On 11/07/2011 12:16 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 13:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
twaugh ghostscript
twaugh gutenprint
I've rebuilt these two.
Tim.
*/
(Apologies for replying to your reply, Tim, but I wasn't subscribed at
the start of this thread.)
I'm a graphviz upstream
Simo,
For the VPN scenario I've been happily using dnrd for some time.
I use it to steer DNS requests for mycompany.com to the
company's DNS servers, and all other DNS requests to the
external servers.
Unlike just adding the company DNS servers to /etc/resolv.conf,
this never uses the
Having thought about it, I don't think it's unreasonable to do a
which $PROG, and stick it into the hashbang. I think that's a
perfectly reasonable approach, with portability being the goal. The
problem I see here, is that Fedora's bash is compiled with the default
PATH placing a symlink,
On 06/26/2012 08:50 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com said:
The main caveat with per terminal settings is that
it might be desired to provide config options per terminal.
Though I suppose users can always override TERM in their
startup files in the
On 06/26/2012 06:54 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
.
The main caveat with per terminal settings is that
it might be desired to provide config options per terminal.
Though I suppose users can always override TERM in their
startup files in the unlikely case they need to change
back to 'xterm' for
On 08/23/2012 08:45 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 2012-08-23 15:12, Jon Ciesla wrote:
things in %doc shouldn't be things that affect run-time operation
True, but there are other considerations in favour of unversioned dirs
such as bookmarkability and general referenceability, consistency with
Caution (it might just be me, but just in case...)
I can no longer boot my Fedora 18, i686, virtual host this morning after
yum update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861130
I suspect, but can't verify quickly, either systemd or glibc.
John
--
devel mailing list
On 01/27/2012 08:10 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Hello Testers and rawhide Users,
Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The directories
/bin, /sbin, /lib, /lib64 will only be symlinks:
/bin → /usr/bin
/sbin → /usr/sbin
/lib → /usr/lib
/lib64 → /usr/lib64
Mostly
On 01/28/2012 06:48 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 5:57 PM, John Ellsonjohn.ell...@comcast.net wrote:
Another issue is that I have:
/bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
[1.796642] Kernel
On 01/27/2012 05:57 PM, John Ellson wrote:
On 01/27/2012 08:10 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Hello Testers and rawhide Users,
Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The
directories
/bin, /sbin, /lib, /lib64 will only be symlinks:
/bin → /usr/bin
/sbin → /usr/sbin
Can we just generate karma from a comment in bugzilla please? Having
to find some other weird place to indicate that a fix works for me is
a real pain.
John
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 03/16/2012 05:13 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 12:49 -0400, John Ellson a écrit :
Can we just generate karma from a comment in bugzilla please? Having
to find some other weird place to indicate that a fix works for me is
a real pain.
Have you tried fedora-easy-karma
Before I generate a bug report, could I get a second opinion on whether
this is a bug or a feature?
Console logins through gdm are not getting recorded in lastlog.
(Fedora 16)
John
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 04/16/2012 03:16 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 00:03 -0400, John Ellson wrote:
Before I generate a bug report, could I get a second opinion on whether
this is a bug or a feature?
Console logins through gdm are not getting recorded in lastlog.
(Fedora 16)
I think it is a bug
, and stderr. A small set of plug-ins are
distributed with NodeBrain to provide commonly needed features such as
peer-to-peer communication, log monitoring, event caching, and a
web browser interface for administrators.
I will be pleased to return the favor, if I can.
John Ellson
--
devel mailing list
; On July 20, 2017 at 6:47 AM Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:27:54 -0400 (EDT), John Ellson wrote:
>
> > Jaroslav Škarvada requested that i move the discussion from:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410366
>
Jaroslav Škarvada mailto:jskar...@redhat.com requested that i move the
discussion from:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410366
about unifying the graphviz .spec file with upstream, to this list.
Perhaps the unification objective is not attainable because of different
source rpm is at
http://graphviz.org/pub/graphviz/development/SRPMS/graphviz-2.41.20170720.1642-1.src.rpm
> On July 20, 2017 at 9:36 AM John Ellson <john.ell...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > Doubtful. It's a maintenance nightmare
> OK, but I'm raising this issue to try
18 matches
Mail list logo
