means there is a syntax error in the
spec file. In this case I'd guess the package may be missing a build
dependency on whatever package includes the %py3_build macro?


Exactly. The %py3_build is not expended. And not expended macro is left as is (unles %{?foo} is used). So the bash is 
trying to execute '%py3_build" command. That is treated as job control:


https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Job-Control-Basics.html

You can run in bash:

  %foo

and you get the very same error.

The solution is to fix your buildrequires.

Miroslav
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

2023-04-17 Thread Reon Beon via devel 
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/releases/tag/rpm-4.19.0-alpha
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

2023-04-17 Thread Reon Beon via devel 
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/releases/tag/rpm-4.19.0-alphaf
5 days ago.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: indent license corrected

2023-04-17 Thread Richard Fontana 
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 12:42 PM David Cantrell  wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 04:49:13PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > A license of "indent" package was corrected from
> >
> > GPLv3+ and BSD and Verbatim
> >
> > to
> >
> > GPL-3.0-or-later AND BSD-3-Clause AND BSD-4.3TAHOE AND 
> > Latex2e-translated-notice.
>
> BSD-4.3TAHOE and Latex2e-translated-notice are on the spdx.org/licenses list,
> but are not in fedora-license-data.  Please open a license review issue at
> https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues for BSD-4.3TAHOE
> and Latex2e-translated-notice.

Latex2e-translated-notice was recently added to Fedora allowed
licenses. For BSD-4.3TAHOE we have
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/174
which shouldn't have been closed because we didn't add a TOML file for
it. So I'll reopen that.

Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: soname bump: libtraceevent and libtracefs

2023-04-17 Thread Justin Forbes 
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 2:45 PM John Kacur  wrote:
>
> There is a new tool that is dependent on these libs too. Also from Daniel 
> Bristot (rtla)
> tools/verification/rv
>
> I was wondering if we could get this into rawhide?

Yes, I will get it in before the 6.3 release next Monday, that way it
will automatically follow into stable Fedora as they get the 6.3
rebase.

Justin

> John Kacur
>
> On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 12:12 AM Zamir SUN  wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/5/23 23:49, Justin Forbes wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 5:05 AM Zamir SUN  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I'm working on libtraceevent and libtracefs update. There will be soname
>> >> bump happening to them. Namely,
>> >>
>> >> libtraceevent.so 1.6.3 -> 1.7.2
>> >> libtracefs.so 1.5.0 -> 1.6.4
>> >>
>> >> IIRC only kernel-tools (for perf and rtla) and trace-cmd depends on
>> >> them. So I'm also copying their corresponding contacts.
>> >>
>> >> As for libtraceevent, I've tried running trace-cmd/perf/rtla with the
>> >> new version and they still works. So I've updated it in Rawhide, Fedora
>> >> 38 and Fedora 37. They are now in Bodhi.
>> >>
>> >> As for libtracefs I've built it in side tag f39-build-side-65890. I plan
>> >> to update it in both Rawhide and Fedora 38 this week.
>> >
>> > Given that we are in a freeze for F38, it might be better to wait
>> > until GA, but I have rebuilt kernel-tools in the sidetag.  Please let
>> > me know when this is merged back as we rebuild kernel-tools weekly in
>> > rawhide.
>> >
>>
>> Hi Justin,
>>
>> I think this is a good point. I will coordinate with you when I do it
>> for Fedora 38.
>>
>> --
>> Zamir SUN
>> GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
>> Want to know more about Fedora?
>> Visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
>> Ready to contribute? See https://whatcanidoforfedora.org/
>> 想了解更多中文资讯，访问 https://zh.fedoracommunity.org/
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: 
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: soname bump: libtraceevent and libtracefs

2023-04-17 Thread John Kacur 
There is a new tool that is dependent on these libs too. Also from Daniel
Bristot (rtla)
tools/verification/rv

I was wondering if we could get this into rawhide?

John Kacur

On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 12:12 AM Zamir SUN  wrote:

>
> On 4/5/23 23:49, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 5:05 AM Zamir SUN  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm working on libtraceevent and libtracefs update. There will be soname
> >> bump happening to them. Namely,
> >>
> >> libtraceevent.so 1.6.3 -> 1.7.2
> >> libtracefs.so 1.5.0 -> 1.6.4
> >>
> >> IIRC only kernel-tools (for perf and rtla) and trace-cmd depends on
> >> them. So I'm also copying their corresponding contacts.
> >>
> >> As for libtraceevent, I've tried running trace-cmd/perf/rtla with the
> >> new version and they still works. So I've updated it in Rawhide, Fedora
> >> 38 and Fedora 37. They are now in Bodhi.
> >>
> >> As for libtracefs I've built it in side tag f39-build-side-65890. I plan
> >> to update it in both Rawhide and Fedora 38 this week.
> >
> > Given that we are in a freeze for F38, it might be better to wait
> > until GA, but I have rebuilt kernel-tools in the sidetag.  Please let
> > me know when this is merged back as we rebuild kernel-tools weekly in
> > rawhide.
> >
>
> Hi Justin,
>
> I think this is a good point. I will coordinate with you when I do it
> for Fedora 38.
>
> --
> Zamir SUN
> GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
> Want to know more about Fedora?
> Visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
> Ready to contribute? See https://whatcanidoforfedora.org/
> 想了解更多中文资讯，访问 https://zh.fedoracommunity.org/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

2023-04-17 Thread Otto Liljalaakso 

Jakub Kadlcik kirjoitti 17.4.2023 klo 18.53:

I want to thank you all for the feedback.

Everything was already mentioned in the discussion so I am not going
to dig into details again. Just a quick summary for anyone who wants
TL;DR for this thread:

- I am not going to implement the original proposal or any variation of it
- Instead, I am going to automatically open an issue in the
package-sponsors tracker for new contributors after they receive
fedora-review+ on their first ticket. A link to this issue along with
some explanation will be automatically commented to their package
review Bugzilla ticket.
- You can follow the progress here
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service/issues/18


Sounds great, thank you for working on this!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Tuesday's FESCo Meeting *canceled* (2023-04-18)

2023-04-17 Thread Major Hayden via devel 
I went through the ticket queue for FESCo and couldn't find any agenda items 
for tomorrow's meeting, so we can skip it and go for next week, April 25th. 

I'll chair that meeting for the group. 晴

Just as a reminder if you need to put something on the agenda:

*
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can
reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at
https://pagure.io/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it
up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note
that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. 
*

Best wishes to all of you this week.

--
Major Hayden
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

UPDATED: Re: Upcoming Fedora Legal hackfest - converting to SPDX IDs

2023-04-17 Thread David Cantrell 
Time corrections from the original announcement:

14:00 - 18:00 UTC
10:00 - 14:00 EDT
16:00 - 20:00 CEST

Thanks,

On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:35:36AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> Fedora Legal will be conducting a hackfest on April 26, 2023 during a four
> hour block.  Information is on the SIGs calendar:
> 
> https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/SIGs/2023/4/26/
> 
> We will be focusing on the ELN package set in Fedora and preparing pull
> requests for those packages to convert the License tag to a valid SPDX
> expression.  There will be a short presentation and [hopefully] a video
> walking through an example package and the steps we want package maintainers
> to follow.
> 
> If you can make it, great!  We expect to do more of these events in the
> future.
> 
> 
> What
> 
> Hackfest for updating the license field in ELN packages to SPDX license
> expressions.
> 
> Date
> 
> Wednesday, April 26, 2023
> 
> Time
> 
> 10:00 - 14:00 US eastern time
> 18:00 - 22:00 Central European time
> 
> Where
> 
> Google Meet: https://meet.google.com/fiu-jdzq-mws
> (chat.fedoraproject.org information coming soon...awaiting new chat room)
> 
> How
> 
> There will be a short presentation for background and a demo on updating a
> package to start, then we'll work on packages and be available for
> questions and help.
> 
> We plan to have more events like this to help package maintainers convert
> License tags in spec files to SPDX syntax.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> David Cantrell 
> Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT

-- 
David Cantrell 
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

F39 proposal: Remove webkit2gtk-4.0 API Version (System-Wide Change proposal)

2023-04-17 Thread Ben Cotton 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_webkit2gtk-4.0_API_Version

This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

== Summary ==
The webkit2gtk-4.0 API version will no longer be built. Packages that
depend on it will fail to build from source and eventually be retired.

== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:catanzaro|Michael Catanzaro]]
* Email: 

== Detailed Description ==

The webkitgtk source package currently provides three different API
versions of WebKitGTK:

* webkit2gtk-4.0: for GTK 3 and libsoup 2
* webkit2gtk-4.1: for GTK 3 and libsoup 3
* webkitgtk-6.0: for GTK 4 and libsoup 3

Building three different package versions is slow, and Red Hat does
not wish to do so anymore. We will remove the webkit2gtk-4.0 API
version, which is provided by the webkit2gtk4.0 and
javascriptcoregtk4.0 packages. Everything that depends on these
packages will fail to build from source and will eventually be removed
from the distribution unless fixed.

The good news is that updating your package to webkit2gtk-4.1 is
probably easy because there are no API changes other than the version
of libsoup that is linked to. If your package does not directly or
indirectly depend on libsoup 2, then just change the API version
number from 4.0 to 4.1 and you're done.
[https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs/c/1670e57f63e0897d6d6027826f247bb3e90ddd2a?branch=rawhide
Here is a typical example of how easy this is.]

However, if your package does directly or indirectly depend on libsoup
2, then you will need to eliminate that dependency, which will require
more effort. If your application links to libsoup 2 via any
dependency, it will crash if also linked to libsoup 3.

This is a slimmed-down version of the
[[Changes/libsoup_3:_Part_Two|libsoup 3: Part Two]] change proposal
that was previously rejected by FESCo. Instead of removing all
packages that depend on libsoup 2, packages will only be removed if
they depend on both libsoup 2 and also WebKitGTK. No effort will be
made to remove libsoup 2 from the distribution (though an obsolete
HTTP library is a major security risk and packages really ought to
stop using it).


== Benefit to Fedora ==

libsoup 3 brings support for HTTP/2, whereas libsoup 2 supports only
HTTP/1.1. Users will experience shorter load times and improved
responsiveness in applications that use WebKitGTK. Users of
applications that previously used webkit2gtk-4.0 will have one fewer
massive package installed after this transition is completed.

Additionally, the WebKitGTK package maintainer will be less grumpy
because WebKitGTK will need to be built only twice for each supported
version of Fedora, rather than three times.

== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: ensure packages required by Fedora Workstation and
ELN no longer depend on webkit2gtk-4.0 (already done)

* Other developers: ensure other packages no longer depend on webkit2gtk-4.0

* Release engineering: [https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11368 #11368]

* Policies and guidelines: no policies or guidelines would need to be updated

* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)

* Alignment with Community Initiatives: None

== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==

To be determined. The newer packages can either Obsoletes the older
ones, or not, since they are not compatible, it's probably not
appropriate to use Obsoletes?

== How To Test ==

Applications ported to webkit2gtk-4.1 need to be tested individually
to ensure they still work. It's unlikely anything will go wrong for
applications that do not directly or indirectly use libsoup 2. If an
application or one of its dependencies needs to be ported to libsoup
3, then there is more potential for trouble.

== User Experience ==

Users will experience shorter load times and improved responsiveness.
Additionally, there will be one fewer huge package that might be
installed on user systems.

== Dependencies ==

 $ dnf repoquery --whatdepends webkit2gtk4.0 --latest-limit 1 --arch
'noarch,x86_64'
 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:31 ago on Thu 30 Mar 2023 03:07:12 PM CDT.
 apostrophe-1:2.6.3-6.fc38.noarch
 apvlv-0:0.4.0-2.fc38.x86_64
 atril-libs-0:1.26.0-4.fc38.x86_64
 badwolf-0:1.2.2-4.fc38.x86_64
 balsa-0:2.6.4-2.fc38.x86_64
 bookworm-0:1.1.3-0.9.20200414git.c7c3643.fc38.x86_64
 cairo-dock-plug-ins-webkit-0:3.4.1-42.20210730gitf24f769.fc38.1.x86_64
 claws-mail-plugins-fancy-0:4.1.1-5.fc38.x86_64
 eclipse-swt-1:4.26-2.fc38.x86_64
 emacs-1:28.2-4.fc38.x86_64
 ephemeral-0:7.1.0-5.fc38.x86_64
 exaile-0:4.1.2-2.fc38.noarch
 exfalso-0:4.5.0-5.fc38.noarch
 fapolicy-analyzer-0:1.0.0-1.fc38.x86_64
 foliate-0:2.6.4-6.fc38.noarch
 gambas3-gb-gtk3-webview-0:3.18.1-1.fc38.x86_64
 gamehub-0:0.16.3.2-6.fc38.x86_64
 geany-plugins-markdown-0:1.38-9.fc38.x86_64
 glade-libs-0:3.40.0-2.fc38.x86_64
 gnucash-0:4.13-6.fc38.x86_64

F39 proposal: Remove standard storage option from Fedora EC2 images (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2023-04-17 Thread Ben Cotton 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CloudEC2ImagesNoStandardStorage

This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

== Summary ==

AWS offers multiple
[https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/ebs-volume-types.html
types of block storage] depending on the needs of the individual user.
Fedora images are uploaded with `standard` and `gp2` currently (`gp3`
will replace `gp2` very soon with another
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CloudEC2gp3 approved change]).

The `standard` storage is a previous generation storage option with
less performance and less consistent performance than the other
storage types. It also causes some confusion when AWS customers look
through the list of Fedora cloud images in the EC2 console because now
they see '''four''' images (aarch64 + x86_64, both with `standard` and
`gp2` storage).

Removing the `standard` storage option would reduce the amount of
images that appear in the console, but AWS customers could still
provision Fedora on standard storage during the instance creation
process if they really want that storage option.

== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:mhayden| Major Hayden]]
* Email: ma...@redhat.com


== Detailed Description ==

The scripts that upload images to AWS will be adjusted so that they do
not include the creation of an AMI with standard storage. AWS
customers could still choose that option at instance creation time if
needed.

== Feedback ==

No alternatives have been proposed yet.

== Benefit to Fedora ==

This would reduce the amount of Fedora AMIs that appear in the EC2
console by half and it would ensure that Fedora lands on AWS' best
performing storage (soon to be `gp3`) by default. It avoids a
situation where an AWS customer (without a strong knowledge in block
storage types) starts a Fedora instance on standard storage and gets a
low performance experience.

It would have no effect on running instances or existing AMIs.

== Scope ==

* Proposal owners: This is an isolated change that should be made
within `fedimg` and it affects only the AMI creation process.

* Other developers: Should not require work from other developers.

* Release engineering: No work should be required from releng for this change.

* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)

* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)

* Alignment with Community Initiatives: Should make it easier to
display Fedora AWS images on the Fedora Cloud page.

== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==

Existing systems will not be affected by this change. Customers
launching new instances will get better performing storage by default
but will still have the option to select standard storage if they
really need it.


== How To Test ==

1. The updated version of fedimg should create only `gp2` (soon to be
`gp3`) AMIs.
2. We can verify that the latest image upload from rawhide (after the
fedimg change is made) will only include a gp2/gp3-backed image.

== User Experience ==

AWS customers who are not familiar with different block storage types
should always land on high performance storage. They still have the
option to choose other storage types at instance creation time.

== Dependencies ==

Only fedimg needs to be updated. There are no other dependencies.


== Contingency Plan ==

* Contingency mechanism: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change)

== Documentation ==

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

== Release Notes ==

Fedora AMIs for EC2 now default to the latest `gp2/3` storage option.


-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

F39 proposal: Remove standard storage option from Fedora EC2 images (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2023-04-17 Thread Ben Cotton 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CloudEC2ImagesNoStandardStorage

This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

== Summary ==

AWS offers multiple
[https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/ebs-volume-types.html
types of block storage] depending on the needs of the individual user.
Fedora images are uploaded with `standard` and `gp2` currently (`gp3`
will replace `gp2` very soon with another
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CloudEC2gp3 approved change]).

The `standard` storage is a previous generation storage option with
less performance and less consistent performance than the other
storage types. It also causes some confusion when AWS customers look
through the list of Fedora cloud images in the EC2 console because now
they see '''four''' images (aarch64 + x86_64, both with `standard` and
`gp2` storage).

Removing the `standard` storage option would reduce the amount of
images that appear in the console, but AWS customers could still
provision Fedora on standard storage during the instance creation
process if they really want that storage option.

== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:mhayden| Major Hayden]]
* Email: ma...@redhat.com


== Detailed Description ==

The scripts that upload images to AWS will be adjusted so that they do
not include the creation of an AMI with standard storage. AWS
customers could still choose that option at instance creation time if
needed.

== Feedback ==

No alternatives have been proposed yet.

== Benefit to Fedora ==

This would reduce the amount of Fedora AMIs that appear in the EC2
console by half and it would ensure that Fedora lands on AWS' best
performing storage (soon to be `gp3`) by default. It avoids a
situation where an AWS customer (without a strong knowledge in block
storage types) starts a Fedora instance on standard storage and gets a
low performance experience.

It would have no effect on running instances or existing AMIs.

== Scope ==

* Proposal owners: This is an isolated change that should be made
within `fedimg` and it affects only the AMI creation process.

* Other developers: Should not require work from other developers.

* Release engineering: No work should be required from releng for this change.

* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)

* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)

* Alignment with Community Initiatives: Should make it easier to
display Fedora AWS images on the Fedora Cloud page.

== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==

Existing systems will not be affected by this change. Customers
launching new instances will get better performing storage by default
but will still have the option to select standard storage if they
really need it.


== How To Test ==

1. The updated version of fedimg should create only `gp2` (soon to be
`gp3`) AMIs.
2. We can verify that the latest image upload from rawhide (after the
fedimg change is made) will only include a gp2/gp3-backed image.

== User Experience ==

AWS customers who are not familiar with different block storage types
should always land on high performance storage. They still have the
option to choose other storage types at instance creation time.

== Dependencies ==

Only fedimg needs to be updated. There are no other dependencies.


== Contingency Plan ==

* Contingency mechanism: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change)

== Documentation ==

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

== Release Notes ==

Fedora AMIs for EC2 now default to the latest `gp2/3` storage option.


-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

F39 proposal: Remove webkit2gtk-4.0 API Version (System-Wide Change proposal)

2023-04-17 Thread Ben Cotton 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_webkit2gtk-4.0_API_Version

This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

== Summary ==
The webkit2gtk-4.0 API version will no longer be built. Packages that
depend on it will fail to build from source and eventually be retired.

== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:catanzaro|Michael Catanzaro]]
* Email: 

== Detailed Description ==

The webkitgtk source package currently provides three different API
versions of WebKitGTK:

* webkit2gtk-4.0: for GTK 3 and libsoup 2
* webkit2gtk-4.1: for GTK 3 and libsoup 3
* webkitgtk-6.0: for GTK 4 and libsoup 3

Building three different package versions is slow, and Red Hat does
not wish to do so anymore. We will remove the webkit2gtk-4.0 API
version, which is provided by the webkit2gtk4.0 and
javascriptcoregtk4.0 packages. Everything that depends on these
packages will fail to build from source and will eventually be removed
from the distribution unless fixed.

The good news is that updating your package to webkit2gtk-4.1 is
probably easy because there are no API changes other than the version
of libsoup that is linked to. If your package does not directly or
indirectly depend on libsoup 2, then just change the API version
number from 4.0 to 4.1 and you're done.
[https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs/c/1670e57f63e0897d6d6027826f247bb3e90ddd2a?branch=rawhide
Here is a typical example of how easy this is.]

However, if your package does directly or indirectly depend on libsoup
2, then you will need to eliminate that dependency, which will require
more effort. If your application links to libsoup 2 via any
dependency, it will crash if also linked to libsoup 3.

This is a slimmed-down version of the
[[Changes/libsoup_3:_Part_Two|libsoup 3: Part Two]] change proposal
that was previously rejected by FESCo. Instead of removing all
packages that depend on libsoup 2, packages will only be removed if
they depend on both libsoup 2 and also WebKitGTK. No effort will be
made to remove libsoup 2 from the distribution (though an obsolete
HTTP library is a major security risk and packages really ought to
stop using it).


== Benefit to Fedora ==

libsoup 3 brings support for HTTP/2, whereas libsoup 2 supports only
HTTP/1.1. Users will experience shorter load times and improved
responsiveness in applications that use WebKitGTK. Users of
applications that previously used webkit2gtk-4.0 will have one fewer
massive package installed after this transition is completed.

Additionally, the WebKitGTK package maintainer will be less grumpy
because WebKitGTK will need to be built only twice for each supported
version of Fedora, rather than three times.

== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: ensure packages required by Fedora Workstation and
ELN no longer depend on webkit2gtk-4.0 (already done)

* Other developers: ensure other packages no longer depend on webkit2gtk-4.0

* Release engineering: [https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11368 #11368]

* Policies and guidelines: no policies or guidelines would need to be updated

* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)

* Alignment with Community Initiatives: None

== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==

To be determined. The newer packages can either Obsoletes the older
ones, or not, since they are not compatible, it's probably not
appropriate to use Obsoletes?

== How To Test ==

Applications ported to webkit2gtk-4.1 need to be tested individually
to ensure they still work. It's unlikely anything will go wrong for
applications that do not directly or indirectly use libsoup 2. If an
application or one of its dependencies needs to be ported to libsoup
3, then there is more potential for trouble.

== User Experience ==

Users will experience shorter load times and improved responsiveness.
Additionally, there will be one fewer huge package that might be
installed on user systems.

== Dependencies ==

 $ dnf repoquery --whatdepends webkit2gtk4.0 --latest-limit 1 --arch
'noarch,x86_64'
 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:31 ago on Thu 30 Mar 2023 03:07:12 PM CDT.
 apostrophe-1:2.6.3-6.fc38.noarch
 apvlv-0:0.4.0-2.fc38.x86_64
 atril-libs-0:1.26.0-4.fc38.x86_64
 badwolf-0:1.2.2-4.fc38.x86_64
 balsa-0:2.6.4-2.fc38.x86_64
 bookworm-0:1.1.3-0.9.20200414git.c7c3643.fc38.x86_64
 cairo-dock-plug-ins-webkit-0:3.4.1-42.20210730gitf24f769.fc38.1.x86_64
 claws-mail-plugins-fancy-0:4.1.1-5.fc38.x86_64
 eclipse-swt-1:4.26-2.fc38.x86_64
 emacs-1:28.2-4.fc38.x86_64
 ephemeral-0:7.1.0-5.fc38.x86_64
 exaile-0:4.1.2-2.fc38.noarch
 exfalso-0:4.5.0-5.fc38.noarch
 fapolicy-analyzer-0:1.0.0-1.fc38.x86_64
 foliate-0:2.6.4-6.fc38.noarch
 gambas3-gb-gtk3-webview-0:3.18.1-1.fc38.x86_64
 gamehub-0:0.16.3.2-6.fc38.x86_64
 geany-plugins-markdown-0:1.38-9.fc38.x86_64
 glade-libs-0:3.40.0-2.fc38.x86_64
 gnucash-0:4.13-6.fc38.x86_64

[Bug 2187440] New: perl-Sys-Virt-9.2.0 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187440

Bug ID: 2187440
   Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-9.2.0 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Sys-Virt
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: berra...@redhat.com, crobi...@redhat.com,
jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, st...@silug.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 9.2.0
Upstream release that is considered latest: 9.2.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 9.0.0-1.fc38
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Sys-Virt/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3355/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sys-Virt


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187440
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Retiring flintqs in EPEL7/8/9

2023-04-17 Thread Ben Beasley 
As previously proposed on the epel-devel mailing list, and in accordance 
with the EPEL Retirement Policy: Process: Security Reasons[1], I will be 
retiring the flintqs package in EPEL7, EPEL8, and EPEL9 today.


When I took over maintenance of the flintqs package[2]—which contains 
William Hart’s quadratic sieve implementation, as modified for 
sagemath—I built it for EPEL7, EPEL8, and EPEL9. My thoughts were, “Why 
not? Someone might find it useful.”


It was recently pointed out[3][4] that the flintqs command-line tool 
uses temporary files in unsafe ways[5], which could potentially 
represent an exploitable security vulnerability; this has been assigned 
CVE-2023-29465[6].


There is no immediate patch available; while one could surely be 
constructed, the sagemath project plans to incorporate the factorization 
algorithm directly in sagemath and discontinue support of the vulnerable 
command-line tool rather than fixing it[7].


Since sagemath is not packaged in any of the EPEL releases, and flintqs 
is therefore a leaf package, I am handling this security report by 
retiring flintqs in all three EPELs.


Anyone who does need FlintQS on EL will need to consider their security 
threat model, then build it from source—either by cloning the upstream 
GitHub repository, or, for the time being, by rebuilding the Fedora 
source RPM. Note, however, that the Fedora package will also be retired 
as soon as it is no longer needed by sagemath.


[1] 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-retirement/#process_security_reasons


[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/flintqs

[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185301

[4] https://github.com/sagemath/FlintQS/issues/3

[5] https://owasp.org/www-community/vulnerabilities/Insecure_Temporary_File

[6] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-29465

[7] https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35419
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: indent license corrected

2023-04-17 Thread David Cantrell 
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 04:49:13PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> A license of "indent" package was corrected from
> 
> GPLv3+ and BSD and Verbatim
> 
> to 
> 
> GPL-3.0-or-later AND BSD-3-Clause AND BSD-4.3TAHOE AND 
> Latex2e-translated-notice.

BSD-4.3TAHOE and Latex2e-translated-notice are on the spdx.org/licenses list,
but are not in fedora-license-data.  Please open a license review issue at
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues for BSD-4.3TAHOE
and Latex2e-translated-notice.

Thanks,

-- 
David Cantrell 
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Non-responsive maintainer - rkuska

2023-04-17 Thread Mattia Verga via devel 
Il 17/04/23 17:39, Jakub Kadlcik ha scritto:
> Hello,
> per the Non-responsive maintainer policy
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> I am sending this email. We (copr-sig) would like to (co)maintain the
> python-flask-whooshee package but @rkuska can't give us permission
> because he lost access to his FAS account.
>
> We talked about this off-list, so this is basically just FYI for others.
>
> RHBZ ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042681
>
> Jakub

rksuska was removed from packagers some months ago:

https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issue/253

python-flask-whooshee was orphaned and is now taken by msuchy. I've
resetted the BZ ticket assignee to the default assignee (msuchy).

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

2023-04-17 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel 

On 17/04/2023 17:53, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:

- Instead, I am going to automatically open an issue in the
package-sponsors tracker for new contributors after they receive
fedora-review+ on their first ticket.


LGTM now. Thank you for working on this.

--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: strange python3 mock error

2023-04-17 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Mon, 2023-04-17 at 11:52 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, Steve Dickson wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I'm getting a very strange mock error [1] on a package [2]
> > that was recently ported to python 3.
> > 
> > The package builds fine locally... only fails in a
> > scratch build... and that function that the error is c
> > complaining about does not exist in the package...
> > 
> > Not clear what to do... tia!
> > 
> > steved.
> > 
> > [1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4223/100064223/build.log
> > [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/NFStest
> 
> The code that you're building doesn't seem to be pushed anywhere, so it's 
> hard to see what's going on (ie, the latest version currently in dist-git 
> is not calling %py3_build).
> 
> The mock error is just what happens when a build fails.  This seems to be 
> the real error:
> 
> + %py3_build
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.XYSHTs: line 44: fg: no job control

And that error in turn usually means there is a syntax error in the
spec file. In this case I'd guess the package may be missing a build
dependency on whatever package includes the %py3_build macro?
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

2023-04-17 Thread Jakub Kadlcik 
I want to thank you all for the feedback.

Everything was already mentioned in the discussion so I am not going
to dig into details again. Just a quick summary for anyone who wants
TL;DR for this thread:

- I am not going to implement the original proposal or any variation of it
- Instead, I am going to automatically open an issue in the
package-sponsors tracker for new contributors after they receive
fedora-review+ on their first ticket. A link to this issue along with
some explanation will be automatically commented to their package
review Bugzilla ticket.
- You can follow the progress here
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service/issues/18

Jakub

On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 8:51 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
 wrote:
>
> On 04/04/2023 23:42, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > But then after a outcry... "We are reverting this change for now. More
> > details to follow."
>
> Yes, after a lot of negative feedback they (temporary?) reverted this
> change. Even their own vcpkg (package manager by Microsoft) uses these
> hashes to verify downloaded files.
>
> They said that after each download of the git tag archive, its contents
> are permanently stored on the content server, and all subsequent
> downloads will be performed by it. It consumes a lot of disk space.
>
> --
> Sincerely,
>Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: strange python3 mock error

2023-04-17 Thread Scott Talbert 

On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, Steve Dickson wrote:


Hello,

I'm getting a very strange mock error [1] on a package [2]
that was recently ported to python 3.

The package builds fine locally... only fails in a
scratch build... and that function that the error is c
complaining about does not exist in the package...

Not clear what to do... tia!

steved.

[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4223/100064223/build.log
[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/NFStest


The code that you're building doesn't seem to be pushed anywhere, so it's 
hard to see what's going on (ie, the latest version currently in dist-git 
is not calling %py3_build).


The mock error is just what happens when a build fails.  This seems to be 
the real error:


+ %py3_build
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.XYSHTs: line 44: fg: no job control

Scott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187283] Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Upcoming Fedora Legal hackfest - converting to SPDX IDs

2023-04-17 Thread David Cantrell 
Fedora Legal will be conducting a hackfest on April 26, 2023 during a four
hour block.  Information is on the SIGs calendar:

https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/SIGs/2023/4/26/

We will be focusing on the ELN package set in Fedora and preparing pull
requests for those packages to convert the License tag to a valid SPDX
expression.  There will be a short presentation and [hopefully] a video
walking through an example package and the steps we want package maintainers
to follow.

If you can make it, great!  We expect to do more of these events in the
future.


What

Hackfest for updating the license field in ELN packages to SPDX license
expressions.

Date

Wednesday, April 26, 2023

Time

10:00 - 14:00 US eastern time
18:00 - 22:00 Central European time

Where

Google Meet: https://meet.google.com/fiu-jdzq-mws
(chat.fedoraproject.org information coming soon...awaiting new chat room)

How

There will be a short presentation for background and a demo on updating a
package to start, then we'll work on packages and be available for
questions and help.

We plan to have more events like this to help package maintainers convert
License tags in spec files to SPDX syntax.

Thanks,

-- 
David Cantrell 
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Upcoming Fedora Legal hackfest - converting to SPDX IDs

2023-04-17 Thread David Cantrell 
Fedora Legal will be conducting a hackfest on April 26, 2023 during a four
hour block.  Information is on the SIGs calendar:

https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/SIGs/2023/4/26/

We will be focusing on the ELN package set in Fedora and preparing pull
requests for those packages to convert the License tag to a valid SPDX
expression.  There will be a short presentation and [hopefully] a video
walking through an example package and the steps we want package maintainers
to follow.

If you can make it, great!  We expect to do more of these events in the
future.


What

Hackfest for updating the license field in ELN packages to SPDX license
expressions.

Date

Wednesday, April 26, 2023

Time

10:00 - 14:00 US eastern time
18:00 - 22:00 Central European time

Where

Google Meet: https://meet.google.com/fiu-jdzq-mws
(chat.fedoraproject.org information coming soon...awaiting new chat room)

How

There will be a short presentation for background and a demo on updating a
package to start, then we'll work on packages and be available for
questions and help.

We plan to have more events like this to help package maintainers convert
License tags in spec files to SPDX syntax.

Thanks,

-- 
David Cantrell 
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187283] Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simpl
   ||e-0.03-28.el9




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Non-responsive maintainer - rkuska

2023-04-17 Thread Jakub Kadlcik 
Hello,
per the Non-responsive maintainer policy
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers

I am sending this email. We (copr-sig) would like to (co)maintain the
python-flask-whooshee package but @rkuska can't give us permission
because he lost access to his FAS account.

We talked about this off-list, so this is basically just FYI for others.

RHBZ ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042681

Jakub
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

strange python3 mock error

2023-04-17 Thread Steve Dickson 

Hello,

I'm getting a very strange mock error [1] on a package [2]
that was recently ported to python 3.

The package builds fine locally... only fails in a
scratch build... and that function that the error is c
complaining about does not exist in the package...

Not clear what to do... tia!

steved.

[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4223/100064223/build.log
[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/NFStest
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187286] Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187291] Add perl-IO-Interactive to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Future of encryption in Fedora

2023-04-17 Thread Matthew Miller 
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 12:55:28PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> There are a couple more disadvantages to using Discourse:
> 
> * Several of the replies are lower-quality and are not contributing
> to the conversation.

That happens here too, of course. I think it's really a consequence of
greater conversation visibility rather than Discourse per se. And, Discourse
gives greater ability to moderate those -- either to hide them, or to split
them out into separate discussions so they don't distract. Or, at a greater
extreme if we want to do this, we could limit direct participation in some
discussions to members of FAS groups we decide (others could participate by
replying in linked threads).

> * There is no threading like we have with emails, so these replies
> are more disruptive and the discussion is less organized.

There actually _is_ threading in Discourse topics. It's just not presented
in as a nested tree. For example:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/future-of-encryption-in-fedora-desktop-variants/80397/4?replies_to_post_number=2

I probably should have been a little more active in moderating that thread.
But also, I'm working on building up a bigger moderation team to help with
that. (This too is waiting on the FAS group sync.)



-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187286] Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet
   ||-0.31-28.el9




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Future of encryption in Fedora

2023-04-17 Thread Matthew Miller 
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 12:56:55PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On the downside, spam limits on new posters have gotten in the way in some
> cases, and people have had some trouble figuring out how to use the quoting
> features, resulting in disconnected responses.

I have bumped some of the default limits -- and I have a planned solution
for this long-term Fedora contributors in the very near future, as we will
soon have FAS groups synced to Discussion. When that is available, we can
make it so membership in a FAS group automatically grants "trust level 1",
which removes most limits. (The "trust level 0" limits are pretty important
to stop spammers and trolls, so I don't want to relax them further.)



-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Heads-up: USD 23.02 coming to Rawhide

2023-04-17 Thread Ben Beasley 
Now that Blender 3.5 has landed, I can update the usd package in Rawhide 
to version 23.02[1]. I plan to build it in one week, 2023-04-24, or 
slightly later.


The .so version is bumped (as with every release) and the monolithic 
library is renamed from libusd_usd_ms.so to libusd_ms.so. I am also 
enabling the Draco plugin now that draco is packaged in Fedora; this 
adds the usdcompress command-line tool.


The sole dependent package is blender; I will rebuild it in a side tag 
myself.


[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/usd/pull-request/4
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

indent license corrected

2023-04-17 Thread Petr Pisar 
A license of "indent" package was corrected from

GPLv3+ and BSD and Verbatim

to 

GPL-3.0-or-later AND BSD-3-Clause AND BSD-4.3TAHOE AND 
Latex2e-translated-notice.

-- Petr


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fixed crb, testing on RHEL requested

2023-04-17 Thread Troy Dawson 
A bug was found in /usr/bin/crb [1] dealing with how crb determines if you
are on a RHEL system or not.  A fix was made and tested on every RHEL
compatible distro I could find.  So I'm very confident about those.
But for real RHEL systems that use subscription-manager, I only have access
to a few different types of installs and containers.

Could some people who have access to some of the more exotic RHEL installs
(SAP etc...) check and see if the new /usr/bin/crb works correctly for them.

The new update is in
epel-release-9-5.el9 [2]
epel-release-8-19.el8 [3]

Thank You
Troy

[1] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186721
[2] -
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/epel-release/9/5.el9/noarch/epel-release-9-5.el9.noarch.rpm
[3] -
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/epel-release/8/19.el8/noarch/epel-release-8-19.el8.noarch.rpm
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2186030] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230416 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-84d06718aa has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-84d06718aa


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2186030] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230416 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-2fa29d5522 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-2fa29d5522


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2186030] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230416 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
   ||0230416-1.fc39
 CC|iarn...@gmail.com,  |
   |jples...@redhat.com,|
   |mspa...@redhat.com  |




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186030
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187283] Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/52766


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187275] perl-User-Identity-1.02 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275



--- Comment #5 from Sergio Basto  ---
I forgot give one information, we only need it for tests

BTW I found one src.rpm of perl-Hash-Ordered ,
http://repo.openfusion.net/srpms/perl-Hash-Ordered-0.009-1.of.el7.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187291] Add perl-IO-Interactive to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1790527e47


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Getting back the old Bugzilla bug entry form

2023-04-17 Thread Ben Cotton 
Mea culpa. My understanding was that this would not impact the sorts
of use cases that were broken. Clearly that's not the case.
Regardless, this should have been better communicated and tested. I
take full responsibility for that; I should know better.

I'll work with the Bugzilla developers to get this fixed or rolled
back if it can't be.

-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187291] Add perl-IO-Interactive to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-IO-Interactive-1.023-8
   ||.el9
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187275] perl-User-Identity-1.02 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jples...@redhat.com



--- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---
(In reply to Sergio Basto from comment #3)
> Error:  Can't locate Hash/Ordered.pm in @INC (you may need to install the
> Hash::Ordered module)
> 
> but we haven't perl(Hash::Ordered) on Fedora ... 
> 
> how do you suggest fix this ?

Perl module 'Hash::Ordered' has to be added to Fedora. 
https://metacpan.org/dist/Hash-Ordered


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187275] perl-User-Identity-1.02 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275

Sergio Basto  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #3 from Sergio Basto  ---
Error:  Can't locate Hash/Ordered.pm in @INC (you may need to install the
Hash::Ordered module)

but we haven't perl(Hash::Ordered) on Fedora ... 

how do you suggest fix this ?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 Workstation boot time and memory improvements

2023-04-17 Thread Michael J Gruber 
> On 2023-04-14 01:28, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> 
> 
> The boot time improvements came from removing iscsi from the critical 
> path.  There's no longer a dependency on network-online in the path to 
> graphical.target.
> 
> The memory improvements came from allowing packagekitd to shut down on idle.

Thanks, and I can confirm that on upgrade F37->F38, iscsi does get removed from 
cp. Great!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2023-04-17 Thread Miro Hrončok 

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets 
retired.

Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

Full report available at:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-04-17.txt
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.

For human readable dependency chains,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
For all orphaned packages,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan

Package  (co)maintainers   Status Change

7kaa  orphan   5 weeks ago
golang-github-exoscale-egoscale   go-sig, orphan   2 weeks ago
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free   orphan, uraeus, wtaymans 0 weeks ago
kitty atim, orphan, salimma,   2 weeks ago
  zawertun
perl-Debug-ShowStuff  orphan   1 weeks ago
perl-MemHandleorphan   1 weeks ago
pluto orphan   5 weeks ago
python-ssh-python orphan   0 weeks ago
rocm-smi  orphan   0 weeks ago
studio-controls   orphan   1 weeks ago
vim-nerdtree-git-plugin   atim, orphan 5 weeks ago
wyhashorphan   0 weeks ago

The following packages require above mentioned packages:
Depending on: golang-github-exoscale-egoscale (4), status change: 2023-03-28 (2 
weeks ago)

golang-github-acme-lego (maintained by: eclipseo, go-sig)
		golang-github-acme-lego-4.4.0-8.fc37.src requires 
golang(github.com/exoscale/egoscale) = 0.38.0-6.fc38
		golang-github-acme-lego-devel-4.4.0-8.fc37.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/exoscale/egoscale) = 0.38.0-6.fc38


golang-github-acme-lego-3 (maintained by: eclipseo, go-sig)
		golang-github-acme-lego-3-3.9.0-7.fc37.src requires 
golang(github.com/exoscale/egoscale) = 0.38.0-6.fc38
		golang-github-acme-lego-3-devel-3.9.0-7.fc37.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/exoscale/egoscale) = 0.38.0-6.fc38


golang-github-caddyserver-caddy-1 (maintained by: eclipseo, go-sig)
		golang-github-caddyserver-caddy-1-1.0.4-11.fc38.src requires 
golang(github.com/go-acme/lego/v3/certcrypto) = 3.9.0-7.fc37, 
golang(github.com/go-acme/lego/v3/challenge) = 3.9.0-7.fc37, 
golang(github.com/go-acme/lego/v3/challenge/tlsalpn01) = 3.9.0-7.fc37
		golang-github-caddyserver-caddy-1-devel-1.0.4-11.fc38.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/go-acme/lego/v3/certcrypto) = 3.9.0-7.fc37, 
golang(github.com/go-acme/lego/v3/challenge) = 3.9.0-7.fc37, 
golang(github.com/go-acme/lego/v3/challenge/tlsalpn01) = 3.9.0-7.fc37


golang-github-coredns-corefile-migration (maintained by: eclipseo, 
go-sig)
		golang-github-coredns-corefile-migration-1.0.11-10.fc38.src requires 
golang(github.com/caddyserver/caddy-1/caddyfile) = 1.0.4-11.fc38
		golang-github-coredns-corefile-migration-devel-1.0.11-10.fc38.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/caddyserver/caddy-1/caddyfile) = 1.0.4-11.fc38


Depending on: gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free (22), status change: 2023-04-13 (0 
weeks ago)

cheese (maintained by: amigadave, gnome-sig, jwrdegoede, mclasen, mcrha)
cheese-2:44.0-1.fc39.src requires 
pkgconfig(gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.0) = 1.22.2
		cheese-2:44.0-1.fc39.x86_64 requires gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free(x86-64) = 
1.22.2-1.fc39
		cheese-libs-devel-2:44.0-1.fc39.i686 requires 
pkgconfig(gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.0) = 1.22.2
		cheese-libs-devel-2:44.0-1.fc39.x86_64 requires 
pkgconfig(gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.0) = 1.22.2


cozy (maintained by: suve)
cozy-1.2.1-3.fc39.noarch requires gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free = 
1.22.2-1.fc39

farstream02 (maintained by: stefanb, uraeus)
		farstream02-0.2.9-11.fc38.i686 requires gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free = 
1.22.2-1.fc39
		farstream02-0.2.9-11.fc38.x86_64 requires gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free = 
1.22.2-1.fc39


gnome-sound-recorder (maintained by: amigadave, gnome-sig)
		gnome-sound-recorder-43~beta-2.fc38.noarch requires 
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free = 1.22.2-1.fc39

[Bug 2187291] Add perl-IO-Interactive to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/52764


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2186946] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.38 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186946



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-2f88fcefcb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-2f88fcefcb


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186946
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2186946] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.38 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186946

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-Locale-1.38-1
   ||.fc39
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186946
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187291] New: Add perl-IO-Interactive to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291

Bug ID: 2187291
   Summary: Add perl-IO-Interactive to EPEL9
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel9
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-IO-Interactive
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
Blocks: 2187286
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Could you add perl-IO-Interactive to EPEL9? I need it there for
perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet.



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286
[Bug 2187286] Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet to EPEL9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187286] Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||2187291





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187291
[Bug 2187291] Add perl-IO-Interactive to EPEL9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187283] Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||2187286





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286
[Bug 2187286] Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet to EPEL9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187286] New: Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286

Bug ID: 2187286
   Summary: Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet to EPEL9
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel9
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
Blocks: 2187283
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Could you please add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet to EPEL9? I need it there for
perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple.



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283
[Bug 2187283] Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple to EPEL9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187286
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187283] New: Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple to EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283

Bug ID: 2187283
   Summary: Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple to EPEL9
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel9
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
Blocks: 2177873
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Could you please add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple to EPEL9? I need it there for
perl-Net-Amazon-S3.



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177873
[Bug 2177873] Please provide perl-Net-Amazon-S3 for EPEL9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2177873] Please provide perl-Net-Amazon-S3 for EPEL9

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177873

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||2187283





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187283
[Bug 2187283] Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple to EPEL9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177873
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230417.n.0 changes

2023-04-17 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report 
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230416.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230417.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images:  1
Added packages:  1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   266
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  143.20 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   2.88 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   17.36 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree ppc64le
Path: Kinoite/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230417.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree ppc64le
Path: 
Silverblue/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230416.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: adw-gtk3-theme-4.5-1.fc39
Summary: The theme from libadwaita ported to GTK-3
RPMs:adw-gtk3-theme
Size:143.20 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  Macaulay2-1.21-5.fc39
Old package:  Macaulay2-1.21-4.fc39
Summary:  System for algebraic geometry and commutative algebra
RPMs: Macaulay2
Size: 133.69 MiB
Size change:  24.36 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Apr 15 2023 Florian Weimer  - 1.21-5
  - Port configure script to C99


Package:  akonadi-calendar-tools-23.04.0-1.fc39
Old package:  akonadi-calendar-tools-23.03.90-1.fc39
Summary:  Akonadi Calendar Tools
RPMs: akonadi-calendar-tools
Size: 925.23 KiB
Size change:  188 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 14 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 23.04.0-1
  - 23.04.0


Package:  akonadi-import-wizard-23.04.0-1.fc39
Old package:  akonadi-import-wizard-23.03.90-1.fc39
Summary:  Akonadi Import Wizard
RPMs: akonadi-import-wizard akonadi-import-wizard-devel
Size: 2.34 MiB
Size change:  -1 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 14 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 23.04.0-1
  - 23.04.0


Package:  akonadiconsole-23.04.0-1.fc39
Old package:  akonadiconsole-23.03.90-1.fc39
Summary:  Akonadi developer tool
RPMs: akonadiconsole
Size: 1.50 MiB
Size change:  3.31 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 14 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 23.04.0-1
  - 23.04.0


Package:  akregator-23.04.0-1.fc39
Old package:  akregator-23.03.90-1.fc39
Summary:  Feed Reader
RPMs: akregator akregator-libs
Size: 5.83 MiB
Size change:  1.08 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 14 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 23.04.0-1
  - 23.04.0


Package:  analitza-23.04.0-1.fc39
Old package:  analitza-23.03.90-1.fc39
Summary:  Library of mathematical features
RPMs: analitza analitza-devel
Size: 3.02 MiB
Size change:  219 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 14 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 23.04.0-1
  - 23.04.0


Package:  ardour7-7.3.0-1.fc39
Old package:  ardour7-7.2.0-2.fc38
Summary:  Digital Audio Workstation
RPMs: ardour7
Size: 57.69 MiB
Size change:  215.04 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Apr 17 2023 Nils Philippsen  - 7.3.0-1
  - Version 7.3.0


Package:  ark-23.04.0-1.fc39
Old package:  ark-23.03.90-1.fc39
Summary:  Archive manager
RPMs: ark ark-libs
Size: 6.99 MiB
Size change:  56.29 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 14 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 23.04.0-1
  - 23.04.0


Package:  artikulate-23.04.0-1.fc39
Old package:  artikulate-23.03.90-1.fc39
Summary:  Improve your pronunciation by listening to native speakers
RPMs: artikulate artikulate-libs
Size: 5.26 MiB
Size change:  1.36 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 14 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 23.04.0-1
  - 23.04.0


Package:  baloo-widgets-23.04.0-1.fc39
Old package:  baloo-widgets-23.03.90-1.fc39
Summary:  Widgets for Baloo
RPMs: baloo-widgets baloo-widgets-devel
Size: 953.76 KiB
Size change:  243 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 14 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 23.04.0-1
  - 23.04.0


Package:  blinken-23.04.0-1.fc39
Old package:  blinken-23.03.90-1.fc39
Summary:  Memory Enhancement Game
RPMs: blinken
Size: 9.33 MiB
Size change:  164 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 14 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 23.04.0-1
  - 23.04.0


Package:  bomber-23.04.0-1.fc39
Old package:  bomber-23.03.90-1.fc39
Summary:  Arcade bombing game
RPMs: bomber
Size: 3.67 MiB
Size change:  352 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 14 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 23.04.0-1
  - 23.04.0


Package:  bovo-23.04.0-1.fc39
Old package:  bovo-23.03.90-1.fc39
Summary:  Five in a row game
RPMs: bovo
Size: 1.41 MiB
Size change:  106 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 14 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 23.04.0-1
  - 23.04.0


Package:  cantor-23.04.0-2.fc39
Old package:  cantor-22.12.3-1.fc39
Summary:  KDE Frontend to Mathematical Software
RPMs: cantor cantor-R cantor-devel cantor-julia cantor-libs
Size: 6.53 MiB
Size change:  -36.19 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Mar 20 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 
23.03.80-1
  - 23.03.80

  * Fri Mar 31 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 
23.03.90-1
  - 23.03.90

  * Fri Apr

[Bug 2186944] perl-Time-Progress-2.14 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186944



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-18f776e7ba has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-18f776e7ba


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186944
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187275] perl-User-Identity-1.02 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-User-Identity-1.02-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100055645


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187275] perl-User-Identity-1.02 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1957821
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1957821=edit
Update to 1.02 (#2187275)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2187275] New: perl-User-Identity-1.02 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275

Bug ID: 2187275
   Summary: perl-User-Identity-1.02 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-User-Identity
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ser...@serjux.com,
spo...@gmail.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 1.02
Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.02
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.01-4.fc38
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/User-Identity/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/6038/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-User-Identity


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Getting back the old Bugzilla bug entry form

2023-04-17 Thread Florian Weimer 
* Miro Hrončok:

> Apparently, the RHEL 9 product still has the old form, so Fedor amust
> have opted into this. I wonder, where was this change coordinated? How
> did I miss it?

It was coordinated here:

  Default Fedora bug creation to Guided bug entry 
  

It's not just something the Bugzilla admins came up with.  To be clear,
I learned about it only after deployment, too.

Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2186944] perl-Time-Progress-2.14 is available

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186944

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-Time-Progress-2.14-1.f
   ||c39
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186944
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Getting back the old Bugzilla bug entry form

2023-04-17 Thread Miro Hrončok 

On 17. 04. 23 9:19, Miro Hrončok wrote:

On 17. 04. 23 8:40, Florian Weimer wrote:

Guided bug filing in Bugzilla was rolled out today.

Is there a way to get back the old entry form?  ...


We have a workflow that generates links like this:


     url_prefix = 'https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?'
     params = {
     'short_desc': summary,
     'comment': description,
     'component': str(package),
     'blocked': TRACKER,
     'product': 'Fedora',
     'version': 'rawhide',
     #'bug_severity': 'high',
     'cc': '...@redhat.com,...@redhat.com'
     }

     # Rate-limit opening browser tabs
     async with browser_lock:
     webbrowser.open(url_prefix + urlencode(params))
     await asyncio.sleep(1)

It no longer fully functional. This will disrupt our Python 3.12 work :(

Apparently, the RHEL 9 product still has the old form, so Fedor amust have 
opted into this. I wonder, where was this change coordinated? How did I miss it?


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187263

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Getting back the old Bugzilla bug entry form

2023-04-17 Thread Miro Hrončok 

On 17. 04. 23 9:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:

On 17. 04. 23 8:40, Florian Weimer wrote:

Guided bug filing in Bugzilla was rolled out today.

Is there a way to get back the old entry form?  It doesn't look it's
possible, specifying ?format=FORMAT gives this error:

| file error - cannot find file -
| bug/create/create-FORMATguided-Fedora.html.tmpl ()

So it looks like the server just inserts “-Fedora” unconditionally.


We link to 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora=fedora-review from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Review_Process/ and the link is now broken as well :(


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187261

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2023-04-17 Thread Miro Hrončok 

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets 
retired.

Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

Full report available at:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-04-17.txt
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.

For human readable dependency chains,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
For all orphaned packages,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan

Package  (co)maintainers   Status Change

7kaa  orphan   5 weeks ago
golang-github-exoscale-egoscale   go-sig, orphan   2 weeks ago
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free   orphan, uraeus, wtaymans 0 weeks ago
kitty atim, orphan, salimma,   2 weeks ago
  zawertun
perl-Debug-ShowStuff  orphan   1 weeks ago
perl-MemHandleorphan   1 weeks ago
pluto orphan   5 weeks ago
python-ssh-python orphan   0 weeks ago
rocm-smi  orphan   0 weeks ago
studio-controls   orphan   1 weeks ago
vim-nerdtree-git-plugin   atim, orphan 5 weeks ago
wyhashorphan   0 weeks ago

The following packages require above mentioned packages:
Depending on: golang-github-exoscale-egoscale (4), status change: 2023-03-28 (2 
weeks ago)

golang-github-acme-lego (maintained by: eclipseo, go-sig)
		golang-github-acme-lego-4.4.0-8.fc37.src requires 
golang(github.com/exoscale/egoscale) = 0.38.0-6.fc38
		golang-github-acme-lego-devel-4.4.0-8.fc37.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/exoscale/egoscale) = 0.38.0-6.fc38


golang-github-acme-lego-3 (maintained by: eclipseo, go-sig)
		golang-github-acme-lego-3-3.9.0-7.fc37.src requires 
golang(github.com/exoscale/egoscale) = 0.38.0-6.fc38
		golang-github-acme-lego-3-devel-3.9.0-7.fc37.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/exoscale/egoscale) = 0.38.0-6.fc38


golang-github-caddyserver-caddy-1 (maintained by: eclipseo, go-sig)
		golang-github-caddyserver-caddy-1-1.0.4-11.fc38.src requires 
golang(github.com/go-acme/lego/v3/certcrypto) = 3.9.0-7.fc37, 
golang(github.com/go-acme/lego/v3/challenge) = 3.9.0-7.fc37, 
golang(github.com/go-acme/lego/v3/challenge/tlsalpn01) = 3.9.0-7.fc37
		golang-github-caddyserver-caddy-1-devel-1.0.4-11.fc38.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/go-acme/lego/v3/certcrypto) = 3.9.0-7.fc37, 
golang(github.com/go-acme/lego/v3/challenge) = 3.9.0-7.fc37, 
golang(github.com/go-acme/lego/v3/challenge/tlsalpn01) = 3.9.0-7.fc37


golang-github-coredns-corefile-migration (maintained by: eclipseo, 
go-sig)
		golang-github-coredns-corefile-migration-1.0.11-10.fc38.src requires 
golang(github.com/caddyserver/caddy-1/caddyfile) = 1.0.4-11.fc38
		golang-github-coredns-corefile-migration-devel-1.0.11-10.fc38.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/caddyserver/caddy-1/caddyfile) = 1.0.4-11.fc38


Depending on: gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free (22), status change: 2023-04-13 (0 
weeks ago)

cheese (maintained by: amigadave, gnome-sig, jwrdegoede, mclasen, mcrha)
cheese-2:44.0-1.fc39.src requires 
pkgconfig(gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.0) = 1.22.2
		cheese-2:44.0-1.fc39.x86_64 requires gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free(x86-64) = 
1.22.2-1.fc39
		cheese-libs-devel-2:44.0-1.fc39.i686 requires 
pkgconfig(gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.0) = 1.22.2
		cheese-libs-devel-2:44.0-1.fc39.x86_64 requires 
pkgconfig(gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.0) = 1.22.2


cozy (maintained by: suve)
cozy-1.2.1-3.fc39.noarch requires gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free = 
1.22.2-1.fc39

farstream02 (maintained by: stefanb, uraeus)
		farstream02-0.2.9-11.fc38.i686 requires gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free = 
1.22.2-1.fc39
		farstream02-0.2.9-11.fc38.x86_64 requires gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free = 
1.22.2-1.fc39


gnome-sound-recorder (maintained by: amigadave, gnome-sig)
		gnome-sound-recorder-43~beta-2.fc38.noarch requires 
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free = 1.22.2-1.fc39

Re: Getting back the old Bugzilla bug entry form

2023-04-17 Thread Miro Hrončok 

On 17. 04. 23 8:40, Florian Weimer wrote:

Guided bug filing in Bugzilla was rolled out today.

Is there a way to get back the old entry form?  ...


We have a workflow that generates links like this:


url_prefix = 'https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?'
params = {
'short_desc': summary,
'comment': description,
'component': str(package),
'blocked': TRACKER,
'product': 'Fedora',
'version': 'rawhide',
#'bug_severity': 'high',
'cc': '...@redhat.com,...@redhat.com'
}

# Rate-limit opening browser tabs
async with browser_lock:
webbrowser.open(url_prefix + urlencode(params))
await asyncio.sleep(1)

It no longer fully functional. This will disrupt our Python 3.12 work :(

Apparently, the RHEL 9 product still has the old form, so Fedor amust have 
opted into this. I wonder, where was this change coordinated? How did I miss it?


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Getting back the old Bugzilla bug entry form

2023-04-17 Thread Miro Hrončok 

On 17. 04. 23 8:40, Florian Weimer wrote:

Guided bug filing in Bugzilla was rolled out today.

Is there a way to get back the old entry form?  It doesn't look it's
possible, specifying ?format=FORMAT gives this error:

| file error - cannot find file -
| bug/create/create-FORMATguided-Fedora.html.tmpl ()

So it looks like the server just inserts “-Fedora” unconditionally.


We link to 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora=fedora-review 
from 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Review_Process/ 
and the link is now broken as well :(


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Getting back the old Bugzilla bug entry form

2023-04-17 Thread Florian Weimer 
Guided bug filing in Bugzilla was rolled out today.

Is there a way to get back the old entry form?  It doesn't look it's
possible, specifying ?format=FORMAT gives this error:

| file error - cannot find file -
| bug/create/create-FORMATguided-Fedora.html.tmpl ()

So it looks like the server just inserts “-Fedora” unconditionally.

And including the user agent in the description without warning is not
cool. 8-(

Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue