[Test-Announce] 2023-10-02 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 39 Blocker Review Meeting

# F39 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2023-10-02 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat (*NOT* Matrix) Hi folks! We have 7 proposed Final blockers and 3 proposed Final freeze exception issues to review, so let's have a meeting on Monday. I will not be around to

[Test-Announce] 2023-10-02 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting?

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2023-10-02 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: ** #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat ** Greetings testers! There is a meeting slot on Monday, but I won't be around (I'll be on my way back from a weekend

[Bug 2239931] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239931 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2

[Bug 2239940] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20230920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239940 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023

[Bug 2239931] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239931 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2

[Bug 2239940] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20230920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239940 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023

Re: New contributor interested in taking maintainership of SWORD, Xiphos, and Bibletime

On 9/29/23 1:10 PM, Aaron Rainbolt wrote: Hello, and thanks for your time. I am a former (and possibly future) Ubuntu and Lubuntu Developer who recently started using Fedora on some of my systems. I have about a year of experience in Linux distro development from my previous work with

[Bug 2240080] perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240080 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.52-1.fc4 |perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.52-1.fc4

Re: 16 packages still need a Python 3.12 rebuild, final freeze in 6 days

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 2:28 PM Dulaney wrote: > On Sep 27, 2023 aig 11:56:01AM +0200, sgrìobh Miro Hrončok: > > Hello packagers, > > here is the list of packages that still need a Python 3.12 rebuild for > Fedora 39+. > > > > supervisor in fedora 39 is 4.2.2 but the version that supports python

[Bug 2239940] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20230920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239940 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023

[Bug 2239931] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239931 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2

Re: python-3.12 distutils removal just happened after python mass rebuild and Fedora mass rebuild ?

On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 23:42 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 29. 09. 23 23:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 29. 09. 23 20:32, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Hi. > > > > > Recent build of some packages like opencv and an old gpgme shows > > > that > > > python-3.12 disutils has gone for good

Re: python-3.12 distutils removal just happened after python mass rebuild and Fedora mass rebuild ?

On 29. 09. 23 23:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 29. 09. 23 20:32, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, Hi. Recent build of some packages like opencv and an old gpgme shows that python-3.12 disutils has gone for good , but just after all mass rebuilds and recently , what you advice to do ? It has been gone

Re: python-3.12 distutils removal just happened after python mass rebuild and Fedora mass rebuild ?

On 29. 09. 23 20:32, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, Hi. Recent build of some packages like opencv and an old gpgme shows that python-3.12 disutils has gone for good , but just after all mass rebuilds and recently , what you advice to do ? It has been gone for since the Python 3.12 rebuild in

Re: python-3.12 distutils removal just happened after python mass rebuild and Fedora mass rebuild ?

On 29-09-2023 20:32, Sérgio Basto wrote: Recent build of some packages like opencv and an old gpgme shows that python-3.12 disutils has gone for good , but just after all mass rebuilds and recently , what you advice to do ? Any quick way to replace distutils ? the python 3.12 final release,

Re: python-3.12 distutils removal just happened after python mass rebuild and Fedora mass rebuild ?

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 07:32:45PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > Recent build of some packages like opencv and an old gpgme shows that > python-3.12 disutils has gone for good , but just after all mass > rebuilds and recently , what you advice to do ? > > Any quick way to replace

Re: New contributor interested in taking maintainership of SWORD, Xiphos, and Bibletime

Welcome to Fedora! Glad to have you here. On 29.09.2023 13:10, Aaron Rainbolt wrote: Hello, and thanks for your time. I am a former (and possibly future) Ubuntu and Lubuntu Developer who recently started using Fedora on some of my systems. I have about a year of experience in Linux distro

Re: New contributor interested in taking maintainership of SWORD, Xiphos, and Bibletime

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 2:10 PM Aaron Rainbolt wrote: > > Hello, and thanks for your time. > > I am a former (and possibly future) Ubuntu and Lubuntu Developer who > recently started using Fedora on some of my systems. I have about a year > of experience in Linux distro development from my

python-3.12 distutils removal just happened after python mass rebuild and Fedora mass rebuild ?

Hi, Recent build of some packages like opencv and an old gpgme shows that python-3.12 disutils has gone for good , but just after all mass rebuilds and recently , what you advice to do ? Any quick way to replace distutils ? the python 3.12 final release, currently is scheduled for 2023-10-02

New contributor interested in taking maintainership of SWORD, Xiphos, and Bibletime

Hello, and thanks for your time. I am a former (and possibly future) Ubuntu and Lubuntu Developer who recently started using Fedora on some of my systems. I have about a year of experience in Linux distro development from my previous work with Lubuntu and Ubuntu. After trying Fedora, I liked

Re: -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=implicit-function-declaration coming to rawhide

> Sandro writes: > That aside, having the document linked in the packaging guidelines is > a big step towards letting packagers know of its existence. I just wanted to point out that the packaging guidelines have pointed users to the document for quite some time (early 2019) in this

[EPEL-devel] Re: retirement of klee from EPEL 9

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 10:37:28PM -0500, Carl George wrote: > It recently came to my attention that the klee package in EPEL 9 > needed to be rebuilt against the LLVM 15 library that shipped in RHEL > 9.2. I filed a bug for this [0], and then noticed it was assigned to > "Orphan Owner". It

Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 01:03:08PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 22:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I'm not sure at all that it would be possible to do at compose-time... > > composes are taking around 3.5-4hours and thats after I have done > > a lot to speed them up, but

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 39 RC 20230929.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 39 RC 20230929.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see:

Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 08:03, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 22:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I'm not sure at all that it would be possible to do at compose-time... > > composes are taking around 3.5-4hours and thats after I have done > > a lot to speed them up, but might be

Re: SPDX Statistics - Munich Agreement edition

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 3:03 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Can I ask for additional help? Robert-André packaged scancode-toolkit for > Fedora. This is license-check on steroids. Very useful and powerful tool. But > it has lots of dependencies. Robert packaged them too. That's great news!

[EPEL-devel] Re: retirement of klee from EPEL 9

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 9:20 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 8:37 PM Carl George wrote: >> >> It recently came to my attention that the klee package in EPEL 9 >> needed to be rebuilt against the LLVM 15 library that shipped in RHEL >> 9.2. I filed a bug for this [0], and then

[EPEL-devel] Re: retirement of klee from EPEL 9

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 8:37 PM Carl George wrote: > It recently came to my attention that the klee package in EPEL 9 > needed to be rebuilt against the LLVM 15 library that shipped in RHEL > 9.2. I filed a bug for this [0], and then noticed it was assigned to > "Orphan Owner". It looks like

Update for ddcutil and for dependent package (powerdevil)

Hi all, I am planning to update package ddcutil to latest upstream release 2.0.0. This will introduce a soname bump for libddcutil.so from libddcutil.4 to libddcutil.5. I checked that the only affected package due to this update will be powerdevil. dnf repoquery --whatrequires

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230929.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230928.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230929.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 20 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 67 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 6.81 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: spec file with aarch64 specific Fortran build flags

* Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho: > Have you already reported this issue upstream? To close the loop here, Sébastien has reported this as: -fstack-protector-strong FLAG causes compiler error on aarch64 I find the upstream decision not

[Bug 2241294] New: perl-Authen-Krb5-1.9-42.fc40 FTBFS: Krb5.xs:492:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘krb5_gen_portaddr’

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241294 Bug ID: 2241294 Summary: perl-Authen-Krb5-1.9-42.fc40 FTBFS: Krb5.xs:492:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘krb5_gen_portaddr’ Product: Fedora

SPDX Statistics - Munich Agreement edition

Hot news: we are over 50 %!!! With almost 4k license tags converted in past 2 weeks. How it was possible? First - it is because you rocks and really lots of work has been done. Both on our (Change owners) side and on you as package maintainers. But the biggest impact was migration of texlive

org.eclipse.Java flatpak crashes

I installed Eclipse from https://flathub.org/apps/org.eclipse.Java on my F38 KDE Lenovo T14 (FS = btrfs). I reported this issue: https://github.com/flathub/org.eclipse.Java/issues/78 I tried to debug it using strace, but Flatpaks are not easy to debug. I have noticed many error messages, and