On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:50 AM Randy Barlow
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 09:04 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It is not. Arguably, this check should be blocking across the board.
> > I
> > personally would rather have this check earlier than Bodhi (mark
>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 1:42 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 3:35 PM Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > There was an announcement of release libsolv-0.7.0 ([HEADS UP] libsolv 0.7)
> > into rawhide, but the rebase also ended up in stable branches of
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:27 PM Ray Strode wrote:
>
> > I suggest that if we think this is a serious issue and that we want to
> > get the maximum possible help to those who are forced to pay by the
> > bit that we stop sending them mail they don't need all together. Lets
> > move this mailing
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:02 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
>
> Dne 2.10.2018 v 13:11 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:53:45AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 1.10.2018 v 20:00 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a):
> "BP" == Björn Persson writes:
> >>> BP> This
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:30 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 02.10.18 um 13:25 schrieb Neal Gompa:
> > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:01 AM Michal Schorm wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm sending you this HTML email because Google dropped possibility to
> >>&
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 11:59 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:00 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:02 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Dne 2.10.2018 v 13:11 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:56 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> El mar., 2 oct. 2018 a las 13:48, Iñaki Ucar
> () escribió:
> >
> > El mar., 2 oct. 2018 a las 13:44, Neal Gompa ()
> > escribió:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:30 AM Reindl Harald
&g
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 3:15 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 06:07:44PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> >-- And the one question I have to add on to Christopher's wonderful
> > list: I have a package where upstream releases about once a month,
> > and each new
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 7:41 PM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
> > "KP" == Kamil Paral writes:
>
> KP> That policy has been cancelled. Since the upgrade tools started
> KP> doing basically "dnf distrosync (--allowerasing)" for upgrades, the
> KP> upgrade path between distros stopped being a
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:01 AM Michal Schorm wrote:
>
> > I'm sending you this HTML email because Google dropped possibility to send
> > plaintext emails. Sorry =(
>
> Gmail
> -> compose
> -> options (bottom right)
> -> plain text mode
>
> doesn't work for you?
>
> (I'm sending this e-mail
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:43 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I've been trying to get in touch with Matthias Runge (mrunge) over the
> last couple of days (for getting python-celery into EPEL7 for Pagure
> 5). However, his email address listed in FAS bounces with "unab
Hey all,
I've been trying to get in touch with Matthias Runge (mrunge) over the
last couple of days (for getting python-celery into EPEL7 for Pagure
5). However, his email address listed in FAS bounces with "unable to
connect" errors.
Does anyone know of another email address or method to get in
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:03 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
> > converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
>
> Maybe I'll try that next time I have some free time. This is
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:02 AM Adam Samalik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:57 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:32 AM Adam Samalik wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I thought that Arbitrary Branching (now referred to as Stream Branching)
>>> was initially developed for Modularity
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 9:23 AM Antonio Trande wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> Are we ready for excluding python2-future on fedora 30+ ?
>
> $ dnf repoquery --release rawhide --enablerepo=*-source
> --disablerepo=rpmfusion* --whatrequires python2-future
>
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:54 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > * Máirín Duffy:
> >
> > > - Found out it's cloud-info stalling the boot.
> >
> > I think it's actually cloud-init.
> >
> > > - Yay I have a login prompt! What's the login info? Ga...
> > > - Realize have to run virt-customize
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 4:48 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> Koji seems to be requiring 7 days in -testing for F29. Shouldn't it
> be requiring 3 days at this point?
It should... I wonder what's going on here?
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 6:35 PM Julio González Gil
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> As requested by maintainers guide, I am introducing myself to the community.
>
> I am working as Release Engineer for the last 6 years, and since one year ago
> for SUSE as Release Engineer for SUSE Manager and the
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 2:39 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 13:07 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > While doing this extremely tedious task, it occurred to me to think:
> > > what the hell is the *point* of these 'optional' entries any more,
> > >
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 2:13 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Well, or "find plan c and work to make sure it's integrated in future
> > versions of dnfdragora".
>
> That would have to be done BEFORE we drop the comps entries though.
>
> > The RPM Group tag is very inflexible —
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:54 AM Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2018-11-17 at 22:30 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > > My proposal would be to make zchunk the rpm compression format for
> > > Fedora.
> >
> > Given that:
> > 1. zchunk is based on zstd, which is
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 5:08 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> On 11/18/18 2:29 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I'm not for or against a longer Fedora lifecycle, but I think we need
> > a stronger statement of what the problem is we're trying to address.
> >
> > From your email:
> >
> > On Tue,
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 2:41 PM Tom Callaway wrote:
>
> When I wasn't looking, asymptote grew a new dependency, which means I
> have two new packages that need reviews.
>
> python-speg: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663036
> python-cson:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 3:19 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:37 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >
> > On 1/11/19 9:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > Can we apply the same "flag and remove" approach as currently used in
> > > Copr?
> >
> > I'd rather have a licensing
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:17 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> [This proposal was submitted after the deadline. I am announcing it
> for community discussion and will leave the decision on whether or not
> to grant an exception to FESCo]
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC9
>
> == Summary ==
>
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 2:06 PM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> On 12/10/2018 07:30 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > It is versioned, actually. The 1.x API is `pkconfig(modulemd)` and 2.x
> > is `pkgconfig(modulemd-2.0)`. The source of the conflict between the
> > two -devel subpackages is that they both
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:30 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Any news ?
>
> "But I guess nothing's getting released, for some reason? fedora-review has
> been on version 0.6.1 since May 2016; all package activity since then has
> been housekeeping rebuilds. "
>
> may you add me as admin to
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 2:50 PM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 8:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 2:34 PM Igor Gnatenko
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello folks,
> > >
> > > for long time we have pro
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 3:09 PM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> That makes sense that we can do something like this from DNF code..
> However, it would be kinda hard to do any dependency resolution
> checks..
>
> Although we already have one which is module(platform:$PLATFORM_ID)
> which is
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 2:34 PM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> for long time we have problem if you have some arch-specific
> BuildRequires, you still get one src.rpm from one of arches (not sure
> how koji chooses that one) which might not work for your architecture.
>
> For example
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 5:17 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 20-12-18 10:54, Raphael Groner wrote:
> >> So what process should I use? Pull Requests or just removing obsolete
> >> stuff?
> >> I'm ready to do either way. Should I leave this to FESCo?
> >
> > My vote would go for Pull
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:14 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> The upgrade of bugzilla.redhat.com has been delayed a week. It will
> now be done on 9 December 2018 from 0:00 to 12:00 UTC.
>
Aww, anyone know why?
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 1:39 PM Clement Verna wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to get feedbacks on the following proposal. Use OSBS to
> build the fedora container base image, indeed OSBS has the capability
> to build a base container image using a kickstart file.
> To do this OSBS needs a
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:54 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:12 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> > I'm worried that this kind of pointless work makes it hard to attract
> > talent.
>
> Florian, you might want to check out rdopkg.
> https://github.com/softwarefactory-project/rdopkg .
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 7:59 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Neal Gompa:
>
> > The problem with merged source trees (aka source-git) is that it
> > implies forking projects.
>
> But that's true for *any* distribution that wants to integrate things.
> I guess you co
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:57 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:22 AM Paul Frields wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 4:47 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 27. 11. 18 v 17:04 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> > > >> In other words, the "technical debt" we are trying to solve
Hello all,
I've released livecd-tools v26.0 and it is making its way to Fedora
and Mageia now.
It is currently available in Rawhide, and will be in updates-testing
for Fedora 28 and 29 soon.
For Mageia, I've pushed it into Cauldron. It will be part of the
upcoming Mageia 7.
## What's new
This
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 9:26 AM Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> I've certainly made the mistake of accidentally creating branches
> in dist-git and now being stuck with them because we can't delete
> them. Now that src.fedoraproject.org (dist-git) is backed by a newer
> version of pagure you can prevent
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 6:25 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:21:04PM +0100, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> > The update of dnf-plugins-core and dnf-plugins-extras is ready for rawhide.
> > But I cannot make fedpkg build due to error:
> > Kerberos authentication fails: unable
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 6:03 PM Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>
>
> *Changes*
> The zchunk format would need to be extended to allow for a zchunked rpm
> to contain both the uncompressed chunks that were already on the local
> system and the newly downloaded compressed chunks while still passing
>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:03 PM Michal Novotny wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:57 PM Michal Novotny wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:43 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
>>>
>>> > * Matthew Miller:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Make it cheap to maintain branches. I expect that one what to achieve
>>> >
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:49 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:15:17PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:03 PM Michal Novotny wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:57 PM Michal Novotny wrote:
> > >&g
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:08 PM Jeff Fearn wrote:
>
> On 27/11/18 02:06, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > * Neal Gompa [26/11/2018 11:01] :
> >>
> >> Out of curiosity, does anyone know where the source code for Red Hat
> >> Bugzilla actually is? I tried
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> If you haven't seen the banner at the top of bugzilla.redhat.com, it
> is scheduled to undergo an upgrade from Bugzilla 4 to Bugzilla 5 on
> December 2 2018. The outage will begin on 2 December at 0:00 UTC and
> end on 2 December
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:27 PM Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>
> On 11/16/18 7:50 AM, Paul Frields wrote:
> [snip]
> > We should skip the F31 release cycle and leave F30 in place longer in
> > order to focus on improving the tooling and testing changes. These
> > tooling changes will improve the
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 9:08 AM John Florian wrote:
>
> On 11/26/18 3:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > The one issue I see off hand is that koji
> > tags are kind of expensive so we can't just tag everything the way we
> > may want
>
> Can you please elaborate a bit on this? What makes them
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 1:15 PM Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>
> Neal, thanks so much for your thoughts on this. Responses inline:
>
> On Sat, 2018-11-17 at 09:53 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > If we're really considering changing the RPM file format, then we need
> > a pro
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 5:30 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 18.11.18 um 23:19 schrieb Neal Gompa:
> > I think it's quite obvious why. No one can really influence what's in
> > CentOS. Red Hat Enterprise Linux itself is developed mostly behind
> > closed doors, after
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dennis Gregorovic wrote:
>
> Forwarding info I got from Tomas off-line...
>
> """
> oz should be py3-ready according to clancellete (not tested by me). I've
> started some work on ImageFactory, but didn't get too far as there were other
> priorities. It seemed to
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:30 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 12/30/18 12:26 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 19:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnablingPythonGeneratorsByDefault
> >>
> >> = Enabling Python Generators by default =
> >
> > No
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 1:59 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We had a recent discussion on this list last month about (among other
> things) the current state of Pagure as a replacement for pkgdb [1].
>
> I mentioned in that discussion that there are various issues which
> have arisen from
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:23 AM Randy Barlow
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 08:34 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Was
> > there some kind of design rationale for them? Or were they just added
> > because 'hey, fedmsg is cool'?
>
> I don't know because they were added before my tenure, though
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:52 AM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 10. 01. 19 v 20:47 Artur Iwicki napsal(a):
> > > - Now that I've mentioned it, maybe we should add something like "fedpkg
> > > fas-login"? Personally I've put "alias koji-init='kinit
> > >
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:19 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 02:42:05PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > * non free submissions. What if someone submits non free content and we
> > build and host it? That would not be great.
>
> Can we apply the same "flag and remove" approach
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 10:08 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Well, strictly speaking, this is really only a problem for IBM
> > architectures (ppc64le and s390x) because there's no economical way
> > for anyone to be able to care for them. For b
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 5:42 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 11:05:33 +0100
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > On 12. 01. 19 19:47, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On 1/12/19 5:59 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >> On 12. 01. 19 14:19, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > >>> Dan Horák wrote:
> > This is a
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 8:50 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> * Buildbot (Python 3)
> * Jenkins (Java)
> * Vespene (Python 3)
> * GoCD (Java + Ruby)
> * Zuul (Python)
>
> Of the four listed above, only the first two are packaged in Fedora.
> Buildbot is up-to-date in Fedo
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 11:35 AM Avram Lubkin wrote:
>
> Looks like the dependency generator was turned on in rawhide. Igor has been
> making pull releases against packages because this is now creating duplicate
> requires for some packages. That would seem reasonable, but he never pushed
>
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 12:38 PM Avram Lubkin wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 11:55 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>>
>> Well, now that this has been enabled, it is likely that there already
>> are packages which make use of this functionality, and disabling the
>> generator again
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 1:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 28. 12. 18 18:58, Avram Lubkin wrote:
> > Especially since there is no test code!
>
> And this is the only thing when I agree with you.
>
> Neal, where would be the best place to add some tests for the generator?
> I can scratch something
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 4:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 28. 12. 18 22:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 1:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 28. 12. 18 18:58, Avram Lubkin wrote:
> >>> Especially since there is no test code!
&
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 4:16 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>
> I'm going to push multiple commits to packages (I'll send list later)
> which execute scriptlets which are not needed anymore for Fedora.
>
> However, people tend to keep same spec for Fedora and EPEL which makes
> everything much more
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 12:58 PM Tomas Orsava wrote:
>
> On 09/13/2018 06:43 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 18:17 +0200, Tomas Orsava wrote:
> >> We'd like to propose a new functionality for dnf: When a user tries
> >> to install a package XYZ and dnf doesn't find it, dnf
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 3:10 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> Hi, (sorry for duplicates I sent from wrong email before)
>
> Nothing happened last week .
>
> Can you add me to https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/ and to
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-review please .
>
> My fas user is sergiomb ,
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 9:23 AM Georg Sauthoff wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> so I wrote dracut-sshd - a dracut module that adds sshd to the
> initramfs such that one is able to remotely access early
> userspace for e.g. unlocking an encrypted root filesystem or
> dealing with the dracut emergency shell:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 9:49 PM Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Nico Kadel-Garcia"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 11:06:39 PM
> > Subject: Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bash 5.0
> >
>
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 9:55 PM Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Frantisek Zatloukal"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 4:16:45 PM
> > Subject: Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bash 5.0
> >
> >
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 10:01 PM Siteshwar Vashisht
wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Neal Gompa"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > Cc: "Mikolaj Izdebski" , "Michael Simacek"
&
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:29 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> Remove packages from the distribution:
> [...]
> * python-urlgrabber
>
We don't actually have to drop this one. One of the SUSE guys
submitted a pull request to port it to Python 3:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:02 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Greetings.
>
> This is a periodic reminder that we have some test instances setup for
> package maintainers. Please see:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
>
> for more information.
>
>
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 3:27 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 4/4/19 1:16 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:02 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>
> >> Greetings.
> >>
> >> This is a periodic reminder that we have some test instance
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 1:43 PM Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 16:37, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>
>> Dne 28. 03. 19 v 13:57 Tomasz Kłoczko napsal(a):
>> > dnf does not provide any signing functions and I was not even aware that
>> > someone implemented in base dnf building
>> >
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:32 AM Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just found that on some minimal system it is not possible to remove some rpm
> subpackages.
>
> * Current state
>
> # rpm -qa | grep rpm
> rpm-libs-4.14.2.1-4.fc30.1.x86_64
> rpm-4.14.2.1-4.fc30.1.x86_64
>
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:21 AM Neal Becker wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 7:36 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08. 04. 19 13:28, Neal Becker wrote:
> >> > mercurial 4.9 packages zstd and python wrapper.
> >> >
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 7:36 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 08. 04. 19 13:28, Neal Becker wrote:
> > mercurial 4.9 packages zstd and python wrapper.
> >
> > I think we need to use system zstd. But I don't see python2-zstd.
> >
> > Is anyone working on packaging python2-zstd? It would be needed to
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 4:51 PM Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 19:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> As we've now reached the branch point, it's time to start weekly
>> blocker status mails.
>
>
> mdadm does not compile on fc30
>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 2:37 AM Mosaab Alzoubi wrote:
>
> Due to like-dead upstream and security issue, I orphan these packages:
>
> apt
I'll take this. Then it can be updated to latest apt-dpkg instead and
used for other things.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 8:58 AM Pavel Zhukov wrote:
>
> All,
> tl;dr dhcp 4.4.1 will not require bind-export-libs and will bring
> dhcp-libs-static with bundled version of libisc/libdns/etc
>
> As ISC dropped support of single thread build of BIND libraries [1] and dhcp
> requires one we
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 2:20 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 27. 02. 19 v 12:30 Lukas Ruzicka napsal(a):
> >
> > However, you cannot upgrade from Fedora 29 to Fedora 30 with Modular
> > repositories allowed. It fails with an error
> > similar to what Mirek has reported. Disabling modular
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 8:23 PM Dennis Gregorovic wrote:
>
> I have an update on the koji end. The 1.17 release will not only drop the
> yum dependency, it will also have full python 3 support (except for image
> building that uses oz / imagefactory). Unfortunately, there is only medium
>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:05 AM Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
>
> Greetings packagers,
>
> I know how important RPM is to the Fedora Project, but it breaks
> everything downstream and we'd be better off using DPKG as we should
> have from day one.
>
> I'm calling this initiative fedpkg: Fedora
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 4:36 PM Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:21 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildRequires_Generators
> >
> > = BuildRequires Generators =
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Add possibility to generate build-time
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 7:40 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 11:03 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> > Greetings packagers,
> >
> > I know how important RPM is to the Fedora Project, but it breaks
> > everything downstream and we'd be better off using DPKG as we should
> > have
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 7:06 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> > Greetings packagers,
> >
> > I know how important RPM is to the Fedora Project, but it breaks
> > everything downstream and we'd be better off using DPKG as we should
> > have from day one.
> >
> > I'm calling this initiative fedpkg: Fedora
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 6:01 AM Petr Viktorin wrote:
>
> On 2/18/19 9:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildRequires_Generators
> >
> > = BuildRequires Generators =
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies within RPM spec
> >
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:01 AM stan wrote:
>
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 09:08:19 +0100
> Adam Samalik wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:26 PM Michael Cronenworth
> > wrote:
>
> > > Why should I care? Please, win me over. (I'm being serious.)
> > >
> >
> > I think you should care if:
> >
> > a)
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 6:14 PM Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering about the state of the "fedora-review" package. It seems to be
> a pretty important package to ensure new stuff adhers to the latest Fedora
> packaging policy.
>
> When I ran "fedora-review" I noticed that it was
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 7:48 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> I've got a COPR based on the devel branch:
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eclipseo/fedora-review/
>
fedora-review 0.7.0 has been released and updates have been proposed for Fedora:
Fedora 30:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:39 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am curious whether we can move our repo files from
> /etc/yum.repos.d
> to
> /etc/distro.repos.d
>
> In Fedora 31 we are going to wipe away last left overs of YUM, so it really
> does not have sense to keep `yum.repos.d`.
>
>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 7:05 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I just added those chroots to Copr:
> rhelbeta-8-x86_64
> mageia-7-i586
> mageia-7-x86_64
>
> Please be aware that there is no available EPEL for rhelbeta-8-x86_64 yet.
> This chroot is intended for some initial
> bootstraping
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 6:48 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 at 05:29, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dne 09. 03. 19 v 15:37 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 7:11 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >>
>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 7:35 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 03:07:09PM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > The epoch was inadvertently bumped (not by me) when ceph was rebased to
> > 14.x in f30/rawhide.
> >
> > I reset it to 1 in subsequent builds. Now adamwill is running
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:12 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 8:22 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> Heck, the spec file
>> that is in Fedora is basically an openSUSE spec with Fedora
>> conditionals in it.
>
>
> The ceph.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:07 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:24:00PM +0800, Zamir SUN wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3/2/19 5:02 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 06:57:48PM -0800, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > >> On 03/01/2019 01:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:08 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> The epoch was inadvertently bumped (not by me) when ceph was rebased to 14.x
> in f30/rawhide.
>
> I reset it to 1 in subsequent builds. Now adamwill is running builds with it
> bumped to 2 again.
>
> I would prefer that it not be bumped.
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 7:11 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 09. 03. 19 v 13:00 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > Dne 08. 03. 19 v 23:19 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a):
> >>>>>>> "MH" == Miro Hrončok writes:
> >> MH> On 08. 03. 19 21
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 9:00 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:44:53AM +0100, Michal Ruprich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am preparing FRR so that it could be added to Fedora and since there
> > are a lot of experienced packagers here, I would like to ask for an
> >
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 8:35 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:36 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > This whole process was handled in the worst possible way. To sum up:
> > * No one knew Java SIG was having manpower issues because Mikolaj
> > didn't
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 7:29 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:17 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 at 12:02, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:49 AM Jakub Jelen wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Is there already a way
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:21 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 3/7/19 5:52 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Panu Matilainen:
> >
> >> On 3/7/19 1:13 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >>> * Richard W. M. Jones:
> >>>
> $ sudo dnf install glibc-headers.i686
> >>> …
> Downgrading:
> >>>
> >>> That
601 - 700 of 2790 matches
Mail list logo
