search sponsor

Hello, I'm nineteen years old and I'm a french fedora user I would like to become a packager for fedora I have four packages that are waiting to be reviwed : http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726080 http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732215

Re: search sponsor

Jon Ciesla a écrit : Hello, I'm nineteen years old and I'm a french fedora user I would like to become a packager for fedora I have four packages that are waiting to be reviwed : http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726080 http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732215

Cannot upload sources to git repository

At the step 9, fedpkg can't import the srpm for [2] and [3] but it worked for [1] The output error : [Casper@Blackbird ~/fedora-scm]$ fedpkg clone Xnee Cloning into Xnee... remote: Counting objects: 7, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (6/6), done. remote: Total 7

Re: Cannot upload sources to git repository

Does: fedora-cert -v show a current/valid cert? kevin Hello, yes my cert was uploaded two days before I built xinput_calibrator and I tryed to build Xnee and OpenStego. So this is the output : [Casper@Blackbird ~]$ fedora-cert -v Verifying Certificate cert expires: 2012-05-05

spin-kickstarts package comaintainer

Hello, I would like comaintain spin-kickstarts package with actual comaintainers just to update the package more regulary. regards Matthieu Saulnier -- Pour encrypter vos emails Clef GPG ID : 83288189 @ hkp://pgp.mit.edu:11371 Empreinte : CC26 692F 5205 AC8F 7912 7783 D7A7 F4C5 8328 8189

Re: Orphaned packages up for grabs

Kevin Fenzi a écrit : Greetings. The following packages have been orphaned due to their former maintainer removing themselves from the packager group: NetPIPE checkdns taken, co-maintainers welcome pxe-kexec (epel5/6 only) Thanks, kevin -- devel mailing list

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

Hello I've taken: * qrencode * dnstracer So co-maintener are welcome too Matthieu -- Pour encrypter vos emails Clef GPG ID : 83288189 Empreinte : CC26 692F 5205 AC8F 7912 7783 D7A7 F4C5 8328 8189 pgpRbLYWonwUe.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

Peter Gordon a écrit : And if it's agreeable with Casper, I've also requested comaintainership of qrencode. =) Approved in devel, f16 and f15 branch Thank you for your involvement :) -- Pour encrypter vos emails Clef GPG ID : 83288189 Empreinte : CC26 692F 5205 AC8F 7912 7783 D7A7 F4C5 8328

Add a spec template in rpmdevtools

Hi folks, 8 months ago I opened a ticket on rpmdevtools track to request the integration of a spec template. 5 months later without any response, someone made a ping on the ticket, but there was no response for now. https://fedorahosted.org/rpmdevtools/ticket/20 So my question is: Is there any

Re: Add a spec template in rpmdevtools

Le mardi 12 février 2013 à 11:08 +0100, Simone Caronni a écrit : Hello, The situation is already much better: rpmdev-newinit rpmdev-newspec cpanspec Examples: $ rpmdev-newspec -m -r 4.5 -o package.spec Generates a spec file with all the tags required for RHEL 5 systems; while

Re: Add a spec template in rpmdevtools

Le mardi 12 février 2013 à 22:06 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit : On 2013-02-12 08:18, Casper wrote: So my question is: Is there any living developper of rpmdevtools, I'm alive, but haven't been doing much at all wrt rpmdevtools lately. just to add one file in the git repo ?... I'm

Re: Self Introduction : Pierre-Yves Luyten

Pierre-Yves Luyten a écrit : Hello all, I'm just starting as a new packager, thanks to my sponsor Kalev Lember but also thanks to help from Mathieu Bridon and Matthias Clasen. Its care regarding upstream made me discover fedora. Stayed for the community ! The first package is bijiben,

Re: Orphaned packages up for grabs

Mauricio Tavares a écrit : On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Casper fan...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Kevin Fenzi a écrit : Greetings. The following packages have been orphaned due to their former maintainer removing themselves from the packager group: NetPIPE checkdns taken, co

Is it a SELinux policy problem ?

Or is it a luajit problem ? Dear devs hello. I would like to determine if these AVC are caused by prosody, lua, or a wrong SELinux policy. lancaster ~ # systemctl status prosody ● prosody.service - Prosody XMPP (Jabber) server Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/prosody.service;

Re: Is it a SELinux policy problem ?

Tomasz Torcz a écrit : On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:11:35PM +0100, Casper wrote: Or is it a luajit problem ? Dear devs hello. I would like to determine if these AVC are caused by prosody, lua, or a wrong SELinux policy. That would be https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id

Re: Is it a SELinux policy problem ?

Daniel J Walsh a écrit : On 01/27/2015 05:11 PM, Casper wrote: Or is it a luajit problem ? Dear devs hello. I would like to determine if these AVC are caused by prosody, lua, or a wrong SELinux policy. This avc (execmem) looks like it is allowed in Fedora selinux-policy

Orphaning i7z package

Dear Fedora Developpers, Due of a lack of time, I'm not able to take care of i7z package anymore. There is 2 bz tickets opened agains't it that need intensive work. I hope someone will take care of it. Best regards, Matthieu Saulnier -- Autorité de Certification:

orphaning OpenStego

regards, Casper -- GPG Key ID: 83288189 @ hkp://keys.fedoraproject.org Empreinte: CC26 692F 5205 AC8F 7912 7783 D7A7 F4C5 8328 8189 x509 C.A.: https://dl.casperlefantom.net/pub/root.pem Empreinte: 0975 864A 2036 0F94 A139 114A D32E 8EBE 30F2 2429 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[HUP] [critpath] Upgrade soname version of qrencode in Rawhide

Dear Fedora Devops, qrencode (critpath) package has been updated in rawhide branch. Major change: from: libqrencode.so.3.4.4 to: libqrencode.so.4.0.0 If you need to report any issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510097 Koji build:

Re: [HUP] [critpath] Upgrade soname version of qrencode in Rawhide

mind no kidding, it's a critpath, and one day it will be updated in development branch (which is called "Rawhide"). you want a rendez-vous or what ? Sérgio Basto a écrit : > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 21:12 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 20:37 +0100, Caspe

orphaning some packages

Dear Fedora Developpers, due of lack of time, I'm orphaning most of my packages: * asterisk-gui (upstream is dead) * bvi * checkdns * dnstracer * easybashgui * exif * libexif-gtk * mined * xinput_calibrator * Xnee regards, Matthieu Saulnier -- Clé GPG: 0x29F0BEF2 @

Re: Standard version specification in Dockerfile's for 'x-pkg verrel'

ion exactly, the Docker image will fail to build by the time... then you need to fix the Dockerfile. So, where do I specify the version of the software (because I need this information, anyway) ? I put it in the tag of the image during the build (or after), like that: poezio:0.13.1-9 :- regards, Casper

Re: leap from f22 to f34 fairytale

Happy to read this :) Congrats, man :) I will do soon an f33 - f34 - f35 journey Jiri Vanek a écrit : > Hello good people! > > I would like to thanx to everybody for amazing work in fedora, for keeping it > alive, and updatable. > > In friday I had found an old laptop running f22 and decided

Re: A way to request/vote for packages to add next to Fedora Linux?

Tomasz Torcz a écrit : > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 05:32:28AM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > > Video2X would be a nice add. > > There's a package wishlist here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist > > But adding the package there is no guarantee anyone will

License change for poezio

://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-16b9ac5491 Regards, Casper -- GnuPG: AE157E0B29F0BEF2 at keys.openpgp.org CA Cert: https://dl.casperlefantom.net/pub/ssl/root.der Jabber/XMPP Messaging: cas...@casperlefantom.net signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Hardware without AES-NI: use xchacha12/Adiantum instead of AES-XTS

83,5 MiB/s ``` I forgot to mention RaspberryPi4, 3, 2, does not have AES flag too. Good to know a ticket has been already opened to Blivet. Regards, Casper Christopher Klooz a écrit : > The irony is that XTS uses two different keys for different parts of the > operation. This means that AES-X

Re: Hardware without AES-NI: use xchacha12/Adiantum instead of AES-XTS

256b 105,0 MiB/s 103,9 MiB/s ``` Results on a SATA disk (no SSD), and no AES flag in cpuinfo. Regards, Casper py0xc3 a écrit : > Good everning, > > I just experienced that, when setting up a new Fedora, Anaconda (both > "Custom" and "Advanced Custom

Re: Remaining packages in need of a Python 3.11 rebuild

Miro Hrončok a écrit : > profanity > @fantom > ASSIGNED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2049682 > Bug status changed ~3 weeks ago without comment, > not updated since. > Fixed in rawhide recently, f37-candidate build exists. > I just made package update 1 hour ago. Cross-fire :)

Re: spin-kickstarts package

Neal Gompa a écrit : > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 2:52 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > Greetings everyone. > > > > So, we used to have a release requirement that we package up and release > > along side the release a spin-kickstarts rpm package with the current > > kickstarts used for that release. >

Re: fedpkg clone fails with Permission denied (publickey).

Pavlos Orfanidis a écrit : > I cannot connect to fedorapeople ssh due to public key Permission > denied. Why desn't it sync my public key? (Of course I have added it > to my account) The subject said "fedpkg clone fails with Permission denied (publickey)" But you are talking about fedorapeople

systemd-resolved package overwrite /etc/resolv.conf again

I usualy disable systemd-resolved on my servers, because it is not working well... For disabling, I use /etc/resolv.conf file which is the main entrypoint for administrators. However, systemd packages continue to replace the file: Upgrade systemd-250.9-1.fc36.x86_64

Re: systemd-resolved package overwrite /etc/resolv.conf again

Adam Williamson a écrit : > On Sat, 2023-01-21 at 10:06 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > This is only supposed to happen if (a) upgrading from systemd < > > 246.1-1, which you're not doing, or (b) installing systemd for the > > first time, which you're not doing. Must be a bug in the package

Re: systemd-resolved package overwrite /etc/resolv.conf again

Peter Boy a écrit : > By providing your own /etc/resolv.conf you do not *disable* > systemd-resolved, if it’s that what you really want to achieve. It’s > just a part of it. You would have to > > [—]# systemctl stop systemd-resolved > [—]# systemctl disable systemd-resolved > [—]# rm

Re: systemd-resolved package overwrite /etc/resolv.conf again

Bill C a écrit : >I am going to ask because I am curious. Is systemd a good resolving >server? I normally don't run servers but I find this thread interesting. I use named + ( NM or systemd-resolved ) Good or not, I don't know. It is causing me issues... >Everyone seems to want to

Re: invalid 'sshpubkey': invalid SSH public key

Kenneth Goldman a écrit : >Knowing that it should work, I tried from Windows and it seems OK.  >Newline issue perhaps. Windows is known to (automatically) add a newline at the end of a copy-paste. -- GnuPG: AE157E0B29F0BEF2 at keys.openpgp.org CA Cert:

Self Introduction: Casper Meijn

Hi, my name is Casper. I am a software developer by trade and in my free time I am developing an open-source application [1]. During the development I noticed that the library I use (KDSoap) is not available in Fedora. I want to contribute to Fedora by packaging this library and later