[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2023-04-22 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c126e4af73 chromium-112.0.5615.121-1.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing yapet-2.6-1.el7 Details about builds:

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 07:21:54PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: ...snip... > Unless this discourse has some great mail bridge (it doesn't) or maybe > an rss feed (I do not use those at work, but I guess I could ?) So that > I can skim messages on my terms, I think I (and those like me) will be > the

Re: RFC: No koji builds during mass branching and updates-testing enablement

2023-04-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 09:03:11PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 8:56 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > * Cancel all builds that are in progress. Maintainers can resubmit after > > the outage with the appropriate branches. > > * unpush all updates stuck in gating/pending? Is

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2023-04-22 at 10:37 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 02:30:45PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 23:20 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > > > > For lists that are active, the split is confusing — when should > > > > something be on the packaging

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 06:03:12PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I would also be one of those people who would be much less engaged -- > even disengage -- if everything moved to a website. > > I have one thing to add that I don't think was covered: > > Can we make contributing to the

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 05:20:37PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > First, I’d like to move the Changes discussion. They will still be > posted to devel-announce, but responses directed to Project Discussion > in a new #changes tag. Ben tells me that this is a FESCo decision, > which seems

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 02:30:45PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 23:20 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > > For lists that are active, the split is confusing — when should > > > something be on the packaging list rather than devel? What happens when > > > something is

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-22 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Sat, 22 Apr 2023 at 13:03, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I would also be one of those people who would be much less engaged -- > even disengage -- if everything moved to a website. > > I have one thing to add that I don't think was covered: > > Can we make contributing to the mailing list

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 06:03:12PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I would also be one of those people who would be much less engaged -- > even disengage -- if everything moved to a website. > > I have one thing to add that I don't think was covered: > > Can we make contributing to the

[Bug 2188829] perl-Pod-Parser-1.66 is available

2023-04-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188829 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed. Details below: GenericError: File upload failed: cli-build/1682184432.3854659.bEOhuKBa/perl-Pod-Parser-1.66-1.fc36.src.rpm Traceback: File

[Bug 2188829] New: perl-Pod-Parser-1.66 is available

2023-04-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188829 Bug ID: 2188829 Summary: perl-Pod-Parser-1.66 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Pod-Parser Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I would also be one of those people who would be much less engaged -- even disengage -- if everything moved to a website. I have one thing to add that I don't think was covered: Can we make contributing to the mailing list easier? One thing we have done in a community I manage is *not* to

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 04:38:28PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 4:05 PM Maxwell G wrote: > > > > What evidence shows that the group is ever shrinking? I often see Self > > Introduction posts and new people interacting with project. I suppose > > that whether they continue

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 11:54:09AM -0400, JT wrote: > > But with my Fedora Ambassador hat on I can tell you that the problem > we see right now is not that we don't have people coming to Fedora. We have > a problem helping people to connect to where the work is happening in a way > that they can

Re: Error with libheif package

2023-04-22 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 22/04/2023 14:41, Christopher Klooz wrote: So once users have rpmfusion enabled, `dnf install/update libheif` ends up in a conflict because of `libheif-hevc` and `libheif-freeworld`. Already fixed in libheif-freeworld-1.15.1-5. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

Re: Firecracker microVM manager

2023-04-22 Thread David Michael
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 10:48 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 10:13:31AM -0400, David Michael wrote: > > > Would it be possible to add a warning to this effect? Without any form > > > of sandboxing Firecracker is not suitable for production use. > > Where would such a warning

Re: Firecracker microVM manager

2023-04-22 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
On 4/22/23 10:13, David Michael wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 10:02 PM Demi Marie Obenour > wrote: >> On 4/21/23 11:13, David Michael wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Following up on this, Firecracker has been accepted and submitted to >>> Fedora. Thanks to Fabio for all of the Rust reviews. >>> >>>

Re: Firecracker microVM manager

2023-04-22 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 10:13:31AM -0400, David Michael wrote: > > Would it be possible to add a warning to this effect? Without any form > > of sandboxing Firecracker is not suitable for production use. > Where would such a warning be placed? The sandboxing is done by a > standalone program[0]

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-22 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 07:01:06AM +0300, Benson Muite wrote: > > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/navigating-fedora-discussion-tags-categories-and-concepts/3 > This is helpful. Wish it were a magazine article. Those get read. Interesting idea! I'll check with the Magazine team to see

Re: Firecracker microVM manager

2023-04-22 Thread David Michael
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 10:02 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > On 4/21/23 11:13, David Michael wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Following up on this, Firecracker has been accepted and submitted to > > Fedora. Thanks to Fabio for all of the Rust reviews. > > > > F37

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-22 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 17:20, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > For lists that are active, the split is confusing — when should > > something be on the packaging list rather than devel? What happens when > > something is related to both Cloud and Server, or Workstation and KDE? > > One can post to

Re: Interested in helping package unison

2023-04-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 03:02:51PM +0200, Jos de Kloe wrote: > There used to be a unison240 package, but it was orphaned over 2 years ago. > See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/unison240 You probably want to read back over emails on this list related to Unison, links here:

Re: Interested in helping package unison

2023-04-22 Thread Jos de Kloe
There used to be a unison240 package, but it was orphaned over 2 years ago. See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/unison240 On 4/22/23 09:59, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 03:52:42PM -0600, Craig Christianson wrote: Hello, Unison is a tool I use all the time, and I would

Re: Fedora magazine site down

2023-04-22 Thread Stephen Smoogen
There was a general outage at wordpress causing many sites hosted there to be offline. https://wpenginestatus.com/incidents/478228 I would like to thank the Red Hat Open Source Program Office (OSPO) for working on what the issue was, and answering questions in the Fedora Infrastructure ticket

Error with libheif package

2023-04-22 Thread Christopher Klooz
Several users experience an issue with Fedora's `libheif` package, which can be easily reproduced: See https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/unknown-update-error-with-libheif/81302/6 With regards to our default dnf repositories: our package has weak dependencies that are not satisfied by

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-22 Thread Tomi Lähteenmäki
I'm relatively new on mailing lists but just wanted to give my opinion. With mailing lists one gets to choose the client to use, unlike with the web based forums where one is more or less limited to use a browser. The Discoure's mailing list functionality sounds interesting but how much it

Review swap Bottles dependencies

2023-04-22 Thread Sandro
Hi, I'm looking for a review for a couple of Bottles dependencies. 1. python-fvs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187061 2. vkbasalt-cli https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188653 Both are Python packages and I'll be happy to do reviews in return, with Python having my

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-22 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova
On 4/21/23 19:39, Jaroslav Prokop wrote: On 4/21/23 17:42, Matthew Miller wrote: On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 10:50:42AM +0200, Jarek Prokop wrote: also drives us towards more scattered communications. Our infamous mega-threads are not really effective for getting to community consensus, and tend

Re: Interested in helping package unison

2023-04-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 03:52:42PM -0600, Craig Christianson wrote: > Hello, > > Unison is a tool I use all the time, and I would like to see it > packaged for RPM systems. Is there something I can do to help? You will need to become a packager, if not already: