I'm trying to build qt-creator 3.0.1 for EL6 and have successfully done it
on my own machine but I'm having an issue when building it with koji. It
appears that it's not finding one of the files (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6542755 ), but it's
checked into the git branch
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:06:53 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to build qt-creator 3.0.1 for EL6 and have successfully
done it on my own
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim
sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/03/2014 10:31 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Dave Johansen
davejohan...@gmail.com mailto:davejohan...@gmail.com wrote
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 20:56:15 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to do a build on koji and ran into an error during the mock
buildroot setup (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.comwrote:
The EL6 build of llvm 3.4 is currently in testing and it was just pointed
out that there's a potential issue with the build (
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0264/llvm-3.4-5.el6).
If you
I'm trying to do a build on koji and ran into an error during the mock
buildroot setup (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6488038). Is this
something wrong with koji? Or with the EL6/EPEL packages?
Thanks,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The EL6 build of llvm 3.4 is currently in testing and it was just pointed
out that there's a potential issue with the build (
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0264/llvm-3.4-5.el6).
If you examine the build.log (
I spoke with the package owner and plan on taking ownership of the el6
branch of llvm. I've modified the current .spec file from rawhide and plan
on building llvm 3.4 for el6. The .spec and source .rpm can be found at:
http://daveisfera.fedorapeople.org/llvm_3.4/llvm.spec
I just updated odb to 2.3.0 in rawhide and the build works just fine on
RHEL 6, but failed in koji (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6425496 ). It looks like
a path changed or something along those lines that I need to account for in
my .spec. Is that the case? Or is there
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19.01.2014 01:06, Dave Johansen wrote:
I just updated odb to 2.3.0 in rawhide and the build works just fine on
RHEL 6, but failed in koji (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6425496 ). It looks
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19.01.2014 01:06, Dave Johansen wrote:
I just updated odb to 2.3.0 in rawhide and the build works just fine on
RHEL 6, but failed in koji
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:47:04PM -0800, Dave Peterson wrote:
Wouldn't this be a perfect use case for Software Collections?
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Contributor_Documentation/1/html/
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.comwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/16/2014 10:14 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:32:18 -0500 Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Perhaps this would be a good time to
I would like to create an EL6 branch of qt-creator and I am willing to
become the maintainer. I have a working .spec and .src.rpm, so if an
existing maintainer would prefer to take this over, then they are free to
do so, but I'm fine with doing it.
Thanks,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 16:53:19 -0800
Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
What's the process opt-in at this point? I'm a bit unclear. I see that
epel-release was built for EPEL7 (and that the git branch is epel7
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 21:42:10 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:45:44 +0400
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:45:44 +0400
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All!
2013/12/2 Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com:
I recently submitted ODB 2.2 to the EPEL for EL 5/6 and version 2.3
has been
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/12/2 Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com:
Currently, llvm/clang in the EPEL repo has been orphaned and I was
considering packaging YouCompleteMe (
https://github.com/Valloric/YouCompleteMe ) for EL
I recently submitted ODB 2.2 to the EPEL for EL 5/6 and version 2.3 has
been released (
http://codesynthesis.com/pipermail/odb-announcements/2013/37.html ).
The wiki seems to indicate that updating software for feature releases is
discouraged (
Currently, llvm/clang in the EPEL repo has been orphaned and I was
considering packaging YouCompleteMe (
https://github.com/Valloric/YouCompleteMe ) for EL, but if requires clang
3.2 or higher and so I was wondering if it would be possible for me
llvm/clang to be updated to 3.3. I have spoken with
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 19:51:48 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm packaging odb ( http://codesynthesis.com/products/odb
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 19:51:48 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm packaging odb ( http://codesynthesis.com/products/odb/ ) for
Fedora/RHEL and I've run into a bit of a problem. Everything worked
fine
I'm packaging odb ( http://codesynthesis.com/products/odb/ ) for
Fedora/RHEL and I've run into a bit of a problem. Everything worked fine
for f18 and f19, but when I try to build libdodb-boost for f20 I get an
error that libodb-devel isn't available on the arm builds (
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Robert Scheck rob...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
Hallo Dave,
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Dave Johansen wrote:
I just noticed that the boost141 package had been previously available in
Fedora, but it has since been removed (
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Robin Lee cheese...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
Upstream Tracker is a convenient place for checking API/ABI changes:
For Boost: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/boost.html
Wow, that's a great resource and I didn't even know about it.
Thanks,
Dave
--
devel
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.comwrote:
Le 29/09/2013 05:44, Dave Johansen a écrit :
I just noticed that the boost141 package had been previously available
in Fedora, but it has since been removed (
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5291 ). I'm
I just noticed that the boost141 package had been previously available in
Fedora, but it has since been removed (
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5291 ). I'm not familiar with the
recent changes in Boost, but is the API stable enough to support a package
to build on EL 5/6 and Fedora?
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:44 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Part of the confusion may also come from the fact that the binaries
generated by devtoolset are standalone and can be run
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:32:41 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
How can I get involved in that process? I would definitely like to
help out with enabling the support for them in the EPEL.
Join
http://developerblog.redhat.com/2013/09/12/rhscl1-ga/
I know that the devtoolset requires an additional subscribe to get
access, but is there a way to make use of it in the Koji build process
so that those who are subscribed to the devtoolset can make use of the
package that uses it in the EPEL?
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:43:50 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
http://developerblog.redhat.com/2013/09/12/rhscl1-ga/
I know that the devtoolset requires an additional subscribe to get
access
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/30/2013 05:56 AM, Dave Johansen wrote:
But that doesn't work
You mean that it is not executed at all? Then you probably do not have
defined macro scl. Which is probably because you do not have installed
meta
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/29/2013 10:19 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
%{?scl:scl enable %{scl} }
# this is a shell
command 1
command 2
...
%{?scl:}
Just one command with this syntax. If you need more command, you have to
use
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/29/2013 12:04 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
So does that mean that this is the correct statement to put in the .spec
file?
%{?scl:scl enable %{scl} }
source /opt/rh/devtoolset-1.1/enable
%{?scl:}
What
I'm trying to make a spec file that uses the devtoolset in RHEL 5/6 (
rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-0175.html ) but I haven't been able
to figure out how to enable devtoolset in the spec file. If I run 'scl
enable devtoolset-1.1 bash' before doing rpmbuild it works, but how do
I run a command
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote:
Le 28/08/2013 18:09, Dave Johansen a écrit :
I'm trying to make a spec file that uses the devtoolset in RHEL 5/6 (
rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-0175.html ) but I haven't been able
to figure out how to enable
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 08:05:19AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
I have a ThinkPad T60 that I recently upgraded to Fedora 19 from
CentOS 6
I have a ThinkPad T60 that I recently upgraded to Fedora 19 from
CentOS 6. With CentOS 6, I could connect to the dock with an extra
monitor connected to the VGA port just fine, but with Fedora 19 it has
issues.
It used to crash when I connected it to the dock with the monitor connected:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 08:05:19AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
I have a ThinkPad T60 that I recently upgraded to Fedora 19 from
CentOS 6. With CentOS 6, I could connect to the dock with an extra
monitor connected
201 - 239 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
