[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2023-05-13 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 58 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e00c3d01e cutter-re-2.2.0-1.el8 rizin-0.5.1-1.el8 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f44d817bc9 chromium-113.0.5672.63-1.el8 3

[Bug 2203047] Upgrade perl-Text-Tabs+Wrap to 2023.0511

2023-05-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203047 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-13 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
Thanks, Kevin! No  problem, no rush, I did not quite know what to expect, hence the questions. Thanks again! On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 06:12:33 PM CDT, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 02:41:10AM +0200, Sandro wrote: > On 11-05-2023 17:57, Globe Trotter via devel

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 02:41:10AM +0200, Sandro wrote: > On 11-05-2023 17:57, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > > Still no movement on my unretire requests for both slim and oclock, not > > even a request for additional information. > > Tags have been added to the ticket. So, it has come up in

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-13 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
Thanks, Sandro! How does one ping in the ticket on paguire? On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 07:41:47 PM CDT, Sandro wrote: On 11-05-2023 17:57, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > Still no movement on my unretire requests for both slim and oclock, not even > a request for additional

Re: review swaps

2023-05-13 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hi Zbigniew, On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 11:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I have a bunch of nice python packages looking for a reviewer: > > #2121902 pyinstrument - Python profiler with colorful output I've taken the profiler. Do you think you could take 2180418? I would really

review swaps

2023-05-13 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
I have a bunch of nice python packages looking for a reviewer: #2121902 pyinstrument - Python profiler with colorful output #2203529 blosc2 - High performance compressor optimized for binary data #2203544 python-ndindex - Python library for manipulating indices of ndarrays #2203546 python-blosc2

Re: Heads up! Nforro's awscli2 is working. It's time to retire the awscli

2023-05-13 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 7:02 PM David Duncan wrote: > > Now that awscli2 is out and functional. Excellent! I will finally be able to stop installing a local version. > Gwyn and I are thinking it's time to retire the original > awscli package in favor of this one. We are thinking > that it will

Re: Heads up! Nforro's awscli2 is working. It's time to retire the awscli

2023-05-13 Thread David Duncan
Thanks Neal! Responding inline, but from gmail, so it's not as pretty as I would like. On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 2:15 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 3:02 PM David Duncan wrote: > > > > Now that awscli2 is out and functional. Gwyn and I are thinking it's > time to retire the

Re: Heads up! Nforro's awscli2 is working. It's time to retire the awscli

2023-05-13 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 3:02 PM David Duncan wrote: > > Now that awscli2 is out and functional. Gwyn and I are thinking it's time to > retire the original awscli package in favor of this one. We are thinking that > it will be best to keep the awscli (v1) maintained until the release of F39 >

Heads up! Nforro's awscli2 is working. It's time to retire the awscli

2023-05-13 Thread David Duncan
Now that awscli2 is out and functional. Gwyn and I are thinking it's time to retire the original awscli package in favor of this one. We are thinking that it will be best to keep the awscli (v1) maintained until the release of F39 later this year and retire it from the active releases it at

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Flatpaks without Modules (System-Wide Change)

2023-05-13 Thread Owen Taylor
On Sat, May 13, 2023, 4:24 AM Mattia Verga via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Il 13/05/23 03:04, Owen Tay rt I look > > On Fri, May 12, 2023, 1:03 PM Mattia Verga via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> Il 10/05/23 12:54, Aoife Moloney ha scritto: >> M kk kk kk

Re: Questions about mingw static libraries

2023-05-13 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 09:31:02PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I'm just starting to look into the mingw packages and building mingw > executables with them - and in particular static building. I'm > hoping someone can clarify some things for me. > > For "regular" libs we seem to have: > >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230513.n.0 changes

2023-05-13 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230512.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230513.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 87 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Flatpaks without Modules (System-Wide Change)

2023-05-13 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 13/05/23 03:04, Owen Taylor ha scritto: > On Fri, May 12, 2023, 1:03 PM Mattia Verga via devel > wrote: > >> Il 10/05/23 12:54, Aoife Moloney ha scritto: >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlatpaksWithoutModules >>> >>> >> I've never tried to make a flatpak because I was scared by