Re: heads up: planned changes of Git (split, credentials replacements) in rawhide

On 02/14/2017 01:58 PM, Petr Stodulka wrote: > Hello, > we are planning some changes in Git in rawhide according to some > changes in upstream. I want to apply all changes during this week > yet, but in case you have some recommendation or propmts to planned > changes, you can yet give me feedback

Re: HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

On 02/02/2017 10:04 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: > On 02.02.2017 08:49, Kalev Lember wrote: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418572 is the review for >> compat-libwebp05 package I put together just now. >> > I see the review is already taken care of. H

Re: HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

On 02/02/2017 08:12 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > Hi Sandro, > > Thanks for working on this! The number of packages affected by the > soname bump is quite big though and I think it needs a compat package. > We probably wouldn't have to keep it around for a long time, but ma

Re: HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

On 02/01/2017 06:59 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > I'm about to fire off the libwebp and mingw-libwebp 0.6.0 updates, which > include soname bumps. > > I'm rebuilding all of the dependent packages: Hi Sandro, Thanks for working on this! The number of packages affected by the soname bump is

Re: F26 System Wide Change: GNOME 3.24

On 01/31/2017 08:31 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote: > 2017-01-31 20:24 GMT+01:00 Matthew Miller : >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 02:53:13PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >>> == Detailed Description == >>> Tentative new features for 3.24 include: >>> >>> * Updated System Settings panels:

Re: Heads up: today's rawhide gnome-shell crashes on startup

On Jan 19, 2017 18:06, "Adam Williamson" <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 14:57 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > The fix is to update to latest mozjs31 build, mozjs31-31.5.0-1.fc26, > available from https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?bu

Heads up: today's rawhide gnome-shell crashes on startup

The fix is to update to latest mozjs31 build, mozjs31-31.5.0-1.fc26, available from https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=834907 Hope this helps save debugging time for someone. -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Applications with AppData and not visible in the software center

On 01/05/2017 12:56 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > * nextcloud-client (maybe fixed in distgit) > * owncloud-client I just pushed fixes for nextcloud-client and owncloud-client. They had the same issue where the desktop file and appdata file names didn't match up. -- Kalev

Re: /usr/share/metainfo now ok

On 12/22/2016 02:49 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> A quick heads up that we've fixed the appstream generator that we use in >> Fedora and it now processes appdata files in /usr/share

/usr/share/metainfo now ok

Hi, A quick heads up that we've fixed the appstream generator that we use in Fedora and it now processes appdata files in /usr/share/metainfo as well. I know some packages in Fedora have been patched to use /usr/share/appdata instead; we now process both directories and it's no longer necessary

Re: cross-compiler support?

On 12/19/2016 11:59 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hi, > > I found only one cross-compiler in repos -- arm-none-eabi-gcc-cs There's also two mingw cross compilers: mingw32-gcc and mingw64-gcc. Not sure if that's what you were looking for :) -- Kalev ___

Re: f25+: vala 0.34.x+ bug causing .vapi file generation for ALL CURRENT PACKAGE BUILDS to be possibly faulty

On 12/01/2016 07:48 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > I has come to my attention that - since the update to vala from the > 0.34.x series has made it into the fedora 25(+) repositories - every > package that generates .vapi files during build might have done so > incorrectly, because of the following

Re: Nautilus usability

On 11/29/2016 09:08 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > About gnome bugzilla: > Once I had reported a bug in gnome-software, and it took almost a year for > someone to respond at all. Really? I fixed the bug 2 days after you had filed it, https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748582 -- Kalev

Re: F25 GNOME Shell notification locked up hard for some time

On 11/29/2016 02:52 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:39:30 +0100, Felipe Borges wrote: > >> sorry about that. >> >> Could you please report the bug at bugzilla.gnome.org/ > > Is it an upstream bug or downstream bug? > Does it work flawlessly for you? > > Here, it seems, any

Re: Recommended upgrade procedure for >1 release upgrades

On 11/22/2016 04:44 PM, Kamil Paral wrote: >> OK, so we have two cases here: >> >> 1) gnome-software as is currently in F23 and F24 >> >> 2) gnome-software future releases >> >> For (1), the version of gnome-software in F23 and F24 currently doesn't >> have the UI in place to allow choosing which

Re: Recommended upgrade procedure for >1 release upgrades

On 11/17/2016 07:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, folks! > > While looking into an issue with how GNOME Software decides which > release to offer an upgrade to when there's more than one plausible > candidate, I noticed something interesting: we do not actually have a > policy on what we

Re: Recommended upgrade procedure for >1 release upgrades

On 11/18/2016 06:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On 2016-11-18 08:30 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> Actually, I am inclined to believe only packages which are replaced by >> others within Fedora or are definitely dead can be obsoleted. Package >> which a just being retired for current/temporary lack

Re: Recommended upgrade procedure for >1 release upgrades

and both PackageKit and DNF these days use the > same underlying dependency resolvers. So they're a lot closer than they used > to be. > > The remaining issues are basically that they don't share a history database or > local file cache, but I think that's being worked on For F26 or F2

Re: [HEADS UP] Retiring mozjs31

On 11/14/2016 11:54 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hi, > > At this point, nothing uses mozjs31, so I'm going to retire it in > Rawhide and orphan for F24 / F25. It was used by 0 A.D. (the reason > why we packaged it), but nowadays upstream migrated to mozjs38. Hi Igor, Can you transfer it to me

Re: RPM %changelog?

On 10/25/2016 09:25 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > What I often do is write write the changelog entry in a way that can be > used as the summary line of dist-git, and then the rest of the commit > message explains the details in the level of detail necessary. > > The same would easily go the other

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Broken dependencies: vim-syntastic

On 10/03/2016 08:53 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Even more interesting, %arm is not on ExclusiveArch list for > 'vim-syntastic-d' package, while the build on arm machine succeeded: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15919447 I drive-by fixed the ldc package on arm last night (I

Re: [SO-NAME BUMP] jsoncpp 1.7.7 comes to rawhide (and maybe to fc25)

On 10/04/2016 10:18 AM, Björn Esser wrote: > All packages have been rebuilt, except for 'paraview', which FTBFS [1] > [2]. It seems it needs a little patching for some small change in > jsoncpp. I will do that during the next few days. Have you had a chance to look at this? In addition to

Re: Someone needs to stop texlive madness!!!

On 10/15/2016 08:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:39:35AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> * Perhaps we could split things up a little. I have often wondered if >> just splitting things in 5-10 packages could help, but I would >> absolutely defer to Tom here since he's

Re: rawhide vs koji f26 builds

On 10/12/2016 02:47 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > Hi, > > I have a glusterfs-3.7.16 scratch build that's failing in koji f26 builds > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=16059122=build.log=-4000 > > > Yesterday (11 October) I downloaded and installed the current rawhide >

GNOME 3.22.1 megaupdate

Hi all, It's GNOME 3.22.1 this week! You all know the drill; if you are helping with builds, please do: $ fedpkg build --target f25-gnome and I'll take care of submitting the builds to Bodhi later this week in a single megaupdate. Thanks, Kalev ___

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-10-07)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-10-07) === Meeting started by kalev at 16:00:29 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-10-07/fesco.2016-10-07-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-10-07)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-10-07 16:00 UTC' Links to all tickets below

Re: [HEADS UP] Gnome 3.22 update for Fedora 25 is broken!

On 09/23/2016 09:57 PM, Heiko Adams wrote: > Hi, > after updating to Gnome 3.22 it seems that at least evolution[1] and > epiphany[2] are broken but I'm affraid the problem affects any app which > deals with html conten. > > So please unpush that update and fix the problem ASAP. > > [1]

GNOME 3.22.0 megaupdate

Hi all, It's GNOME 3.22.0 final release this week! You all know the drill; if you are helping with builds, please do: $ fedpkg build --target f25-gnome and I'll take care of submitting the builds to Bodhi later this week in a single megaupdate. Thanks, Kalev

GNOME 3.21.92 megaupdate

Hi all, It's GNOME 3.21.92 release this week and we're going to do a megaupdate this time as well. If you are helping with building, please use the f25-gnome build target: $ fedpkg build --target f25-gnome I'll take care of submitting all the builds to Bodhi later this week. Thanks, Kalev --

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-09-09)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-09-09) === Meeting started by kalev at 16:00:26 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-09-09/fesco.2016-09-09-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-09-09)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-09-09 16:00 UTC' Links to all tickets below

Re: Unversioned and >/=/>= obsoletes

On 09/02/2016 06:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 09/02/2016 12:54 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote: >> Stephen Gallagher writes: >> >>> On 09/02/2016 07:14 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: * Weird obsoletes (broken) "krb5-server" has "Obsoletes:

Re: Unversioned and >/=/>= obsoletes

On 09/02/2016 02:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 09/02/2016 07:55 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >> On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 13:14 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >>> * Package replacement >>> Package "storaged" has "Obsoletes: udisks2" -> take latest version >>> from koji (2.1.7-1) and make Obsoletes

Re: BuildRequires on obsoleted packages provided by Python

On 08/31/2016 02:10 PM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > Hello all, > > While checking out the SPEC file of python, it seems there were some packages > that, while separate at some point, they got included in python's stdlib and > then obsoleted as standalone packages (thus to cope with the

GNOME 3.21.91 megaupdate

Hi all, It's GNOME 3.21.91 release this week and we're going to do a megaupdate this time as well. If you are helping with building, please use the f25-gnome build target: $ fedpkg build --target f25-gnome I'll take care of submitting all the builds to Bodhi later this week. Thanks, Kalev --

Re: GNOME 3.21.90 megaupdate

On 08/22/2016 03:07 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that gnome-control-center is missing from the megaupdate ? Yes; this is because the control center stack is missing upstream releases for .90. -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: broken dependencies due to libgexiv2 python subpackages rename

On 08/22/2016 01:56 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hello, Kalev. > It would've been nice if you had contacted the maintainers of affected > packages before renaming the python subpackages of libgexiv2: Sorry, I didn't find anything using them when I checked. My bad. Thanks for fixing

Re: GNOME 3.21.90 megaupdate

It's in F25 updates-testing now: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7cbdc6e228 -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

GNOME 3.21.90 megaupdate

Hi all, It's GNOME 3.21.90 release this week. As we are deep in the Alpha freeze in Fedora, this will stay in updates-testing for a while until the freeze is lifted and floodgates open again. We have koji side tag to collect the builds. If you are helping with building, please use the f25-gnome

Re: Pending ACLs

On 08/06/2016 05:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 03:48:36PM +0100, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 08:41:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know >>> what they are supposed to

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-06-03)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-06-03) === Meeting started by kalev at 16:00:13 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-06-03/fesco.2016-06-03-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-06-03)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-06-03 16:00 UTC' Links to all tickets below

Re: gnome-software integration

On 06/01/2016 06:34 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: > Would it be better for me to leave only a single appdata.xml file, but > move it to the xiphos-gtk2 package, then it would be exposed to > gnome-software users? Then anyone wanting the GTK3 build could install > through a package manager instead of

Re: gnome-software integration

On 06/01/2016 05:43 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > >> xiphos-gtk2.rpm: >> /usr/bin/xiphos-gtk2 >> /usr/share/appdata/xiphos-gtk2.appdata.xml >> /usr/share/applications/xiphos-gtk2.desktop >> >> xiphos-gtk3.rpm: >> /usr/bin/xiphos-gtk3 >> /usr/share/appdata/xiphos-gtk3.appdata.xml >>

Re: gnome-software integration

On 06/01/2016 05:24 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: > I'm looking into a bug filed against one of my applications (BZ: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330096). The complaint is > that the gnome-software application picks up the xiphos-common package > when the user tries to install from

Re: Packages to be Retired because of Broken Dependencies (2016-05-27)

On 05/27/2016 10:53 AM, opensou...@till.name wrote: > The following packages have broken dependencies and will be retired > on 2016-05-31 (Final Freeze for Fedora 24) unless someone fixes them. If you > know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a > proper reason: >

Re: corebird incorrectly removes sqlite-libs when uninstalling

On 05/24/2016 02:37 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 24 May 2016 08:20, "Kalev Lember" <kalevlem...@gmail.com > <mailto:kalevlem...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> On 05/23/2016 10:12 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: >> > I opened a ticket on this: >>

Re: corebird incorrectly removes sqlite-libs when uninstalling

On 05/23/2016 10:12 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > I opened a ticket on this: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338198 > > > and I have sent a message to klember who just put out the new release > on koji yesterday with the same issue. > > I don't know how long it has been like

Re: F24 Beta status

On 04/27/2016 08:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 09:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on with F24 Beta: we have two outstanding accepted blockers that need fixing before we can spin a 'release candidate':

Re: How to fix broken dependency in orphaned package that FTBFS in F24

On 04/07/2016 02:26 PM, Tomas Hozza wrote: Hi all. We pushed an update for log4cplus in F24+ [1]. It is a rebase and one of the dependent packages is "pion-net". The problem is that pion-net does not build on F24+, which stops us from pushing update on F24 which would not break dependencies.

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-01)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-04-01) === Meeting started by kalev at 17:00:38 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-04-01/fesco.2016-04-01-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-01)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-04-01 17:00 UTC' Links to all tickets below

Re: [HEADS UP] libgit2 bump to 0.24.0

On 03/22/2016 01:29 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:46:58PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: On 03/21/2016 07:28 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: This time it was easy. They didn't break anything. Should I build it in f24-gnome? Because libgit2-glib requires it and itself

Re: [HEADS UP] libgit2 bump to 0.24.0

On 03/21/2016 07:28 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: This time it was easy. They didn't break anything. Should I build it in f24-gnome? Because libgit2-glib requires it and itself it required by some other gnome packages. I think it's easier if we can do the gnome and libgit2 updates separately. Can

GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

Hi all, It's GNOME 3.19.92 release this week. As we are deep in the Alpha freeze in Fedora, this will stay in updates-testing for a while until the freeze is lifted and floodgates open a again. We have koji side tag to collect all the builds before submitting them to Bodhi. If you are helping

Re: Please update Rygel in F23 ?

On 03/04/2016 03:51 AM, linux guy wrote: > 28.3 has most of the fixes that I want to test. A build of it would be > appreciated. Here you go, https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/rygel-0.28.3-1.fc23 -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Gnome in Rawhide broken

On 03/03/2016 03:51 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 3.3.2016 v 15:42 Kalev Lember napsal(a): Should be fixed in gnome-terminal-3.19.91-1.fc24, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=741368 The broken ABI was in vte291, so how could possibly update of gnome-terminal fix

Re: Gnome in Rawhide broken

On 03/03/2016 03:37 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: After update, my gnome-terminal failed to start. The journal contained following message: Mar 03 15:01:17 localhost org.gnome.Terminal[1965]:*/usr/libexec/gnome-**terminal**-server: symbol lookup error: /usr/libexec/gnome-**terminal**-server:

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Graphical System Upgrades

On 02/03/2016 03:16 PM, Heiko Adams wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2016, 15:00 +0100 schrieb Jan Kurik: >> First supported version is going to >> be Fedora 23->24 upgrades. > Does this mean the changes will be backported to GNOME Software 3.18? No. The plan is to put GNOME Software 3.20 in F23,

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Graphical System Upgrades

On 02/03/2016 03:11 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 03:00:53PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >> We'll implement a graphical user interface for system upgrades. The >> implementation will use PackageKit and the libhif stack as a backend >> and GNOME Software as a frontend. First

Re: Xulrunner - intent to remove from Fedora 24

On 01/27/2016 07:28 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > As for building NPAPI plugins, there's a separate project that only > ships the required headers. I've forgotten what it's called, but Debian > uses it to build their NPAPI plugins and it probably needs just > packaging up if the pla

Re: Xulrunner - intent to remove from Fedora 24

On 01/27/2016 06:26 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 09:11 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote: >> Will exist a browser which can run this plugin? Firefox is going to >> remove NPAPI plugin support (it's disabled by default now), Chrome >> already did so. Does Web (Epiphany) run

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-01-22)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-01-22) === Meeting started by kalev at 17:02:29 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-01-22/fesco.2016-01-22-17.02.log.html . Meeting summary

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-01-22)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-01-22 17:00 UTC' Links to all tickets below

Re: Can I enable C++11 to build a package?

On 01/13/2016 03:21 PM, Björn Esser wrote: Am 13.01.2016 um 15:06 schrieb Ankur Sinha: On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 13:08 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: Yes. Thanks Michael. Follow up question: What is the cleanest way of doing this - replacing -ansi with -std=c++11 in %{_optflags} while using the

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Astronomy Spin

On 01/11/2016 12:51 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: I'm struggling to see the point in doing this as a Fedora Spin, as opposed to just providing a yum 'Astronomy' group that can be installed on any Fedora deployment ? It would seem to be useful to a broader set of users that way. Alternatively

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Astronomy Spin

On 01/11/2016 03:16 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: I would have done that even without a benefit to KDE. Everything improving users experience is welcome ;) Awesome, thanks :) -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

On 01/11/2016 03:46 PM, Jan Kurik wrote: = Proposed System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NewRpmDBFormat Change owner(s): * Florian Festi < ffesti AT redhat DOT com > Change format of the RPM Database from Berkeley DB to RPM's own

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20151216 compose check report

On 12/16/2015 11:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: only it was too late - by the time he posted that, the new gsettings- desktop-schemas was already in the repos. So all the Workstation upgrade tests fail; the upgrade process itself works fine, but GDM does not start properly in the upgraded system.

Re: Some comps cleanup

On 12/07/2015 11:42 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Can somebody explain me why Rawhide comps are called F24? Trying to use > "git blame" and surprisingly (or not that much), almost every line was > created by Kevin Fenzi. Why we are using git if we break the history > this way? How can I find what was

Re: Updating cppformat in Rawhide?

On 12/03/2015 09:57 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: > My hope was to maintain source compatibility and not binary > compatibility. For example, the header file moved from: > /usr/include/format.h > to: > /usr/include/cppformat/cppformat.h > > I was planning on updating the stable release with a symlink

Re: Updating cppformat in Rawhide?

On 12/03/2015 07:13 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: > cppformat 2.0.0 was released [1] and it has several breaking changes. In > addition to API/ABI changes, the soname changed and the header file was > relocated. Since this package was recently added to Fedora, I don't know > if any packages depend on

Re: criterion proposal: upgrading across 2 releases

On 12/01/2015 12:45 PM, Kamil Paral wrote: > Hello, > > a week ago I proposed a new release criterion for upgrading across two > releases (e.g. from F21 to F23 directly, skipping F22). As this was never > officially supported (even though users were probably unaware of this fact, > because we

Re: python-cycler has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:

On 11/15/2015 03:14 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > python-cycler has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > On x86_64: > python3-cycler-0.9.0-4.fc24.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:3.4 > On i386: > python3-cycler-0.9.0-4.fc24.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:3.4 > On armhfp: >

Re: Failing builds on rawhide

On 11/13/2015 04:01 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > > still problems on rawhide/python3.5? > > RPM build errors: > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sPV9pz (%build) > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sPV9pz (%build) >

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

On 11/08/2015 10:17 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Felix Miata wrote: > >> For those without >> SSE2, Plasma 5 is completely unusable, but OK with any of the lightweigh > > . > > Qt5 (Gui and Declarative) pretty much requires sse2, and I/kde-sig asked > about pushing the minimum i686 fedora spec to

Re: git commits mess up

On 11/06/2015 02:01 PM, Germano Massullo wrote: 1) I edited the file once to remove 32 bit CPU support Why are you trying to remove 32 bit support in the first place? -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora

Re: [HEADS UP] Ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in Rawhide

On 11/04/2015 12:23 PM, Robert Kuska wrote: > There is ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in rawhide's side-tag f24-python3. > > I would like to ask all maintainers to rebuild their packages (which > depend on python3) within the f24-python3 side-tag. > > To rebuild your package simply run: > `fedpkg

Re: STOP messing with nfs-utls... PLEASE!!!

On 11/04/2015 12:37 PM, Ian Kent wrote: > Looks like the compose went ok too, based on the mail I saw. Yes, looks like everything is properly rebuilt now. Thanks! -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of

Re: STOP messing with nfs-utls... PLEASE!!!

On 11/03/2015 04:08 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: commit 7765dd87e174beaa44a16a89530d4b956d9abdba Author: Kalev Lember <klem...@redhat.com> Date: Sun Nov 1 16:48:00 2015 +0100 Disable bootstrap commit 6ea94b72ac9dfdb6c6d93f8bf975c23c578b9ba0 Author: Kalev Lember <klem...@redhat.

Re: [HEADS UP] Upcoming soname change for libtirpc

On 10/30/2015 05:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:50:48 -0400 > Steve Dickson wrote: >> 2) find and rebuild all the dependencies? > > Should be something like: > > % sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libtirpc.so.1()(64bit)' > Last metadata expiration check

Re: GNOME 3.18.1 megaupdate

On 10/12/2015 12:04 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > Hi all, > > It's GNOME 3.18.1 release this week and I'll be wrangling the builds for > Fedora. Same drill as with previous megaupdates: if you are helping with > builds, please use f23-gnome build target. > > $ fedpkg bui

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pfor

On 10/14/2015 03:00 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > Attempts to contact pfor via bug #1266870 [1] as well as direct email > have been unsuccessful. An update request last year also went > unanswered, and commit access request has been awaiting review since > then. fedora_active_user reports last

GNOME 3.18.1 megaupdate

Hi all, It's GNOME 3.18.1 release this week and I'll be wrangling the builds for Fedora. Same drill as with previous megaupdates: if you are helping with builds, please use f23-gnome build target. $ fedpkg build --target f23-gnome I'll take care of submitting them all in a single bodhi update

Re: "Unbundling SIG" was [Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-10-07)]

Just replying to this one point: On 10/11/2015 02:29 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > 3. There is a common credo (which I do not adher to) in Fedora that upstream >should be followed blindly ("upstream, upstream, upstream"). My interpretation of this is completely different than yours. :) To me it

Re: Fedora 23 Branched 20151009 compose check report

On 10/09/2015 10:39 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 13:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >>> How are the screenshots rebased? Is it all manual work? >> >> More or less. the openQA web UI has an interactive needle editor >> which >> lets you basically run a test and pause after

Re: Fedora 23 Branched 20151009 compose check report

On 10/09/2015 06:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 12:17 -0400, Fedora compose checker wrote: >> No missing expected images. >> >> Images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151008: >> >> Cloud docker x86_64 >> >> Images in 23 Branched 20151008 but not this: >> >> Workstation

Re: Fedora 23 Branched 20151009 compose check report

On 10/09/2015 07:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 18:46 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: >> On 10/09/2015 06:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 12:17 -0400, Fedora compose checker wrote: >>>> No missing expected images. &g

Re: Fedora 23 Branched 20151009 compose check report

On 10/09/2015 06:17 PM, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151008: > > Cloud docker x86_64 > > Images in 23 Branched 20151008 but not this: > > Workstation disk raw armhfp > > Failed openQA tests: 48 of 52 > > ID: 5182

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree, v2

On 10/05/2015 05:46 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 5.10.2015 v 17:35 Kalev Lember napsal(a): >> On 10/05/2015 04:52 PM, Martin Gansser wrote: >>> Hi Kalev, >>> >>> >>> >>> i am the packager of the package vdr-live (martinkg). >>>

Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree, v2

Hi all, Here's another look at F23 broken dependencies. A number of packages have been fixed last week, but there's also a new broken dependency, CableSwig, due to gccxml retirement. The goal is to ship Fedora releases with repos where all packages are installable. On 2015-10-12, any packages

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree, v2

On 10/05/2015 04:52 PM, Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi Kalev, > > > > i am the packager of the package vdr-live (martinkg). > > > > vdr-live has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: > On x86_64: > vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.x86_64 requires > libtntnet.so.12()(64bit) >

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

On 09/24/2015 07:29 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > IIRC, sqljet needs netbeans-platform (swing-smth to be precious from > netbeans) for its db browser UI which is a subpackage so disabling this part > to build (and killing the browser subpackage) should remove the need for > netbeans platform

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

On 09/25/2015 12:15 AM, Björn Persson wrote: > Kalev Lember wrote: >> aws landgraf > > Here's a patch to include the missing library that prevents installation > of aws-tools. > > To get it to build I had to disable PDF generation and bui

Re: GNOME 3.18.0 megaupdate

On 09/24/2015 11:10 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Richard Hughes > wrote: > > On 24 September 2015 at 10:04, Kalpa Welivitigoda > > wrote: > >

Re: GNOME 3.18.0 megaupdate

On 09/21/2015 12:12 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > Hi all, > > GNOME 3.18.0 is going to be released this week and I'll be wrangling the > builds for Fedora. Same as with the pre-releases we've built so far, we > are still using the f23-gnome side tag in koji for preparing every

Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

Hi all, In less than three weeks we will be entering the F23 Final Freeze. At that point, Fedora release engineering retires any packages that still have broken dependencies in the F23 tree. Based on today's Branched report [1], we still have a number of unfixed packages with broken dependencies

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

On 09/24/2015 05:47 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 24.9.2015 16:34, Kalev Lember wrote: >> python-Fionachurchyard, group::python-sig > > > This one cannot work with Fedora 23 due to GDAL 2. Feel free to retire it. Can you retire it yourself if it is un

Re: F23 broke dependencies

On 09/23/2015 02:00 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Will there be some effor to clean this up prior release? Yes, same plan as in previous releases: anything that still has broken deps by the time of final freeze is going to get retired. I opened https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6260 to sort this

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >