Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

* directory *in front* of PATH is plain stupid security wise and there is not but and not if +1 -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

software. The biggest problem is simply that users don't know about it. I certainly didn't. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

, rather than speculated about), but the latter is simply not true. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8

I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not necessarily as the default, but at least available in the repos. As it stands, it's difficult to use a modern Fedora on projects that are still developing against JDK 1.6. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com wrote: * Christopher ctubb...@apache.org [2014-03-25 19:59]: I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not necessarily as the default, but at least available in the repos. As it stands, it's difficult to use a modern

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

Whoa, the fact that the Firewall is on by default in Fedora (along with SELinux) is one of the reasons I choose Fedora over alternatives. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: = Proposed System Wide

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 15.04.2014 16:28, schrieb Christian Schaller: There was a long thread about this on the desktop mailing list, and I was not in the 'disable

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

I think you and I disagree that b is broken. In my mind b (listening w/firewall closed) is precisely what the firewall is designed to do... act as a failsafe in the event of an unexpected application listening when a user doesn't really know or want it to. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:11 PM, William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au wrote: On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 13:49 -0700, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 20:41 +0200, Thomas Woerner wrote: What you need is clearly different zones that the user can configure and associate to

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Lars Seipel lars.sei...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:14:01PM -0400, Christopher wrote: Perhaps shorten to: block public work home That is a much more intuitive default set. Is it? What's supposed to be the difference between work

Self Introduction: Christopher Tubbs

Hi, My name is Christopher Tubbs. I'm a long-time user of Fedora and Linux, and a big fan of free (as in speech) software. I love bigdata and scientific computing, and consider myself a seasoned Java developer and Maven user. I'm currently working on Apache Accumulo as my first package

Re: Self Introduction: Christopher Tubbs

Thanks. I still have a bit of work to do before its ready for review... mainly right now, it's missing control scripts and systemd (units?). I'm hoping to have it ready for review soon. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski

Re: JNI packaging guidelines for optional native sub-package

On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote: Hello all, I'm working on packaging a jar which includes a java-only implementation, and optionally loads [System.load()] if configured to do so and the shared library is available. The actual (arch-dependent) shared

FESCo #1263 question (optional javadocs)

Regarding https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1263 Does this policy change affect updates to older releases still receiving updates? Or only F21 and later? -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: FESCo #1263 question (optional javadocs)

when the condition fails (=20), but that's more to maintain in the specfile, and it'd be much simpler to just not declare any subpackaging for javadocs. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote: Hello

Re: Future changes in the new package and new branch processes

, I like the proposal, but I think it could be made simpler on new packagers (and reviewers) with better tooling (which I suppose could be considered out of scope for this proposal, but something to consider in future). -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list

Re: 'Branch freeze policy' and 'Change deadline' naming change proposal

. net http://www.happyassassin.net -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Changing release time (was Re: Major wiki revisions:)

. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Rejy M Cyriac rcyr...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/15/2014 07:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 15.11.2014 um 15:06 schrieb Kevin Kofler: Lars Seipel wrote: What does the community think of it? Is it okay for our flagship applications to carry ads and report

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Christopher ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Rejy M Cyriac rcyr...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/15/2014 07:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On 11/16/2014 08:24 PM, Christopher wrote: On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Mustafa Muhammad mustafaa.alhamda...@gmail.com mailto:mustafaa.alhamda...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 4:25 PM

Fedora 21 Final RC1 dual boot

the same problem if I delete all the existing partitions on the drive and install only Fedora. That proceeds fine. The problem only seems to exist if I try to install alongside Windows. My question is: how might I go about troubleshooting this? -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com

Re: Fedora 21 Final RC1 dual boot

willing to bet it's more of an Anaconda problem. I'm just not sure how to even begin tracking it down. I had thought it may have something to do with the extra recovery partitions, but the partitioning screen in Anaconda seemed to detect the existing partitions just fine. -- Christopher L Tubbs II

Re: Fedora 21 Final RC1 dual boot

On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:24 PM, John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote: So, I'm willing to bet it's more of an Anaconda problem. I'm just not sure how to even begin tracking it down. ... File a bugzilla report, and attach each file in /var/log/anaconda as a separate text/plain attachment.

Re: Tick-tock release cadence?

. Basically, the name or release type (not LTS, but whatever label is appropriate), could be a semantic hook for packages to follow or not. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

I just verified that I have the same default configuration from a clean install. Not good at all. I expected more. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Hi, I just happened to look at the firewalld

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 01:35 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: To me, it is obvious that the Workstation WG is in deliberate contempt of FESCo's decision. That alone ought to lead to sanctions from FESCo. In addition,

Re: Poll: How users use DNF

everything. In my normal workstation environment, I typically only run yum manually from the command-line and don't need these. I have not yet tried dnf at all. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: chromium

-party repo for Fedora users. Perhaps you can contribute packaging for Chromium to their project? -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:33 AM, john.tiger john.tigernas...@gmail.com wrote: I understand Fedora's position on Chromium BUT not having a 3rd

Re: [fedora-java] AutoService in Fedora?

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Christopher ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/26/2015 11:57 PM, Christopher wrote: Does anybody know if AutoService ( https://github.com/google/auto/tree/master/service

Re: [fedora-java] AutoService in Fedora?

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/26/2015 11:57 PM, Christopher wrote: Does anybody know if AutoService ( https://github.com/google/auto/tree/master/service) is already packaged for Fedora? Maybe under a different name? It doesn't seem

AutoService in Fedora?

Does anybody know if AutoService ( https://github.com/google/auto/tree/master/service) is already packaged for Fedora? Maybe under a different name? Upstream Apache Accumulo is considering adding it as a build dependency. (It's Apache 2.0 licensed). -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com

Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Vít Ondruch wrote: I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build dependencies, etc. -1, all the serious software requires gcc,

Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/12/2015 02:08 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dear Fedora developers, I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build dependencies,

Re: Advice on naming a new library package - libunicode or courier-unicode?

to the other name? -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: System-wide crypto policy transition tracker

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos n...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 12:16 -0500, Christopher wrote: Are there any guidelines for enforcing crypto policies in Java applications. Primarily, I was thinking about those Java applications that use JSSE system

Re: System-wide crypto policy transition tracker

on the user's configuration, right? Thanks, Christopher -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-04-20)

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote: On 20 April 2015 at 19:00, opensou...@till.name wrote: [snip] Package (co)maintainers Status Change == erlang-jsx

Re: erlang-jsx about to be retired (Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-04-20))

upstream version? What degree of confidence do you have that 0.9.2 (the current upstream version) doesn't break thrift 0.9.1-based projects? [1]: http://bit.ly/1IBSsrW [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1691 [3]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2950 -- Christopher L

Re: Packaging with hidden strings

to me more like the question was about how to package an app which could be easily configured with a user's private authentication credentials. For instance, a client-app for an internet service that requires authentication. Did I misread the original question? -- Christopher L Tubbs II http

Re: Rawhide plans

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: On 08/20/2015 03:13 PM, Eric Griffith wrote: If you have a bad experience that experience stays with you. Maybe you can get over it, maybe you can't. But a name does have history. I guess, you guys are not aware

Re: dnf doesn't check for rpmdb lock?

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote: On 07/16/2015 01:19 PM, Eric Griffith wrote: I tried to do an install and an update on two different terminals on my machine yesterday. The second one didn't yell about an rpmdb lock but it did say that it

Re: Bodhi updates not pushed?

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, 04:46 Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org> wrote: > On https <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272694>:// <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=127

Bodhi updates not pushed?

On https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272694 it was brought to my attention that my updates for the zookeeper package weren't pushed to the f22 and f21 updates-testing repos, though I do see the one in the f23 repo. Did I do something wrong? Where can I go to check or fix the problem?

Re: fedora-packages out of sync with bugzilla

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:01 PM Ralph Bean wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:41:45AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > We are planning a re-work/re-write of the application entirely, but > > it's not happened yet. ;( > > Small correction, we started on it at the end of last week!

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:21 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 07:06:51AM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:50:55PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > em* and p?p? come from biosdevname, which should not be used and

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

On Sun, Nov 8, 2015, 14:29 Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote: On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 05:28:54PM +, Christopher wrote: > I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most > part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from &

Ivy packaging for EPEL7

What's the best way to deal with resolving ivy dependencies in EPEL7? I'm trying to package zookeeper for EPEL7, and am running into problems. I see there's ivy-local for F21 and later, which comes with xmvn 2, but it looks like EL7/EPEL7 is mostly a F19-era package set. Are there any plans to

Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from em1 to eno1. Is this something that was expected? It certainly surprised me. In addition to the mediatomb configuration needing to be changed, I also

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015, 12:28 Christopher <ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org> wrote: I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from em1 to eno1. Is this something that was expected? It certainly surpri

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-11-02)

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:48 AM wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for > sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

Re: Looking for co-maintainers: zookeeper, bookkeeper, curator

I'm currently a co-maintainer on ZooKeeper. I know there's some bugs that I've overlooked these last few months. I intend to try to address some of them this week, but having another, esp. an upstream maintainer involved, would be nice. On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:42 AM Jared K. Smith wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: > >> I like the idea with mirroring Fedora Git to GitHub. Read only mirror >> just to be a dedicated place for that kind of contributions

fedora-packages out of sync with bugzilla

Has anybody else noticed that the fedora-packages bug listing (linked from pkgdb) seems out of sync with bugzilla? For example, https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/zookeeper/bugs shows bugs which have been closed as being still open, and the counts are incorrect. Is this a known issue? --

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

To support this, I try to keep a mirror in GitHub for my packages... But it's hard to stay in sync sometimes and nobody really knows it's there. It'd be nice if this were supported directly, perhaps by automatically mirroring all packages in GitHub, like the ASF does, and emailing maintainers when

Hadoop javadoc problem (FTBFS)

jersey, so I can fix my stuff? -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Ivy packaging for EPEL7

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:26 AM Christopher <ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org> wrote: > What's the best way to deal with resolving ivy dependencies in EPEL7? I'm > trying to package zookeeper for EPEL7, and am running into problems. > > I see there's ivy-local for F21 and later, whi

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Wouldn't the provides line needs a full path, otherwise, it could conflict? I'm generally against this proposal. One of the reasons I like using a distribution like Fedora is for dependency convergence. And I prefer exceptions to be rare and carefully deliberated. That said, where I think this

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

I don't really understand what's going on with the netbeans-platform package, or why accumulo would be affected. Upstream accumulo doesn't have any dependencies on netbeans. Before I try to dive in and figure out what's breaking, does anybody have any insight into what's going on with this, and

Devel archives site is awesome, but...

The devel mailing list archives has an awesome interface, but unfortunately, it only seems to work with the devel@ list, not any of the others (like java-devel@). Any plans to extend that functionality to improve all the mailing list archives? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Let's Encrypt for F23?

I see a couple of the Let's Encrypt dependencies (like python-acme) are working their way in to rawhide, but not yet in F23. I also don't yet see a 'letsencrypt' package. Since it's now in "Public Beta"[1], having it available soon might be very useful for F23 users. Does anybody have any plans

Re: Easier %config management?

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:37 AM J. Randall Owens < jrowens.fed...@ghiapet.net> wrote: > On 12/14/2015 02:47 PM, Christopher wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:22 AM Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net > > <mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote: > > &

Easier %config management?

Which components/packages are best candidates for adding a feature which would make it easier for users to track changes from the default %config %files on the system? I've found this to be a deficiency, requiring users to do configuration management independently of the installer tools on a

Re: Easier %config management?

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 2:50 PM Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 13.12.2015 um 05:58 schrieb Christopher: > > rpm could track more than hashes of config files, and instead track the > > full file. This could be optional, as it uses more disk space, but

Re: Easier %config management?

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 3:39 PM Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 13.12.2015 um 21:22 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: > > For the few cases that can't or won't comply, then having rpm > > (optionally?) make the originals available would be fantastic for > > system management > >

Re: Easier %config management?

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:22 AM Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 14.12.2015 um 17:01 schrieb Christopher: > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 3:39 PM Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net > > For me, I'd want the up-to-date one from the current version

Re: Easier %config management?

That blog seems to describe supporting a stateless use case, not for advocating that all systems should be stateless. In any case, the factory reset use case they describe is similar to some of my own. On Mon, Dec 21, 2015, 23:32 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015

LibreOffice packaging is a messy dependency graph

What's the deal with libreoffice packages being a dependency for so many system library packages? I try to `sudo dnf remove libreoffice\*` and it grabs a bunch of surprising packages with it, including some fonts and system libraries. Granted, I don't think I need any of these things, so it's

Upstream DNF?

Where is the upstream DNF issue tracker? I see the project on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf However, there doesn't appear to be a corresponding issue tracker, or point of contact to request access to edit Wiki pages (which are locked down), etc. In fact, there appears to

Re: Dealing with the "my packages" problem

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 11/18/2015 02:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> Just as a general note on this thread: if you're a packager and you >> have a genuine reason why people should be careful about touching your >> package, or follow

Re: is there a reason for starting zookeeper.service in background?

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:41 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 11.01.16 18:30, Muayyad AlSadi (als...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > quoted from systemd.serivce manual page > > > > >> it is recommended to also use the PIDFile= option, so that systemd can > > identify the

Re: Hadoop?

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:21 PM Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: > > So, it would seem at some point, without me noticing (certainly my fault, > > for not paying attentio

Hadoop?

So, it would seem at some point, without me noticing (certainly my fault, for not paying attention enough), the Hadoop packages got orphaned and/or retired? in Fedora. This is a big problem for me, because the main package I work on is dependent upon Hadoop. What's the state of Hadoop in Fedora

Re: Bugzilla email address sync

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:44 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 04:37:26PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 22:30:14 + > > Christopher <ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > > Thanks

Re: Hadoop?

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:33 PM gil <punto...@libero.it> wrote: > > > Il 02/06/2016 23:20, Chris Murphy ha scritto: > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: > >> So, it would seem at some point, wi

Re: Hadoop?

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:38 AM gil <punto...@libero.it> wrote: > > > Il 03/06/2016 13:20, Christopher ha scritto: > > I also tried to unretire in pkgdb, but it resulted in an error. > have you open a rel-eng ticket as suggested before? > regards > .g >

Re: Hadoop?

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:33 PM Christopher <ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:38 AM gil <punto...@libero.it> wrote: > >> >> >> Il 03/06/2016 13:20, Christopher ha scritto: >> > I also tried to unretire in pkgdb, but it res

Re: Hadoop?

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 1:35 AM Till Maas <opensou...@till.name> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:25:19AM +, Christopher wrote: > > > Ugh. Wish I had noticed. Is there a quick way to get it unretired? It's > > still an essential dependency of some packages which are

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:58 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 27.05.16 08:09, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote: > > > Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said: > > > Also note that running jobs in a systemd service has advantages on

Re: Bugzilla email address sync

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:56 PM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 21:51:27 + > Christopher <ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > I recently updated my FAS account email forwarding address. > > > > Then, I got a

Bugzilla email address sync

I recently updated my FAS account email forwarding address. Then, I got an email with the title "Please fix your bugzilla.redhat.com account" This email was notifying me that my bugzilla.redhat.com account email address did not match my FAS forwarding address. I'd really rather not broadcast my

Re: i686 failures

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 7:40 PM Mat Booth <fed...@matbooth.co.uk> wrote: > On 16 June 2016 at 20:16, Christopher <ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures[1] on >> i686 in koji that I cannot reproduc

Re: Netcat

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:20 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On 16 June 2016 at 14:23, Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazq...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Ch

(retire nc6) never retired a package before

Hi all, I've never retired a package before, so I'm trying to figure out my way through it for nc6. Background: * nc was properly obsoleted by nmap-ncat, and retired (though, it hasn't been removed from comps entirely) * nc6 should also be obsoleted by nmap-ncat with nc, but it never was.

Netcat

So, I'm trying to understand what's going on with netcat. If anybody can enlighten me, I'd appreciate it. Here's what I've found so far: It looks like rpms/nc was retired due to being orphaned for too long. It looks like the same thing (almost) happened to rpms/nc6. I think netcat is too

i686 failures

I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures[1] on i686 in koji that I cannot reproduce locally in x86_64. The thing is... I don't really have any good 32-bit environment to test this locally. Hadoop isn't really suitable for 32-bit architectures (IMO) and I doubt it's a

Re: Gnome keyring security in Fedora

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:38 PM Christopher <ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org> wrote: > I've been thinking about Gnome keyring a lot lately, and I have concerns > about security, and I don't know if this is a Gnome keyring problem, or a > problem affecting Fedora specifically. > >

Re: Gnome keyring security in Fedora

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:06 PM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:43:09 + > Christopher <ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org> wrote: > > ...snip... > > > I can't be the only one interested in finding out how to secure these > >

Re: Gnome keyring security in Fedora

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:37 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 18:43 +, Christopher wrote: > > I can't be the only one interested in finding out how to secure these > > things in Fedora. > > Any application running as your

Koschei false positives?

I occasionally get notifications from Koschei about my packages failing to build. When I look ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13071213), I see a python stack trace which looks like it has nothing to do with my package's build. Rather, it looks like Koschei itself failed.

Re: Koschei false positives?

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Ralph Bean wrote: > Good idea! Can you open a ticket on the koschei issue tracker about it? > https://github.com/msimacek/koschei/issues Done, and thanks: https://github.com/msimacek/koschei/issues/73 -- devel mailing list

Re: Embedding javascript in binary

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:03 PM Sander Hoentjen <san...@hoentjen.eu> wrote: > On 01/21/2016 12:29 AM, Christopher wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM Sander Hoentjen <san...@hoentjen.eu > > <mailto:san...@hoentjen.eu>> wrote: > > [snip] >

Gnome keyring security in Fedora

integration with Gnome/Seahorse/GPG. Thoughts? -- Christopher -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Embedding javascript in binary

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM Sander Hoentjen wrote: [snip] > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:JavaScript > Yeah I read that, but is says "Please note that this section really only > applies to JavaScript libraries intended for use on the web." so I am > not sure

GPG2 as default /usr/bin/gpg

I just ran into this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309175 It's not a huge deal (and there are several workarounds, for git and for other tools which default ot using 'gpg'), but it highlights the mismatch between the default /usr/bin/gpg running gpg1, when other tools, like

Re: GPG2 as default /usr/bin/gpg

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:18 PM Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:29:10AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:29:26 -0800 > > "Brian C. Lane" wrote: > > > > > I am opposed to this. If a tool wants/needs to > > > use v2 it should

Re: GPG2 as default /usr/bin/gpg

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:09 PM John M. Harris, Jr. wrote: > Unless there are any issues with gpg, and to my knowledge there aren't, I > can't see any important reason to default 'gpg' to 'gpg2', at least not for > f24. > > The biggest reason I can think is to make things

Re: [Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:04 AM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines. > *​https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_for_EPEL > *​https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging >

Status of XRDP in F23+

Hi, I sent a message to the users@ list[1] about XRDP, and didn't get a response. I'm curious what's the status of XRDP in Fedora. I tried to get it to work in the AWS cloud image for Fedora 23, and it didn't work (could authenticate, but it couldn't start vnc/gnome, but couldn't figure out why).

Re: Status of XRDP in F23+

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:26 PM Timotheus Pokorra < timotheus.poko...@solidcharity.com> wrote: > Hello Christopher, > > please check [1] if your bug has been reported already. > Or report new bugs at [2], and hopefully the maintainers (see list at > [3]) should reply on th

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >