Re: abiword

On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:00:43AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Abiword is currently broken in f16/rawhide due to the retiring of link-grammar (a FTBFS retiree). This is currently breaking the Xfce, LXDE, and soas spins. Would someone be interested in reviving link-grammar and possibly

Re: enlightenment packaging?

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 06:36:49PM -0400, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: Hi, I was directed to contact this list about enlightenment packaging when I asked around in #fedora-devel. Our packages are (still) orphaned in Fedora, and we are hopeful that someone may decide to take up ownership of

Re: Fedora 16 beta vice Knoppix

On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 11:59:09PM +0200, drago01 wrote: And *sendmail* (in my vms it takes up to 60s to start even though I never use it; and I it does not really make much sense on desktops). https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NoMTA Yeah ... I was technically the owner on that one,

Re: Fedora 16 Final Release Criterion for Xen DomU

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 02:23:59PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: SNIP I don't think we can dismiss the ability to have Fedora run on the hyerpvisor that powers (by most accounts) 80% of the public clouds. Amazon, RackSpace, Linode, Tata, IDCF, and virtually every other major compute cloud

Orphaning pida

Hello all, I am planning to orphan pida, I haven't used it since probably mid F14 cycle and I feel it needs a maintainer that will give it more attention. -AdamM -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Unreachable maintainer: Adam Miller

On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 05:51:10PM +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote: Last three months I cannot reach Adam Miller (aka maxamillion), neither by emails nor by bugzilla ticket (#733030), whereas it seems that during this period he appears sometimes here. Could anybody contact him? Apologies

Re: Mailing list guidelines and smartphones

On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Andrew Clayton and...@digital-domain.net wrote: On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:08:12 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/14/2010 08:50 PM, inode0 wrote: On Saturday, August 14, 2010, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

This has all been talked about in the past and there was even some action taken on it. I wrote up the wiki page, but Will Woods did all the heavy lifting. We missed our target and appear to have been side tracked since but there aren't really many line items left before we can pull the trigger.

Re: Starting Java SIG

I don't currently maintain any Java packages within Fedora but I did (somewhat) build the maven2 stack for EPEL[0] and I would be interested in seeing a Java SIG happen as well as would definitely join up. -AdamM [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MavenEPEL --

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:48:44AM -0400, Chris Lumens wrote: Useless waste of time. Just grab Ubuntu iso and see a stunning gap in both technology and usability between anaconda and their own installed. Does the Ubuntu installer support installing to iscsi? Multipath? CCISS? Fully

Re: Orphaning a few packages

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Vivek Shah boni.vi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Adam,                 I would be interested in comaintaining pida. Thanks and Regards, Vivek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Sounds

Re: Orphaning a few packages

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Debarshi Ray debarshi@gmail.com wrote: I have orphaned ldtp and pida. However there is something wrong wiwht glade3. Pressing the release ownership button is not orphaning it. Any ideas? Cheers, Debarshi -- One reason that life is complex is that it has

Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: snip I think that the Fedora Project's target audience needs to be people who want to work on open source operating systems.  If you want to market the Fedora Project, that's the audience that needs to be addressed. If

Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:05:22PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: I think that the Fedora Project's target audience needs to be people who want to work on open source operating systems.  If you want to market the Fedora

Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: snip Ubuntu is better than Debian snip If you honestly believe that, I have pitty on you. -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com - () ascii ribbon campaign

Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Snip Would that mean that users who don't start with one of these 'products' get to magically try and choose which implementation of which they want? Perhaps even mix and match, leaving QA and the developers to sort out

Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:22:37PM -0600, Adam Miller wrote: I think the responsibility of these things should be placed upon the SIG members who perform the functions from within these different groups. Why not have

Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: snip QA is a particular skill set, not every sig has a QA member and requiring it wouldn't work either.  I feel it's like assuming that just because I've done turbogears apps that someone would ask me to do CSS as well.  I

Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: snip Take a random downstream app. (Firefox is an example, but there are many others.) Right now, it only needs to track a single version of python, or a single auth framework, even if it may be used on any desktop or any

Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:36 AM, John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote: snip These are *working drafts and in process documents* all the in spirit of transparency.  It would be more helpful to these discussions to get clarification on advisory-board first rather than conclude that the board

Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:26 AM, John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote: snip Thanks for your clarification.  I think it is great to ask questions, I ask a lot of them myself.  I question how productive it is to all of us though, to ask questions if the starting point of those questions is

Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at said: Yes, but having a spin with them already on it is much simpler for its target audience. (That said, I wouldn't use it since they moved away from KDE to GNOME. :-/

Re: Name that Tree!

vanguard Its got a nice we're leading the way ring to it :) -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com - () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- devel mailing list

Might need to orphan glade3

Hello all, Recently glade3 was orphaned and I left it alone for about a week and nobody had picked it up yet and since I use it I decided to snag it up. I felt it was long enough that nobody really seemed to want to take it over themselves, I figured I would take it and try to triage bugs and

Re: Might need to orphan glade3

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala huzai...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Adam Miller wrote: Hello all,     Recently glade3 was orphaned and I left it alone for about a week and nobody had picked it up yet and since I use it I decided

Re: Name that Tree!

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, pub/fedora/linux/development/13  That's where we'll be putting things that are tagged for the release

Re: Heads up: bazaar is retired in F13 and devel

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Zoltan Kota z.k...@gmx.net wrote: Hi, I have started the retiring process for bazaar in the F13 and devel branch. Please update your package if it depends on bazaar! Thanks! Zoltan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Heads up: bazaar is retired in F13 and devel

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Adam Miller (maxamill...@fedoraproject.org) said: I have started the retiring process for bazaar in the F13 and devel branch. Please update your package if it depends on bazaar! Thanks! Just out of curiosity, why

Re: default fedora-virt-server.ks

I really like Colin's idea, if the original needs scoped by Colin are not fulfilled by the efforts of the Cloud SIG then I would be willing to help maintain. Also, I was unaware of the Cloud SIG and will probably start looking into poking my head in that direction in the near future. -AdamM --

Re: Fedora 13 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting: 2010-03-04 @ 01:00 UTC Recap

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: We have various different definitions of the Alpha, it seems. The working definition that QA / rel-eng have always worked on when deciding whether to ship it is, broadly, 'can you install it,

Re: Fedora has become fat!

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote: Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle?      * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a        single change in the Spin. There actually was a change, SLIM was      

Re: Copr

Copr is amazing, kudos to all those involved! -AdamM On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote: Dear developers and Fedora contributors, let me introduce Copr:

Re: Updates Criteria Summary/Brainstorming

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:49:38AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Kevin Kofler wrote: Right, and the big point there should be that a bug which can corrupt mail folders should be fixed IMMEDIATELY, i.e. with a direct stable push! ANY testing requirement there is a failure. So you'll

Planning to orphan some packages

Hello all, I hate to do this, but I'm running out of spare time these days and I am going to have to start dropping some of the packages I just don't use anymore because keeping up with them is added time and effort. I will be orphaning the following packages, please feel free to pick them

Re: Planning to orphan some packages

I some how goofed an thought I still was the owner for glade3, there are just some old bugs sitting in my queue apparently. Appologies to huzaifas (current owner of glade3). -AdamM -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Orphaning bespin - a Qt/KDE theme

I haven't used bespin in quite some time and as such it has gone a little neglected. I am orphaning it, it has a co-maintainer so before claiming it, please coordinate with the co-maintainer (rdieter). -AdamM -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Firefox 4 for f14?

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:35:55PM +0100, Joshua C. wrote: Hi, fedora is known for offering the latest and greates software and being on the edge etc. So I was just wondering if the latest f14 will ever get the latest firefox 4.0? Recompilation of the packages from f15 is not such a good

Re: What's this /run directory doing on my system and where does it come from?

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 01:54:30PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: SNIP So, this is what is implemented for F15 now. For F16 we will make a minor change on top of this: /var/run and /var/lock will become symlinks to /run (resp /run/lock), so that we don't have to use bind mounts anymore which

Re: What's this /run directory doing on my system and where does it come from?

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:24:42AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 09:35 -0500, Adam Miller wrote: Again, I'm not against that this is being done, but I would like to see everyone equally follow suit on the way things are traditionally done in Fedora land. Well, up

Re: Security release criterion proposal

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:27:07PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 05/18/2011 09:58 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 05/18/2011 03:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Feedback please! Thanks:) Given that we ship selinux on by default should this proposal only be applicable to

LXC package ownership

Hello all, At some point in the timeline it would appear that lxc got orphaned. This was brought up today in #fedora-devel and I'm announcing my intent to take ownership and hoping others might be interested in helping play along with co-maintainership. thm already expressed interest in

Re: on /etc/sysconfig

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:16:13PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: SNIP Hmm? Which ones in fedora can't? Are you suggesting we are shipping software that cannot be modified? If so, please explain which one that is, since we need to remove it from the distro then. Fedora only includess Free

Re: F18 DNF and history

On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote: On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF Are there any plans to replace yum with

orphaning lxc

Hello all, I am orphaning the lxc package as I no longer have a use for it because I've switched to the libvirt lxc driver so I have been rather neglectful of the lxc package. I'll release in pkgdb for anyone interested. Happy hacking, -AdamM -- devel mailing list

Orphaning ldtp

I'm planning for orphan ldtp, there's only one bug against it and that's that it should be migrated to noarch since its written in pure python these days. The current version of the package in the repo is a couple versions out of date and I just haven't used ldtp in at least a year so and as all

Re: Graphics test week: Where is gfx_test_week_20100414_i686.iso

Yeah, there was a bit of down time for fedorapeople today but the ninjas over in fedora-infrastructure got everything back up and solid. -AdamM (From Android) On Apr 16, 2010 12:01 PM, Terry Barnaby ter...@beam.ltd.uk wrote: On 16/04/10 16:43, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 09:05

Re: os

This seems like a strange place to post something like that. In any case, more information would have been nice. -AdamM On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:50 AM, jerrick Davis lamabo...@gmail.com wrote: I made a operating system anyone up for testing it for me -- Lama boy ;-) -- devel mailing

Re: Add mercurial to development group?

By that logic we shouldn't have a development group at all since developers know what they need. -AdamM (from Android ) On Apr 29, 2010 2:07 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: On 04/28/2010 09:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote: Bill Nottingham wrote: Rex Dieter (rdie...@math.un... Make

Re: preupgrade-cli

I use it as well. It's extremely useful. -AdamM (from Android ) On May 5, 2010 1:27 PM, Juan Rodriguez nus...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: On 5 May 2010 11:3... I tested the CLI version too for F12-F13 during the test

Re: Clarification about taking orphaned packages asked

I think your safe with not redoing the review. -AdamM (from Android ) On May 13, 2010 1:52 PM, Julian Aloofi julian.fedorali...@googlemail.com wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 13.05.2010, 13:25 -0500 schrieb Jon Ciesla: On 05/13/2010 01:23 PM, Julian Aloofi wrote: Now, while going through [2] I

Re: bodhi statistics

Luke's dictionary is more correct than yours. anyone else see how horrid the line I just wrote sounded in your head when you read it? That's what this thread sounds like. Did we really need to take some raw numbers that Luke was kind enough to put together and make it into some sort of QA

Re: Hey Presto!

I'm with Christopher, this topic is a bit outside my realm of knowledge but I would be willing to donate monitarily to those who are willing and able. This actually brings up something a bit more, but would a Vote with your dollars bounty system be possible? Such that users donate money to an

Re: Evolution update in F13

Sounds like it might need to be. Maybe push stable requests with -2 karma to some list that requires investigation and possibly a +3 (or other agreed upon number) proventesters karma to go stable? Just a thought. -AdamM (From Android) On Jun 25, 2010 6:27 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com

Re: concept of package ownership

I don't think it really matters what we call it, I just think that package maintainers are starting to get a sense of entitlement and I feel that's counter productive to the open environment we're used to and are trying to help continue to grow. The package owner gets emails about cvs commits, so

Re: measuring success [was Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release]

If there are any discrepancy with the proventesters critpath policy then please feel free to file a ticket with FESCo and allow our elected officials decide the fate of this. -AdamM (From Android) On Jul 2, 2010 8:16 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Will Woods wrote: The main

Orphaning Glade3

Hello all, I am orphaning Glade3, I don't use it at all anymore since I've transitioned to Qt4 for the most part. There are quite a few bugs open but a large portion of them are duplicates from abrt that I just never got around to triaging (hence the orphaning). There are three co-maintainers

Re: What is the usage of an empty RPM ?

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Kevin Wilson wkev...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, What is the usage of an empty RPM ? What it is for ? For example, on Fedora 20: rpm -qpl libvirt-1.1.3.3-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm shows: (contains no files) It's effectively a meta-package that pulls in dependencies.

Re: What is the usage of an empty RPM ?

: (not BuildRequires:), it will at least show where the dependencies originate. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libvirt.git/tree/libvirt.spec -AdamM On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Adam Miller maxamill...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Kevin Wilson wkev

Re: kde-4.13.x update for f20

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote: KDE SIG has been discussing moving forward with another kde x.y+1 update for Fedora 20, largely due to it's extended lifetime (and f21's delayed release), extending the same rationale per

Re: Call for testers for FMN

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote: Dear all, Pkgdb2 is now running for a little over two months. It seems that most of you like it which is appreciated :) However, one of the annoyance from Pkgdb1 has not disapeared. Pkgdb2 sends you an email for

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Python 3 as Default

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, at 09:30 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: Could you please be more specific with your answers? What does *there* mean? there = Atomic Host I think the point that Colin is trying to make is that while

Docker base image naming for non-x86_64

Hello all, There was recently a thread on the Fedora ARM mailing list[0] about getting a Fedora ARM image into the official Docker Hub. That discussion lead down the trail of how to best handle the naming for all of this. The current questions are either using Fedora's namespace and just

Re: Self Introduction: Seth Jennings

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Seth Jennings spartacu...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings! In acordance with the procedure for a first-time packager, I'm annoucing on devel list :) I opened my first review request bug for yubioath-desktop, and GUI and CLI for extracting OTP tokens from a Yubikey.

Re: Hosting End-Of-Life Fedora Base images?

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: Isn't it true the install media ISOs are available indefinitely? And if so the security cat is already out of the bag, so that's not a very good argument. I'd say if we wanted to do something better it would be an

Re: Hosting End-Of-Life Fedora Base images?

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:05:19AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: Isn't it true the install media ISOs are available indefinitely? And if so

Re: Hosting End-Of-Life Fedora Base images?

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote: On 07/20/2015 02:13 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Monday, July 20, 2015 01:00:34 PM Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Adam Miller maxamill...@fedoraproject.org wrote: There was an issue

Hosting End-Of-Life Fedora Base images?

Hello all, There was an issue ticket filed against the Fedora Docker Base Images[0] github repo requesting that older End-Of-Life'd (EOL'd) Fedora releases be made available as docker images[1] and I'm not personally very inclined to do this because I think EOL'd releases should be left alone

Re: Koji: no space left on device

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote: > On 10/23/2015 11:12 AM, Jerry James wrote: >> >> Just had a build fail: >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11560206 > > > Me too, on multiple build nodes. It's going to be a koji-wide

[RFC] DistGit Container Image namespacing for Layered Image Build Service

Hello all, In the Fedora 24 timeframe the Fedora Release Engineering group is aiming to deliver the Layered Image Build Service[0] to allow Fedora contributors to build containers images. In the first iteration of this we're targeting Docker layered image support. Part of this will be to allow

Re: [RFC] DistGit Container Image namespacing for Layered Image Build Service

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Adam Miller > <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> Hello all, >> In the Fedora 24 timeframe the Fedora Release Engineering group is >>

Re: [RFC] DistGit Container Image namespacing for Layered Image Build Service

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Mathieu Bridon <boche...@daitauha.fr> wrote: > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 12:08 -0600, Adam Miller wrote: >> Hello all, >> In the Fedora 24 timeframe the Fedora Release Engineering group >> is >> aiming to deliver the Layered Image

Re: [RFC] DistGit Container Image namespacing for Layered Image Build Service

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Ralph Bean <rb...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 03:01:49PM -0500, Ray Strode wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Adam Miller >> <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> > If we were

Re: [RFC] DistGit Container Image namespacing for Layered Image Build Service

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Brian C. Lane <b...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:08:25PM -0600, Adam Miller wrote: >> Hello all, >> In the Fedora 24 timeframe the Fedora Release Engineering group is >> aiming to deliver the Layered Image Build

Re: i3wm based minimal Spin?

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Dan Book wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Dennis Chen wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> What are the chances that a minimal desktop spin can be created for the >> 24 release? It would be nice to have a prepackaged "desktop

Re: [RFC] DistGit Container Image namespacing for Layered Image Build Service

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Tomas Tomecek <ttome...@redhat.com> wrote: > Quoting Adam Miller (2015-11-10 19:08:25) >> Cockpit's Dockerfile repo in DistGit would be stored with a >> leading special character: >> fedpkg clone -cockpit >> > &g

Re: Fedora Developer Portal - released !!!!

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Petr Hracek wrote: > Hello folks, > > I am happy to announce that Fedora Developer Portal is released. > Official web address is http://developer.fedoraproject.org. > Official ticket on Fedora infrastructure is here [1]. Thanks to kevin from >

Oprhaned EPEL7 branch of Quassel

Hello all, I have orphaned the EPEL7 branch of Quassel as I have stopped using it long ago and no longer have the spare time to give it the amount of attention it deserves. It's a package with many co-maintainers so I doubt it will be orphaned for long.

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > 2015-10-19 2:33 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kofler : >> Dusty Mabe wrote: >>> Does anyone have a good solution for this? Obviously it would be nice >>> if ansible went to python3 but I think they

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > Re-sending this with a better title so people might read it ;-) > > On 08/31/2015 10:18 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: >> >> On 08/31/2015 08:17 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> [snip] >>> >>> Minutes: >>> >>>

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Carlos O'Donell <car...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/10/2015 03:42 PM, Adam Miller wrote: >>> It doesn't matter how rare they are, it'll only take a single bundled >>> library handled incorrectly to completely screw a running OS. I don't

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 07:42 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 09:02 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> > One can only tilt at windmills for so long before one's horse gives >> > out. This battle

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 09:03 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher > om> wrote: >> > I assume that subject line got your attention. >> > >> Most

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> > I would like to propose that the no-bundled-libraries policy be >>> > amended as follows: "Any package that has an existing mechanism to >>> > link against a shared system library and functions correctly when >>>

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I assume that subject line got your attention. > > I know this is a long-standing debate and that this thread is likely > to turn into an incomprehensible flamewar filled with the same tired > arguments, but I'm

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 09:53 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> I assume that subject line got your attention. >> >> I know this is a long-standing debate and that this thread is likely >> to turn into an

Re: rpmbuild...empty RPMS

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 12:23 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > It is my first rpm build. I followed this how-to[0]. > > $ rpmdev-setuptree > $ cd ~/rpmbuild > $ ls > BUILD/ BUILDROOT/ RPMS/ SOURCES/ SPECS/ SRPMS/ > $ rpm -ivh sourcepackage-name*.src.rpm # I use an already

Review Swap Request

Hello all, I would like to request a review for the OpenShift Origin package and would be happy to review someone else's package in return. origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 Thank you, -AdamM -- devel

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service

Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service = >>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service >>>> >>>> Change owner(s): >>>> * Colin Walters >>>> * Adam Miller >>>> * Tomas Tomecek

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: sen - terminal user interface for docker engine

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed Self Contained Change: sen - terminal user interface for > docker engine = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/sen--tui-for-docker > > Change owner(s): > * Tomas Tomecek > > sen enables you to manage your

Re: [RFC] DistGit Container Image namespacing for Layered Image Build Service

Hello all, After consideration and discussion of feedback from this thread with members of the Fedora Infrastructure and Fedora Apps team (special thanks to pingou and threebean), the following is the proposal we'd like to move forward with: DistGit Restructure/Namespace - Move all current

RFC: Round 2 review of Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

Hello all, I had previously sent out a RFC email about a month ago asking for feedback on the Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines[0]. I was asked by FESCo to start a new thread so that this can be discussed further on the devel mailing list before we discuss it in FESCo. Therefore if there

Re: Proposal: spins-kickstarts workflow changes

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > I am sending this to the devel and spins lists. Feel free to forward to > other places people who might be affected by it should see it. > > Some history: > > We setup the spin-kickstart project on fedorahosted

Orphaning Package: oggvideotools

I plan to orphan oggvideotools, I don't have the time to really give it the proper attention it needs anymore. It is currently failing to build in rawhide. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/oggvideotools/ -AdamM -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2016-03-11)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-03-11) === Meeting started by maxamillion at 17:00:19 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-03-11/fesco.2016-03-11-17.00.log.html . Meeting

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-03-11)

Apologies for the late email, this is my first time as chair. :) Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016, at 06:52 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > >> Docker Layered Image "packaging" Guidelines [1] > > This current design means Dockerfiles are always secondary shims. &

RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

Hello all, We're wrapping up the first phase of the Fedora Docker Layered Image Build Service[0] and the time has come to start thinking about what we as a Project need to do to formalize what it means to be shipping Docker Layered Images once we are capable of building and distributing them.

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:52:44 -0500 > Adam Miller <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> We're wrapping up the first phase of the Fedora Docker Layered >> Image

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Subhendu Ghosh wrote: > If we assume that image is immutable, how does one expect the applications > configuration and data to be managed? Are there additional ENV handlers > inside the container that might not be present otherwise in the RPM

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2016 11:22:30 -0500 > Adam Miller <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> Collection of RPMs is fine, the goal is just not to ship non-rpm code >> or content yet outside o

  1   2   >