On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 09:12 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Looks like it was rebuilt for Rawhide and Fedora 14. Are you sure
you are not looking ong f13 branch?
I looked right after doing my fedpkg clone when I edited the spec file.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 11:44 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
The git package contains the /etc/bash_completion.d/git file where
is defined function __git_ps1() which provides more usable strings
(it's able to detect if you are rebasing, bisecting, merging, ...) and
allows to use formatting for the
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 10:09 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Where can I get such information? And is it possible to indicate where
I can locate Fedora's kernel git tree?
rpm -q --changelog should be a start.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 15:58 +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I plan to put up some scripts to automate part of the review process
as soon as I have the time to finish them.
Some time ago I put this together:
http://project.pingoured.fr/reviewHelper/
The idea here is of course not to do
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 11:59 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
Here's where it gets weird:
0.6.10-1 then 0.6.10-2 then 0.6.9-4 then 0.6.9-2 seems an arbitrary
ordering:
It is only weird/inverted when the date are the same.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:08 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
Hi,
I just heard I might be put through the unresponsive maintainer process
in Fedora? I'm a little confused as I've never received emails on this,
and I'm always on irc and read fedora-devel and still perform very regular
package
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:48 +0530, Hiemanshu Sharma wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/13/2010 07:17 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:39:45 +1000
Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 17:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
On
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 20:18 +, José Matos wrote:
One request, would it be possible for R2rpm to read the personal
rpmmacros
instead of forcing a given directory layout?
I have just commit this change to the git, could you test it ?
Thanks,
Pierre
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 16:23 +, José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 16:06:46 Pierre-Yves wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 20:18 +, José Matos wrote:
One request, would it be possible for R2rpm to read the personal
rpmmacros
instead of forcing a given directory layout?
I
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 19:50 +, José Matos wrote:
For the rest, does it work properly for you ?
OK, I am catching on all the mail after a busy week. I have not yet tried to
apply the latest version 0.3 here are my comments from previous versions.
I had to use the following patch.
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 16:18 +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Saturday 27 March 2010 14:30:12 Pierre-Yves wrote:
I have just put together a version 0.7 which give the option to use mock
to build the rpm.
See R2rpm for the usage.
Feel free to poke me if it doesn't work for you.
Nice work
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 16:07 +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Obviously not every fedora maintainer has shell account so exact
replica
of [2] wouldn't work, but I was thinking some nicer interface could be
provided. Maybe simple email with special subject line:
FAS-name - $messsage
And
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 19:48 +0100, Johan Cwiklinski wrote:
I'm going to orphan following packages:
- homebank ([8], [9])
I will take this one if you orphan it as I am already comaintainer.
However I do not use it personally so if someone else is interested
please feel free.
Pierre
--
devel
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 14:57 -0200, Filipe Rosset wrote:
I use this software daily. I can take ownership or maintain this
package as a co-maintainer.
Please take it then, I can stay co-maintainer if you wish though.
Thanks !
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I have been looking into the review #668863 in which the packager for
this library (who also happens to be upstream) is actually removing the
flag -fexceptions from $RPM_OPT_FLAGS in the %build.
Asking this question on irc (on fedora-devel) as lead to a small
discussion without clear
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 16:36 +, Mat Booth wrote:
[mbooth@mc ~]$ repoquery --alldeps --tree-whatrequires pmd
Just FYI, the --alldeps is not needed here as the current implementation
of --tree-* is recursive anyway.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 10:28 +0200, josef radinger wrote:
I prepared a handfull of R-subpackages and would need a reviewer.
The packages should be rather easy to review, some have dependencies
to
other packages from my list. I noted that on the given
bugzilla-entries.
Are-you already a
Hi,
Being the maintainer of Guake I have received a number of bug gconf
related [1]. Their common pattern is that they only appear the first
time guake is installed and run (and then again not always).
If the user restart X/the computer, the bug does not appear at all.
I am therefore quite
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 20:44 +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
Hi,
Being the maintainer of Guake I have received a number of bug gconf
related [1]. Their common pattern is that they only appear the first
time guake is installed and run (and then again not always).
If the user restart X
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 09:38 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Pierre-Yves pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
Would it be allowed to try to restart gconfd ?
It would make sense to SIGHUP gconfd after new schemas are installed,
yes. Note though we should really only
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:24 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Something like this:
%posttrans
killall -HUP gconfd-2 /dev/null || :
You might want to switch to using the macros documented here at the
same
time::
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GConf
I have
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:24 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
(Since this might be a regression in gconf2, you might need to still add the
%posttrans scriptlet wth the new scriptlets. If Colin knows that this is
%a bug that won't be fixed in some versions of Fedora I'll add the killall
%to the
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 14:04 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I'm a bit unclear on the original problem report, actually. In
addition to
what you've said, the report also says that the user had to logout and
log
back in before it worked. That seems like a different symptom. 30
seconds
is not
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 16:33 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
JBoss is stalled because it depends on a package with:
- incompatible license
- six years old
- dead upstream
How is this different from what is on the bug report ?
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi all,
On the 12th of May I approved the package R-caTools [1].
Since, and despite 2 ping on the bugzilla, there has been no sign of
life from the original submitter.
The question is then, can I do the cvs request for this package and take
over its maintenance in place of the original submitter
Dear all,
Does someone know how to contact Cheese ?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/cheese
I have tried to join him by the bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585817
He has two packages in updates-testing:
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 09:22 +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
Dear all,
Does someone know how to contact Cheese ?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/cheese
I have tried to join him by the bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585817
He has two packages
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 12:30 +0100, Mark Chappell wrote:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
It takes three weeks which can be frustrating, the initial can we
push this update to testing might count as the initial ticket
creation, dropping it down to 2
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 10:51 +0200, josef radinger wrote:
sorry for being offline. had some longer trouble in real life and am
now
wading through lots of mails which piled up since some weeks.
Good to hear you are back :-)
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 08:37 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 22:57 -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Is there any interest in helping me maintain and review these new R
packages in Fedora? The packages are already done, its just the
reviews
and upkeep that I'd need help
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 13:23 +0100, Dan Bolser wrote:
Sorry for the dumb question, but can you link me to a step by step
review process?
I'd like to do an 'internal review' if not a propper review.
Hi Dan,
Indeed you will not be able to do an official review until you have been
approved as
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 12:36 +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
On 07/13/2010 12:27 PM, Jens Petersen wrote:
Should someone write up a draft for an official package review
checklist, and have FPC update it when guidelines change? (I guess by
writing this email I just volunteered myself...)
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 22:38 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
$ make tag
Make system retired, please use fedpkg. See fedpkg --help
Suggestions on what to put in here?
Might be nice to already print the equivalent command:
$ make tag
Make system retired, please use fedpkg.
The equivalent function
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 10:51 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
For packagers, developers, and sysadmins needing python-fedora client
code,
this should mean you need to make no changes. yum install
python-fedora
or Requires: python-fedora will continue to get you python-fedora and
the
minimal
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 13:24 +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
There are Fedora core, EPEL, JPackage... it is not really clear for
newcomers to see several repository, and what are their
relationships...
Since your are french, I would invite do check out the french
documentation on
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 20:16 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
It's not being enforced in bodhi, but it should be:
https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/277
It is somehow sad that nobody took the time to write a two line patch
to
fix this 3 year old bug report:
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 09:22 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
Someone pointed out an interesting Ruby gem [1] to me recently that I
thought about packaging for Fedora. The gem has a dependency tree that
includes several other gems that aren't in Fedora as well [2], so I'd
love it if a few people
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 22:14 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
Hello,
I tried to reach the maintainer of elementary-icon-theme.noarch for
several times now.[1] So far I didn't receive any notice if he even read
the mails from bugzilla.
I don't feel the need to take over the package but if no one
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 15:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
The right solution is for the user to just uncheck the kernel from
the list
of packages to update in the PackageKit GUI of choice (be it gnome-
packagekit, KPackageKit or Apper) if the kmod doesn't show up along
with it.
It's not
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 11:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I know a lot of people wanted to have a discussion about this first,
but since we had the opportunity to hack on this
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 10:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
Should we request a separate mailing list? I don't expect it to be
high volume obviously but it could make communication easier since
people live across multiple time zones. Also, it would make subjects
easier since right now on the
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 22:12 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 13:24 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
I just sent an email directly to his archlinux.us email address asking
if he wishes to resign from his maintainer duties or if he is just
busy.
Let's see if he
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 16:27 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:55 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 21:45 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
That's a nonsense. Simply said. If I have a properly generated random
ssh private key with a strong passphrase that I
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:56 -0300, James Bowes wrote:
python-vobject -- A python library for manipulating vCard and
vCalendar files
I have taken this one.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:56 -0300, James Bowes wrote:
gitg -- GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system
This one seem to already have found a new owner: nacho.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:04 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for fedpkg
(part of fedora-packager).
This build is a pretty major rewrite to make use of a shared pyrpkg backend.
Coming along for the ride is a new build of GitPython
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 10:00 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Anonymously checking doesn't help:
$ fedpkg clone R-widgetTool -a
Never-mind this part, I had a typo (R-widgetTool*s*).
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 09:47 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Nov 2, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
It seems it is not reading the username from the certificate.
That's right, it does not just yet. I plan on working on user discovery code
soon as
I also have to support
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 17:23 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Nov 1, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for fedpkg
(part of fedora-packager).
This build is a pretty major rewrite to make use of a shared pyrpkg
backend.
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 13:25 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/21/2011 01:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Hello fellow devs,
I am sure quite a few of you have done some reviews and thought Hey,
a,b,c and d could be automated. For E I could use some more
information that can be
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 16:13 +0100, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
curl -H Accept: application/json
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/applications/Terminal results in
500 Internal error
This one is not that is true and that can be fixed.
For an example of the json output see:
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 17:06 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 11/21/2011 02:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
- Any ideas, bugreports etc will be much appreciated
I would be very interested in feature, which instead of mock, will run
Koji scratch build and then will download resulting
Hi,
Once in a while comes back the question: is insert nick here
around ?
Normally followed by: I have opened and pinged him several time on
bugzilla #/email/irc/insert what I missed here.
And there the hunt for the last trace of activity starts. Some days ago
someone on the list was asking if
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 08:15 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 01:25:36PM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
The non existing contingency plan was wrong thing to do and it must
be taken more seriously for features since F-19.
One way to deal with non-esitent contingency
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 22:24 +0300, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
2012/11/6 Matthieu Gautier mgaut...@fedoraproject.org:
Hum.. It should be some misunderstanding somewhere :
Definitely. Please stop talking about things you have no idea about.
You can also just show him where he is wrong rather
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 09:49 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
You are still maintainer, you are still owner and you are notified by
email about every change in your package, so you'll be able to catch
such activity pretty soon and act accordingly.
To be the devil's advocate, you do get the email
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 10:12 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 7.11.2012 10:00, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 09:49 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
You are still maintainer, you are still owner and you are notified by
email about every change in your package, so you'll be able
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 16:59 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2012-11-07 16:53, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com
Besides that, I can just agree with Tim. The oldest package
was reviewed less than a year ago,
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 11:02 -0600, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
It has been discussed in the past that we should have a repository of
the rawhide kernels with debug turned off to encourage more users to run
the latest upstream snapshots. That repository now exists. You can
enable it by dropping
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 07:49 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
David Cantrell wrote:
The scope was not a surprise to us, we knew from the beginning when we
started this that the delivery of all newui work would have to be staged
across multiple Fedora releases. The key was getting groups like
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 19:05 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.01.2013 18:57, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
Just to be clear, RHEL != Fedora. Red Hat policy for RHEL kernel
is not acceptable to Fedora and Fedora kernel
continues to have the patches split out. You cannot use that to
defend
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 21:34 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.2013 21:24, schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
but keep in mind that Fedora is the base for RHEL
applications may be certified for mysql
And that is Fedora's problem how?
and THAT is the problem with many pieces of fedora
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 03:52:03AM -0800, Dan Mashal wrote:
On Monday, January 28, 2013, M�ir�n Duffy wrote:
On 01/28/2013 02:06 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
You don't see the point of MATE or Cinnamon? How long did you play
with
them 5 minutes?
Do you remember the
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 05:17:20AM -0800, Dan Mashal wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Jiri Eischmann eischm...@redhat.com wrote:
Dan Mashal píše v Út 29. 01. 2013 v 04:25 -0800:
I'll tell you what, last time I checked #1 spin is KDE.
1. because the Desktop spin is not included in
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 09:34 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:
2013/2/1 Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com
Yes, defaults needs to be sensible and usable and for many
people
that's what they end up with. I'm not saying we should go and
have AOO
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 11:41 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
On Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:38:19 +0100
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 09:34 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:
2013/2/1 Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com
Yes, defaults needs to be sensible
Application should request the ports to be opened and the firewalld
layer should then confirm with the user stating which ports and
which app requested said ports. The app can't lie if the firewall
layer is the one asking for confirmation.
But a malicious app can pretend to be another one,
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:59:40AM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:23:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Sep 11, 2013 6:02 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
What if we made this like the I voted stickers -- you can get one by
checking a box in the
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:08:21PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:59:40AM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:23:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Sep 11, 2013 6:02 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
What if we made
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:55:51AM -0500, inode0 wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:23:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Sep 11, 2013 6:02 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
What if we made this like the
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:56:03PM +0600, Malintha Adikari wrote:
* Hi,
I am a student who is participating GSOC 2013 for Fedora organization. I
am developing a web application for fedora ambassadors. I want to give
users to login facility with FAS. I could found that the FAS
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:38:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:35:20 +0200
Jakub Filak jfi...@redhat.com wrote:
a bugzilla ticket [1] requiring a better Bugzilla summary field text
produced by abrt has been
On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 10:58 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:38:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:35:20 +0200
Jakub Filak jfi...@redhat.com wrote:
a bugzilla ticket [1] requiring
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:18:35AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:12:31PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Error: Auth was requested but no way to perform auth was given.
Please set username and password or session_id before calling this
function with auth=True
Could not
Hi,
I have just tagged, build and pushed a new fedocal update, 0.2.0, available as
before at:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/
With this update comes a number of improvements:
- Move to OpenID (and more specifically FAS-OpenID)
- Redesign of the home page (no more one calendar by
Dear all,
I have been working for some time on the next version of packagedb/pkgdb [1].
I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are passing
and I seem to be able to do what I want with it. Thus I thought this would be a
good time to call for testers and collect bug
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 03:20:30PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
- The idea of owner of a package disapear. There are only maintainers on
which
one of them appears to be the dedicated point of contact
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:05:10PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dne 13.11.2013 14:52, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do, but
don't
forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE
feel
free to note
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:57:38PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:52:27 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
The development instance of pkgdb2 is at:
http://209.132.184.188/
That page says Version 1.0.0 at the top and 0.1.0 at the bottom,
and you refer
Yesterday I updated the production servers to fedocal 0.3.0.
With it comes a number of features and bugfixes:
* Select the timezone when adding a new meeting
* Pre-view of the meeting description (allows Markdown - html)
* iCal export link easier to find/copy for mobile devices
* Calendar can be
Yesterday I updated the production servers to fedocal 0.3.0.
With it comes a number of features and bugfixes:
* Select the timezone when adding a new meeting
* Pre-view of the meeting description (allows Markdown - html)
* iCal export link easier to find/copy for mobile devices
* Calendar can be
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:16:53AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Yesterday I updated the production servers to fedocal 0.3.0.
I just pushed a small 0.3.1 update allowing to edit meeting that have already
occured.
This new version is available as before on:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:50:42AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
One thing which is probably an issue with the import process: I looked at
the package kdelibs-experimental which has been retired, as seen on pkgdb1:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/kdelibs-experimental
(see
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:19:35AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:50:42AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
One thing which is probably an issue with the import process: I looked at
the package kdelibs-experimental which has been retired, as seen on pkgdb1:
https
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:34:28PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote:
The reason is simple. Fedorahosted lacks features, is unplesant and need
byrocracy even to create a repository.
Creating a repository is actually the only time bureaucracy is required.
Giving write
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 05:34:19PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
By using github you are also eliminating the possibility of some people to
contribute to your project. I personally won't create an account on
github. Just because I believe that open projects should be hosted on open
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:57:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
You're forgeting, patch/code reviews,
Export patch from git, attach to new issue in the bug tracker; as the
maintainer, apply it with git am and push it; where's the problem?
possibility to close
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 01:48:53PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:57:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
You're forgeting, patch/code reviews,
Export patch from git, attach to new issue in the bug tracker; as the
maintainer, apply it with git
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:07:55AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
Hey,
recently, I saw a few requests to update python-django to Django-1.6,
the corresponding bug is [1].
As there are quite a few changes, I'd expect this update to be harmful,
at least
- python-django-openstack-auth
-
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are
passing
and I seem to be able to do what I want with it. Thus I thought this would be
a
good time to call for testers and collect bug reports and RFE
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:52:58PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 12/10/2013 02:20 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do,
but don't
forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE
feel
free
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 09:55 +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Dan Mashal [10/12/2013 11:29] :
Can we get a my packages button? Or am I blind and not seeing one?
There's a Restrict to owner: form where you can enter your FAS username.
Also works if you just click on your nick on the top
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 10.12.2013 14:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are
passing
and I seem to be able to do
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 04:45:22PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 12.12.2013 14:42, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 10.12.2013 14:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote
FYI :-)
Pierre
---BeginMessage---
I've rolled up R-2.12.2.tar.gz a short while ago. This is an update release,
which fixes a number of mostly minor issues, and one major issue in which
complex arithmetic was being messed up on some compiler platform.
You can get it from
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 14:11 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 03/30/2011 02:10 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/3/30 Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de:
On 03/30/2011 01:54 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya,
I just uploaded a new version of systemd into F15, which
establishes a
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:38 +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
I've been putting something similar together [1], to simplify the
process.
It doesn't do much at the moment (a checklist with mock/koji rebuild
support)
and is quite ugly :)
I like your config files idea. I currently just use CSV
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 15:10 -0400, Allen S. Rout wrote:
When I try to build from a local source, it fails to find the source
file.
[...]
[root@troll-2 cran]# R2rpm -s /var/tmp/cran/plyr_1.2.1.tar.gz
(Do you always build as root ? I was always told that it should be
avoided)
[...]
* Building
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 15:06 -0400, Allen S. Rout wrote:
R2spec remains a project designed to make the life of Fedora's R
packager's easier, so it has to remain guideline compliant. That is
a reason why putting the source0 as URL also is not *in my opinion*
a good approach (while I
Hi,
With the help and advices from abadger1999, akurtakov and Haikel I put
together some code for a project called PackageDB-cli [1]*.
The idea is to provide packagers with a way to do in CLI what they do at
the moment on the website (so allowing them to manage their ACL without
going on the
1 - 100 of 1057 matches
Mail list logo
