Re: dnf-4.19.0 without filelists in Rawhide soon

On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 4:29 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > * Jan Kolarik: > > > From a Fedora user perspective, there won't be any changes in the way > > you operate the DNF package manager. The only difference is that > > typically there will be less metadata downloa

dnf-4.19.0 without filelists in Rawhide soon

Hello everyone, Just a heads up that a new DNF version (4.19.0) is on its way to Rawhide and is expected to land within the next several hours. This update brings a system-wide change related to not downloading filelists metadata by

Re: dnf-4.19.0 without filelists in Rawhide soon

already a tracking issue for this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263771. Jan On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:09 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > /usr/bin/BINARYNAME is part of the primary metadata AFAIK > > > Vít > > > Dne 14. 02. 24 v 10:49 Jan Kolarik napsal(a): > >

Re: dnf-4.19.0 without filelists in Rawhide soon

4, 2024 at 10:42 AM Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 9.02.2024 o 14:02, Jan Kolarik pisze: > > Just a heads up that a new DNF version (4.19.0) is on its way to Rawhide > > and is expected to land within the next several hours. This update > > brings a system-wide change &

Re: Feedback wanted: Testing side-tag for switching dnf5 in Rawhide

side-tag :) However, as I mentioned earlier, it hasn't been thoroughly tested yet; that's our goal for the upcoming months. Regards, Jan On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 7:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 11:42:57AM GMT, Jan Kolarik wrote: > > Hello Michael, > > > > Doe

Re: Feedback wanted: Testing side-tag for switching dnf5 in Rawhide

t. That's actually the purpose of this side-tag, to identify any gaps we may have missed while working on the switch. The 5.2.0.0 API changes aren't significant, there are though many ABI-breaking changes. Thanks, Jan On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 5:29 PM Maxwell G wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On Thu Apr 25,

Feedback wanted: Testing side-tag for switching dnf5 in Rawhide

Hello everyone, We've prepared a side-tag for testing Rawhide with dnf5 as the default package manager. Instructions for installing the packages from the side-tag can be found at the following link [1]. Please provide feedback in Bodhi or on this mailing list regarding the use cases you're

Re: Feedback wanted: Testing side-tag for switching dnf5 in Rawhide

Hi Mattia, Yep, there's a dnf5-testing COPR that serves exactly this purpose: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf5-testing. Jan On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 10:10 AM Mattia Verga via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Il 25/04/24 07:42, Jan K

Re: Feedback wanted: Testing side-tag for switching dnf5 in Rawhide

talled packages are fully updated. Jan On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 10:22 AM Michael J Gruber wrote: > Jan Kolarik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-04-25 07:42:10: > > Hello everyone, > > > > We've prepared a side-tag for testing Rawhide with dnf5 as the default > > package man

Re: Feedback wanted: Testing side-tag for switching dnf5 in Rawhide

date under testing). I fixed that, and now the tests pass. > Great, thanks! Regards, Jan On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 8:20 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2024-04-24 at 22:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-04-25 at 07:42 +0200, Jan Kolarik wrote: > > > Hello

dnf5 default switch and soname bump in Rawhide

Hi, Given the positive feedback on the testing side-tag , this is now moving into the stable along with the soname bump. Thanks for the feedback, everyone! Jan -- ___ devel mailing list --

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF 5 (System-Wide)

Hello Vit, I don't understand this. So if GS going to use DNF, therefore the same > cache etc, or not? Or what other metadata PackageKit downloads on top of > DNF? > Yes, it will ultimately utilize the same cache. The paragraph you referenced is extracted from the "Early access for developmental

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF 5 (System-Wide)

gards, Jan On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 7:11 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 03:46:47PM +, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > == Summary == > > Change the default package manager from dnf to dnf5. > > > > == Owner == > >

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF5 (system-wide)

Hi guys, the dnf-automatic command will be obsoleted. > Oh, sorry about that. This portion of the text was inadvertently altered during the review process. I've already corrected the text on the wiki. The dnf-automatic command will still be available, now provided as a plugin and functionally

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF 5 (System-Wide)

tack should be removed in Fedora 43. Jan On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 10:04 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 26. 03. 24 v 8:02 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 06:39:35AM +0100, Jan Kolarik wrote: > >> Previously, I had issues that migration from DNF4 to