Hi there,
Is there any plan to have the EKOPath compiler, from PathScale,
shipped as part of the future Fedora releases?
It doesn't necessarily mean having Fedora's packages built with it,
but merely packaging it as a first step.
Any thoughts?
-Ilyes
--
devel mailing list
, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
Is there any plan to have the EKOPath compiler, from PathScale,
shipped as part of the future Fedora releases?
It doesn't necessarily mean having Fedora's packages built with it,
but merely packaging it as a first
You (or anyone else) is still free to just package it.
Sure. I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora.
-Ilyes
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:36 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Well assuming no legal
--rombobjrn-67a.se wrote:
Ilyes Gouta wrote:
I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora.
According to PathScale's license document their products are partly
free and partly unfree. You can of course only package the free
parts. How useful are they without the unfree parts?
Björn
Are there any plans to bring gimp 2.7.x - 2.8 into F16 ?
Is there a specific reason to? The home page states that the whole
2.7.x series should be considered unstable.
Alright, would then the 2.8.x series be in F16?
-Ilyes
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 23:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
But based on what they've said in the past, I expect that once most
hardware that previously needed the fallback mode is covered, fallback
mode will die. AIUI,
Hi,
Any reasons on why libgbm isn't being built and packaged in the
current mesa SPEC file? libgbm is a dependency for wayland-demos.
The --enable-gbm configure option depends on --enable-shared-glapi. Is
there any constraint?
-Ilyes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I'm interested too! Do we cover embedded platforms?
-Ilyes Gouta
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 18:11 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
There is already WebKit page on Wiki [1] but I'd
like to use this one as the entry
Hi,
Where can I get such information? And is it possible to indicate where
I can locate Fedora's kernel git tree?
-Ilyes Gouta
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi Pierre-Yves,
How you're doing? We met at Fosdem last time. I'm the Tunisian guy :)
OK, thanks. The git tree would be interesting too :)
-Ilyes Gouta
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Pierre-Yves pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 10:09 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Where can I
.
Thanks, everyone!
-Ilyes Gouta
Regards
Till
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I do need to be in a ACL and have a public key, isn't? :)
-Ilyes Gouta
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
So fedpkg is only available in updates-testing. Any direct link?
fedpkg is included in the package fedora-packager and it is already
improved browser security model.
-Ilyes Gouta
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 21:31 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Shipping a Firefox with no ability to use Javascript would be more or
less equal
support that.
-Ilyes Gouta
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Since JavaScript has a client-side execution model and since the all
the JS scripts are downloaded in plain text format (even if sometimes
obfuscated) along with the html code
and a
foundation for the next iteration. It happens that HTML (and its
siblings) and JS are part of this wild landscape and both are
*evolving*, and (IMHO) I would like to see Fedora leading (and
pursuing) the way with this.
-Ilyes Gouta
And IMHO, as a Free Software distribution, we should do all we
open source piece of software, such
as Firefox, WebKit and WebKit2 (http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/WebKit2),
as a source of that generated native code at runtime? This would
immensely help verifying the emitter of such a code and take the
appropriate action, if needed.
-Ilyes Gouta
It's changing
on.
-Ilyes Gouta
Please,
Matěj
--
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mceplatceplovi.cz
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
SCSI is *not* magic. There are *fundamental* *technical*
reasons why you have to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI
chain every now
Hi,
What about the WebKit SIG that Jaroslav Reznik wants to setup?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-August/140497.html
-Ilyes Gouta
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Matej,
and WebKit2 (http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/WebKit2
Hi,
On Nov 24, 2012 8:20 AM, Dariusz J. Garbowski thufo...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
On 24/11/12 05:37 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com said:
It should also be normally trying multiple mirrors, not a bunch of
times to the same one. :(
[...]
Actually,
Hi,
Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver
updates more frequently in Fedora?
These are kinda critical for the stability of desktop/X.
-Ilyes
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
Date: Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:07 AM
Hi Adam,
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote:
On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:23 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver
updates more frequently in Fedora?
These are kinda critical
Hi Adam,
On Dec 15, 2012 9:48 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 20:54 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:23 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote
Hi,
On Dec 16, 2012 2:30 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Dom, 2012-12-16 at 01:46 +0200, Ebru Arslan wrote:
I am using Adlink cPCI 3970D board. and my system also include cPCI
3455 driver compatible just Fedora 14 32 bit.
why is not compatible with newer Fedoras ? is the
/how_to_use_mock.txt
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Dec 15, 2012 9:48 PM, Adam Williamson
awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 20:54 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Hi Adam
and performance (blt and blending, cairo-demos) is way better than the
2.20.10 and 2.20.14 releases.
-Ilyes
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just testing the 2.20.16 release and everything looks good so far on GM45.
-Ilyes
On Sun, Dec 16
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote:
I concur: I locally build xorg-x11-drv-intel (including
xf86-video-intel-2.20.16.tar.bz2), updated, and logged out/in.
System does appear snappier, and I have not yet been able to recreate
the hang/crash.
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 16.12.2012 21:39, schrieb Tom London:
I concur: I locally build xorg-x11-drv-intel (including
xf86-video-intel-2.20.16.tar.bz2), updated, and logged out/in.
System does appear snappier, and I have not
Hey,
Would it be possible to also push the xf86-video-intel-2.20.16 update to
Fedora 16 (technically it's not EOL yet)?
-Ilyes
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Ebru Arslan earslan2...@gmail.com wrote:
i did like that but it doesnt work.
I updated Fedora 14 32 bit. then i installed driver
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
Would it be possible to also push the xf86-video-intel-2.20.16 update to
Fedora 16 (technically it's not EOL yet)?
I just ran a xorg-x11-drv-intel scratch build for f16 w/ the new
xf86-video-intel-2.20.16
Hi,
I'm attempting to build a software requiring glib2-devel.i686, however when
attempting to yum install it, RPM generates a transaction error and states
that few files from glib2-devel.i686 conflict w/the x86_64 flavor.
The listed conflicting files seem related to gdb and systemtap (tools)
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Josh Stone jist...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/27/2012 05:30 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Hi,
I'm attempting to build a software requiring glib2-devel.i686, however
when attempting to yum install it, RPM generates a transaction error and
states that few
Yes, please!
It would be about the right time to start enabling Wayland in distributions.
-Ilyes
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm tentatively planning to enable the Wayland and Broadway backends in
GTK+ for f19.
From a quick test build,
, during an install? Is it
possible to change the kernel configuration so that the next yum
update picks up the SMP enabled one?
-Ilyes Gouta
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
running a
PAE 32bit kernel, or a x86_64 kernel on my machine.
Thanks,
-Ilyes Gouta
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:43 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I own a laptop which has an Intel SU4100
(http://ark.intel.com
Hi,
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/11/16/1330233/The-200-Line-Linux-Kernel-Patch-That-Does-Wonders
patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=128978361700898w=2
Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14 and
possibly posted as an update? :)
Would be wonderful!
...@math.uh.eduwrote:
IG == Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com writes:
IG Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for
IG Fedora 14 and possibly posted as an update? :)
IG Would be wonderful!
Would be more wonderful to wait until the upstream development has
actually finished before
Thanks Kyle for making it available!
-Ilyes
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Kyle McMartin k...@mcmartin.ca wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14
and
possibly posted as an update
and setup a
proper cgroup so that we could differentiate when scheduling with other
processes?
-Ilyes
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.dewrote:
On Tue, 16.11.10 16:58, Ilyes Gouta (ilyes.go...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10
] [81124ac3] sys_ioctl+0x56/0x79
[ 234.580119] [81009c72] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
-Ilyes
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Kyle for making it available!
-Ilyes
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Kyle McMartin k...@mcmartin.ca
a term open for churning code is part (or
a possible user-case) of the desktop experience :)
-Ilyes
2010/11/17 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com
Hi,
2010/11/16 Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com:
Hi,
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/11/16/1330233/The-200-Line-Linux-Kernel-Patch
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:56 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 19:30 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
[...]
Interesting idea. Note that I've _just_ released the stable GTK+ 3.0.0.
We could think
Hi,
Removing PackageKit In Fedora 14 was easy and painless since it causes up to
5 packages, all *really* related to PackageKit in the form of a yum-plugin
and few other things.
On Fedora 15, trying to yum remove PackageKit causes the system to attempt
removing up to 74 MB worth of software,
Hi,
I filed a bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699263
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699263-Ilyes
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 24.04.2011 20:04, schrieb Ilyes Gouta:
Hi,
Removing PackageKit In Fedora 14
wrote:
On 04/25/2011 12:36 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Rahul,
If you aren't actively using the GNOME or KDE frontend, just remove
those and leave the
framework as it is.
That was tough :)
AFAIK (and I might be wrong) deep PacakgeKit integration wasn't
clearly mentioned in Fedora
Hi Matej,
Christoph Wickert provided an analysis in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699263
-Ilyes
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 25.4.2011 10:35, Rahul Sundaram napsal(a):
You can [...] remove PackageKit-yum-plugin.
Unfortunately not
Hi Matěj,
Ceterum autem censeo, Carthaginem esse delendam.
So this is Latin, what does it mean?
Btw, I'm from Tunisia (Tunis), the country of Carthage (historically) ;)
-Ilyes
On 26 avr. 2011, at 06:57, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 25.4.2011 21:26, Ilyes Gouta napsal
Hi Reindl,
You could also build it from sources. You should already have the
latest kernel and the X server updates, compiling the intel driver
will then produce a couple of user-space shared libraries that you can
place in /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers. That's it.
-Ilyes
2011/6/12 Reindl
Hi,
Zotero is a referencing tool that helps the user collecting,
maintaining and generating citations from research papers and so on.
Since version 3.0, Zotero has also been available as a standalone
executable (previously a Firefox plugin) based on the XULRunner
runtime; and I'm thinking about
Hi,
I'm reposting this e-mail, slightly edited and with a much more clear
subject, highlighting the issue.
Hi,
Zotero is a referencing tool that helps the user collecting,
maintaining and generating citations from research papers and so on.
Since version 3.0, Zotero has also been available as
/discussion/23104/packaging-zotero-for-gnulinux-distributions/#Item_0).
Alright, I'm then proceeding with the packaging.
-Ilyes
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 07:47:32AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Ilyes Gouta wrote:
What's
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 02:51:52PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Alright, I'm then proceeding with the packaging.
I've opened this ticket with the Fedora Packaging Committee. I don't know
that it belongs
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 02:51:52PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Alright, I'm then proceeding with the packaging.
I've opened
Hi,
I read a recent Fedora rawhide report and found that mesa is now at
8.1 (master @ upstream), but then couldn't fetch the Fedora branch
using fedpkg, as I usually do.
$ fedpkg switch-branch f17(OK)
$ fedpkg switch-branch master(OK, still has the mesa-20120424 snapshot)
$ fedpkg
The .spec file clearly states Version 8.1, sorry for the noise.
-Ilyes
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I read a recent Fedora rawhide report and found that mesa is now at
8.1 (master @ upstream), but then couldn't fetch the Fedora branch
using
Hi,
http://blog.macromates.com/2012/textmate-2-at-github/
TextMate 2 is (for now) placed under GPL3.
Source code is available at github: https://github.com/textmate/textmate
How about packaging it for Fedora?
-Ilyes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
?
-Ilyes
in here. Just we need packages and It can be compile it. And If It's become
open-source just MAC OSX. Yes then you right It won't be compile because of
OS X's Cocoa
On 10 August 2012 02:25, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
The Frameworks/Oak* code looks like it calls to few
-C and Cocoa bits .. Maybe they can be
ported?
I never ported OS X apps so We need check source and Cocoa syntax for
making sure.
On 10 August 2012 02:45, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Onuralp SEZER
thunderbir...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Well
Hi,
In other words,should we have to push this package into fedora?(if build
successfully?)
Building TM2's code base for Linux is the most difficult part of the
effort; as it (may) involve interacting with many bleeding-edge s/w
components such as clang, Objective-C, and probably GNUstep for
Hi,
While gedit is nice, it is a GTK+ app. Do we actually have a decent
selection of open source text editors for the GNUStep environment? As
far as I know, we don't. TextMate would target a different group of
people, those who use the NeXTSTEP/GNUStep environment.
Ehm, ... does anybody
Hi Gerry,
Try contacting the main dev. mailing-list of DirectFB. I'm sure you'll get
an answer there.
Btw, DirectFB-1.5.3 is rather old, DirectFB-1.6.1 is rather the latest
stable release.
-Ilyes
On Aug 28, 2012 1:04 AM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 08/24/2012 06:56 PM, Gerry Reno
Gerry,
You could also use DirectFB's X11 system module, so that you can run
DirectFB-based applications in a usual X11 window. You can tell
DirectFB so by using the DFBARGS environment variable:
$ export DFBARGS=system=x11,mode=1280x800
(probably also w/ disable-module=gl)
Hi,
I'm getting the following errors, when attempting to build llvm-3.1
(from f18) on my Fedora 17 setup.
In file included from APInt.cpp:16:
In file included from
/home/ilyes/fedora-scm/llvm/llvm-3.1.src/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:18:
In file included from
...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Ilyes Gouta wrote, at 09/01/2012 11:06 PM +9:00:
Hi,
I'm getting the following errors, when attempting to build llvm-3.1
(from f18) on my Fedora 17 setup.
In file included from
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/iterator:63:
In file
Hi Lars,
Indeed! I removed an older clang-3.0 package before rebuilding the f18 set.
Cool. The builds should now complete then.
-Ilyes
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Lars Seipel lars.sei...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 01 September 2012 15:06:40 Ilyes Gouta wrote:
and this is with gcc
Hi,
This is to reboot the discussion about: why not also building the
libgbm part of Mesa in Fedora?
Having it would make it easier to test Wayland and friends. Any
reasons on why not having it so far?
-Ilyes
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Any
Cool! That's what I want to be part of, too :)
Could these be installed on a Fedora 16?
Thanks,
-Ilyes
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 21:28 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
This is to reboot the discussion about: why not also building
Hi,
Google released a set of high quality fonts as open source and I'm
wondering of those can be packaged and included for/in the next Fedora
14. Would that be possible?
http://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/
-Ilyes Gouta
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
Hey Lennart,
So how fast is a systemd boot (with all the changes to the scripts)
compared to the current F13 setup? How about a ratio?
-Ilyes Gouta
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/23/2010 04:04 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
ATM everything
into the original ijg's code and get Fedora to
rebase on that unique source instead? That way ijg can test for any
regressions using their conformance tests.
Regards,
-Ilyes Gouta
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org wrote:
On 05/25/2010 10:09 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Why
. Would be nice if
we could build a kind of a whitelist where bci would be used against
this and that font and disabled otherwise.
-Ilyes Gouta
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2010-05-23 at 21:51 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 9
.
Also, one has to think about the applications that depend on it: what
if they break and/or require changes.
-Ilyes Gouta
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Ilyes Gouta wrote:
There is one strong point that libjpeg-{6b, 8ab} inherited since it's
been
+1
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Martin Sourada
martin.sour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:29 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 09:51:53PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
The patents for the former expired but apparently some fonts look
worse with it so we decided
Hi Adam,
it also contains bunch of
pure algorithmic enhancements so even if target platform doesn't
support MMX/SSE libjpeg-turbo is around 25% faster than original libjpeg.
Can you please give some details on this point?
-Ilyes Gouta
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Adam Tkac
routines which can be merged with the ijg's official libjpeg,
and I think we should push in that direction instead.
-Ilyes Gouta
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:51:56PM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Adam
Hi,
http://apple.slashdot.org/story/10/07/19/1524250/FreeType-Project-Cheers-TrueType-Patent-Expiration
Are we going to have it enabled for Fedora 14?
-Ilyes Gouta
On Wednesday, May 26, 2010, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:30:56PM +0200, Martin Sourada
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Juan Manuel Borges Caño
juanmabcm...@gmail.com wrote:
The packages built okay without the optional kernel module (to know,
linux-fusion is the one), if that turns to be
76 matches
Mail list logo
