On 07/27/2011 09:39 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:19:08 -0700, JK (Jesse) wrote:
On 7/27/11 2:03 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
There is a big difference between a package going backwards in its EVR
and staying there and a package getting untagged because it breaks koji
Hi all,
Due to the brown paperbag bug of rpm-4.9.1 causing unwanted trailing
slashes on directories (with various nasty side-effects), the following
packages in rawhide require rebuilding, the sooner the better to stop
spreading the damage:
accountsservice-0.6.13-1.fc16.src.rpm
Hi all,
Due to the brown paperbag bug of rpm-4.9.1 causing unwanted trailing
slashes on directories (with various nasty side-effects), the following
packages in F16 require rebuilding. The sooner the better to stop
spreading the damage but at any rate, before F16 final:
On 08/17/2011 12:10 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Hi all,
Due to the brown paperbag bug of rpm-4.9.1 causing unwanted trailing
slashes on directories (with various nasty side-effects), the following
packages in rawhide require rebuilding, the sooner the better to stop
spreading the damage
On 08/17/2011 05:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Panu Matilainenpmati...@laiskiainen.org writes:
Due to the brown paperbag bug of rpm-4.9.1 causing unwanted trailing
slashes on directories (with various nasty side-effects), the following
packages in F16 require rebuilding. ...
This list was compiled
On 09/06/2011 05:16 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Most of the packages I work with have very few patches so it's not all
that difficult, but there are a couple of packages I'm working with
that have a lot of patches and one of them has a very active upstream
(which is a good thing!) but that also
On 09/06/2011 09:53 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Dne 6.9.2011 16:29, Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
I like the idea of quilt but I can't seem to find the magic recipe to
get it to integrate with rpmbuild.
Please mind your quotes, I didn't write the above.
What's wrong with
quilt setup specname.spec
On 09/08/2011 03:44 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
Hi All,
On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get
yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit
builddeps on a 64-bit system?
It's been recently implemented at upstream, see
On 09/16/2011 11:53 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:49:36 -0400, SV (seth) wrote:
There are still a largish number of packages out there that have things
like:
Requires: foo
where they really want:
Requires: foo(64bit)
Fixing this in some packages is not entirely
On 09/17/2011 05:58 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 09/17/2011 07:53 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
The near-flamefest on this thread over whose depsolver is the best is
largely besides the point: in a perfect world there would be just one
Grand Unified Depsolver (library) that everything including
On 09/18/2011 08:40 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 09/17/2011 01:02 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 16 September 2011 20:02, Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Is Zif a SAT solver?
No, but I've been playing a few times with libsatsolver in the past year or
so.
Since Panu Matilainen has
On 09/20/2011 08:19 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mardi 20 septembre 2011 à 17:10 +0200, Miloslav Trmač a écrit :
So when _is_ a good time to do binary-incompatible changes to libraries?
The answer is obvious - in rawhide, before branching point. Anything
after branching will interact with
On 10/11/2011 08:16 PM, Jan Vcelak wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:22:34, Tomi Leppikangas wrote:
Kashyap Chamarthy writes:
Running Transaction Check
ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
/bin/sh is needed by groff-base-1.21-5.fc17.x86_64
I have this same problem when trying to
On 10/13/2011 01:30 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
This is probably not worthy of a bug report, but may still be useful to
confirm a problem that someone else may have experienced.
I resurrected an old notebook (HP Pavilion ZE4201) to test some stuff
under relatively low memory conditions (768 MB
On 10/13/2011 03:36 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 11:15 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Let's see whether this is something that can be replicated.
When the installation finished and I pressed the reboot button, a
message flashed briefly at the bottom of the screen. Something
On 11/09/2011 08:49 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Tom Lanet...@redhat.com wrote:
postgresql is currently failing to rebuild in rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3499379
This seems quite repeatable, in koji, but the
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Mike McLean wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626209
Reported against F13, but I've encountered it in F14 Beta.
Seems like more folks ought to be impacted by this bug that seem to
be, so I wonder what is going on here. Do less folks use ssh-add that
I
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
JN == Joe Nall j...@nall.com writes:
JN On Oct 28, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
More to the point, I can easily see the setuid bit easily on a
binary.
How do I tell if these strange/hidden capabilities are
present on a
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
On Monday, November 08, 2010 15:49:28 Michal Hlavinka wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to find out what are differences between environment for local
rpm build and usual user's environment. I've added regression tests to
%check section of ksh spec file. These
On 10/09/2012 04:58 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:18:25PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
To build such an image I'd really would have preferred not installing
the docs. It appears rpm once had a feature for that where you could add
excludedocs in rpmrc. This feature
On 10/09/2012 05:06 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:18:25PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
To build such an image I'd really would have preferred not installing
the docs. It appears rpm once had a feature for that where you could
On 10/09/2012 05:19 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 09.10.12 17:14, Panu Matilainen (pmati...@laiskiainen.org) wrote:
On 10/09/2012 04:58 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:18:25PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
To build such an image I'd really would have preferred
On 10/09/2012 05:29 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Panu Matilainen wrote:
--nodocs and tsflags=nodocs ends up with ugly ugly things when you want
to do rpm -Va later.
Err, not. Rpm remembers files that were skipped on purpose and does
not whine about them on verification
On 10/09/2012 08:15 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 09.10.12 10:54, Seth Vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:18:27AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
You'll need to get the packaging team on board with it. I have to
On 10/09/2012 08:39 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 20:20 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 10/09/2012 08:15 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 09.10.12 10:54, Seth Vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012
On 10/09/2012 10:03 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 09.10.12 17:25, Panu Matilainen (pmati...@laiskiainen.org) wrote:
Can I pass this somehow to yum? Or do I have to creat a macro file for
this?
You can set it in yum.conf (tsflags=nodocs), but then rpm wont know
about it (so if you
On 10/30/2012 08:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 19:32 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
I don't know if it's impossible to revert to the F17 anaconda at this
time, however it is clear that F18 is going to be the longest release
cycle we had in 9 years and somehow we need to
On 10/29/2012 04:06 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/29/2012 05:39 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2012-10-29, Michel Alexandre Salim sali...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On 10/28/2012 04:08 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: Is there any RPM-fu I
can use to
On 10/31/2012 11:47 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
it is REALLY bad make UsrMove and HRADCODE /bin:/sbin
in PATH of openssh, this results in packages built
with rpmbuild having Requires: /bin/perl as example
in my opinion rpmbuild should know about the change
and fix implicit Requires: /bin and
On 11/01/2012 08:37 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/31/2012 11:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:59:54AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
I think we need to give developers more time for feature integration
after the feature freeze.
+1
No matter whether we increase the
On 11/01/2012 07:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 09:56 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 09:24:52AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
There are features and features... some of them are new versions of
leafnode packages or a just bunch of new packages which
On 11/04/2012 02:32 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, I have been thinking about rawhide.
I agree identifying the problems/issues would be good, and I think
there's something we can do to help with that:
Get a nice group of at least 10 or so folks who are active on this list
to agree to run it full
On 11/04/2012 12:17 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le samedi 03 novembre 2012 à 09:29 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 11:28 +, mike cloaked wrote:
Others may wish to compare Fedora with other distributions also - but
one thought I had was that in Archlinux there are
On 11/05/2012 09:39 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:59:54 -0700
Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net escribió:
On 10/31/2012 09:56 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
*
On 11/05/2012 01:12 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
Le Lun 5 novembre 2012 10:45, Dodji Seketeli a écrit :
Just having a dedicated Rawhide Swat Team of die hard volunteers
who
could spot issues early, file more bugs, gently push for fixes in
Rawhide and last but not
On 11/09/2012 07:15 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:33:05PM +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 2012-11-09, 14:30 GMT, David Cantrell wrote:
Just to cite similar complaints I see from time to time... It
irritates me that people think it's a problem that in 2012 they can't
install in
On 11/09/2012 08:08 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 11/09/2012 09:57 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Except that rpm (and yum) use a lot LESS memory these days than they did
in the RHEL-5 era, which I think was used as a comparison here. That's
not where all the memory has gone, quite the contrary
On 11/10/2012 11:41 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Andre Robatino wrote:
*IMPORTANT*: Both TC8 install DVDs are oversized and will not fit on
single-layer DVDs. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD#Capacity for
DVD size limits.
See what damage MiniDebugInfo is doing? Nobody (other than me) cared
On 11/11/2012 06:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 2012-11-11 0:53, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Reverting mini-debuginfo would require a mass-rebuild which is hardly
going to happen at this point of F18 no matter what you think of the
feature.
For starters it would help if the DVD didn't contain
On 11/12/2012 08:56 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 2012-11-11 22:02, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Based on a quick grep, it doesn't seem to consider obsoletion at all,
which explains what I see on the DVD and perhaps deserves looking at.
I think the basic idea is that pungi isn't supposed
On 11/12/2012 09:43 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 11/12/2012 08:56 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 2012-11-11 22:02, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Based on a quick grep, it doesn't seem to consider obsoletion at all,
which explains what I see on the DVD and perhaps deserves looking at.
I think
in %changelog: Tue Jun 03 2009 Panu Matilainen
pmati...@redhat.com - 4.7.0-5
Jun 03 2009 was Wednesday, not Tuesday, hence the warning. As rpm hasn't
hasn't previously validated changelog dates make sense as a whole,
nearly every spec has one or more of these mistakes. It's just a warning
On 11/15/2012 11:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:28:49AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
For further details see the draft release notes at
http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.11.0
Should we start changing
%doc README COPYING
to
%doc README
%license COPYING
On 11/15/2012 12:21 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 06:20 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 11/15/2012 11:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:28:49AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
For further details see the draft release notes at
http://rpm.org
On 11/15/2012 12:20 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 11/15/2012 11:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:28:49AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
For further details see the draft release notes at
http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.11.0
Should we start changing
%doc README
On 11/20/2012 07:45 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Panu Matilainen
pmati...@laiskiainen.org mailto:pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
Now that FESCo accepted
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/__Features/RPM4.11
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RPM4.11
On 11/22/2012 12:03 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 10.11.2012 10:51, Julian Sikorski pisze:
Hi,
I was wondering if it was possible to monitor the maximum and/or average
memory usage of a mock build process. I am trying to investigate why a
package takes less 2 hours to build on F16/F17, 24
On 11/25/2012 09:12 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 2012-11-24 15:05, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 24.11.2012 14:37, Panu Matilainen pisze:
On 11/23/2012 09:19 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 22.11.2012 07:55, Panu Matilainen pisze:
On 11/22/2012 12:03 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu
On 12/02/2012 10:57 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
system-config-keyboard should do this:
1. Get the old settings: cat /etc/sysconfig/keyboard
2. Set the new settings: su -c 'localectl set-x11-keymap layout
On 12/02/2012 03:46 AM, Mark Bidewell wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 17:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Ven 30 novembre 2012 15:11, Mark Bidewell a écrit :
I have been working on packaging software into RPMs for my
On 12/04/2012 04:59 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 09:20:05AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 12/02/2012 10:57 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
system-config-keyboard should do this:
1. Get the old
On 12/04/2012 01:59 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Looks like some packages make use of:
%doc --parents Copyright.txt README.html vtkLogo.jpg vtkBanner.gif
Wrapping/*/README*
To pass --parents to the cp command. This appears to no longer work:
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SeYbFF
On 12/05/2012 09:38 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
One approach: a convention where each feature gets a tracking bug, and then
various tasks can be marked as blocking that. *Then*, each release can have
a tracking bug for accepted features themselves, and the tool to produce the
chart can simply be
On 12/06/2012 12:50 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 6.12.2012 10:14, Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
On 12/05/2012 09:38 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
One approach: a convention where each feature gets a tracking bug,
and then
various tasks can be marked as blocking that. *Then*, each release
can have
On 12/07/2012 09:41 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 16:48 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 6, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:02:20PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 03:34:23PM -0500,
On 12/07/2012 05:26 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:56:44AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
I haven't experienced this with F16, F17 or so far F18. What I'm seeing is:
yum install/update grub gets me grub legacy.
yum install/update grub-efi gets me grub legacy efi.
yum
On 12/07/2012 07:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 06:49:25PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
My comment was simply on the if you have both part: it's not
really possible to have both without playing dirty tricks, so even
the if is pretty moot.
My point is that it's
On 12/07/2012 07:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Are there other obsoleted packages in the F18 repo?
Here's what I see on F18, it's quite a pile:
4ti2-1.3.2-12.fc18.x86_64
anyremote2html-1.4-4.fc18.noarch
chktex-1.6.4-11.fc18.x86_64
classads-1.0.8-5.fc18.i686
classads-1.0.8-5.fc18.x86_64
On 01/02/2013 01:53 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 28.12.2012 15:39, Michael Scherer napsal(a):
[root]
root-graf3d-gl-5.34.02-1.fc19.x86_64 requires
libGLEW.so.1.7()(64bit)
doesn't even let a srpm be created on F18, and fail on this line :
%if %{?fedora}%{!?fedora:0} = 17 ||
On 01/17/2013 03:30 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Hallo,
during my last build of inn on rawhide I have got the following odd
error messages:
RPM build errors:
bogus date in %changelog: Wed Jan 13 2009 Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com
- 2.4.5-7
bogus date in %changelog: Fri Jul 7 2008
On 01/20/2013 07:32 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Here's another %doc change:
%doc doc/Users\ guide\ Apache.html
Gets executed as:
+ cp -pr 'doc/Users
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/rubygem-passenger-3.0.19-1.fc19.i386/usr/share/doc/mod_passenger-3.0.19'
cp: missing destination file operand after
On 01/21/2013 10:39 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 01/20/2013 07:32 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Here's another %doc change:
%doc doc/Users\ guide\ Apache.html
Gets executed as:
+ cp -pr 'doc/Users
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/rubygem-passenger-3.0.19-1.fc19.i386/usr/share/doc/mod_passenger
Apologies for shouting but we have a genuine, rare, rpmdb-eating bug
(shade of dark paperbag) at hand:
DO NOT UPGRADE TO rpm-4.11.0-0.beta1.2.fc19!
The buggy version is expected to appear in todays rawhide-push. I've
built a new version where the broken %ghost-related patch is reverted
but
On 01/29/2013 03:14 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:09:49 +0200
Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
Apologies for shouting but we have a genuine, rare, rpmdb-eating bug
(shade of dark paperbag) at hand:
DO NOT UPGRADE TO rpm-4.11.0-0.beta1.2.fc19!
The buggy
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
should be possible, we have an (old but we have one) apt
unless I'm reading that forum thread wrong - it sure seems like apt-fast
requires axel's repo? If that's true then I think it nixes any chance
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 02:08:10PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
- If the file in both packages is identical, installation is allowed
and the file is written
- If the file in both packages is an ELF binary, the file used is the
file in the
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 02:08:10PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
- If the file in both packages is identical, installation is allowed
and the file is written
- If the file in both packages is an ELF
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 06:43:35PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Note that rpm 4.6.0 did behave differently here: packages with
conflicting files were allowed to be installed in the same transaction but
not if installed separately, leading
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:13:33PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
%global _use_internal_dependency_generator 0
The external dependency generator doesn't create the file coloring that
the multilib magic needs to operate. So you'll get conflicts on all
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Owen Taylor (otay...@redhat.com) said:
Looking at the build logs for F-12, e.g.:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/glib2/2.22.4/1.fc12/data/logs/i686/build.log
we seem to have things set up to run configure as:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Doug Ledford wrote:
One could argue that the current bodhi karma system is simply too
simplistic for real use cases. Maybe instead of just +1 -1, there
should be:
Fixes my problem
Works for me (someone testing that didn't necessarily have any of the
problem supposedly
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Doug Ledford wrote:
Fixes my problem
Works for me (someone testing that didn't necessarily have any of the
problem supposedly fixed by this update just noting that their system
still works ok with the update)
Doesn't fix my problem (but doesn't
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Enrico Scholz wrote:
%post can give out something; e.g. '%post failed' which would happen
here due to the redhat-lsb bug. I just give out a more useful message
than '%post failed' which helps people to identify the problem.
%post MUST *NEVER* FAIL!!!
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Tom \spot\ Callaway wrote:
On 03/04/2010 05:21 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 03/04/2010 12:07 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 3 March 2010 21:45, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote:
Here are the list of changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines:
I've done some
I've been refraining from commenting on these update-threads but as it
seems folks have started actually counting the pro semi-rolling vs
conservative updates style replies... for the record:
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, Kalev Lember wrote:
I'd personally want to be able to _choose_ if and when I
On 08/28/2013 05:42 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I wanted to let everyone know that as of last night all of the buildvm
builders were moved from RHEL 6 to Fedora 19. We do still have some
rhel6 builders.
Hum... a question, or perhaps more
On 08/28/2013 06:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:22:57 +0300
Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
Hum... a question, or perhaps more like two:
Are you planning to move the remaining RHEL-6 builders to Fedora too,
and if so, is this (builders running on Fedora
On 08/29/2013 11:47 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 29.8.2013 08:05, Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
For a practical example of the timescale of this process as things
have been so far: opt-in install-time macro-expansion of scriptlets
was implemented upstream in March 2010 and has been in Fedora since
On 10/16/2013 12:51 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Hi,
This is one of these passionate threads I enjoy reading because I
usually learn something interesting, and I also enjoy people being
passionate about stuff. But this time I'm a bit disappointed about the
defaults for Fedora.
I'm a developer,
On 10/16/2013 10:17 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Panu Matilainen
pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
On 10/16/2013 12:51 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Hi,
This is one of these passionate threads I enjoy reading because I
usually learn something interesting, and I
On 11/01/2013 05:12 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 01.11.2013 16:09, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 01.11.2013 16:07, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to do some rpm macro magic:
%define do_build() \
mkdir
On 11/14/2013 05:45 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 08:56 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
- Is this a bug in redhat-rpm-config/Python/RPM/Fedora?
Yes. People hit this _constantly_ in a lot of ways. Like why am I not
getting debuginfo packages. The theory is that you might
On 11/15/2013 05:25 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/14/2013 06:13 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 11/14/2013 05:45 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 08:56 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
- Is this a bug in redhat-rpm-config/Python/RPM/Fedora?
Yes. People hit this _constantly_
On 11/15/2013 10:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.11.2013 04:08, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Reindl Harald wrote:
but sadly you can't do Requires: package.x86_64 explicitly
You can actually:
Requires: openssl(x86-64)
See also the %{_isa} macro
you can't, been there done that in trying to list
On 11/18/2013 10:27 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 11/18/2013 12:44 AM, Mattias Ellert wrote:
sön 2013-11-17 klockan 22:12 +0100 skrev Sandro Mani:
Upgrading from xflr5-6.09.05-4.fc21.x86_64 to
xflr5-6.09.05-5.fc21.x86_64 however fails with
Transaction check error:
file
On 01/04/2014 11:50 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
This is the first time I heard of DNF.
Looking at the page where differences between DNF and yum are explained
(http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html) my question is: do we
really need DNF to replace yum?
Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me
On 01/06/2014 11:47 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Richard Fearn (richardfe...@gmail.com) said:
On 28 December 2013 16:43, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_.25pretrans_scriptlet
Notes that you need to use lua in pretrans scriptlets, not
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Wednesday 17 November 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ville Skyttä wrote:
I'd get rid of the versioned javadoc dir altogether, and simply install
to %{_javadocdir}/%{name}. Unversioned is good for bookmarking and
javadoc crosslinking.
One thing
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 23/11/10 10:11, Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
While applying today's updates on a machine running a slapd server, the
following error occurred:
Stopping slapd: [ OK ]
Checking configuration files for slapd: [FAILED]
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 23/11/10 10:11, Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
While applying today's updates on a machine running a slapd server, the
following error occurred:
Stopping slapd: [ OK ]
Checking configuration files for slapd
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/23/2010 05:30 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 11/23/10 5:55 AM, Jan Vcelak wrote:
Hi!
Currently, the upgrade process in openldap looks like this:
* during db4 package upgrade run db_upgrade (%triggerin and %triggerun)
* if minor version of
It's that time of year again, although there seems to be an off-by-one bug
in the calendar system causing some inconsistency in the timing wrt last
year :P
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-November/042339.html
Anyway, before going to beta and starting the inevitable Fedora
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
1. This change:
| Packages with no files can now omit the %files section and still have
| packages generated.
is going to make it a PITA to conditionalize
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/26/2010 04:50 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
and Fedora compatible SRPM(s) can be found at
http://laiskiainen.org/rpm/srpms/
I am using this now on my Fedora 14 box and I haven't
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/28/2010 04:17 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
The new dependency generator is where I suspect some regressions might
be lurking - try building packages (for example ones that you maintain),
check that all the expected automatic dependencies
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:15:52 +0200 (EET)
Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
1. This change:
| Packages
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 11/26/2010 12:20 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
It's that time of year again, although there seems to be an off-by-one bug
in the calendar system causing some inconsistency in the timing wrt last
year :P
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
PM == Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org writes:
PM In particular, I'm interested in feedback on the new, pluggable and
PM enhanced dependency extration system. Documentation is scarce at the
PM moment but some background and examples
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
Panu Matilainen schreef op vr 26-11-2010 om 13:20 [+0200]:
In particular, I'm interested in feedback on the new, pluggable and
enhanced dependency extration system. Documentation is scarce at the
moment but some background and examples can
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
Panu Matilainen schreef op di 30-11-2010 om 22:10 [+0200]:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
If I understand your blog entry correctly then we (the Fedora MinGW SIG)
are recommended to use something like this:
%__mingw32_provides
1 - 100 of 662 matches
Mail list logo
