already ...
Have you looked at smock? It somehow computes the order a set of rpms
need to be built in...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
in that thread was informative on this problem.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10/11/2011 08:38 PM, Nathan O. wrote:
Curious to know, I am thinking about getting a Yubikey to use on FAS and
other related logins. I seen you must burn the key. I am concidering
getting the Yubikey with the Lasspass subscription included. The
question is, if I burn the key first then is
On 10/12/2011 12:02 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I currently have my yubikey set up to do this (slot 1 is Fedora, slot 2 is
for yubikey servers).
Hmm that's great. For some reason I thought the slots still used the
same keys...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel
On 10/12/2011 10:44 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Q: How do I generate a new ssh key? How do I use it for just Fedora
hosts?
A: See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cryptography and use a
~/.ssh/config file to match fedoraproject.org hosts for that key.
So just a message to say, thanks for the
Just a thank you for allowing me to uncheck 'Use LVM'. Much simpler than
custom partitioning but still gets me what I need/wanted to use.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 08/02/2010 09:32 AM, Branched Report wrote:
Compose started at Mon Aug 2 13:15:11 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
barry-0.17-0.1.20100329git.fc14.x86_64 requires
libboost_serialization.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
Barry is my
On 08/02/2010 02:26 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:17:43 -0600, Nathanael wrote:
On 08/02/2010 09:32 AM, Branched Report wrote:
Compose started at Mon Aug 2 13:15:11 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
On 08/06/2010 11:32 AM, Jos Vos wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with an IBM point-of-sale system with an Intel 82Q35
graphics chipset that does not work in RHEL6/F13, but that does work
fine on SLED 11 !!! That system has a 15 display attached and also
a VGA port for a second display (to which
Hello,
I recently acquired a Toshiba L655 laptop, fairly new stuff (both
network card drivers have yet to be merged into the mainline kernel). I
had issues getting Fedora installed, it had massive kernel panics
related to ACPI, but installed with acpi=off. Doing so removed some
advanced
On 08/12/2010 11:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
status is unclear:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985
Two reporters in the bug - John Reiser and Mike Chambers - and one
reporter from the list - Rui He,
So with RC4. I have one success and one failure.
Works: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV730
PRO [Radeon HD 4650]
Fails: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV730XT
[Radeon HD 4670]
I've also got one more to test against later today
01:05.0 VGA
On 08/13/2010 09:08 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
It would hurt all sides - it would hurt Fedora, the new distribution, our
work in Red Hat, users and so on. And I don't understand why we can't work
under one roof - to make Fedora the best OS. Maybe more autonomy for SIGs
Just an idea, without _fully_ understanding the infrastructure, man
power etc ramifications.
Since the move to git, would it not be easier to allow features to
branch rawhide, get their individual bits together (syncing with 'trunk'
periodically)... Then like the kernel does, merge back the
On 08/13/2010 12:20 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Ven 13 août 2010 16:01, Nathanael D. Noblet a écrit :
There was however a kernel issue from dmesg, should this be filed?
===
[ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage
One more success.
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon 2100
With AMD 64 X2 CPU
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10/07/2010 10:58 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
One usage of yubikey I would like very much is as storage for the AES
encryption key for disk encryption. I'd prefer the disk crypto key to
not be on the disk at all, protected by just a passphrase. It would be
nice to have it on a yubikey instead.
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638691
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10/25/2010 04:28 PM, nodata wrote:
Hi,
I'm concerned about the default behaviour of mounting encrypted volumes.
The default behaviour is that a user must know and supply a passphrase
in order to mount an encrypted volume. This is good: know the
passphrase, you get to mount the volume.
On 10/25/2010 04:40 PM, nodata wrote:
Wouldn't they be restricted based on the contents of the encrypted volume?
Yes. Once the volume is mounted it will be treated with normal UNIX
permissions. So you would have to create a sub-directory on the volume
where the permissions were strict and
easily make it user only accessible with a checkbox I guess. I'm
wondering though, when you plug in a USB thumbdrive... don't all users
have access? What's the difference here? Are we talking about system
wide mounts like mine where only /home is encrypted??
Just wondering.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
On 10/26/2010 04:07 AM, nodata wrote:
Imagine that you want to login to the computer, your username is oiang.
I want to login too. My username is nodata. Now, I can only login to my
account and look at my files because only I know my password. You can
only login to your account because only
On 11/03/2010 11:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:58 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 11/3/2010 7:02 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
Just a followup thought... I wonder if abrt could be made smarter /
changed to allow for a preference setting to report on updates-testing
or all updates... I know awhile back I made suggestions on what it would
take in my mind to increase user testing [1]. I see abrt as another way
to help
should I go about having him take them over?
If you're willing to mentor him, it's probably easiest to do this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Become_a_co-maintainer
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel
of func but not certmaster. Oversight?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
, not the sub-packages it
may produce.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
}/.??*
Use
rm -rf %{buildroot}%{pear_metadir}/.??*
This can be applied on all branches
(already used on some of my packages, see php-phpunit-PHPUnit p.e.)
I presume php-pecl packages are un-affected by this?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
in the packager group etc. Having a fedora account etc...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/14/2010 01:49 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 07.01.10 10:42, Nathanael D. Noblet (nathan...@gnat.ca) wrote:
Hello,
First off, not trying to bash or otherwise start a war about pulseaudio.
Just checking if anyone else is experiencing issues with the
latest F12 update
On 03/02/2010 06:06 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 01:34 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Even bugfix releases of KDE require a session restart to fully work.
I consider that a serious design flaw in KDE and a strong argument
against
grouping so that it tells you what can be
built in parallel.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
if we can still do the $100,000,000 transfer with only my personal
information and without my FAS credentials. :D Fingers crossed!
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct
into the original package but the spec file is so
complicated and I have no idea how java programs are packagaed so shied
away. If someone else thinks collectively we could bring it back up to a
recent version. I'd be delighted to co-maintain it.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel
On 11/23/2010 03:02 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:48:30PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn
on
/var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
with the following accepted F15 feature:
On 11/24/2010 08:00 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 23.11.10 16:56, Nathanael D. Noblet (nathan...@gnat.ca) wrote:
Imho there should be a packaging guideline to make it clear what needs
to be done in which cases. E.g. when to %ghost files and when not.
I'm curious, one of my packages
Hello,
My aunt has F13 installed.. I got the following from her. Is this a
known bug ?? I can't make heads or tails of the error message or what to
tell her to do to resolve it.
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
perl-libs = 4:5.10.1-112.fc13 is needed by perl-4:5.10.1-112.fc13.i686
On 12/01/2010 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I don't really see any reason why *everyone* who's a packager shouldn't
also have signed up to be a proven tester by now. I'd like to ask if
anyone has a perception that it's a hard process to get involved in, or
if they got the impression that
On 12/01/2010 04:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:53 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 12/01/2010 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I don't really see any reason why *everyone* who's a packager shouldn't
also have signed up to be a proven tester by now. I'd like to ask
they be,
if so where do they go etc... are there any guidelines for this?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/07/2011 11:56 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
What is the process for taking over packages that haven't been
maintained in a long time?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
I think that is the procedure.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 01/09/2011 05:52 PM, bradb...@seanet.com wrote:
I am trying to update the cppad package using a new version of the
upstream source following the instructions on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo
I used the command
fedpkg new-sources
On 01/19/2011 12:11 PM, Callum Lerwick wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Well /tmp should be mounted tmpfs anyway (I have been doing this for
years and it is working just fine).
tmp isn't a persistent storage so it makes a lot of sense, and it is
*not*
On 01/27/2011 04:10 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote:
Hello,
Hoping to be wrong.
Today I was working on my package after a long time,
I upgraded from version 2.1-320 to 2.1-400.
I didn't fedpkg new-sources and only updated
the spec file to be 2.1-400 (sources file
Hello while trying to build a package of mine on F15 I ran into
configure issues. They stem from a change in how bash evaluates case
statements. My test script: http://fpaste.org/6zuv/
F14:
-Z!!!
= x
X1
X1.1 --- evaluates to No Match for F15
xyes2
xyes3
F15:
-Z!!!
= x
X1
No match1.1
On 03/02/2011 04:03 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello while trying to build a package of mine on F15 I ran into
configure issues. They stem from a change in how bash evaluates case
statements. My test script: http://fpaste.org/6zuv/
F14:
-Z!!!
= x
X1
X1.1--- evaluates to No Match
On 03/02/2011 04:23 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 03/02/2011 04:03 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello while trying to build a package of mine on F15 I ran into
configure issues. They stem from a change in how bash evaluates case
statements. My test script: http://fpaste.org/6zuv/
F14
On 03/02/2011 11:55 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I'd say, report this as a bug and see where it leads. It's certainly not
expected behaviour even if it is intentional.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681940
as well I submitted to bash upstream with bashbug which submits to a
On 03/03/2011 10:18 AM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 03/02/2011 11:55 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I'd say, report this as a bug and see where it leads. It's certainly not
expected behaviour even if it is intentional.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681940
as well I submitted
On 03/03/2011 12:42 PM, Will Woods wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 22:55 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I'd say, report this as a bug and see where it leads. It's certainly not
expected behaviour even if it is intentional.
One-line reproducer:
case x in x) echo matches x;; x?) echo matches x?
transfer that same assumption...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
was rejected as F15 is going to systemd making it
somewhat moot. Though I haven't looked at how systemd handles encrypted
partitions
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
that? Or do I need
to wait for the rel-eng ticket so that your build is in the buildroots?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
builds.
Build launched... How do I know when to push it as an update? Will I
have to?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 03/22/2011 03:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
So I just got a broken dep mail. I don't mind rebuilding my package
however I'm wondering if I shouldn't just wait till you do a mass
rebuild of all dependent packages?? Or are you doing that? Or do I need
to wait
it will add a comment to that bug informing you of
a new build to test. Then you can upgrade to the test build and provide
karma for it via bodhi. (there will be links in the comments in bugzilla
when the build is made)
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel
on this? Will the update be pushed by someone else??
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 04/04/2011 07:58 AM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote:
* xournal
I use this so I've applied for co-maintainership...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
like this as well. Seems clear, and then when the candidate
'graduates' it just becomes 'Alpha', 'Beta' release Seems clear to me.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
to updates-testing and consume it on my production
machines. If good, then I usually add karma. I think its fairly rare for
me, and I can only think of one package where I do that...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
problem.
If it does and you need/want the threaded patches let me know.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
on
IRC, midway through it all of a sudden continued on. Have you waited
that long?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 06/03/2011 05:19 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
So it is ultimately conditioned on fedora version, not foo-devel version.
Just curious, why don't you require the version that doesn't require the
patch?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
was unsatisfactory so I haven't switched. Also I can't
remember if the virtual system fedora provided could host windows??
Maybe I'm confusing Xen with whatever is in use now. Like I said I made
the switch and haven't seen much reason to switch again.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel
it have anything like vino where you can share your current running
desktop via VNC? like in Gnome, that's probably my biggest check against
it as I have to often vnc to a remote users session to show them
something...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel
On 06/14/2011 11:24 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 06/14/2011 12:27 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 06/14/2011 07:31 AM, seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 11:25 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I've installed XFCE. It was easy to install, and it works sanely
(unlike GNOME 3 / Unity
On 06/14/2011 12:40 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:27:33AM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 06/14/2011 07:31 AM, seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 11:25 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I've installed XFCE. It was easy to install, and it works sanely
at the North
Pole.
I hope that helps.
It does, and I like it. I will definitely look into that. Anytime I've
looked for something like this, it always targeted the use case of using
VNC as a 'thin client' type system where you'd get multiple users served
over VNC.
Thanks,
--
Nathanael d
encryption and routing/firewall rules.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
made it to the repos
yet I think?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
by
nss-3.12.10-5.fc16dist-f16 mschwendt
perhaps bodhi build override feature go amok?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
is that it checks for that changing as part of its 'hash' if it
changes we know something moved... maybe we're no longer on original
hardware etc...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
different than the 1710 in driver parlance? I have
a samsung ML-1710 that's been happily printing for years on my
continually upgraded Fedora box, without me installing anything in
particular.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On 07/07/2011 12:38 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hmmm... wonder if this is somehow related to glibc changing memcpy that
caused problem in flash and squashfs?
I thought that happened in F14. so I would expect it to have been
discovered already if that was the case?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t
of
the script that was used to generate the source tarball.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
and fill up his / filesystem.
Without getting into the specifics of whether the feature is useful or
not... Part of it could be. If fstab contains a /tmp mountpoint re-write
it to /var/tmp? I doubt that will make people stop talking about this
feature but just a thought.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t
-x11-drv-wacom-0.14.0-2.fc17.src.rpm
- ajax
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
will now class in F17 due to the lack
of a separation between /usr and / so /bin/ex == /usr/bin/ex... Just
something to think about for this package it seems.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
the ownership of this package from
me to gnat, will ping him.
Sorry, had a few busy days and didn't for whatever reason think I had
reason to read the retiring packages... I took ownership.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
Hello,
No rush on this I *just* posted it and sadly I don't have a lot of
time to swap reviews. I thought I would point out that I had posted a
review for php-pecl-cairo if anyone is interested in having it in fedora
so they could review it.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel
-0.2.0-1.fc16
Enjoy!
Stanislav Pierre
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Thanks Pierre,
Unfortunately there is no such file .config/fedora-review there is
however a .config/fedora-create-review.
On 07/19/2012 01:12 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:14 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello,
I tried to use fedora-review and it seems
in the install section
etc.
To try it out yourself try it against bug 841662
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 08/02/2012 12:02 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 23:52 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Where would you like bug reports?
I tried it against one of my own review tickets. It found a number of
issues however almost all of them except one was wrong.
For example it complained
?
That would definitely be clearer to me.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_Fedora_install_ISO_for_testing
I've used it with good success.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
work together towards a common goal. I can't imagine
how it wouldn't be possible to get NM to the point where it does do
everything one needs it to do. Especially with the lead developers it has.
My 2cents.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
kickstart, but somehow merges only the pieces that are
inputted?? This way there are the defaults, but a community of 'user
preference' snippets could exist etc...
Just a random thought.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On 09/26/2012 12:23 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:15 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
I wonder if this couldn't be a RFE for anaconda. Maybe not possible,
however couldn't we allow the upload of a kickstart 'snippet' or
something where users installing Fedora could
to start apps...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
work
to do on it.
My 2cs
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
and I see there
are other co-maintainers with commit rights. Its funny since I think
I've been managing the package as if I were the sole maintainer.
Do I just sit and wait then?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On 01/19/2012 10:00 AM, Arun SAG wrote:
Hi,
I found this interesting http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q1/200 . I am
not able to reproduce this on my laptop. Any one able to reproduce it?
I'm not able to on an up-to-date F15.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel
of packages is
'maintained'...?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
if there was a reason for the current setup...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello,
Just curious, when assigning the default applications I can select
other browsers, email clients etc, but only evolution for the calendar.
Is there something lightening doesn't do such that I can't select it as
the calendar app??
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel
want my password, or root pw? Some dialogs do
clearly say, some don't.
+1*1
The number of times I wonder... which password do I enter here? Is
astounding.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On 03/02/2012 02:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 09:34 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 03/02/2012 06:59 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
I believe Fedora 17 has an add user to admin group checkbox when
adding the initial user, not sure if it is checked on or off by default
On 03/04/2012 06:04 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hey folks,
A package that we'd like to use for fedora videos requires review:
I'm curious what you mean by 'fedora videos review'... could you explain
more?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora from
the live media would be a win for all use cases I think.
How bout adding/changing the icon for installing? Can we not include
some text in the icon? Install Fedora somehow??
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
