Re: F23 -> Rawhide upgrade fails to start GDM

Dne 29.9.2015 v 12:48 Richard Bradfield napsal(a): > On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, at 07:02, drago01 wrote: >> Please file a bug against selinux-policy. > I have done so: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267207 BTW With updated Mesa, pressing spacebar several times to close to Oh-No

Re: f23: dnf returns nothing

Or simpler: dnf update https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/dnf/1.1.2/3.fc23/noarch/dnf-1.1.2-3.fc23.noarch.rpm https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/dnf/1.1.2/3.fc23/noarch/dnf-automatic-1.1.2-3.fc23.noarch.rpm

Re: bugzilla search missing fields; can't find if F21 dracut bug filed lately

Dne 1.10.2015 v 09:38 Felix Miata napsal(a): > Is anybody else bothered by the latest BZ changes? Where does one select the > Fedora release to limit search results to? And how does one figure out where > to select kernel or dracut? Those scroll lists are much too difficult to find > anything in,

Re: bugzilla search missing fields; can't find if F21 dracut bug filed lately

Dne 1.10.2015 v 10:53 Felix Miata napsal(a): > Vít Ondruch composed on 2015-10-01 04:22 (UTC-0400): > >> Does http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/dracut work for you? > Marginally better than nothing: > > doesn't any kind of list in SeaMonkey (maybe because of noscript?) >

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Dne 30.9.2015 v 16:52 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a): > On 09/30/2015 04:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 30.09.2015 um 16:13 schrieb Orion Poplawski: >>> On 09/30/2015 07:45 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote: Yes, I also see this as a good compromise. We then have the ability to at least track

F23 broke dependencies

Will there be some effor to clean this up prior release? Vít Dne 23.9.2015 v 13:18 Fedora Branched Report napsal(a): > Compose started at Wed Sep 23 07:15:03 UTC 2015 > Broken deps for armhfp > -- > [apache-scout] >

Re: F23 broke dependencies

Dne 23.9.2015 v 15:07 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > On 09/23/2015 02:00 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Will there be some effor to clean this up prior release? > Yes, same plan as in previous releases: anything that still has broken > deps by the time of final freeze is going to get re

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

Dne 22.9.2015 v 11:07 Matej Stuchlik napsal(a): > > When it comes to python3, one way to shave off ~9MiB from python3-libs, and > possibly quite a bit more overall, would be to not install both optimized and > unoptimized bytecode, as we do now, but just the unoptimized one (the > performance >

Re: python: dropping the .py files [was Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything)] bloat

Dne 25.9.2015 v 16:04 Matthew Miller napsal(a): > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:10:40AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Also, you might consider to ship the precompiled bytecode just >> optionally, using recommends. Just to be clear, not/optional shipping the bytecode is the prefe

Re: python: dropping the .py files [was Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything)] bloat

Dne 25.9.2015 v 16:15 Mathieu Bridon napsal(a): > On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 10:04 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:10:40AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> Also, you might consider to ship the precompiled bytecode just >>> optionally, using reco

Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

Dne 22.9.2015 v 00:00 Owen Taylor napsal(a): > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 23:26 +0200, Germano Massullo wrote: >> Il 17/09/2015 21:13, Andrew Lutomirski ha scritto: >>> To clarify: did you get blasted by music or by video conference >>> sounds? If the music volume got louder, then it sounds like

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

Dne 22.9.2015 v 17:30 Richard Hughes napsal(a): > On 22 September 2015 at 16:16, Neal Gompa wrote: >> Looks like Fedora 23 is shaping up to be an exciting release! > It does, but not exciting enough to use HTML email. Can you switch > your email client to use text emails

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree, v2

Dne 5.10.2015 v 17:35 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > On 10/05/2015 04:52 PM, Martin Gansser wrote: >> Hi Kalev, >> >> >> >> i am the packager of the package vdr-live (martinkg). >> >> >> >> vdr-live has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: >> On x86_64: >>

Re: fedora notifications

Dne 8.12.2015 v 13:15 Tom Hughes napsal(a): > On 08/12/15 12:05, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > >> I'm quite lost with the fedora notifications [0] for email. Do you >> know which is the option to send me an email once a package is ready to >> be pushed to stable? (i.e., when the waiting

How to collect "bundled" virtual provide

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dne 2.12.2015 v 15:30 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > > > In accordance with the bundling policy, it *is* carrying a virtual > Provides to allow us to identify whether it is affected by discovered > CVEs. > This brings me to interesting question,

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Node.js 4.2

Is there some testing version of v8 somewhere? Will we have time to play with rubygem-therubyracer, if we can convince it to run with recent v8 or what else have to be done? The same applies for MongoDB if I am not mistaken. Vít Dne 1.12.2015 v 17:58 Jan Kurik napsal(a): > = Proposed F24

Re: Some comps cleanup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Can somebody explain me why Rawhide comps are called F24? Trying to use "git blame" and surprisingly (or not that much), almost every line was created by Kevin Fenzi. Why we are using git if we break the history this way? How can I find what was

Re: Bodhi front page after login

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dne 6.12.2015 v 20:42 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 20:17:37 +0100 > Reindl Harald wrote: > >> Am 06.12.2015 um 20:06 schrieb Michael Schwendt: >>> When I log in at https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/ the new

Re: Some comps cleanup

Dne 7.12.2015 v 11:56 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > On 12/07/2015 11:42 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Can somebody explain me why Rawhide comps are called F24? Trying to use >> "git blame" and surprisingly (or not that much), almost every line was >> created by Kevin Fe

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Node.js 4.2

Dne 2.12.2015 v 09:41 Tom Hughes napsal(a): > On 02/12/15 08:27, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Is there some testing version of v8 somewhere? Will we have time to play >> with rubygem-therubyracer, if we can convince it to run with recent v8 >> or what else have to be done? The

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20151216 compose check report

Dne 16.12.2015 v 23:07 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > might be a good idea to keep that gsettings-desktop-schemas > build out of rawhide until we get a shell release > since the old shell won't start with the new schemas If there is so tight relation between gsettings-desktop-schemas and

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Glibc locale subpackaging

Why there are no lang specific subpackages? Then English could be recomended and the rest suggested and Anaconda would install the appropriate language subpackage during installation. Vít Dne 18.12.2015 v 08:56 Jan Kurik napsal(a): > = Proposed System Wide Change: Glibc locale subpackaging = >

Re: Specs using %define

Dne 24.12.2015 v 22:01 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a): > To satisfy my curiosity, I grepped the convenient tarball of specfiles > (http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rpm-specs-latest.tar.xz) for lines > matching "(? there were more than 1900 hits. > > Here's a complete (long) list. I don't think

Re: Specs using %define

Dne 24.12.2015 v 22:01 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a): > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rpm-specs-latest.tar.xz Btw why this ^^ was never announced to my knowledge nor it is documented, except [1]. It seems useful indeed. Vít [1]

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Suds Jurko Fork

Dne 6.1.2016 v 17:50 Scott Talbert napsal(a): > On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >>> Chandan did contact him a while ago and I confirm that he did not >>> receive any answer. >>> Since maintainer is inactive for a while, I was thinking about doing >>> the update as provenpackager after a

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Suds Jurko Fork

Dne 6.1.2016 v 18:45 Scott Talbert napsal(a): > On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >>>>> Chandan did contact him a while ago and I confirm that he did not >>>>> receive any answer. >>>>> Since maintainer is inactive for a while, I was thin

Re: [INPUT REQUESTED] Fedora Policy on generated code

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 For Ruby, regenerating all the generated content would be a huge burden. I can't really imagine the Ruby bootstrap, since you need to have Ruby to build Ruby, I don't think we can identify every piece which is/was generated nor we can collect the

Re: Let's write metadata about add-ons

Dne 21.12.2015 v 11:36 Jiri Eischmann napsal(a): > Hi, > due to previous efforts we have a pretty good appdata coverage of apps > themselves, but add-ons (plugins, extensions,...) lag far behind. There are > dozens of useful GUI app add-ons in Fedora repositories which don't have > metadata

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

If I am not mistaken, this is at least 3rd time this change is proposed. Can somebody post some short summary what was changed, that you believe it will be successful this time? Thx Vít Dne 30.11.2015 v 17:14 Jan Kurik napsal(a): > = Default Local DNS Resolver = >

[HEADS UP][RAWHIDE]: Gnome broken in Rawhide

Heads up for Rawhide users. It seems that gnome-shell-3.19.2-1.fc24.x86_64 is broken so avoid updates to this version if you can. Downgrading back to gnome-shell-3.19.1-3.20151110.fc24 and gnome-shell-extensions-3.19.1-1.fc24 workarounds the issues for me. Would be nice if Gnome people can take a

Re: Some analysis on the size of the minimal and Server installs of Fedora 23

Dne 17.11.2015 v 11:00 Stef Walter napsal(a): > On 17.11.2015 02:39, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> (Please keep responses on the devel@ list; I've set it in the Reply-To.) >> >> To jump right to the premise: The default Fedora Server install is Way >> Too Big(TM) and the minimal install (also

Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

Dne 18.11.2015 v 15:53 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Panu Matilainen > wrote: >> Right. Only took eight years for anybody to notice ;) >> >> - Panu - >> > At this point, I'm wondering why we don't use the ~/+ operators to > more

Re: wayland in rawhide

Dne 20.11.2015 v 13:23 Thomas Gilliard napsal(a): > > > On 11/20/2015 03:15 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 10.11.2015 v 20:54 Ray Strode napsal(a): >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> Today I built snapshots of gnome-session gdm gnome-shell and mutter >>> that c

Re: wayland in rawhide

Dne 10.11.2015 v 20:54 Ray Strode napsal(a): > Hey guys, > > Today I built snapshots of gnome-session gdm gnome-shell and mutter > that change how we do sessions at the login screen. We'll no longer > have separate items for GNOME and GNOME on Wayland. Instead they're > now both consolidated

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainer - jklimes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dne 6.1.2016 v 01:07 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > If you have a way to contact this maintainer, please let them > know that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages. > Thanks! > > * jklimes - former email: jkli...@redhat.com > > Not

Re: Build root prepared by DNF is way larger

Dne 18.8.2015 v 16:26 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Hi all, > > Today, I noticed that mock build root prepared by DNF is significantly > larger then prepared by YUM (see attached logs). Owners of packages > installed into minimal buildroot probably wants to review their > dependency

Re: Hacks for multilib unclean C headers

I pursued this once before: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/312 but failed to propose the draft. But still, it would be much better if this can be resolved on gcc side: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979403 Vít Dne 7.6.2016 v 17:30 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a): > Just wanted to

Re: Retired solr, parquet, parquet-format

chm ... should I read it as I should retire rubygem-rsolr as well? Nothing depends on it in Fedora I guess. Vít Dne 2.6.2016 v 16:05 gil napsal(a): > hi > > i retired solr and parquet depend on hadoop that was retired > > parquet-format was used only by parquet > > regards > > .g > -- > devel

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

Dne 1.6.2016 v 18:18 Ben Rosser napsal(a): > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Matthias Clasen > wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 09:59 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > > This paints a very specific premise of what a "logout"

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

Dne 31.5.2016 v 21:20 DJ Delorie napsal(a): > Lennart Poettering writes: >> Again, as mentioned before: key here is that permitting user processes >> to stick around after all sessions of the user ended needs to be a >> privilieged concept. It should not be allowed for

Re: Unannounced soname bump - userspace-rcu

Dne 22.6.2016 v 16:21 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 03:03:09PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> It seems there was unannounced soname bump in userspace-rcu. Not sure >> what everything needs to get rebuild, but it seems that lttng-ust at >> minimum

Re: spec.vim plugin

You might want to talk about this plugin with Igor (in CC), who is maintainer of the spec.vim. He had similar intentions (rewrite) as far as I know ... Vít Dne 19.6.2016 v 21:12 Filip Szymański napsal(a): > Hi, > > For some time now I have small problems with the `spec.vim` plugin > on f24

Unannounced soname bump - userspace-rcu

It seems there was unannounced soname bump in userspace-rcu. Not sure what everything needs to get rebuild, but it seems that lttng-ust at minimum (and there is already rhbz#1348895). Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora development of Snap packages

Dne 14.6.2016 v 21:06 Eric Griffith napsal(a): > > I'm testing it out for Phoronix. The copr works correctly, it installs > fine. Running snapper works fine, once you figure out what the correct > instructions should be (snapcraft.io 's > instructions are slightly wrong). > >

Re: Fedora development of Snap packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dne 22.6.2016 v 19:19 Jiri Eischmann napsal(a): > Michael Catanzaro píše v St 22. 06. 2016 v 10:22 -0500: >> On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 15:43 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> Eric, >>> >>> So how about similar artic

Re: Injecting perl-devel and perl-generators build-requires

I applaud it as well. Thx for doing this. Vít Dne 23.6.2016 v 21:50 Tim Orling napsal(a): > Thank you for doing all this work, Petr. I, for one, really appreciate > it. I hope others feel the same (whether or not they agree with the > Built Root change itself). > > > Cheers. > > --Tim > > On

Re: Updating summary and description of a package on pkgdb and the spec

Dne 8.1.2016 v 14:45 Tom Hughes napsal(a): > On 08/01/16 13:41, Ankur Sinha wrote: >> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 13:36 +, Ankur Sinha wrote: >>> Hiya! >>> >>> Can the summary and description of a package be changed on pkgdb? >>> >>> Also, if it can't, is it OK if the summary and description on

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: System Python

Since this is about disk size, I proposed already quite long ago to not ship the source *.py code, e.g. there could be something like: python-foo-source python2-foo python3-foo And in the python{2,3}-foo could be "Suggests: python-foo-source" (or Recommends, since there were some voices that the

Re: Firefox - call for testing (Gtk3 effort)

I observer this issue like past 10 release of FF. Some versions it is better, some worse. Why is the ABRT handler disabled anyway? I have no idea where the data from the default handler goes and I doubt anybody cares (but I hope I am wrong ;)) Vít Dne 3.2.2016 v 12:12 Martin Stransky

Re: Gnome always broken in Rawhide

Dne 29.1.2016 v 00:34 Jared K. Smith napsal(a): > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com > <mailto:vondr...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > am not even mentioning that gnome-shell now consumer like 18% of my > CPU, probably due to the c

Re: hawaii

Dne 25.1.2016 v 17:55 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): > Hi, > > On Seg, 2016-01-25 at 13:40 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 22.1.2016 v 21:12 Pier Luigi Fiorini napsal(a): >>> 2016-01-22 20:58 GMT+01:00 Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com>: >>>> On Fri, 22 Jan 2016

Re: Build root prepared by DNF is way larger

Dne 25.1.2016 v 18:58 Mattias Ellert napsal(a): > mån 2016-01-25 klockan 18:09 +0100 skrev Marcin Juszkiewicz: >> W dniu 25.01.2016 o 17:03, Vít Ondruch pisze: >>> So it appears this thread was probably not enough. Which keeps us with >>> interesting state where mock

Re: glibc in Fedora rawhide now split by langpacks.

Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a): > On 02/26/2016 05:02 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> You also forget to mention what Rawhide users are supposed to do. >> >> I assume that I should do: >> >> # dnf install langpacks-cs >> >> to have onl

Re: Rawhide Report Rawhide 20160226.n.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dne 29.2.2016 v 16:55 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > On Monday, February 29, 2016 04:29:08 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 29.2.2016 v 16:10 Adam Williamson napsal(a): >>> On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 16:01 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: &g

Re: glibc in Fedora rawhide now split by langpacks.

Dne 29.2.2016 v 17:12 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a): > On 02/29/2016 04:22 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a): >>> On 02/26/2016 05:02 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>>> You also forget to mention what Rawhide users are supposed to do. &g

Re: Strange VM/HW dichotomy building Ruby packages

If you observe the build logs carefully, there were some segfaults for example: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13171578 This particular one is PPC, so it might be platform specific issue, who knows Vít Dne 29.2.2016 v 06:22 Greg Hellings napsal(a): > I've been

Re: Rawhide Report Rawhide 20160226.n.1

Dne 29.2.2016 v 16:10 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 16:01 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Is this (1) new version of Rawhide report which will stay or (2) is this >> just some temporary version or (3) is it something completely new and >> the old Rawhide re

Re: Rawhide Report Rawhide 20160226.n.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Is this (1) new version of Rawhide report which will stay or (2) is this just some temporary version or (3) is it something completely new and the old Rawhide report is not sent just due to some issues? If (1) is the case, then it is missing

Re: glibc in Fedora rawhide now split by langpacks.

You also forget to mention what Rawhide users are supposed to do. I assume that I should do: # dnf install langpacks-cs to have only czech language available and English should be available by default, right? Vít Dne 26.2.2016 v 10:47 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a): > The glibc in Fedora rawhide

Re: Gnome always broken in Rawhide

Dne 22.1.2016 v 18:58 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > there were reports about gnome-settings-daemon as well (which is > crashing in libcolord). Apparently known issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288850 Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.or

Gnome always broken in Rawhide

Hi everybody, I am wondering why the Gnome updates in Rawhide has to be always broken? Today I updated my computer just to find out that my gnome-shell is crashing instantly. As it turned out, majority of Gnome components were at 3.19.4 version but gnome-shell was at 3.19.3. Yes, there is already

Re: hawaii

Dne 22.1.2016 v 21:12 Pier Luigi Fiorini napsal(a): > 2016-01-22 20:58 GMT+01:00 Kevin Fenzi >: > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:46:12 - > " mastaiza" > > wrote: > > > Yes hawaii-shell . >

Re: Build root prepared by DNF is way larger

Dne 25.1.2016 v 17:03 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 12.1.2016 v 15:18 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >> Dne 18.8.2015 v 16:26 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Today, I noticed that mock build root prepared by DNF is significantly >>> larger the

Re: Build root prepared by DNF is way larger

Dne 12.1.2016 v 15:18 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 18.8.2015 v 16:26 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >> Hi all, >> >> Today, I noticed that mock build root prepared by DNF is significantly >> larger then prepared by YUM (see attached logs). Owners of packages >> installe

Re: Build root prepared by DNF is way larger

Dne 26.1.2016 v 20:27 Mattias Ellert napsal(a): > tis 2016-01-26 klockan 10:18 + skrev Peter Robinson: > So it appears this thread was probably not enough. Which keeps us with > interesting state where mock by default does not install weak > dependencies where Koji installs them.

Re: Gnome always broken in Rawhide

Dne 22.1.2016 v 17:58 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:37:06 +0100 > Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi everybody, >> >> I am wondering why the Gnome updates in Rawhide has to be always >> broken? Today I updated my computer

Re: Fedora 24 compose report: 20160309.n.1 changes

Hi, Dne 10.3.2016 v 01:31 Fedora Branched Report napsal(a): > = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = > Package: scilab-6.0.0-0.1.beta1.fc24 > Old package: scilab-6.0.0-0.3.alpha2.fc24 > Summary: Scientific software package for numerical computations > RPMs: scilab scilab-devel

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160312.n.0 changes

Dne 12.3.2016 v 15:32 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a): > = SUMMARY = > Added packages: 11 > Dropped packages:0 > Upgraded packages: 164 > Downgraded packages: 2 > Interesting, is this already 4th downgraded package this week? Vít -- devel mailing list

Re: GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

Dne 14.3.2016 v 08:34 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > Hi all, > > It's GNOME 3.19.92 release this week. As we are deep in the Alpha freeze > in Fedora, this will stay in updates-testing for a while until the > freeze is lifted and floodgates open a again. > > We have koji side tag to collect all the

Re: GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

Dne 15.3.2016 v 10:13 Richard Hughes napsal(a): > On 15 March 2016 at 09:06, Tom Hughes wrote: >> If bodhi is in use then you can bundle all the builds into one bodhi update >> to ensure that nobody gets a broken tree. > Why would people get a broken tree if there are no soname

Re: GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

Dne 15.3.2016 v 10:03 Richard Hughes napsal(a): > On 15 March 2016 at 08:53, Peter Robinson wrote: >> so it would be little extra effort for you to do that same for f25/rawhide. > I'm a bit confused where the problem is, at least my workflow is: > > * build latest release

Re: GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

Dne 15.3.2016 v 10:24 Richard Hughes napsal(a): > On 15 March 2016 at 09:17, Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> I'm somewhat confused where the problem is. >> This is the problem: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@l

Re: GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

hes napsal(a): > On 15 March 2016 at 10:00, Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: >> So lets say I am using Gnome 3.19.90. The 3.19.91 is released and you >> start build, which takes some time (12h? 24h? 2 days? Have no idea). > Building all the components in mclazy ta

Re: GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

Dne 15.3.2016 v 16:17 Debarshi Ray napsal(a): > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:20:51AM +0100, V?t Ondruch wrote: >> IOW some of Gnome developers don't care about sonames, "because it is >> just development version". > I find your repeated use of phrases like "don't care" to be insulting. Sorry, I

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160312.n.0 changes

Dne 14.3.2016 v 12:26 Peter Robinson napsal(a): > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Dne 12.3.2016 v 15:32 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a): >>> = SUMMARY = >>> Added packages: 11 >>> Dro

Re: weakdeps and the buildroot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 This applies just for Rawhide, right? Vít Dne 7.4.2016 v 18:40 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > Hi All, > > Following the decision of FPC that weak deps must not be installed into the > buildroot[1] koji has been changed to set install_weak_deps to

Re: GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

Thas a great plan Michael. Thank you. Vít Dne 15.3.2016 v 18:47 Michael Catanzaro napsal(a): > Using a side tag seems like a great idea. When folks are brave enough > to test rawhide for us, we should try to avoid breaking their > computers. :) > > A few arbitrary answers: > > On Tue,

Re: Why is my secondary monitor not detected?

Dne 7.3.2016 v 11:47 Peter Robinson napsal(a): > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Not sure where should I report this issue, but I am wondering, why my >> secondary monitor is not detected after docking my Rawhide laptop (it >

Why is my secondary monitor not detected?

Not sure where should I report this issue, but I am wondering, why my secondary monitor is not detected after docking my Rawhide laptop (it works just fine after restart)? It used to work. If it didn't work right away, opening control panel typically helped, but nowadays, it does not appear to

Re: Gnome in Rawhide broken

Dne 3.3.2016 v 16:08 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > On 03/03/2016 03:51 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 3.3.2016 v 15:42 Kalev Lember napsal(a): >>> Should be fixed in gnome-terminal-3.19.91-1.fc24, >>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=741368 >> &g

Re: Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?

Dne 3.3.2016 v 20:00 Michael Catanzaro napsal(a): > On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 15:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT? > See: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747339#c20 Thx for the link. I was not aware of this change. Vít -- devel mailin

Re: Gnome in Rawhide broken

Dne 3.3.2016 v 15:42 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > On 03/03/2016 03:37 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> After update, my gnome-terminal failed to start. The journal contained >> following message: >> >> >> Mar 03 15:01:17 localhost >> org.gnome.Terminal[1965]:

Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?

Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT? I.e. my 1st VT always contains the GDM and 2nd VT actually displays the Wayland user session. That is confusing, looking like that nobody is logged in ... Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Gnome in Rawhide broken

After update, my gnome-terminal failed to start. The journal contained following message: Mar 03 15:01:17 localhost org.gnome.Terminal[1965]: */usr/libexec/gnome-**terminal**-server: symbol lookup error: /usr/libexec/gnome-**terminal**-server: undefined symbol:

Re: two identical package

Dne 5.4.2016 v 11:49 Jan Chaloupka napsal(a): > > > On 04/05/2016 12:26 AM, Ilia Gradina wrote: >> Thanks, but not working( >> >> output: >> / >> [ilgrad@x230 rubygem-connection-pool]$ fedpkg retire "Renamed to bar" > > This can be done only by maintainer with correct rights.

Re: Dropping primary ownership of several ruby packages

Thank you Michael for your contribution. I took over the Fedora branches. The EPEL branches are still free to grab and of course, co-maintainers are welcome. Vít Dne 14.4.2016 v 00:52 Michael Stahnke napsal(a): > I haven't had the time to be a good steward on a number of these > packages.

Re: Announce: OpenCV 3.1 in Rawhide

Dne 27.4.2016 v 18:59 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > FYI, The reason rawhide composes were not sending broken deps reports > to the lists or developers was a bug in fedora-pungi (The script that > calls pungi4 for us). > > I tracked down the issue and submitted a PR which Dennis merged, so >

Re: Announce: OpenCV 3.1 in Rawhide

Dne 25.4.2016 v 07:08 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 02:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> On Sáb, 2016-04-23 at 07:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hello we need rebuild in rawhide : os-autoinst

Re: 15 thousands python3-* packages for Fedora

Do I understand correctly that you build just the latest version of each package? Vít Dne 19.5.2016 v 08:51 Miroslav Suchy napsal(a): > Hi, > I just finished packaging of 15 634 python3-* packages for Fedora. > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/copr/PyPI3/ > You can click on Builds

Re: Is it time to retire rubygem-therubyracer?

I pulled the trigger and retired rubygem-therubyracer. Please update your packages to use NodeJS instead. RIP Vít Dne 16.5.2016 v 10:13 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > I'll pull the trigger at Friday the 20th, if there is no opposition > (and there was no opposition so far). > &g

Re: Koschei update

Dne 19.5.2016 v 10:47 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a): > On 05/18/2016 10:40 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Could you please enable CI for ruby? Or actually the ruby-rails group >> for every Fedora branch? > It doesn't work this way. Once new targets are added to Koschei, all > packa

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir

Dne 12.5.2016 v 10:11 Peter Robinson napsal(a): >>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir = >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD >>> >>> Change owner(s): >>> * Neal Gompa >>> * Jan Silhan >>> >>> >>> == Detailed Description ==

Re: Is it time to retire rubygem-therubyracer?

I'll pull the trigger at Friday the 20th, if there is no opposition (and there was no opposition so far). Adding devel into the loop for wider audience. Vít Dne 11.5.2016 v 10:33 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > Hi all, > > I am thinking about retiring therubyracer from Fedora. P

Re: Koschei update

Hi Mikolaj, This is sweet! Thx. Could you please enable CI for ruby? Or actually the ruby-rails group for every Fedora branch? Best, Vít Dne 18.5.2016 v 05:03 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a): > TL;DR Koschei now supports targets other than rawhide (not enabled > yet) and should correctly

Re: Kernel plans for Fedora 24

I think Josh wrote nice blog about "kernel release cycle": http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/51935.html Based on it, I'd be surprised to see 4.6 land in F24 prior stable release. Vít Dne 18.5.2016 v 17:27 Matthew Miller napsal(a): > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05:44:43PM +, Jóhann B.

Re: Requiring package test instructions

Dne 12.7.2016 v 18:49 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > > The idea is this: there could be a requirement for all packages to > provide at least *some* kind of 'how to test' information. If the package should be tested by human, I'd expect that there will be some additional value, i.e. the human can

jQuery

Hi, Is there chance that somebody more familiar with JS than me would update jQuery in Fedora? It would be nice to have jQuery 3.x as well. Or should I do the update myself? I am asking since I need to update rubygem-jquery-rails, which requires the recent versions of jQuery (and it will require

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160623.n.0 changes

Dne 27.6.2016 v 15:46 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 13:11:38 +0200 > Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> This doesn't sound right. What is wrong with Rawhide composes? > It was a config issue with the way composes were named. > > I noti

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160623.n.0 changes

This doesn't sound right. What is wrong with Rawhide composes? Vít Dne 26.6.2016 v 13:30 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a): > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160623.n.0 > NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160623.n.0 > > = SUMMARY = > Added images:0 > Dropped images: 0 > Added packages: 0 >

Re: Too fast karma on Bodhi updates

Dne 11.7.2016 v 11:00 Christian Dersch napsal(a): > > On 07/11/2016 10:49 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: >>> Any kind of feedback after package gets into updates repository should >>> be denied, I can't think of a case where package moves to updates >>> repository and bodhi still allows to add

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >