[Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Virt Test Day is this Thurs Nov 1!

Hey all, The Fedora 18 Virt Test Day is this Thursday, November 1st. That's two days away! The test day landing page is here (still being expanded): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-11-01_Virtualization If you're interested in trying out some new virt functionality, we've got step

Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2013-01-12

On 01/11/2013 07:04 PM, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Broken upgrade path report for tags f18 - f18-updates - f19: crobinso: qemu: f18-updates f19 (2:qemu-1.2.2-1.fc18 2:qemu-1.2.0-25.fc19) Was working out some regressions with qemu 1.3, fixed now:

Re: F13Beta OPEN bugs -- need to be by Thu, March 25

, please respond to this mail. ... = libvirt = * 566425 POST (Cole Robinson) - qemu: could not load kernel '/var/lib/libvirt/boot/virtinst-vmlinuz.bmav1g': Permission denied This should be fixed with the following update: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvirt

[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Virt Test Day is October 8th!

Hey all, The Fedora 20 Virt Test Day is this coming Tuesday, October 8th. Check out the test day landing page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-10-08_Virtualization If you're interested in trying out some new virt functionality, there's step by step instructions for: * Snapshot UI

Re: LVM thin provisioning and virt-manager

On 10/15/2013 05:29 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: The better snapshots sound ideal for VM testing. Snapshot a successful install and then try to break the snapshot. Etc. Presently virt-manager ignores thinp pools and only creates conventional LV's. I haven't tried using virsh to force it to use

Re: Reminder: Fedora 15 end of life on 2012-06-26

On 05/31/2012 02:09 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings. This is a reminder email about the end of life process for Fedora 15. Fedora 15 will reach end of life on 2012-06-26, and no further updates will be pushed out after that time.

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2012-01-23 at 18UTC)

On 01/22/2012 07:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 =

Re: Need help with GNOME ?

On 03/10/2012 02:00 PM, Nelson Marques wrote: Is there anything I can help (main packaging related or triage/bug fix) regarding GNOME in Fedora? Hey, I was actually about to send a mail that intersects with your request. Take a look at this:

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

On 07/19/2010 06:41 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: In a systemd world we can fix this in a much nicer way: libvirtd.service would just have a Wants: iscsid.service in it. That way when libvirtd is started iscsid is started too. And if people use iscsid in other areas too they can just add a single

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

On 07/22/2010 07:16 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fri, 23.07.10 00:55, Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) wrote: On 07/23/2010 12:10 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: Kay and I have discussed this now. We agreed to fold systemd-install into systemctl entirely, and replace --realize by

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

On 07/21/2010 10:42 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 21.07.10 22:13, Chuck Anderson (c...@wpi.edu) wrote: Well, there is some merit in the already stated argument for having good UI design. In this example, you could have used long-standing precedent of using -v -vv -vvv (or -q -qq

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Virtio RNG

On 02/01/2013 04:39 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said: Feature owner(s): Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com, Amit Shah amit.s...@redhat.com Provide a paravirtual random number generator to virtual machines, to prevent entropy starvation in guests

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Virtio RNG

amit's response: On (Sun) 03 Feb 2013 [10:30:49], Cole Robinson wrote: On 02/01/2013 04:39 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said: Feature owner(s): Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com, Amit Shah amit.s...@redhat.com Provide a paravirtual random number generator

Re: Fedora 16 EOL Bugzilla Closure - strange behavior?

On 02/15/2013 05:41 AM, Tadej Janež wrote: Hi! Here is an example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736498 I filled this bug during the F-16 Graphics test week. After the Fedora EOL reminder and before the bug was closed, I tried to reproduce it on F-17 and I couldn't. Thus I

[Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Virt Test Day is Tuesday May 28!

Hey all, The Fedora 19 Virt Test Day is tomorrow, Tuesday May 28th. Check out the test day landing page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-05-28_Virtualization If you're interested in trying out some new virt functionality, there's step by step instructions for: * Live migrate a VM

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Virt Test Day is Tuesday May 28!

On 05/27/2013 12:09 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: Hello All! 2013/5/27 Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com: Hey all, The Fedora 19 Virt Test Day is tomorrow, Tuesday May 28th. Check out the test day landing page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-05-28_Virtualization Is it still

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Virt Test Day is Tuesday May 28!

On 05/27/2013 12:37 PM, Reartes Guillermo wrote: Hi, ON: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-05-28_Virtualization Fedora 19 on a physical machine The preferred testing platform is a fully updated Fedora 19 machine. You have a few options for getting the Fedora 18 bits: (there

Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

On 07/10/2013 05:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 09:46 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 22:36:39 +0100 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: ...snip... test instances for

Re: Why does so much virt stuff depend on glusterfs?

On 07/24/2013 05:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:28:20AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 18:15 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:57:50PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:17:01PM -0700, Adam Williamson

Re: Why does so much virt stuff depend on glusterfs?

On 07/24/2013 01:36 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: On 07/24/2013 05:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:28:20AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 18:15 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:57:50PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, Jul

Re: a questionable dependency chain

On 01/29/2014 09:32 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: Hey, On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 09:21:22AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: I've switched to rawhide yesterday, and discovered that vinagre now forces rsyslog onto my system. That's not great. The dependency chain goes something like this:

Re: Wiki pages: Missing tests in %check and missing upstream test suites

On 02/27/2014 09:18 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:55:02PM +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote: Hi folks, thanks for your feedback in the last few days. I've created two wiki pages about packages which don't execute their tests in %check:

Let's close the remaining merge reviews

Hi all, In case readers don't know, this page describes what a merge review is: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Merge_Reviews In short: when fedora core and extras merged, a Package Review was opened for every package in core. The idea was that every core package would be reviewed to ensure it

Re: Let's close the remaining merge reviews

On 03/24/2014 08:07 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 04:41:29PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: An alternative would be to reassign every open merge review to the component in question, and let maintainers handle it as they like. Thoughts? Alternative idea -- maybe identify

Re: qemu / VNC / vino

On 03/25/2014 02:06 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: Hello, So I've found a 'bug'. I have a group of developers who use vagrant/libvirt to develop against. We use VNC since we are a distributed team to connect to each other's desktops/workstations for when we're at the 'huh this makes no

Re: qemu / VNC / vino

On 03/25/2014 05:43 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 18:24 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: In /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf you can set remote_display_port_{min,max} to control the port range used So that is awesome thank you. Given that by default

Re: Let's close the remaining merge reviews

I've proposed discussing this at the next FESCo meeting: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1269 If you have opinions on the matter, please consider attending. Thanks, Cole On 03/24/2014 04:41 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: Hi all, In case readers don't know, this page describes what a merge

Re: Cc: on dead packages

On 06/30/2014 07:20 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Bastien Nocera (bnoc...@redhat.com) said: Apparently, people can still file bugs for dead packages: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114180 And I (and many others) get CC:ed on those bugs files, with no possibility to remove

[Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Virt Test Day is Thu Sep 25!

Hey all, The Fedora 21 Virt Test Day is this coming Thu Sep 25. Check out the test day landing page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2014-09-25_Virtualization If you're interested in trying out some new virt functionality, there's step by step instructions for: * Q35 Chipset * Import

Re: Fedora 21 Final blocker bug status report #1

On 11/22/2014 12:15 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi folks! We're now into the Fedora 21 Final freeze period, and we really need to address blocker bugs promptly to try and make the scheduled release date. On the current schedule Go/No-Go will happen on 2014-12-04, which means we really need the

Re: Cannot start 2 VMs on F21

On 01/27/2015 11:03 AM, Jerry James wrote: I asked the question below on the virt mailing list about 2 weeks ago. There have been a grand total of zero responses so far. I'll ask the same question here, in hopes that somebody knows something that could help. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:19

[Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Virt Test Day is Thu Apr 16!

Hey all, A reminder that the Fedora 22 Virt Test Day is this coming Thu Apr 16. Check out the test day landing page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2015-04-16_Virtualization It's a great time to make sure your virt workflow is still working correctly with the latest packages in Fedora

Re: Is it too late in the F22 cycle to upgrade cross-gcc to gcc-5?

(why does this list screw up reply-all!? ) On 04/24/2015 10:35 AM, David Howells wrote: Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com wrote: FWIW qemu firmware pacakges build with cross-gcc: ipxe, seabios, SLOF, openbios. We want to build for the target architecture but ship as noarch, since the roms

Re: Is it too late in the F22 cycle to upgrade cross-gcc to gcc-5?

On 04/24/2015 10:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:59 AM, David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote: It's taken quite a long time to sort out the bugs in gcc-5 with regard to lesser-used arches, so I've only just managed to get cross-gcc in rawhide upgraded to gcc-5, despite the

Re: fedora-easy-karma: InsecurePlatformWarning

On 04/28/2015 01:32 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: i am not sure for which package file a bug Waiting for Bodhi for a list of packages in updates-testing (F21)... /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/packages/urllib3/util/ssl_.py:90: InsecurePlatformWarning: A true SSLContext object is not

Re: Unresponsive maintainer for libiscsi

On 06/03/2015 03:51 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: Hello all, I've been trying to get in touch with Paulo Bonzini (bonzini) about the version of libiscsi in Fedora. I've not been able to get ahold of him by his Red Hat email address, Bugzilla, or IRC. Has anyone been able to contact him? He's

Re: scriplet issues installing deps in f23 mock

On 10/05/2015 08:42 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 10/05/2015 04:46 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> Dne 30.9.2015 v 00:17 Cole Robinson napsal(a): >>> I'm hitting scriplet errors when trying to build f23 qemu in mock on an up >>> to >>> date f23 host. Example: &g

Re: [fedora-virt] Do we need the Fedora 'virt' mailing list?

On 09/16/2015 08:20 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> Crickets ... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/ >> >> The virt list has long been in an odd place. Fedora has best in class >> virt support, because so many

scriplet issues installing deps in f23 mock

I'm hitting scriplet errors when trying to build f23 qemu in mock on an up to date f23 host. Example: $ mock --root fedora-23-x86_64 --init ... $ mock --root fedora-23-x86_64 --rebuild qemu-2.4.0-4.fc23.src.rpm ... Transaction Summary

Re: scriplet issues installing deps in f23 mock

On 10/05/2015 04:46 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 30.9.2015 v 00:17 Cole Robinson napsal(a): >> I'm hitting scriplet errors when trying to build f23 qemu in mock on an up to >> date f23 host. Example: >> >> $ mock --root fedora-23-x86_64 --init >> ... >> $

Re: [fedora-virt] Do we need the Fedora 'virt' mailing list?

On 09/23/2015 01:27 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:08:57AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >> On 09/16/2015 08:20 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>>> >>>> Cr

Re: [fedora-virt] Do we need the Fedora 'virt' mailing list?

On 09/23/2015 01:30 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 06:27:09PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> One week - do you want to close the list or should I? Dan suggested a >> method to use here: >> >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/2015-September/004295.html >

Re: Fedora Rel-Eng builder boxes can't run qemu-kvm on F23

On 11/19/2015 09:35 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > Basically this means we can't build any images (rawhide/Fedora23/etc) because > the builder hosts have been moved to Fedora 23. The following BZ has more > info. Please discuss in the bug if you have comments about the technicals. > Please discuss

Re: cross-gcc error: Error: missing operand

On 02/05/2016 11:41 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > The mass rebuild of openbios reveals an error in the cross-gcc cross > compiler (powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc). > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12854344 > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4344/12854344/build.log

Re: F25 Self Contained Change: GNS3

On 07/12/2016 10:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:04:53PM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: >> = Proposed Self Contained Change: GNS3 = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNS3 >> >> Change owner(s): >> *Athmane Madjoudj >> >> Graphical Network Simulator 3 >> >>

Fwd: [python-bugzilla] ANNOUNCE: python-bugzilla 2.0.0 released

Here's the new release. Pushed to updates-testing now but with autopush disabled so it can bake for a while, given that there's a number of small incompatibilities. Thanks, Cole Forwarded Message I'm happy to announce a new release of python-bugzilla, version 2.0.0.

Re: Beta of new RH Bugzilla coming soon

On 02/06/2017 04:32 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > I wanted to let the Fedora devel/maintainer community know that a > public beta of Red Hat Bugzilla, based on upstream v5, is coming soon. > There will be an official announcement with the URL and more details > to accompany the beta when it's

Re: integrity verification for virtio-win driver archive

On 02/27/2017 01:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 04:15:12PM +0100, Stefan Pietsch wrote: >> Dear developers, >> >> I would appreciate having some checksum files for the virtio-win driver >> archives located here: >> >>

Re: fedrepo-req is complaining about cookies

On 09/14/2017 02:19 PM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 13:18 -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: >>> Hi, >> Hi, >>> >>> I am trying to add new package to fedora, I did: >>> >>> $

Re: bodhi CLI and USERNAME

On 10/19/2017 04:09 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > Greetings fellow Fedorans, > > We're about to release Bodhi 3.0.0[0] upstream, which has a backwards > incompatible CLI change[1] that I am considering backporting to the > stable Fedoras, but I wanted feedback first before I do that. > > The Bodhi 2

Re: glusterfs in Fedora Modular 27?

On 11/28/2017 08:30 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > I've been contacted by Fedora QE about this, and have bz > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518150 > > I haven't followed (can't follow) Fedora closely enough to know what's > needed here. Apparently none of my co-maintainers have

Re: F29 System Wide Change: uEFI for ARMv7

On 07/11/2018 04:07 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: On 07/10/2018 04:22 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:14:43PM -0700, Thomas Daede wrote: On 07/03/2018 05:15 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: Move to uEFI as the default

Re: Self introduction: Eduardo Otubo

Welcome Eduardo :) On 07/19/2018 06:47 AM, Eduardo Otubo wrote: > Hello all, > > My name is Eduardo and I'll be helping co-maintaining the cloud-init package > for Fedora. > > I've been working with QEMU/KVM since 2011. In 2013 I became the maintainer of > the seccomp subsystem in QEMU. In

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On 07/15/2018 11:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 04:05:42PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: >> On 07/12/2018 10:17 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> Does each build start with its own fresh VM? Do you care about the >>> data in that build VM if either qemu or the host

Re: F29 System Wide Change: uEFI for ARMv7

On 07/10/2018 04:22 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:14:43PM -0700, Thomas Daede wrote: >> On 07/03/2018 05:15 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: >>> Move to uEFI as the default boot mechanism for ARMv7 devices. >> >> Will this work with virt-manager too? Currently, while

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On 07/11/2018 04:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 07/11/2018 12:57 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: >> On 07/11/2018 09:26 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On 07/11/2018 10:53 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 07/11/2018 07:31 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Mikolaj

Re: Spam/scam links in bugzilla

On 11/01/2018 07:23 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > A few minutes ago I was notified about a post in a closed bug. It > turns out that the account that made the post has been sporadically > spamming various bugs: >

Re: Anyone working on Xen on F29

On 10/29/2018 05:26 PM, YOUNG, MICHAEL A. wrote: Incidentally I have now tried the example with virt-install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt updated for fedora 29 and it failed with the error ERRORinternal error: unsupported input bus usb This should

Re: resume= kernel cmdline arg by default on servers

On 10/18/2018 11:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 05:16:19PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: tonynel...@georgeanelson.com wrote:  Stephen Gallagher said:  I can't see anyone putting a Server or Atomic Host into hibernation, though. ... What happens when the "server" is

Re: Fedora for Web Development fail

On 09/27/2018 03:26 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Adam Williamson: I don't think we ship anything that is exactly a *disk image* for this kind of non-cloud, non-Atomic, minimal, probably-virtual deployment, aside from the ones intended for vagrant use. At least not for x86_64. I suppose I'd tend

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On 4/9/19 2:20 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 09.04.19 10:11, Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > >> Basically, anything that's part of the install environment is going to >> be present after a live install. That accounts for both of the above: >> the installer supports

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On 4/9/19 1:09 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:07:09PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> multipathd [...] And beyond that, this daemon is really ugly too: it logs >>at high log levels during boot that it found no configuration and >>hence nothing to

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On 4/9/19 2:24 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 09.04.19 14:16, Cole Robinson (crobi...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> On 4/9/19 1:09 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:07:09PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>>> multipathd [

Re: fedpkg bugzilla error

On 10/28/19 2:59 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > Hi everyone, I'm getting an error (below) trying to request a repo for > a new package. I have my Bugzilla API key specified in > ~/.config/python-bugzilla/bugzillarc (as well as in ~/.bugzillarc, and > I even tried adding it to ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf

Re: Enabling Fedora 33 chroots in Fedora Copr

On 8/18/20 10:48 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Tuesday, August 18, 2020 3:12:06 PM CEST Jakub Kadlcik wrote: >> we have just disabled Fedora 30 chroots in Copr. > > And at the same time, we enabled fedora-33-* chroots. It required us to do > a small bug-fix release of copr-frontend today, but I

Re: Is NetworkManager-wait-online.service necessary by default?

On 2/23/22 5:22 PM, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > On 23/02/2022 21:23, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >> a) change libvirt-daemon-driver-storage >> Requires:libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-iscsi >>     to Suggests:libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-iscsi, > > More generally why does installing

Re: Action Required: Bugzilla - API Authentication changes

On 2/1/22 7:37 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 12:37 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >> Forwarded Message >> Subject: [Bugzilla-announce-list] Action Required: Bugzilla - API >> Authentication changes >> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 12:28:13 +1000 >> From: Jeff Fearn >>

Re: CI failure: Too many packages to install: 233 (threshold 100). Please use 'repository-file' artifact instead.

On 2/1/24 12:35 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > How can we fix this error? > > > > > I think it's related to the fact that glibc has many subpackages. This > used to be a problem with slow tests timing out in Zuul, but