On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler f...@redhat.com wrote:
ajax wrote:
[...]
If this is meant to cover administrative binaries that have no
privilege escalation pieces of their own, merely run by root, then
what makes them different from any other /bin/* program that a root
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Anyone knows what's the holdup with the Samba update (CVE-2012-1182)? No
new builds have been done or queued up recently AFAICT...
There's a BZ open, I'll look into getting n update out ASAP.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:42 AM, yersinia yersinia.spi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:20 PM, devzero2000 pinto.e...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com
wrote
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:20 AM, devzero2000 pinto.e...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com
wrote:
Anyone knows what's the holdup with the Samba update (CVE-2012-1182
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 12.04.2012 03:24, schrieb Bojan Smojver:
Anyone knows what's the holdup with the Samba update (CVE-2012-1182)? No
new builds have been done or queued up recently AFAICT...
this is really scary
CentOS pushed
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 09:52 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 12.04.2012 03:24, schrieb Bojan Smojver:
Anyone knows what's the holdup
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci cagh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone!
I would like to call your attention to the following bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771262
What is required is a build of a small and simple package for EPEL.
However, I am unable
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Caghan Demirci cagh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jon,
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci cagh...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to call your attention to the following bug
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Caghan Demirci cagh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jon,
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci cagh...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com wrote:
This is feedback vs the current version of the following web page:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements_%28Draft%29
FESCo and affected groups should have the ability to review
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com wrote:
Due to lack of time I'd like to orphan a few of my packages, being:
python-wokkel
I took this.
-J
They're all low-maintenance packages with a release maybe once or twice a
year.
Kind regards,
Ruben
--
devel
This affects the following:
libnids
suricata
syslog-ng
Whose owners are CCd and which I'll handle rebuilding unless the
owners would rather.
Thanks,
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:15:12 +0200
Jan Horak jho...@redhat.com wrote:
Why it takes 12-20 hours to submit critical security update to
updates-testing repository? Do we have such long queue or is the push
done regularly in
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:58:58 -0500
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
Slightly OT, will it be much longer before the next f17 push, or are
we waiting on Beta?
Stable f17 push? yes, thats waiting until after we have
Bug already filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807767
Might not be cups-specific, as the corresponding f17 cups-libs does
provide libcups.so.2.
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Anthony Sasadeusz sasad...@umbc.edu wrote:
A package that was just building yesterday doesn't seem to build anymore
because of libcups.so.2().
Here is part of the root.log.
Getting requirements for jboss-web-7.0.13-3.fc18.src
DEBUG util.py:257: --
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:27:57 -0500
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Anthony Sasadeusz
sasad...@umbc.edu wrote:
A package that was just building yesterday doesn't seem to build
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
ti...@math.uh.edu wrote:
JO == Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com writes:
JO Yup - the default config in the f18 httpd does load
JO mod_access_compat, and I don't see a problem with shipping like
JO that.
This is good news, because even if we
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:17 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Could I suggest that, if FESCo is going to have a different chair each
week, you at least have an SOP for arranging the meetings, so that this
kind of thing
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:19 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:17 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Could I suggest
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:48 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:19 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 14:33 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
If you think this is a good example, I'll edit the page to fix those
issues.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-March/163885.html
I'd
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
Hi,
the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay?
--
Regards,
Heiko Adams
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
Hi,
the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay?
--
Regards
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
Am 23.03.2012 15:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
Hi,
the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
still missing
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
Am 23.03.2012 15:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
Hi,
the pidgin
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 03/23/2012 11:57 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
It passed for -testing but after submitting for stable[1] I got the
following:
FAIL] f18
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Darn... I was hoping that wouldn't bite me :) I'm assuming I can
ignore
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:37 +0100, Clément David wrote:
Hi,
Does someone know how to contact lkundrak ?
$ ./fedora_active_user.py --user lkundrak --email lkund...@v3.sk
Last login in FAS:
lkundrak 2012-03-20
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon, Brendan,
In yesterday's FESCo meeting I told you I'd make a list of specific issues
I have with the current proposal for ARM as a primary archictecture. There
are some places where I think the current proposal fails
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 04:37:17PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 15:19 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
4) All supported platforms must have kernels built from the Fedora
kernel SRPM and enabled by
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:55:41AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Matthew, can you add your initial list to the ticket as well, so we
have these starting places to refer to?
I was planning to after we'd had some
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/20/2012 08:24 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I think the speed of the build hardware should be also part of the
criteria,
as all primary architectures are built synchronously. GCC on x86_64/i686
currently builds often
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi again,
I want to thank you, and everyone else in FESCo for talking with us
yesterday, and for looking over the proposal. Bear in mind, it's a work
in progress. We intend to have broader conversations over the coming
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Brendan Conoboy wrote:
Our current build systems can turn GCC 4.7 around in about 24 hours.
The enterprise hardware we anticipate using will take that down to about
12 hours. If speed of build hardware is a
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
Only if you assume that high clock speed workloads are the only
important workloads. For highly parallellizable tasks, an ARM system
with tons of slower cores is a powerhouse. Think a db server
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 08:25:38AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi!
/me gave the mail a subject
Thanks! :)
Jon Ciesla wrote on 18.03.2012 23:33:
= New business =
[...]
#topic #822 F18 Feature: AE1000 USB
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804698
I'll be building this shortly, and I'll handle rebuilding the only
packages I found that require it, fife, manaworld and sear.
Thanks,
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-03-19)
===
Meeting started by limburgher at 18:00:23 UTC. The full logs are
available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-03-19/fesco.2012-03-19-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Jan Klepek jan.kle...@brandforge.sk wrote:
Hi,
I have relased ownership of Argus package for Fedora branches due to lack
of free time to take care about it.
EPEL branches already have owner.
What this will require from new maintainer?
Argus is not
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
* #830 F18 Feature: ARM as Primary Arch --
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraARM (limburgher,
18:44:13)
* LINK:
http
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST, 2:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #699 Proposal to remove the
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Perhaps and stupid question:
After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs:
Uploaded and added to .gitignore:
Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file
2012/3/15 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
On 03/14/2012 07:51 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEYkkeit...@redhat.com
wrote:
Red Hat (nee Gluster) is about to release glusterfs-3.2.6. It's a
bugfix
release. No API/ABI changes (in theory
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM, John Ellson john.ell...@comcast.net wrote:
Can we just generate karma from a comment in bugzilla please? Having to
find some other weird place to indicate that a fix works for me is a real
pain.
Typically the link to the Bodhi update is provided in the BZ. I
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com wrote:
Red Hat (nee Gluster) is about to release glusterfs-3.2.6. It's a bugfix
release. No API/ABI changes (in theory, I haven't done an exhaustive check.)
In f16 we released 3.2.5. Am I allowed to update it in f16 to
lzip just split out lziprecover. If someone would be so kind as to do
this quick review, I'll take one in return.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803018
Thanks!
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
lzip just split out lziprecover. If someone would be so kind as to do
this quick review, I'll take one in return.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga mattia.ve...@tiscali.it wrote:
Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
Stephen Gallaghersgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 12.03.2012 17:44, schrieb Paul Howarth:
On 03/12/2012 03:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
working since many motnhs with:
subversion-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
subversion-libs-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Martin Erik Werner
martinerikwer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 12:21 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga mattia.ve...@tiscali.it
wrote:
Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 12.03.2012 18:46, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating
jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
No, it looks like it stayed in testing because
2012/3/7 Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz:
Hello,
I have orphaned foobillard: I don't have any time to fix reported
bugs, there hasn't been a release since 2008, and the upstream site
has been missing for at least 9 months. If you are interested, please
take it.
Mirek
Taken. I love that
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com wrote:
Fabian Deutsch wrote:
because I no longer use them I am orpahning
dbh
Took dbh.
-J
muParser
scidavis
I use muParser in Meshlab. I'm not a C++ whiz (as witnessed by my not yet
having figured out how to make Meshlab
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
dbh-1.0.24-9.fc12
I just took this and am working on the FTBFS
nightview-0.3.3-2.fc14
Lubo maintains this, I may request ownership if I can fix the FTBFS.
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't have the time to maintain pyusb, and it isn't used by any other
package I maintain.
$ repoquery -q --whatrequires pyusb
garmin-sync-0:0.3-4.fc16.noarch
nxt_python-0:0.7-8.fc15.noarch
Taken.
Tim.
*/
--
devel
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2012-02-27, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be better to walk through this list [1] which was designed
specifically with PP participation in mind as discussed with Toshio
during the F16 development
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 08:42 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Seconded.
And if anyone has gcc47 or libpng FTBFS issues, this is a great place
to ask for help on them.
Well, pulseaudio doesn't currently build, and that's
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 08:42 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Seconded.
And if anyone has gcc47 or libpng FTBFS issues, this is a great place
to ask
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 20:22:56 -0800,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Well, pulseaudio doesn't currently build, and that's preventing us from
fixing the bug that audio doesn't work in F17. The problem is
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
So far there is only an f18 bluez build. That will work for my testing,
but that won't let me easily to an f17 build.
Nottingham appears to be getting an F17 bluez rebuild
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
Are the same packages going to get automatically rebuilt in rawhide as
well as f17?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Yes, when they've finished.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
I am sending this because, we have a lot of FTBFS packages which I have
see at least one blog griping about, I accidentally fixed something that
was blocking other work (in the sense that I didn't know that other work
that
Hey!
As you're aware, as of F15 we changed our default init system from
sysvinit to systemd. But we have lots and lots of packages with
daemons, and not all have thus far been migrated. Some maintainers
haven't responded, some are too busy, some aren't sure how to go about
it. In many cases,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Please forgive my lack of knowledge, but could you please provide a
link to a .iso ? :)
Thx.
2012/2/21 Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org:
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Alpha Release
2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
?
This is the first major release from a few years and has some nice features.
Not likely this late in the cycle, though the timing is
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga
l...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon 13 Feb 2012 04:55:03 AM PST, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Have you filed a bug against that package to alert the maintainer?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
If not, that would be a great first step.
Done. https
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga
l...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hello,
Upstream synfig has updated ETL to 0.04.14. The new version of synfig and
synfigstudio depend on the recent update of that package. Is it possible to
update it?
Have you filed a bug against that package
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Adam Miller
maxamill...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I'm planning for orphan ldtp, there's only one bug against it and that's
that it should be migrated to noarch since its written in pure python
these days. The current version of the package in the repo is a
2012/2/10 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
On 02/10/2012 01:17 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Ok, then my advice to you is: Stop shifiting around responsibilities and
start to work. Team up with others and start working on migrating the
remaining not-converted services.
Excuse me?
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
In any case, badmouthing systemd for an upgrade bug where it actually
works fine *when you're really running F15* doesn't seem right. I
wouldn't have
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been yum upgrading since FC1. I didn't see that. I was also
running a mysql server.
Maybe you should file a bug report noting that yum upgrade
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2012 18:49, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
In any case, badmouthing systemd
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
Dammit. I knew I was doing something wrong. I'd better set those
machines on fire.
youtube video or it didnt happen.
No video camera. But I have
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 11:02 -0800, Scott Doty wrote:
On 02/10/2012 10:57 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 10:39 -0800, Scott Doty wrote:
On 02/10/2012 10:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
You're not
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2012 20:01, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
The IT industry is quite competitive and it advances faster than almost
any other industry. The idea of Hey, let's stop all progress for now,
and spend a year on
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2012 20:35, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 10.02.2012 20:01, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
The IT industry is quite competitive
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2012 20:42, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 10.02.2012 20:35, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
It's long time since PCRE (Perl-Compatible Regular Expression) library
has changed API or ABI. Version 8.30 is different. Besides UTF-16
support, the incompatible changes are described by upstream with these
words:
. The
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2012-02-09, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
Result is pcre library has changed SONAME from libpcre.so.0 to
libpcre.so.1. Other librararies
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 09:31:50AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi all,
Ruby 1.9.3 has finally made it into Rawhide, there are still few more
packages that need to be built, but otherwise the transitions was
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 7.2.2012 16:37, Jon Ciesla napsal(a):
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Darryl L. Piercedpie...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 09:31:50AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi all,
Ruby 1.9.3 has finally made
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 7.2.2012 17:27, Jon Ciesla napsal(a):
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Vít Ondruchvondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 7.2.2012 16:37, Jon Ciesla napsal(a):
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Darryl L. Piercedpie
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:10 PM, darrell pfeifer darrel...@gmail.com wrote:
If you continue to repeat the eating babies myth then it will become
self-fulfilling.
I would humbly suggest that use of future tense is that
PIDA, in f16 and beyond, has broken deps:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754673
So to fix this, I need to update to the latest upstream:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651853
But this release need python-flatland and pygtkhelpers. I got
python-flatland into Fedora.
Neither package has built since F15, and while there's a new patchset
to apply, I don't quite have time to get it to work. Unless someone
wants to get them to build, or take ownership, I'll retire them
Friday, 2/3.
Thanks,
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@pobox.com wrote:
I am trying to retire package blktool. This is what dead.package says
locally: Tool never really caught on with users, or kept up with the
times.
It is retired in the package database, but when trying to fedpkg push
Took libmodelfile and sage.
-J
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been updating ettercap, and I got a build working on my local
f16. Then I built it in local rawhide mock, and it was fine. So I
committed and built for rawhide, f16, and f15. Sometimes it worked,
and sometimes
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been updating ettercap, and I got a build working on my local
f16. Then I built it in local rawhide mock, and it was fine. So I
committed
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:23:14AM +, mike cloaked wrote:
Fedora would appear to be out of line in not taking on board the
potential user base for a rolling release version. For servers there
would be huge
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/24/2012 02:06 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 24/01/12 20:52, David wrote:
A question please? Two related ones actually.
What are you going to name your rolling Linux release? And when can we
expect to see it?
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Dave Riches davi...@ultracar.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
For a variety of reasons I have decided to orphan my packages. There are
some interesting ones in here, so should be alot of fun.
django-dpaste -- dpaste is a code pastebin application using Django.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
Hello.
We have forbidden bundle libs.
But what status if from one project copied some source files into another
and it is not lib to link it?
I work under packaging new version of qutim [1] which is under GPLv3+ and
I took libxdg-basedir for xmoto.
-J
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 01/13/2012 05:11 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 17.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
I want to retire shmpps in Fedora 16+, leaving it in F15 and EPEL. I
haven't retired a package, so I wanted to double check the process. I
should just retire the F16 and devel branches and that will leave the
rest active,
I appear to have miscounted, it was my first chairing experience. My apologies.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
* #720 kay - provenpackager for /usr move (limburgher, 18:07:22)
* AGREED: #topic #720 kay - provenpackager for /usr move (limburgher,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 15:21:11 -0500,
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Of course, a whitelist might be a better idea. Maybe we only
allow .tar.gz, .tar.bz2 and .zip to be uploaded this way and make
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 17:44:12 +,
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Go for it, I think it makes sense. For those that don't support 1.5
they can stay against the compat in the mean time.
Based on the
301 - 400 of 582 matches
Mail list logo
