Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora, but stemming from gnome-software and desktop environments

Hedayat Vatankhah (hedayat@gmail.com) said: /*Bill Nottingham nott...@splat.cc*/ wrote on Tue, 6 Jan 2015 11:39:27 -0500: ... - Even searching for -devel packages implies a target == host build sensibility that is relevant mostly to those developing Fedora, and not to most

Re: Deleting f20-gnome-3-12 copr

Pete Travis (li...@petetravis.com) said: On Jan 7, 2015 6:00 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: I'm planning to delete https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhughes/f20-gnome-3-12/ this week. The original description always had This COPR will be updated until Fedora 21 has

Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora, but stemming from gnome-software and desktop environments

Andrew Lutomirski (l...@mit.edu) said: On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote: While I think you are right in some cases like cashier, isn't this discussion really about the Fedora Workstation?! Since for this the target user is a developer, can we just agree

Re: Why -mtune=atom?

Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) said: The default CFLAGS set by RPM include “-mtune-atom”. Why? I doubt Atom CPUs are Fedora's primary target. It's not even a documented GCC option. There is such a wide variety of CPUs under this label that it's not even clear what it would mean.

Re: Pushing the extra AppData files into Rawhide

David Timms (dti...@iinet.net.au) said: On 01/04/15 00:34, Richard Hughes wrote: On 31 March 2015 at 14:07, David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au wrote: I see my package was adjusted, but I can't get it to build: I only build the new-enough libappstream-glib into rawhide -- seeing as most

Re: gross DNF bandwidth inefficiency if filesystem space limited

Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) said: So, you are proposing we do things exactly as we are now, but also keep around all previous copies of the packages in the repos (but not in the repodata)? I'm not sure if that setup would work with dnf. I think it requires whatever mirror(s) it uses to

Re: Rawhide plans

Rex Dieter (rdie...@math.unl.edu) said: Kevin Fenzi wrote: * Matt opened a thread on the marketing list about renaming rawhide. It sounds like most people would prefer us to make the changes first, then and only then look at renaming. s/renaming/rebranding/ I personally would

Re: Rawhide plans

Jonathan Wakely (jwak...@redhat.com) said: Rawhide already *perfectly* implies rolling to me. Rollin' rollin' rollin' though the streams are swollen. Nice to see tht some things survive, some 17 years on https://lwn.net/1998/0820/rawhide.html Bill -- devel mailing list

Re: Validity of i686 as a release blocker

Paul W. Frields (sticks...@gmail.com) said: On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 09:47:27AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: [...snip...] Perhaps it is time that we evaluate where i686 stands in Fedora more closely. For a starting suggestion, I would recommend that we do not treat it as a release blocking

Re: Is it time to allow Chromium in Fedora?

Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) said: On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Gerald B. Cox gb...@bzb.us wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries Meanwhile, on OS X I was already given notification of Firefox being updated to 40.0.0 just a bit ago. And while I

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

Robert Kuska (rku...@redhat.com) said: > > > Yes, DNF module works for ansible from the box. We worked at it for > > > some time: https://github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-extras/pull/527 > > > > ...with the caveat from the first post in this thread: You will need to > > have the python2 dnf

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) said: > Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > > Also, the problem is that RedHat still supports RHEL5 systems which > > for today standards are totally legacy and therefore it has to run on > > Python 2.4. > > The point of forking would be that the fork wouldn't

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) said: > On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 22:21 -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > Does anyone have a good solution for this? Obviously it would be nice > > if ansible went to python3 but I think they have stated clearly that > > they are sticking with python2 for

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) said: > > Similarly, if I'm developing some piece of software that embeds/uses > > PostgreSQL, I'm likely targeting multiple distributions, potentially > > including Fedora, CentOS, RHEL, Ubuntu, and more. Even if Postgres > > is a core > > well

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) said: > Sorry, I was unclear. I do agree that once upon a time, this was > absolutely effective. I probably should have said something more along > the lines of what you did below; that the battlefield has changed and > our former tactics are no longer

Re: comps packagereq items default to "mandatory"

Orion Poplawski (or...@cora.nwra.com) said: > Almost none of those appear to be "Mandatory". > > We think this is becoming an issue now because it appears that dnf perhaps now > prevents kickstart installs from removing mandatory packages from the install > set. See

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) said: > > You really really want libselinux-python(2) for that as well - it's needed > > for any file/copy/templating you'd do on the node to ensure proper SELinux > > contexts. (In fact, Ansible will abort on the node without it if it detects > >

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:00:41PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > OK - so what's the clear and non-controversial definition of "modules > > like 'file', 'template' and 'copy'"? What do those modules share in > > common that we can define clearly and

Re: ZFS on linux

Gerald B. Cox (gb...@bzb.us) said: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > > > > > Here is a simple if then for figuring out how ZFS support may ever get > > into Fedora: > > > I originally believed it was simply a licensing issue that was

Re: Fedora development of Snap packages

Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) said: > And frankly, if you're trying to solve delivering software in a > cross-distro fashion, you're doing it wrong. Take for example how RPMs > "work": packages are generated with a set of generic dependencies > based on the symbols of libraries and programs.

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: System Python

Miro Hrončok (mhron...@redhat.com) said: > I had this in mind as well, but currently, this is not the part of the > change. Once we need this and we have system-python, we can propose a > system wide change that system-python is a different version. ... is the goal that the system-python is

Re: On packager motivation

Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said: > > Sometimes a provenpackager will make a bad change, and that's > > unfortunate, but it happens. Sometimes package owners make bad changes > > too! :-) > > You're taking it too lightly. Somebody who performs version upgrades really > needs to take

Re: three questions: f24 branch, python3 default, where to put /etc/rsyslog.d/gluster.conf.example

Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said: > > Yeah, this is because the Samba and FreeIPA packages didn't quite finish > > their python 3 conversion in time. By F25, we should be able to avoid > > shipping python 2 in the default installation of Fedora Server. > > Except if you want to use

Orphaning: xchat-gnome

Reasons: - it's effectively dead upstream (and has been for about 5 years...) - it has a variety of crashers I haven't gotten around to finding time to fix - I don't really use it any more anyways Suggestions: use hexchat, or polari, or irccloud, or really anything else. Or take it if you

Re: Minimizing the fedora docker base image footprint

Courtney Pacheco (cpach...@redhat.com) said: > Hi everyone, > > I've spent some time trying to minimize the footprint of the Fedora docker > base image. Overall, I managed to reduce its size by 39.9%. > > A summary of the work I did can be found here: >

Re: introducing curl-minimal and libcurl-minimal RPM packages

Kamil Dudka (kdu...@redhat.com) said: > > - "Minimizing the fedora docker base image footprint" (by yanking dnf et.al. > > into a seprate container, making size of it much more irrelevant) - "DNF > > into C initiative started" (enabling a much larger depythoning that doesn't > > require differing

Re: introducing curl-minimal and libcurl-minimal RPM packages

Ville Skyttä (ville.sky...@iki.fi) said: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > > The curl and libcurl packages, which are both required by dnf, > > Hm, does dnf really require curl? On my F-23 box: > > $ rpm -e --test curl > error: Failed dependencies: >

Re: introducing curl-minimal and libcurl-minimal RPM packages

Kamil Dudka (kdu...@redhat.com) said: > On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 16:19:23 Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Kamil Dudka (kdu...@redhat.com) said: > > > Are you reading it from the specfile? > > > > > > It is just an implementation detail of the packaging (t

Re: introducing curl-minimal and libcurl-minimal RPM packages

Kamil Dudka (kdu...@redhat.com) said: > > If you care about a consistent developer, user, and debugging experience > > regardless of mechanism of delivery, you wouldn't do this in the first > > place, or you'd change the global curl package. Either the features are > > important, or they aren't.

Re: introducing curl-minimal and libcurl-minimal RPM packages

Kamil Dudka (kdu...@redhat.com) said: > Are you reading it from the specfile? > > It is just an implementation detail of the packaging (the RemovePathPostfixes > feature of rpm). The string you mentioned neither appears in the SONAME, nor > in any file installed by the RPMs in question. ...

Re: Please unpush FEDORA-2016-7776983633 on all releases or drop support for libjasper

Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 08:50:49PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > before pushing the next update? Three people gave the update positive > > karma and I can't believe all three did so without actually opening a > > JPEG-2000 image in any

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

Josh Boyer (jwbo...@fedoraproject.org) said: > > If that is not the case anymore it would be good if that would be > > communicated in advance so that all users on mac hw could either > > switch distros or gang together to make a remix or something. > > You are confusing Fedora with a company.

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) said: > The main reason for this is trying to simplify the module-building process. We > really don't want to attempt to build both arches within the same buildroot > for > most of the reasons we've established in this extended conversation. My first >

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) said: > > On a more general note I think a lot of people are assuming we're all > > horrible evil people, trying to subvert the One True Fedora Way. This > > is exceptionally poisonous and needs to stop, otherwise Fedora should > > to drop both the "Friends",

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) said: > This rather begs the question of whether there are any modules which > only work *with python 2*, though... Given 1500+ modules, all of which can have their own python library dependencies, the safe answer is 'yes'. We're working to solve

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

Josh Boyer (jwbo...@fedoraproject.org) said: > > > If 7 years is what manufacturers really want, then it sounds like > > > CentOS is much better positioned to be get shipped on laptops than > > > Fedora. Instead of working on a new "Fedora LTS" for this usage case, > > > would time be better

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

Ben Rosser (rosser@gmail.com) said: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 2:55 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > From what I have talked with in the past.. 3 years is their bare > > minimum and 7 is their what we really want. It usually takes the > > vendor about 3-6 months of work to make sure the OS

Re: Semi-serious proposal: drop all optional entries from comps

Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said: > On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 06:05:16AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Some of the group stuff is also used during the compose and if things > > aren't in groups specified but needed by say a kickstart the packages > > won't be in certain places and

orphaning: comps-extras, goffice08

comps-extras: required by PackageKit goffice08: required by nip2, cutter Neither has required any significant maintenance if someone wants to pick them up. Bill ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Packaging of Ansible collections

James Cassell (fedoraproj...@cyberpear.com) said: > > > I guess if would be enough to put the files somewhere under > > > /usr/share/ansible, but not sure. Also I'm not sure what download URL > > > could > > > be used. > > > > What is the goal of downstream collection packaging here - what

Re: Packaging of Ansible collections

Igor Gnatenko (ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org) said: > Hello, > > Did anybody had an experience of packaging Ansible collections into an RPM? > > I guess if would be enough to put the files somewhere under > /usr/share/ansible, but not sure. Also I'm not sure what download URL could > be

Re: Let's retire original glib and gtk+ (new report)

Peter Boy (p...@uni-bremen.de) said: > And, by the way, it is one of Linux’s (and Fedora Linux’s) core > distinguishing features that it does not follow the short-term commercial > life cycles, but enables long-term usability, for "old" hardware as well > as software. And we should not give that

rpms/perl-HTML-TableExtract/EL-6 perl-HTML-TableExtract.spec, 1.9, 1.10

Author: notting Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-HTML-TableExtract/EL-6 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6474 Modified Files: perl-HTML-TableExtract.spec Log Message: nuke rhel macro, not needed Index: perl-HTML-TableExtract.spec

rpms/perl-HTML-TableExtract/devel perl-HTML-TableExtract.spec, 1.11, 1.12

Author: notting Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-HTML-TableExtract/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6741 Modified Files: perl-HTML-TableExtract.spec Log Message: perl requires are OK in newer RHEL. Index: perl-HTML-TableExtract.spec

[perl-Finance-Quote] - fix TIAA-CREF (#668935, amess...@messinet.com)

commit 33ec38d4fec4e9032c08f0ee05e0ca746ac1b83b Author: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com Date: Wed Jan 12 12:29:39 2011 -0500 - fix TIAA-CREF (#668935, amess...@messinet.com) perl-Finance-Quote.spec |7 +- tiaa-cref.patch | 520

[perl-Finance-Quote/f14/master] (2 commits) ...- fix TIAA-CREF (#668935, amess...@messinet.com)

Summary of changes: 34e0fd7... fix rawhide build. (*) 33ec38d... - fix TIAA-CREF (#668935, amess...@messinet.com) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[perl-HTML-Tree/el6] Retire - actually in RHEL

commit 8e17d38aa241ed3d59e0171c4107126bc20da113 Author: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com Date: Tue Jan 21 20:43:00 2014 -0500 Retire - actually in RHEL dead.package|1 + perl-HTML-Tree.spec | 189 --- sources

[perl-HTML-Tree/epel7] Retire - actually in RHEL

Summary of changes: 8e17d38... Retire - actually in RHEL (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [perl-HTML-Tree/epel7] Retire - actually in RHEL

Paul Howarth (p...@city-fan.org) said: On 22/01/14 01:43, Bill Nottingham wrote: Summary of changes: 8e17d38... Retire - actually in RHEL (*) Might the retirement process have blocked perl-HTML-Tree from being pulled in from RHEL in koji? That's what it looks like from

[perl-HTML-TableExtract/epel7: 3/3] Fix requires.

commit f5efb4b57dcd8d50fc2fddca1106db4316bd9d4d Author: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com Date: Thu Jan 23 14:25:42 2014 -0500 Fix requires. perl-HTML-TableExtract.spec |8 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-HTML-TableExtract.spec b/perl

File Finance-Quote-1.20.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by notting

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Finance-Quote: 1cc20330f383a780685ed72e1b286606 Finance-Quote-1.20.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Finance-Quote] update to 1.20

commit 024d03a472ec7ab76dca25bcf1d3866d0cc4439a Author: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com Date: Mon Feb 17 11:35:39 2014 -0500 update to 1.20 .gitignore |2 +- perl-Finance-Quote.spec | 11 +++ sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions

[perl-Finance-Quote/epel7] (3 commits) ...update to 1.20

Summary of changes: 8dd6c6e... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*) a18423e... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*) 024d03a... update to 1.20 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[perl-Finance-Quote/f20] update to 1.20

Summary of changes: 024d03a... update to 1.20 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Finance-Quote/f19] (3 commits) ...update to 1.20

Summary of changes: 8dd6c6e... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*) a18423e... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*) 024d03a... update to 1.20 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[perl-Finance-Quote/el6: 18/18] Merge branch 'master' into el6

commit bfccbc061723925971a8f4ede6fc738491871e3f Merge: 4a7c1b1 024d03a Author: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com Date: Mon Feb 17 12:07:23 2014 -0500 Merge branch 'master' into el6 .gitignore |2 +- perl-Finance-Quote.spec | 68 ++- sources |2

[perl-Finance-Quote/el6] (18 commits) ...Merge branch 'master' into el6

Summary of changes: a111900... update to 1.17 (#540340, bba...@gmail.com) (*) e908a64... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) 5dc734c... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*) f2dfa16... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*) 8bf9220... dist-git conversion (*)

[perl-Finance-Quote] Add missing requires that causes some quotes to fail. (#859607)

commit aebdbe8bd39afc0cb8b67bc821ea87fd91198721 Author: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com Date: Tue Feb 18 15:10:49 2014 -0500 Add missing requires that causes some quotes to fail. (#859607) perl-Finance-Quote.spec | 11 --- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions

[perl-Finance-Quote] Remove old patch

commit d8d19c8d8e5147171cc3cc5b47540f85ad2d5e3e Author: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com Date: Tue Feb 18 15:11:18 2014 -0500 Remove old patch tiaa-cref.patch | 520 --- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 520 deletions(-) -- Fedora

[perl-Finance-Quote/epel7] (2 commits) ...Remove old patch

Summary of changes: aebdbe8... Add missing requires that causes some quotes to fail. (#859 (*) d8d19c8... Remove old patch (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

[perl-Finance-Quote/el6] (3 commits) ...Merge branch 'master' into el6

Summary of changes: aebdbe8... Add missing requires that causes some quotes to fail. (#859 (*) d8d19c8... Remove old patch (*) 87b1f78... Merge branch 'master' into el6 (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[perl-Finance-Quote/el6: 3/3] Merge branch 'master' into el6

commit 87b1f785ddf95a60d7de13937d001e7acfc28d1e Merge: bfccbc0 d8d19c8 Author: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com Date: Tue Feb 18 15:13:42 2014 -0500 Merge branch 'master' into el6 perl-Finance-Quote.spec | 11 +- tiaa-cref.patch | 520

[perl-Finance-Quote/f19] (2 commits) ...Remove old patch

Summary of changes: aebdbe8... Add missing requires that causes some quotes to fail. (#859 (*) d8d19c8... Remove old patch (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

[perl-Finance-Quote/f20] (2 commits) ...Remove old patch

Summary of changes: aebdbe8... Add missing requires that causes some quotes to fail. (#859 (*) d8d19c8... Remove old patch (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

[perl-Finance-Quote/el6] no perl-Mozilla-CA on el6

commit d0f31458e701cd36d3248955935d1ce77323c4c6 Author: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com Date: Tue Feb 18 15:28:17 2014 -0500 no perl-Mozilla-CA on el6 perl-Finance-Quote.spec |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Finance-Quote.spec b/perl

[perl-Finance-Quote/el6] Fix requires (#1069717)

commit 4864a45a72317122a3467aace3d1b4e5f7e3aae7 Author: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com Date: Tue Feb 25 10:11:35 2014 -0500 Fix requires (#1069717) FQ-requires.patch | 25 + perl-Finance-Quote.spec |7 ++- 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1

Change to the orphan and deprecation policy

FESCo today approved a change to how orphan and deprecated packages are handled in Fedora. The prior policy was: - Packages that have been orphaned for more than three months require a re-review, regardless of whether or not they have been blocked. The new policy is: - Any package that is

An update on critical path packages

As of this week, bodhi is using the Fedora Package Database to determine the critical path package list. As part of this effort, the critical path package lists have been regenerated for Fedora 15, Fedora 16, and rawhide. Various errors in the generation process have been fixed, causing the

Fedora 18 Development - orphaned retired packages

Just a quick note - now that Fedora 18 development is open, we encourage mantainers who are planning on orphaning or retiring their packages to do so as early in the process as possible. That gives other maintainers a longer runway to fix dependencies and possibly pick up maintenance if they so

[rpms/perl-HTML-TableExtract] PR #1: Update to 2.15 and a number of small corrections.

notting commented on the pull-request: `Update to 2.15 and a number of small corrections.` that you are following: `` feel free to build for rawhide (or respond if you can't, and I'll get to it) `` To reply, visit the link below

[rpms/perl-HTML-TableExtract] PR #1: Update to 2.15 and a number of small corrections.

notting merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-TableExtract` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Update to 2.15 and a number of small corrections. `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-TableExtract/pull-request/1

[rpms/perl-HTML-TableExtract] PR #1: Update to 2.15 and a number of small corrections.

notting commented on the pull-request: `Update to 2.15 and a number of small corrections.` that you are following: `` N/M, build started: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33921967 `` To reply, visit the link below

<    4   5   6   7   8   9