Re: python-fedora package split

2011-08-10 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 10:51 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: For packagers, developers, and sysadmins needing python-fedora client code, this should mean you need to make no changes. yum install python-fedora or Requires: python-fedora will continue to get you python-fedora and the minimal

Re: question regarding Fedora packaging

2011-08-21 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 13:24 +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: There are Fedora core, EPEL, JPackage... it is not really clear for newcomers to see several repository, and what are their relationships... Since your are french, I would invite do check out the french documentation on

Re: submitters +1ing their own packages

2011-09-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 20:16 +0200, Till Maas wrote: It's not being enforced in bodhi, but it should be: https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/277 It is somehow sad that nobody took the time to write a two line patch to fix this 3 year old bug report:

Re: Propsing ruby gems foul language in license...

2011-09-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 09:22 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: Someone pointed out an interesting Ruby gem [1] to me recently that I thought about packaging for Fedora. The gem has a dependency tree that includes several other gems that aren't in Fedora as well [2], so I'd love it if a few people

Re: non-responsive icon theme maintainer

2011-09-15 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 22:14 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote: Hello, I tried to reach the maintainer of elementary-icon-theme.noarch for several times now.[1] So far I didn't receive any notice if he even read the mails from bugzilla. I don't feel the need to take over the package but if no one

Re: Need systemd unit file help.

2011-09-26 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 15:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: The right solution is for the user to just uncheck the kernel from the list of packages to update in the PackageKit GUI of choice (be it gnome- packagekit, KPackageKit or Apper) if the kmod doesn't show up along with it. It's not

Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-07 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 11:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: I know a lot of people wanted to have a discussion about this first, but since we had the opportunity to hack on this

Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 10:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: Should we request a separate mailing list? I don't expect it to be high volume obviously but it could make communication easier since people live across multiple time zones. Also, it would make subjects easier since right now on the

Re: non-responsive icon theme maintainer

2011-10-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 22:12 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 13:24 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: I just sent an email directly to his archlinux.us email address asking if he wishes to resign from his maintainer duties or if he is just busy. Let's see if he

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

2011-10-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 16:27 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:55 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 21:45 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: That's a nonsense. Simply said. If I have a properly generated random ssh private key with a strong passphrase that I

Re: Orphaning packages

2011-11-02 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:56 -0300, James Bowes wrote: python-vobject -- A python library for manipulating vCard and vCalendar files I have taken this one. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaning packages

2011-11-02 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:56 -0300, James Bowes wrote: gitg -- GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system This one seem to already have found a new owner: nacho. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

2011-11-02 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:04 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for fedpkg (part of fedora-packager). This build is a pretty major rewrite to make use of a shared pyrpkg backend. Coming along for the ride is a new build of GitPython

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

2011-11-02 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 10:00 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Anonymously checking doesn't help: $ fedpkg clone R-widgetTool -a Never-mind this part, I had a typo (R-widgetTool*s*). Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

2011-11-02 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 09:47 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: On Nov 2, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: It seems it is not reading the username from the certificate. That's right, it does not just yet. I plan on working on user discovery code soon as I also have to support

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

2011-11-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 17:23 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: On Nov 1, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for fedpkg (part of fedora-packager). This build is a pretty major rewrite to make use of a shared pyrpkg backend.

Re: (re)introducing - fedora-review - tool to help with package reviews

2011-11-21 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 13:25 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 11/21/2011 01:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: Hello fellow devs, I am sure quite a few of you have done some reviews and thought Hey, a,b,c and d could be automated. For E I could use some more information that can be

Re: A software center for Fedora

2011-12-04 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 16:13 +0100, Giovanni Campagna wrote: curl -H Accept: application/json https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/applications/Terminal results in 500 Internal error This one is not that is true and that can be fixed. For an example of the json output see:

Re: (re)introducing - fedora-review - tool to help with package reviews

2011-12-05 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 17:06 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: On 11/21/2011 02:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: - Any ideas, bugreports etc will be much appreciated I would be very interested in feature, which instead of mock, will run Koji scratch build and then will download resulting

Non-responsive maintainer ?

2011-12-05 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Hi, Once in a while comes back the question: is insert nick here around ? Normally followed by: I have opened and pinged him several time on bugzilla #/email/irc/insert what I missed here. And there the hunt for the last trace of activity starts. Some days ago someone on the list was asking if

Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

2012-10-31 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 08:15 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 01:25:36PM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: The non existing contingency plan was wrong thing to do and it must be taken more seriously for features since F-19. One way to deal with non-esitent contingency

Re: New release cycle proposal (was Rolling release model philosophy (was ...))

2012-11-06 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 22:24 +0300, Peter Lemenkov wrote: 2012/11/6 Matthieu Gautier mgaut...@fedoraproject.org: Hum.. It should be some misunderstanding somewhere : Definitely. Please stop talking about things you have no idea about. You can also just show him where he is wrong rather

Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process

2012-11-07 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 09:49 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: You are still maintainer, you are still owner and you are notified by email about every change in your package, so you'll be able to catch such activity pretty soon and act accordingly. To be the devil's advocate, you do get the email

Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process

2012-11-07 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 10:12 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 7.11.2012 10:00, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 09:49 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: You are still maintainer, you are still owner and you are notified by email about every change in your package, so you'll be able

Re: Unblocking packages: new review needed?

2012-11-07 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 16:59 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote: On 2012-11-07 16:53, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com Besides that, I can just agree with Tim. The oldest package was reviewed less than a year ago,

Re: Announcing the rawhide kernel nodebug repository

2012-11-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 11:02 -0600, Justin M. Forbes wrote: It has been discussed in the past that we should have a repository of the rawhide kernels with debug turned off to encourage more users to run the latest upstream snapshots. That repository now exists. You can enable it by dropping

Re: Fedora 18 Beta to slip by two weeks, Beta release date is now Nov 27

2012-11-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 07:49 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: David Cantrell wrote: The scope was not a surprise to us, we knew from the beginning when we started this that the delivery of all newui work would have to be staged across multiple Fedora releases. The key was getting groups like

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Replace MySQL with MariaDB

2013-01-26 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 19:05 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 25.01.2013 18:57, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: Just to be clear, RHEL != Fedora. Red Hat policy for RHEL kernel is not acceptable to Fedora and Fedora kernel continues to have the patches split out. You cannot use that to defend

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Replace MySQL with MariaDB

2013-01-26 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 21:34 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 26.01.2013 21:24, schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon: but keep in mind that Fedora is the base for RHEL applications may be certified for mysql And that is Fedora's problem how? and THAT is the problem with many pieces of fedora

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

2013-01-29 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 03:52:03AM -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: On Monday, January 28, 2013, M�ir�n Duffy wrote: On 01/28/2013 02:06 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: You don't see the point of MATE or Cinnamon? How long did you play with them 5 minutes? Do you remember the

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

2013-01-29 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 05:17:20AM -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Jiri Eischmann eischm...@redhat.com wrote: Dan Mashal píše v Út 29. 01. 2013 v 04:25 -0800: I'll tell you what, last time I checked #1 spin is KDE. 1. because the Desktop spin is not included in

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

2013-02-01 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 09:34 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote: 2013/2/1 Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com Yes, defaults needs to be sensible and usable and for many people that's what they end up with. I'm not saying we should go and have AOO

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

2013-02-01 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 11:41 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote: On Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:38:19 +0100 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 09:34 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote: 2013/2/1 Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com Yes, defaults needs to be sensible

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

2013-09-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Application should request the ports to be opened and the firewalld layer should then confirm with the user stating which ports and which app requested said ports. The app can't lie if the firewall layer is the one asking for confirmation. But a malicious app can pretend to be another one,

Re: fedmsg for voting?

2013-09-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:59:40AM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:23:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Sep 11, 2013 6:02 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: What if we made this like the I voted stickers -- you can get one by checking a box in the

Re: fedmsg for voting?

2013-09-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:08:21PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:59:40AM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:23:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Sep 11, 2013 6:02 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: What if we made

Re: fedmsg for voting?

2013-09-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:55:51AM -0500, inode0 wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:23:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Sep 11, 2013 6:02 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: What if we made this like the

Re: Get FAS account authentication facility for my Web page‏

2013-09-13 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:56:03PM +0600, Malintha Adikari wrote: * Hi, I am a student who is participating GSOC 2013 for Fedora organization. I am developing a web application for fedora ambassadors. I want to give users to login facility with FAS. I could found that the FAS

Re: abrt Bugzilla summary

2013-09-16 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:38:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:35:20 +0200 Jakub Filak jfi...@redhat.com wrote: a bugzilla ticket [1] requiring a better Bugzilla summary field text produced by abrt has been

Re: abrt Bugzilla summary

2013-09-16 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 10:58 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:38:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:35:20 +0200 Jakub Filak jfi...@redhat.com wrote: a bugzilla ticket [1] requiring

Re: Reminder on how to EOL a package

2013-09-17 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:18:35AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:12:31PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: Error: Auth was requested but no way to perform auth was given. Please set username and password or session_id before calling this function with auth=True Could not

Fedocal 0.2.0

2013-09-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Hi, I have just tagged, build and pushed a new fedocal update, 0.2.0, available as before at: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/ With this update comes a number of improvements: - Move to OpenID (and more specifically FAS-OpenID) - Redesign of the home page (no more one calendar by

[pkgdb2] call for testers, bug reports and RFE

2013-11-13 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Dear all, I have been working for some time on the next version of packagedb/pkgdb [1]. I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are passing and I seem to be able to do what I want with it. Thus I thought this would be a good time to call for testers and collect bug

Re: [pkgdb2] call for testers, bug reports and RFE

2013-11-13 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 03:20:30PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: - The idea of owner of a package disapear. There are only maintainers on which one of them appears to be the dedicated point of contact

Re: [pkgdb2] call for testers, bug reports and RFE

2013-11-13 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:05:10PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: Dne 13.11.2013 14:52, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do, but don't forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE feel free to note

Re: [pkgdb2] call for testers, bug reports and RFE

2013-11-13 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:57:38PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:52:27 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: The development instance of pkgdb2 is at: http://209.132.184.188/ That page says Version 1.0.0 at the top and 0.1.0 at the bottom, and you refer

Announcing fedocal 0.3.0

2013-11-15 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Yesterday I updated the production servers to fedocal 0.3.0. With it comes a number of features and bugfixes: * Select the timezone when adding a new meeting * Pre-view of the meeting description (allows Markdown - html) * iCal export link easier to find/copy for mobile devices * Calendar can be

Announcing fedocal 0.3.0

2013-11-15 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Yesterday I updated the production servers to fedocal 0.3.0. With it comes a number of features and bugfixes: * Select the timezone when adding a new meeting * Pre-view of the meeting description (allows Markdown - html) * iCal export link easier to find/copy for mobile devices * Calendar can be

Re: Announcing fedocal 0.3.0

2013-11-15 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:16:53AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Yesterday I updated the production servers to fedocal 0.3.0. I just pushed a small 0.3.1 update allowing to edit meeting that have already occured. This new version is available as before on: https://apps.fedoraproject.org

Re: [pkgdb2] call for testers, bug reports and RFE

2013-11-16 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:50:42AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: One thing which is probably an issue with the import process: I looked at the package kdelibs-experimental which has been retired, as seen on pkgdb1: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/kdelibs-experimental (see

Re: [pkgdb2] call for testers, bug reports and RFE

2013-11-19 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:19:35AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:50:42AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: One thing which is probably an issue with the import process: I looked at the package kdelibs-experimental which has been retired, as seen on pkgdb1: https

Re: [pkgdb2] call for testers, bug reports and RFE

2013-11-22 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:34:28PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Miro Hrončok wrote: The reason is simple. Fedorahosted lacks features, is unplesant and need byrocracy even to create a repository. Creating a repository is actually the only time bureaucracy is required. Giving write

Re: [pkgdb2] call for testers, bug reports and RFE

2013-11-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 05:34:19PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: By using github you are also eliminating the possibility of some people to contribute to your project. I personally won't create an account on github. Just because I believe that open projects should be hosted on open

Re: [pkgdb2] call for testers, bug reports and RFE

2013-11-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:57:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: You're forgeting, patch/code reviews, Export patch from git, attach to new issue in the bug tracker; as the maintainer, apply it with git am and push it; where's the problem? possibility to close

Re: [pkgdb2] call for testers, bug reports and RFE

2013-11-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 01:48:53PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:57:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: You're forgeting, patch/code reviews, Export patch from git, attach to new issue in the bug tracker; as the maintainer, apply it with git

Re: python-django update to Django-1.6

2013-11-26 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:07:55AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote: Hey, recently, I saw a few requests to update python-django to Django-1.6, the corresponding bug is [1]. As there are quite a few changes, I'd expect this update to be harmful, at least - python-django-openstack-auth -

Re: [pkgdb2] call for testers, bug reports and RFE

2013-12-10 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are passing and I seem to be able to do what I want with it. Thus I thought this would be a good time to call for testers and collect bug reports and RFE

Re: [pkgdb2] call for testers, bug reports and RFE

2013-12-11 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:52:58PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote: On 12/10/2013 02:20 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do, but don't forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE feel free

Re: [pkgdb2] call for testers, bug reports and RFE

2013-12-11 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 09:55 +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: * Dan Mashal [10/12/2013 11:29] : Can we get a my packages button? Or am I blind and not seeing one? There's a Restrict to owner: form where you can enter your FAS username. Also works if you just click on your nick on the top

Re: [pkgdb2] call for testers, bug reports and RFE

2013-12-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 10.12.2013 14:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are passing and I seem to be able to do

Re: [pkgdb2] call for testers, bug reports and RFE

2013-12-13 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 04:45:22PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 12.12.2013 14:42, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 10.12.2013 14:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote

[Fedora-r-devel-list] [Fwd: [R] R 2.12.2 is released]

2011-02-25 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
FYI :-) Pierre ---BeginMessage--- I've rolled up R-2.12.2.tar.gz a short while ago. This is an update release, which fixes a number of mostly minor issues, and one major issue in which complex arithmetic was being messed up on some compiler platform. You can get it from

Re: What's this /run directory doing on my system and where does it come from?

2011-03-30 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 14:11 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 03/30/2011 02:10 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: 2011/3/30 Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de: On 03/30/2011 01:54 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: Heya, I just uploaded a new version of systemd into F15, which establishes a

Re: Fedora SPEC Review Tool

2011-04-07 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:38 +0200, Petr Sabata wrote: I've been putting something similar together [1], to simplify the process. It doesn't do much at the moment (a checklist with mock/koji rebuild support) and is quite ugly :) I like your config files idea. I currently just use CSV

Re: [Fedora-r-devel-list] R2rpm...

2011-04-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 15:10 -0400, Allen S. Rout wrote: When I try to build from a local source, it fails to find the source file. [...] [root@troll-2 cran]# R2rpm -s /var/tmp/cran/plyr_1.2.1.tar.gz (Do you always build as root ? I was always told that it should be avoided) [...] * Building

Re: [Fedora-r-devel-list] Errors in constructing SPEC from local source.

2011-04-13 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 15:06 -0400, Allen S. Rout wrote: R2spec remains a project designed to make the life of Fedora's R packager's easier, so it has to remain guideline compliant. That is a reason why putting the source0 as URL also is not *in my opinion* a good approach (while I

packagedb-cli needs testers

2011-06-14 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Hi, With the help and advices from abadger1999, akurtakov and Haikel I put together some code for a project called PackageDB-cli [1]*. The idea is to provide packagers with a way to do in CLI what they do at the moment on the website (so allowing them to manage their ACL without going on the

Re: Packages that will be orphaned

2011-06-23 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 10:34 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: SOAPpy I'll take this one. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16

2011-07-13 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 15:28 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Orphan python-igraph I'll take this one, looks like something I could play with. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)

2011-07-20 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 15:28 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Orphan igraph Since I took the python binding I guess I should take this one to :) Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fixing a FTBFS bug - unresponsive maintainer

2011-07-25 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 13:59 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: A provenpackager jumping in for just one FTBFS would be a short-term solution only. I will do that for the time being. I know Xavier is quite busy have you tried to contact him directly ? Pierre -- devel mailing list

Announcing easyfix

2012-04-26 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good news everyone (© Farnsworth), The easyfix project is now live: http://fedoraproject.org/easyfix/ As a new-comers, you will be able to find a list of projects which have bugs/requests considered to be easy to work on (ie: you do not need a deep understanding of the project to fix/implement

Re: Announcing easyfix

2012-04-26 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 12:19 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 26.4.2012 11:12, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): Good news everyone (© Farnsworth), The easyfix project is now live: http://fedoraproject.org/easyfix/ As a new-comers, you will be able to find a list of projects which have

[Fedora-r-devel-list] Start bioconductor update

2012-04-26 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Hi, I have started to update a bunch of R packages to the latest version of bioconductor. Feel free to test and give karma: F17:

Re: Announcing easyfix

2012-04-26 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 12:49 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: However if I am a newcomer, how can I find the easyfix link from fedora homepage? Or how can I find it at all? I am considering marking this as 'easyfix' ;-) This is a good question though and at the moment I do not have a very

Re: Fedora release name in the future

2012-04-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 15:10 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: The poll about Fedora release names keeping is terminated [1]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/results/poll-rel-names?_csrf_token=ed7209dc06f5c8c58528ac55251f52c8ffacdc40. Just for reference for the future, the last part of your url

Re: *countable infinities only

2012-05-31 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 10:23 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote: this will mean that Fedora will be losing a freedom it once had— the freedom to make forks at no cost which are technically equal to the projects, ones which are just as compatible and easy to install. I don't really think this is

Re: *countable infinities only

2012-06-02 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 14:02 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: You are responsible as a package maintainer for bugs against the package. If you don't want to deal with it, give up the package or find a co-maintainer who will deal with such

Re: *countable infinities only

2012-06-02 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 14:26 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: That is not the answer to my question (hint: read the question). Indeed, it is not, but do you really want to put in the CLA the responsibilities of every role past present and future available in the project ? Meaning that every time one

Re: Two more Python packages for review swaps: python-qrcode and gnuhealth

2012-06-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 14:47 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827722 - for python-qrcode, a dependency for GNU Health Don't forget to check the bugzilla before submitting a package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824628 Pure python

Re: Two more Python packages for review swaps: python-qrcode and gnuhealth

2012-06-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 11:48 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Plus, there are comments on your spec file which you apparently did not read. I should have said, that you forgot. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Two more Python packages for review swaps: python-qrcode and gnuhealth

2012-06-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 21:37 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: Exchanged against: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821267 Review Request: R-BiocGenerics - Generic functions for Bioconductor Assigning to myself; will do that tomorrow. Thanks! Thank you :) Pierre -- devel

Re: GitHub is a terrible upstream

2012-06-13 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 11:45 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote: Suppose I cut a package last year: swift3-1.0.0-878c23.tag.xz Then I build an RPM: openstack-swift-plugin-swift3-1.0.0-878c23-1.fc17.noarch.rpm Today I run the same git-archve and get: swift3-1.0.0-5c74ba.tag.xz

Re: GitHub is a terrible upstream

2012-06-13 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 11:45 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:08:05 -0600 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: %global commit bd245c9 Source0: https://github.com/jukka/pcfi/tarball/%{commit}/jukka-pcfi-%{commit}.tar.gz %setup -q -n jukka-pcfi-%{commit}

Re: Revelation password manager issue

2012-06-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 13:39 -0800, Jef Spaleta wrote: On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote: Haven't checked the crypto changes, but I do notice this spew when I try 'Edit-Preferences': Okay I think I have the GConf scriptlets fixed:

Fedora-Review 0.2.0

2012-07-11 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Dear all, A new fedora-review is being brought to you. With this new version you can find: - Checks for Ruby packages (incomplete, but started) - Checks for PHP packages (incomplete, but started) - Better handling of the sources (handled now directly through rpm) - Generate all review-related

Re: Fedora-Review 0.2.0

2012-07-19 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:14 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: Hello, I tried to use fedora-review and it seems to attempt building the package using Fedora 14? from root.log rootdir = /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/root/ Is that intentional? A mis-configuration on my part? You

Re: Fedora-Review 0.2.0

2012-07-19 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:14 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: Hello, I tried to use fedora-review and it seems to attempt building the package using Fedora 14? from root.log rootdir = /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/root/ Is that intentional

Re: Fedora-Review 0.2.0

2012-08-02 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 08:23 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: On 08/02/2012 12:02 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 23:52 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: Where would you like bug reports? I tried it against one of my own review tickets. It found a number of issues

Re: Calling for the packager of fping

2012-08-23 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 21:22 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: I've filed. if there aren't any response, I'll try to take the ownership. You'll have to become a packager before you can take the ownership. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedora-review command fails on package

2012-09-07 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 23:04 +0200, Martin Gansser wrote: sqlite and sqlite-devel are installed, a local rpmbuild works. Did you try with mock? Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: upstream wants me to rename my package

2012-09-09 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, 2012-09-09 at 02:03 -0400, Gary Gatling wrote: ...a user may be using the distribution-supplied version for day-to-day work, but they may need to install a pre-release to test a new fix, or to temporarily use a pre-release until a fix is deployed via YUM. It would be nice for them

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ?

2011-12-06 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 11:07 +0100, Thomas Spura wrote: 2011/12/5 Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr: - koji ➙ last build... This doesn't seem to work correctly. My last build was 2 days ago: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=988 And the script says it was Nov 2

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ?

2011-12-06 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 10:18 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/12/11 23:08, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Hi, Once in a while comes back the question: is insert nick here around ? Normally followed by: I have opened and pinged him several

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ?

2011-12-06 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 10:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: But this might find some people who were active in say bugzilla but missed the fas changes, etc. Just for reference, the bugzilla check doesn't work on F16, something changed between the version 0.6.0 and 0.6.2 and what's returned has

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ?

2011-12-06 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 13:52 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: On 12/06/2011 05:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:08:32PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: snip It might be interesting to run this script across every single user in the Fedora accounts system

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ?

2012-01-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 23:08 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: (download via git clone http://ambre.pingoured.fr/cgit/fedora-misc.git/ ) Move to its own repo on: http://ambre.pingoured.fr/cgit/fedora-active-user.git/ Mirrored on github at: https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-active-user Pierre

fedora-create-review

2012-01-09 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Hi, Some time ago I was speaking with Tibbs who mentioned such a tool, so I wrote a small script this week-end called fedora-create-review. The idea is simple: - from a spec and srpm - start a koji scratch build - if build worked - upload to fedorapeople.org - create the bugzilla

Re: fedora-create-review

2012-01-09 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 21:56 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote: I don't think this should belong to fedpkg. Maybe more to the great fedora-review-tool (to make a tool/package bundling all review-related tools). That would be also my feeling. I would like to see this packaged it sooner than

Re: fedora-create-review

2012-01-09 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 16:04 -0500, Tom Callaway wrote: On 01/09/2012 11:44 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Hi, Some time ago I was speaking with Tibbs who mentioned such a tool, so I wrote a small script this week-end called fedora-create-review. The idea is simple: - from a spec

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >