The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-62c97d6572
zabbix50-5.0.36-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
apptainer-1.2.0-1.el7
pspg-5.7.8-1.el7
Details
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-226639904e
netcdf-4.7.0-3.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
apptainer-1.2.0-1.el8
pspg-5.7.8-1.el8
Details
> Am 19.07.2023 um 23:11 schrieb Otto Liljalaakso :
>
> Robin Lee kirjoitti 14.7.2023 klo 17.53:
>> I've orphaned the Zim package. It fails to build with Python 3.12 in Rawhide.
>>
>> Users can move to the flatpak on Flathub, which is also packaged by me.
>>
> Thank you for maintaining the
Jerry James wrote:
> The code also calls save_pushptrptr (Pel_save_pushptrptr), another
> hidden symbol.
That one is pretty short though. But I do not know whether the stuff it does
can be done without invoking more internal symbols that are now hidden. The
code of the function is in Perl's
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
/home/rjones/d/fedora/polymake/rawhide/polymake-4.10/lib/core/src/perl/RefHash.xxs:737:11:
> error: ‘Perl_ck_fun’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean
> ‘Perl_cx_dup’?
> 737 |return Perl_ck_fun(aTHX_ o);
> | ^~~
> |
On Wed, May 24, 2023, at 2:12 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2023, at 4:43 PM, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> Therefore, I am
>> asking if Fedora should use full kernel preemption by default.
>
> https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/228
>
> The outstanding questions:
>
> a. Do we
2023-07-19T13:39:57Z Peter Robinson :
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:20 PM Nicola Sella wrote:
Hi all,
Yesterday, DNF5 5.1.0 was released upstream[1] and in rawhide[2]. This
update makes DNF5's API stable. This means that changes to the API
won't happen in stable Fedora releases.
How
Robin Lee kirjoitti 14.7.2023 klo 17.53:
I've orphaned the Zim package. It fails to build with Python 3.12 in Rawhide.
Users can move to the flatpak on Flathub, which is also packaged by me.
Thank you for maintaining the Zim package until now. I took it. The
build failure was easy to fix by
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:35 PM Scott Talbert wrote:
> I'm happy to take cvc5, since I just packaged it for Debian a little while
> back. But yeah, it would be nice to have a working fedora-review.
Thank you, Scott. Having someone familiar with cvc5 review it would be great.
Like I just told
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:26 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Just to let you know I'm still up for reviewing those ocaml-* packages
> (without swaps), but I'm waiting on a final resolution of
> fedora-review on Rawhide.
Thank you. I can wait. :-)
I started a thread about fixing fedora-review in
On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, Jerry James wrote:
Finally, a replacement for the existing cvc4 package:
cvc5: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223012
I'm happy to take cvc5, since I just packaged it for Debian a little while
back. But yeah, it would be nice to have a working
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 08:48:56PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
Just to let you know I'm still up for reviewing those ocaml-* packages
(without swaps), but I'm waiting on a final resolution of
fedora-review on Rawhide.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224116
Bug ID: 2224116
Summary: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230719.001 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Business-ISBN-Data
Keywords:
Hi all,
Is anyone interested in swapping reviews? I've got some nontrivial
packages awaiting review, and am willing to review nontrivial packages
in exchange.
Font packages needed to update MuseScore to 4.x:
makemusic-finale-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 08:48:56PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
Forgot to cc: epel-devel - but django3 will be available after the next
compose tonight!
Best regards,
Michel
- Forwarded message from Michel Alexandre Salim
-
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 14:01:22 -0500
From: Michel Alexandre Salim
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject:
Dear all,
I've been maintaining python-django3 across EPEL8 to Rawhide as part of
the effort to upgrade our mailing list infrastructure.
Good news: everything is now ready to get this in EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033064
Bad news: some additional tests are beginning to
On Wed, 2023-07-19 at 17:49 +, Honore Doktorr wrote:
> "we know that opt-in metrics are not very useful because few users would opt
> in … We are not interested in opt-in metrics."
> Any metrics collected *must* be opt-in. If the quote above is still reflects
> your thinking on telemetry
"we know that opt-in metrics are not very useful because few users would opt in
… We are not interested in opt-in metrics."
Any metrics collected *must* be opt-in. If the quote above is still reflects
your thinking on telemetry collection then this is not a viable scheme, and
should be
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 15:27:01 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023, 15:22 Maxwell G wrote:
>
> > On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 12:38 +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> > > Hello Jerry,
> > > I proposed a workaround a few days ago
> > > https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/485
> > >
I have orphaned tint2.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tint2
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 10:55:15AM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 2:24 PM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> > On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 13:47 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 4:38 AM Maxwell G wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > It seems the
Hi all,
The next two ARM meetings (25 July, 1 August) will be cancelled. Several
people will be out-of-town for next week's meeting, and Flock is the
following week, so many others won't be able to make it. We will plan to
reconvene on 8 August.
See you then!
Geoff Marr
IRC: coremodule
Hi,
when I use mock locally, most of the times I use --no-clean , so yes I
use actively mock --no-clean , now I use `fedpkg mock-build -N` most of
the times
mock --shell hopefully, don't clean the buildroot, so is the same run
mock --shell or mock --shell --no-clean
On Wed, 2023-07-19 at
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Parse-Yapp` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Parse-Yapp/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:20 PM Nicola Sella wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Yesterday, DNF5 5.1.0 was released upstream[1] and in rawhide[2]. This update
> makes DNF5's API stable. This means that changes to the API won't happen in
> stable Fedora releases.
How compatible is this API with the old dnf4
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Parse-Yapp` that
you are following:
``
Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Parse-Yapp/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
There's a potentially problematic patch (or maybe we are only
overcautious?). If you belong to the $Subject group, we'd appreciate
if you could help us with testing of a pre-release Mock from
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/pull/1103
Steps for testing are mentioned there.
Hi all,
Yesterday, DNF5 5.1.0 was released upstream[1] and in rawhide[2]. This
update makes DNF5's API stable. This means that changes to the API won't
happen in stable Fedora releases.
Cheers,
Nicola
[1]: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/releases/tag/5.1.0
[2]:
Hi
net-snmp license has been transformed to SPDX license format and corrected
from BSD to Net-SNMP and OpenSSL
Best regards
Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
___
devel mailing list --
Hi all,
Per the Fedora Linux 39 schedule [1] we have started a mass rebuild on
2023-07-19 for Fedora 39. We are running this mass rebuild for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (39-rebuild) and merged
when
Dear colleagues,
Yesterday we added liboqs and oqsprovider packages to Fedora rawhide.
It's a part of our efforts to provide implementation of post-quantum
algorithms in Fedora and later in RHEL.
liboqs is an implementation of NIST-approved PQ algorithms (Kyber,
Dilithium, Falcon, and Sphincs).
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 12:38 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 6:11 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 10:21 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 6:23 AM Jaroslav Mracek
> > > > > > >
> > > > Does that mean the issues with dnf
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 6:11 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 10:21 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 6:23 AM Jaroslav Mracek > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Does that mean the issues with dnf [2] we able to be solved all the
> > > time but just weren't
Oh, that thing again.
Let me update the template so sed works correctly.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 1:28 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 1:04 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Per the Fedora Linux 39 schedule [1] we have started a mass rebuild on
> > 2023-07-19
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 1:04 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora Linux 39 schedule [1] we have started a mass rebuild on
> 2023-07-19 for Fedora 39. We are running this mass rebuild for the
> changes listed in:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
>
> This
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230718.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230719.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 30
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 149
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 12.37 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638
--- Comment #6 from Dan Horák ---
Seems it's really the perl 5.38 update, because after installing it into the
20230712 buildroot, the tests started to fail. I haven't compared the build
logs for new warnings though.
--
You are receiving
Hi all,
Per the Fedora Linux 39 schedule [1] we have started a mass rebuild on
2023-07-19 for Fedora 39. We are running this mass rebuild for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (39-rebuild) and merged
when
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223772
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223772
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 10:21 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 6:23 AM Jaroslav Mracek > wrote:
> >
> > Does that mean the issues with dnf [2] we able to be solved all the
> > time but just weren't investigated?
>
> The issue was investigated also with DNF, but the issue
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 2:24 PM Maxwell G wrote:
> On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 13:47 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 4:38 AM Maxwell G wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > It seems the fedora-scm-requests processor is creating the initial
> > > repository commits with `releng
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 6:23 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
>
> Does that mean the issues with dnf [2] we able to be solved all the
> time but just weren't investigated?
The issue was investigated also with DNF, but the issue was well hidden,
because the code uses hard coded set for downloaded
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230719.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638
--- Comment #5 from Dan Horák ---
The tests are passing the in the Fedora-Rawhide-20230712.n.0 buildroot, so it's
likely the perl 5.38 (added on 07/13) what makes the difference. But the
build/compilation produces tons of warnings and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223772
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
|ka...@ucw.cz,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10-0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223434
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635
Bug 635 depends on bug 2223434, which changed state.
Bug 2223434 Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10-0.20 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223434
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223434
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 16:43 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 05:59:50PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > As part of the cobbler project testing, we need to test accessing Fedora
> > releases with various URLs:
> >
> > "
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223434
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Hi
license for xsane package has been migrated to SPDX format and corrected
from GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ to GPL-2.0-or-later and LGPL-3.0-or-later
Best regards
Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
___
devel mailing
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 6:23 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 6:40 AM Jaroslav Mracek > wrote:
> >
> > Except dnf5 broke a number of microdnf usecases with low memory where
> > microdnf worked [1].
> >
> > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214520
>
> Correct
On pondělí 17. července 2023 20:39:11 CEST Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:54 AM Jerry James wrote:
> > Like many of you, I have been quite inconvenienced because of
> > dnf5-related breakage of fedora-review. I've been monkeying with it
> > today and finally got a successful run
Bob Mauchin wrote:
> I'm currently assessing what is needed by our binaries packages and will
> take packages needed that have been orphaned.
Thank you! I was getting really worried that Restic would drop out and
I'd have to design a new backup solution yet again.
Björn Persson
Hi
OpenCV license has been migrated to SPDX license format and corrected
from BSD to BSD-3-Clause and Apache-2.0 and ISC.
Best regards
Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
___
devel mailing list --
59 matches
Mail list logo
