Brad Bell wrote on 2024/01/18 14:00:
I got the Result in the subject above for the following build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=111912575
Looking at the corresponding root.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2575/111912575/root.log
does not indicate to me
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240115.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240117.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 21
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 257
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.47 GiB
Size of dropped packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258922
Bug ID: 2258922
Summary: perl-Email-Sender-2.601 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Email-Sender
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-8edcddc48e
chromium-120.0.6099.216-1.el7
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-fbdcbc3c7a
python-templated-dictionary-1.4-1.el7
The
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 40 Rawhide 20240117.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Plese note that as part of the update to Gedit 46, the following
packages will break ABI:
* amtk: renamed to libgedit-amtk, review needed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258912
* tepl
* gedit
Affected packages are gedit-plugins which needs to be updated to match
gedit, and
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 02:50:43PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Given the problems we had with font packages not being rebuilt in the
> last mass rebuild, can we ensure that the mass rebuild script uses
> "git push --no-verify" instead of plain "git push"?
>
> See:
> -
Hello Tristan,
We store the data in json format. You can access and download the data directly
at our main page at the bottom - "Download collected data". Or via
https://log-detective.com/download
Cheers
Jiri
--
___
devel mailing list --
I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them in
the f40-build-side-81691
side tag over the next few hours (in advance of the mass rebuild tomorrow).
If your package gets a "Rebuilt for Boost 1.83.0" comment, please
don't rebuild it in rawhide, we're building it in the side
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258864
Bug ID: 2258864
Summary: perl-App-Cme-1.040 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-App-Cme
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-01-17/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-01-17-16.29.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-01-17/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-01-17-16.29.log.html
Text Minutes:
I attempted a quick check:
$ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide -l -a | tee >(
grep -E '^/usr/bin/[^/]+$' | sort -u | xargs -n 1 basename >
bin.txt
) | grep -E '^/usr/sbin/[^/]+$' | sort -u | xargs -n 1 basename
> sbin.txt
$ wc -l bin.txt sbin.txt
31229 bin.txt
Hello Folks,
I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to inform you about a
slight adjustment in our schedule for the upcoming mass rebuild which
was planned to happen on Jan 17, 2024. As per the discussion in our
releng weekly call today, due to an unexpected delay in merging the
side tag
Hi all,
Per the Fedora Linux f40 schedule [1] we will be having a mass rebuild on
2024-01-17 for Fedora f40. We are running this mass rebuild for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild=f40=changes
This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag
Hello Folks,
I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to inform you about a
slight adjustment in our schedule for the upcoming mass rebuild which
was planned to happen on Jan 17, 2024. As per the discussion in our
releng weekly call today, due to an unexpected delay in merging the
side tag
Report started at 2024-01-15 15:04:52 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
Hi all,
Per the Fedora Linux f40 schedule [1] we will be having a mass rebuild on
2024-01-17 for Fedora f40. We are running this mass rebuild for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild=f40=changes
This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 12:34 Jiri Kyjovsky wrote:
> Hey, Fedora devs!
>
> Ever find yourself lost in the labyrinth of build logs, desperately seeking
> the elusive culprit behind a failed build? Enter Log Detective – your
> future personal AI guru dedicated to unravelling the mysteries of build
Dne 17. 01. 24 v 12:45 Priscila Gutierres napsal(a):
Hello James,
I started some months ago as a maintainer and I have been learning
since then.
One important thing I've learned is to ask if "this package should be
kept or should it be retired?"
Good hint is typically in dist-git Pagure,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258808
Bug ID: 2258808
Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-10.0.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sys-Virt
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.73 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/52
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that
you are following:
``
6.73 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/52
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258753
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258753
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update Compress::Raw::Zlib for improved compatibility with zlib-ng
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/11
--
___
Hello,
I'm orphaning $SUBJ as I have no longer use for it:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-rubygems-mirror
(Also it fails to build with Ruby 3.3.)
Regards,
Pavel
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
> On 17 Jan 2024, at 10:57, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I just wanted to quickly announce a small project I did in collaboration with
> the Packit folks.
>
> Do you have some tools or services that perform actions on all currently
> active Fedora releases? And do you have to manually
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.73 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/51
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hello James,
I started some months ago as a maintainer and I have been learning since
then.
One important thing I've learned is to ask if "this package should be kept
or should it be retired?"
If you want to start to contribute, you can send PRs bumping or fixing
opened bugs first, and I can
Hey, Fedora devs!
Ever find yourself lost in the labyrinth of build logs, desperately seeking
the elusive culprit behind a failed build? Enter Log Detective – your
future personal AI guru dedicated to unravelling the mysteries of build log
failures within the RPM community.
*What is Log
Hi All,
I am not sponsored into the packager group yet, but I would like to begin by
maintaining a package that is on this list as "orphaned" however, it is very
difficult to understand which package(s) might be suitable for a newcomer like
me. Any help, advice, or suggested package would be
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that
you are following:
``
6.73 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/51
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258287
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
Thanks, that is exactly the message I wanted to tell.
Perhaps I should keep corner cases to myself until someone actually hits
them. It has clearly confused people and created unnecessary reactions.
Conflict will arise only when configuration change done by administrator
were not complete.
Please, Stephen, would you please read what I wrote, not what Kevin
wrongly deducted?
The change I made in dnsmasq does not conflict with systemd-resolved in
default configuration or if configured correctly. I have wrote scenario,
when it can conflict and how to fix it. So no, there is no
Hello,
I just wanted to quickly announce a small project I did in collaboration
with the Packit folks.
Do you have some tools or services that perform actions on all currently
active Fedora releases? And do you have to manually update their list every
time a new Fedora release is branched or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258753
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
This is an issue in bundled Compress-Raw-Zlib, fixed probably with their
upstream patch:
commit 0a8fb7141a43b8e49609fb06f05fad5150a97c2a
Author: pmqs
Date: Fri Jun 9 14:30:36 2023 +0100
Change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258753
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Github
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258753
Bug ID: 2258753
Summary: perl-5.38.2-503.fc40 FTBFS: constants.h:580:20: error:
‘F’ undeclared
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
On 1/16/24 15:54, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
On 16/01/2024 23:49, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 5:36 PM Aleksei Bavshin
mailto:aleba...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
Ah, I misread the include path. It's our package that is too old :(
40 matches
Mail list logo
