Re: GIT development branches for packagers?

Dne 15.1.2014 18:12, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 02:16:29PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Actually I'd really love to see some possibility for private branches. >> Now, it is possible to push whatever branch (take it literally) you have >> i

Re: GIT development branches for packagers?

Dne 15.1.2014 17:51, Dridi Boukelmoune napsal(a): > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 14.1.2014 21:41, Andrew Lutomirski napsal(a): >>> I have some trivial cleanups I want to make to a package a maintain. >>> These cleanups are trivial enough

Re: F20: Puppet depchain pulls in Java

Dne 18.1.2014 07:40, Michael Stahnke napsal(a): > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> Hi >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Mo Morsi wrote: >>> Yes as others have mentioned puppet requires ruby(release) which is >>> satisfied by both ruby-mri and jruby > So should it

Re: F20: Puppet depchain pulls in Java

Dne 17.1.2014 23:34, Martin Langhoff napsal(a): > Interestingly enough, after uninstalling jruby, rubypick still thinks > it's installed! > > [martin@tp-martin puppet-rlgold.git]$ ruby --help > This is Fedora's rubypick - a Ruby runtime chooser. You can use it > to execute Ruby programmes with any

Re: F20: Puppet depchain pulls in Java

Dne 20.1.2014 11:48, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 17.1.2014 23:34, Martin Langhoff napsal(a): >> Interestingly enough, after uninstalling jruby, rubypick still thinks >> it's installed! >> >> [martin@tp-martin puppet-rlgold.git]$ ruby --help >> This is Fedo

Re: Shipping package metadata in a package

Dne 24.1.2014 11:03, Mathieu Bridon napsal(a): > Hi, > > On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 10:01 +, Richard Hughes wrote: >> There are two ways to fix the jarring UX. We could either ship the >> fedora package metadata pre-prepared in PackageKit, maybe using >> something like %ghost so the new metadata is

Re: Shipping package metadata in a package

Dne 24.1.2014 15:05, Richard Hughes napsal(a): > On 24 January 2014 12:20, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Not sure I like the idea. I install the system, eager to start using it, >> but in background will run some service downloading some data, which >> will make my system sluggis

Re: .spec file Source0 magic for github release source tarballs?

Dne 21.1.2014 18:01, Kaleb KEITHLEY napsal(a): > > Take, for example, > https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/releases, where there's a > button for "Source code (tar.gz)" pointing at > https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/archive/V2.0.0.tar.gz > > Note V2.0.0.tar.gz versus nfs-ganesha-2

Re: Packages installing files to /etc/rpm

Dne 31.1.2014 21:23, Ville Skyttä napsal(a): > A number of packages install files to /etc/rpm in Rawhide; the proper > place for macros.* is /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d for rpm >= 4.11. And no > matter what the location, these files should not be marked as %config. > > Specfiles not targeting EL < 7 can

Re: Nightly builds of DNF available

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 3.2.2014 11:17, Ankur Sinha napsal(a): > Hi Radek, > > On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 04:24 -0500, Radek Holy wrote: >> >> it's wierd, I'm not able to reproduce it here. The command ``dnf >> --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=dnf-nightlies list`` outputs:: > > L

Re: Firefox - call for testing (Gtk3 effort)

I observer this issue like past 10 release of FF. Some versions it is better, some worse. Why is the ABRT handler disabled anyway? I have no idea where the data from the default handler goes and I doubt anybody cares (but I hope I am wrong ;)) Vít Dne 3.2.2016 v 12:12 Martin Stransky napsal(a

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: System Python

Since this is about disk size, I proposed already quite long ago to not ship the source *.py code, e.g. there could be something like: python-foo-source python2-foo python3-foo And in the python{2,3}-foo could be "Suggests: python-foo-source" (or Recommends, since there were some voices that the

Re: glibc in Fedora rawhide now split by langpacks.

You also forget to mention what Rawhide users are supposed to do. I assume that I should do: # dnf install langpacks-cs to have only czech language available and English should be available by default, right? Vít Dne 26.2.2016 v 10:47 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a): > The glibc in Fedora rawhide

Re: glibc in Fedora rawhide now split by langpacks.

Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a): > On 02/26/2016 05:02 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> You also forget to mention what Rawhide users are supposed to do. >> >> I assume that I should do: >> >> # dnf install langpacks-cs >> >> to have o

Re: Strange VM/HW dichotomy building Ruby packages

If you observe the build logs carefully, there were some segfaults for example: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13171578 This particular one is PPC, so it might be platform specific issue, who knows Vít Dne 29.2.2016 v 06:22 Greg Hellings napsal(a): > I've been strug

Re: Rawhide Report Rawhide 20160226.n.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Is this (1) new version of Rawhide report which will stay or (2) is this just some temporary version or (3) is it something completely new and the old Rawhide report is not sent just due to some issues? If (1) is the case, then it is missing broken

Re: Rawhide Report Rawhide 20160226.n.1

Dne 29.2.2016 v 16:10 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 16:01 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Is this (1) new version of Rawhide report which will stay or (2) is this >> just some temporary version or (3) is it something completely new and >> the old Rawhide re

Re: Rawhide Report Rawhide 20160226.n.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dne 29.2.2016 v 16:55 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > On Monday, February 29, 2016 04:29:08 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 29.2.2016 v 16:10 Adam Williamson napsal(a): >>> On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 16:01 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: &g

Re: glibc in Fedora rawhide now split by langpacks.

Dne 29.2.2016 v 17:12 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a): > On 02/29/2016 04:22 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a): >>> On 02/26/2016 05:02 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>>> You also forget to mention what Rawhide users are supposed

Gnome in Rawhide broken

After update, my gnome-terminal failed to start. The journal contained following message: Mar 03 15:01:17 localhost org.gnome.Terminal[1965]: */usr/libexec/gnome-**terminal**-server: symbol lookup error: /usr/libexec/gnome-**terminal**-server: undefined symbol: vte_**terminal**_search_set_rege

Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?

Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT? I.e. my 1st VT always contains the GDM and 2nd VT actually displays the Wayland user session. That is confusing, looking like that nobody is logged in ... Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@

Re: Gnome in Rawhide broken

Dne 3.3.2016 v 15:42 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > On 03/03/2016 03:37 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> After update, my gnome-terminal failed to start. The journal contained >> following message: >> >> >> Mar 03 15:01:17 localhost >> org.gnome.Terminal[1965]:

Re: Gnome in Rawhide broken

Dne 3.3.2016 v 16:08 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > On 03/03/2016 03:51 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 3.3.2016 v 15:42 Kalev Lember napsal(a): >>> Should be fixed in gnome-terminal-3.19.91-1.fc24, >>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=741368 >> &g

Re: Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?

Dne 3.3.2016 v 20:00 Michael Catanzaro napsal(a): > On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 15:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT? > See: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747339#c20 Thx for the link. I was not aware of this change. Vít -- devel mailin

Why is my secondary monitor not detected?

Not sure where should I report this issue, but I am wondering, why my secondary monitor is not detected after docking my Rawhide laptop (it works just fine after restart)? It used to work. If it didn't work right away, opening control panel typically helped, but nowadays, it does not appear to work

Re: Why is my secondary monitor not detected?

Dne 7.3.2016 v 11:47 Peter Robinson napsal(a): > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Not sure where should I report this issue, but I am wondering, why my >> secondary monitor is not detected after docking my Rawhide laptop (it >> works just fine after

Re: Fedora 24 compose report: 20160309.n.1 changes

Hi, Dne 10.3.2016 v 01:31 Fedora Branched Report napsal(a): > = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = > Package: scilab-6.0.0-0.1.beta1.fc24 > Old package: scilab-6.0.0-0.3.alpha2.fc24 > Summary: Scientific software package for numerical computations > RPMs: scilab scilab-devel scilab-d

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160312.n.0 changes

Dne 12.3.2016 v 15:32 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a): > = SUMMARY = > Added packages: 11 > Dropped packages:0 > Upgraded packages: 164 > Downgraded packages: 2 > Interesting, is this already 4th downgraded package this week? Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproj

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160312.n.0 changes

Dne 14.3.2016 v 12:26 Peter Robinson napsal(a): > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> Dne 12.3.2016 v 15:32 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a): >>> = SUMMARY = >>> Added packages: 11 >>> Dropped packages:0 >>&g

Re: GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

Dne 14.3.2016 v 08:34 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > Hi all, > > It's GNOME 3.19.92 release this week. As we are deep in the Alpha freeze > in Fedora, this will stay in updates-testing for a while until the > freeze is lifted and floodgates open a again. > > We have koji side tag to collect all the bu

Re: GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

Dne 15.3.2016 v 10:03 Richard Hughes napsal(a): > On 15 March 2016 at 08:53, Peter Robinson wrote: >> so it would be little extra effort for you to do that same for f25/rawhide. > I'm a bit confused where the problem is, at least my workflow is: > > * build latest release for rawhide This shoul

Re: GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

Dne 15.3.2016 v 10:13 Richard Hughes napsal(a): > On 15 March 2016 at 09:06, Tom Hughes wrote: >> If bodhi is in use then you can bundle all the builds into one bodhi update >> to ensure that nobody gets a broken tree. > Why would people get a broken tree if there are no soname bumps? Because

Re: GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

Dne 15.3.2016 v 10:24 Richard Hughes napsal(a): > On 15 March 2016 at 09:17, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> I'm somewhat confused where the problem is. >> This is the problem: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CI57RU5TGQZ

Re: GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

l(a): > On 15 March 2016 at 10:00, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> So lets say I am using Gnome 3.19.90. The 3.19.91 is released and you >> start build, which takes some time (12h? 24h? 2 days? Have no idea). > Building all the components in mclazy takes a couple of hours. The > issu

Re: GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

Dne 15.3.2016 v 16:17 Debarshi Ray napsal(a): > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:20:51AM +0100, V?t Ondruch wrote: >> IOW some of Gnome developers don't care about sonames, "because it is >> just development version". > I find your repeated use of phrases like "don't care" to be insulting. Sorry, I di

Re: GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

Thas a great plan Michael. Thank you. Vít Dne 15.3.2016 v 18:47 Michael Catanzaro napsal(a): > Using a side tag seems like a great idea. When folks are brave enough > to test rawhide for us, we should try to avoid breaking their > computers. :) > > A few arbitrary answers: > > On Tue, 2016-03-

Re: two identical package

Dne 5.4.2016 v 11:49 Jan Chaloupka napsal(a): > > > On 04/05/2016 12:26 AM, Ilia Gradina wrote: >> Thanks, but not working( >> >> output: >> / >> [ilgrad@x230 rubygem-connection-pool]$ fedpkg retire "Renamed to bar" > > This can be done only by maintainer with correct rights.

Re: weakdeps and the buildroot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 This applies just for Rawhide, right? Vít Dne 7.4.2016 v 18:40 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > Hi All, > > Following the decision of FPC that weak deps must not be installed into the > buildroot[1] koji has been changed to set install_weak_deps to 0

Re: Dropping primary ownership of several ruby packages

Thank you Michael for your contribution. I took over the Fedora branches. The EPEL branches are still free to grab and of course, co-maintainers are welcome. Vít Dne 14.4.2016 v 00:52 Michael Stahnke napsal(a): > I haven't had the time to be a good steward on a number of these > packages. Seve

Re: Announce: OpenCV 3.1 in Rawhide

Dne 25.4.2016 v 07:08 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 02:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> On Sáb, 2016-04-23 at 07:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hello we need rebuild in rawhide : os-autoinst >>

Re: Announce: OpenCV 3.1 in Rawhide

Dne 27.4.2016 v 18:59 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > FYI, The reason rawhide composes were not sending broken deps reports > to the lists or developers was a bug in fedora-pungi (The script that > calls pungi4 for us). > > I tracked down the issue and submitted a PR which Dennis merged, so > hopefully

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir

Dne 12.5.2016 v 10:11 Peter Robinson napsal(a): >>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir = >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD >>> >>> Change owner(s): >>> * Neal Gompa >>> * Jan Silhan >>> >>> >>> == Detailed Description == >>

Re: Is it time to retire rubygem-therubyracer?

I'll pull the trigger at Friday the 20th, if there is no opposition (and there was no opposition so far). Adding devel into the loop for wider audience. Vít Dne 11.5.2016 v 10:33 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > Hi all, > > I am thinking about retiring therubyracer from Fedo

Re: Koschei update

Hi Mikolaj, This is sweet! Thx. Could you please enable CI for ruby? Or actually the ruby-rails group for every Fedora branch? Best, Vít Dne 18.5.2016 v 05:03 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a): > TL;DR Koschei now supports targets other than rawhide (not enabled > yet) and should correctly handl

Re: Kernel plans for Fedora 24

I think Josh wrote nice blog about "kernel release cycle": http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/51935.html Based on it, I'd be surprised to see 4.6 land in F24 prior stable release. Vít Dne 18.5.2016 v 17:27 Matthew Miller napsal(a): > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05:44:43PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson

Re: 15 thousands python3-* packages for Fedora

Do I understand correctly that you build just the latest version of each package? Vít Dne 19.5.2016 v 08:51 Miroslav Suchy napsal(a): > Hi, > I just finished packaging of 15 634 python3-* packages for Fedora. > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/copr/PyPI3/ > You can click on Builds

Re: Koschei update

Dne 19.5.2016 v 10:47 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a): > On 05/18/2016 10:40 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Could you please enable CI for ruby? Or actually the ruby-rails group >> for every Fedora branch? > It doesn't work this way. Once new targets are added to Koschei, all >

Re: Is it time to retire rubygem-therubyracer?

I pulled the trigger and retired rubygem-therubyracer. Please update your packages to use NodeJS instead. RIP Vít Dne 16.5.2016 v 10:13 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > I'll pull the trigger at Friday the 20th, if there is no opposition > (and there was no opposition so far). > &g

Re: RFC: Storing Automated Tasks/Tests In Dist-Git

Dne 17.10.2016 v 17:42 Tim Flink napsal(a): > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:16:22 +0200 > Pavol Babincak wrote: > >> On 10/17/2016 06:46 AM, Tim Flink wrote: >>> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:50:33 -0600 >>> Tim Flink wrote: >>> One of the features for Taskotron that we've been planning since the

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG

Dne 18.10.2016 v 05:00 jku...@redhat.com napsal(a): > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Modularity WG on 2016-10-18 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC >At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net > > The meeting will be about: > Meeting for the Modularity Working Group. > > More i

Re: RFC: Storing Automated Tasks/Tests In Dist-Git

Dne 17.10.2016 v 11:16 Pavol Babincak napsal(a): > Whereas tests repositories have only master branch. I spoke to Pavol today a bit and I realized that I missed this peace of the information, which comes quite essential to me and worth of highlighting. This is very important, since if there i

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Blivet-GUI in Anaconda

Sounds interesting. I hope it won't be choice one or the another, but that I'll be able to do basic setup by Anaconda and probably tweak some properties of the default setup using blivet gui. V. Dne 19.10.2016 v 15:54 Jan Kurik napsal(a): > = Proposed Self Contained Change:Blivet-GUI in Anacond

Re: RPM %changelog?

ot; %{ruby_libdir}/tkextlib %changelog -* Fri Oct 21 2016 Vít Ondruch - 2.3.1-59 -- Continue to use OpenSSL 1.0 for the moment. -- Add gemspec_add_dep and gemspec_remove_dep macros. -- Harden package. - ... snip ... - -* Mon Mar 9 1998 Shoichi OZAWA -- Added a powerPC arch part. Thanks

Re: RPM %changelog?

Dne 25.10.2016 v 13:03 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:35 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:14:14AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> So why don't we optionally split changelog out of the .spec file? >>> Somethi

Re: RPM %changelog?

Dne 25.10.2016 v 16:23 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:56:10 -0400 > Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 05:00:21PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: Please, no, don't do that. RPM is a standard, the changelog is part of that. It would be pretty crappy to just dec

Bodhi For Rawhide?

Hi all, I am thinking, why we don't have enabled Bodhi for Rawhide? I know that you might think now that I went nut and it is bureaucracy, but let me explain. If I understand it correctly, during several past years, our build process was more streamlined and we are trying to do the Rawhide compos

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

Dne 27.10.2016 v 13:42 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am thinking, why we don't have enabled Bodhi for Rawhide? I know that >> you might think now that I went nut and it is bureaucracy, but let me &

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

Dne 27.10.2016 v 14:12 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a): > On Thursday, October 27, 2016 12:53:27 PM CEST Vít Ondruch wrote: >> * And probably last think, why the Rawhide should be really exception? >> Why we should not use Bodhi if we are using it anywhere else? > The reason for excep

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

Dne 27.10.2016 v 16:05 Matthew Miller napsal(a): > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> * And probably last think, why the Rawhide should be really exception? >> Why we should not use Bodhi if we are using it anywhere else? >> Lets use Bodhi f

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

Dne 27.10.2016 v 16:45 Matthew Miller napsal(a): > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 04:35:17PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> This means to go to some unexplored lands. I am not sure I am fan of >> this idea. >>> It might be nice for the "fedpkg build" command l

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

Dne 28.10.2016 v 00:17 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): > >> * From time to time, there is necessary to build some framework, which >> consist of several components which must be released together. >> Currently, we either temporarily break Rawhide or we are asking for side >> tag. But why not use koji for

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

Dne 27.10.2016 v 20:21 Orion Poplawski napsal(a): > On 10/27/2016 08:05 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> * And probably last think, why the Rawhide should be really exception? >>> Why we should not use Bodhi

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20161106.n.0 changes

What is wrong with the PPC? Is it missing dependencies on its own subpackages or how I should understand this? Vít Dne 7.11.2016 v 01:58 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a): > Broken deps for ppc64 > -- > [rubygem-bson] > rubygem-bson-d

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20161105.n.3 changes

Long time no see, welcome back ;) V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

Dne 5.11.2016 v 07:10 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 05:01 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Otherwise, you have to hunt down the old builds >> directly in Koji > "hunt down"? > > koji download-build (nvr) works fine. While more convenient way is "dnf history undo last", which u

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20161106.n.0 changes

Dne 7.11.2016 v 14:49 Dan Horák napsal(a): > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:37:18 + > Peter Robinson wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Vít Ondruch >> wrote: >>> What is wrong with the PPC? Is it missing dependencies on its own >>> subpackages

vim plugins don't need %post{,un} scriptlets anymore

Hi, Just a short note to all vim plugins maintainers. Yesterday, I added %transfiletriggerin and %transfiletriggerpostun triggers into vim package [1, 2], therefore you can safely remove your %post{,un} scriptlets, which you used to refresh the documentation. This should be done automatically now.

Re: vim plugins don't need %post{,un} scriptlets anymore

:helptags %{vimfiles_root}/doc" -c :q &> /dev/null - %files %doc CONTRIBUTING.markdown README.markdown %{vimfiles_root}/doc/* ``` Vít Dne 8.11.2016 v 09:27 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Hi, > > Just a short note to all vim plugins maintainers. Yesterday, I added > %transfiletr

Orphaning rubygem-heroku{,-api}

Hi, I am orphaning rubygem-heroku{,-api} since I was never really user of these. Moreover, there packages are deprecated already and Heroku is going to sunset the Heroku v2 API as well as these packages on April 15, 2017 [1]. Vít [1] https://devcenter.heroku.com/changelog-items/862 __

Re: RFC: Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

Dne 9.11.2016 v 00:19 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:49:42PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: SUSE generates a random name of the fo

rpm vs --compress-debug-sections=zlib

Hi, Recently, there have started to appear weird messages in the build output of development snapshot of Ruby [1]: ``` ... snip ... + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id -m --run-dwz --dwz-low-mem-die-limit 1000 --dwz-max-die-limit 11000 /builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-2.4.0-r5

rubygem-launchy license change to ISC

rubygem-launchy-2.4.3-1.fc26 changed it's license from BSD to ISC. Vít ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: rpm vs --compress-debug-sections=zlib

As a follow up, I opened ticket to add compressed debug section support to RPM [1] and asked Ruby upstream to make this flag configurable [2]. Vít [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394759 [2] https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12934 Dne 10.11.2016 v 16:25 Vít Ondruch napsal

Re: Wiki page subscription

Dne 16.11.2016 v 16:30 Florian Weimer napsal(a): > On 11/16/2016 04:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:03:42 +0100 >> Florian Weimer wrote: >> >>> On the Fedora wiki, I can subscribe to certain pages. I did that, >>> but I did not receive any notifications when they were edited

Re: upcoming build and release developer flag day December 12 2016

Dne 20.11.2016 v 02:11 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > koji authentication will be switching to Kerberos. Koji supports multiple > authentication mechanisms. Fedora infrastructure has set up a freeipa > instance > internally that has credential syncing to fas. We are working on ensuring > that >

Re: upcoming build and release developer flag day December 12 2016

Dne 21.11.2016 v 13:36 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > On 11/21/2016 04:24 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 07:11:25PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>> koji authentication will be switching to Kerberos. Koji supports multiple >>> authentication mechanisms. Fedora infrastructure

Re: upcoming build and release developer flag day December 12 2016

Dne 21.11.2016 v 14:07 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > Dne 21.11.2016 v 13:36 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): >> On 11/21/2016 04:24 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 07:11:25PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>>> koji authentication will be switching to

Re: upcoming build and release developer flag day December 12 2016

Dne 21.11.2016 v 14:18 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > Dne 21.11.2016 v 14:07 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >> Dne 21.11.2016 v 13:36 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): >>> On 11/21/2016 04:24 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >>>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 07:11:25PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore

Re: upcoming build and release developer flag day December 12 2016

Dne 21.11.2016 v 16:07 Alexander Bokovoy napsal(a): > >> } [domain_realm] .fedoraproject.org = FEDORAPROJECT.ORG fedoraproject.org = FEDORAPROJECT.ORG ``` >>> But apparently, with this snippet, I can't kinit anymore :/ >>> >>> ``` >>> $ kinit vondr...@fedoraprojec

Re: upcoming build and release developer flag day December 12 2016

Dne 21.11.2016 v 21:52 Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk napsal(a): >> Dne 21.11.2016 v 16:07 Alexander Bokovoy napsal(a): >> >> >> $ KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stderr kinit vondruch(a)FEDORAPROJECT.ORG >> [8655] 1479746886.252240: Resolving unique ccache of type KEYRING >> [8655] 1479746886.252281: Getting ini

rubygem-hashery license changed to BSD

rubygem-hashery-2.1.2-1.fc26 changed it's license from MIT to BSD. Vít ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [HELPWANTED] Building jquery for F24 branch

Dne 30.11.2016 v 02:30 Christopher napsal(a): > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:13 PM Tom Hughes > wrote: > > > > If you're planning to update from 1.11 to 1.12 then I would have > to ask > if that is even appropriate in a released version anyway... > > > That's a

Re: [HELPWANTED] Building jquery for F24 branch

Dne 30.11.2016 v 02:30 Christopher napsal(a): > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:13 PM Tom Hughes > wrote: > > On 30/11/16 01:02, Christopher wrote: > > > > > If you're planning to update from 1.11 to 1.12 then I would have > to ask > if that is even appropriat

mutter broken in Rawhide

To all Rawhide users, be careful with update of mutter. It seems that mutter-3.23.2-2.fc26 is broken [1], which prevents you from log in to your system. Downgrade to mutter-3.23.1-2.fc26.x86_64 workarounded the issues for me. Vít [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401317 _

Re: mutter broken in Rawhide

Dne 6.12.2016 v 15:19 Kamil Paral napsal(a): >> To all Rawhide users, be careful with update of mutter. It seems that >> mutter-3.23.2-2.fc26 is broken [1], which prevents you from log in to >> your system. Downgrade to mutter-3.23.1-2.fc26.x86_64 workarounded the >> issues for me. >> >> >> Vít >>

Re: Python 2/3 package naming

Dne 7.12.2016 v 14:46 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:13 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> On 7 December 2016 at 13:07, Jakub Jedelsky wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:48:55AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:48 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

So several questions: 1) When I have 2 domains I login to with kerberos, how to really make it work. I don't want to kswitch all the time. I am using Kerberos to authenticate my email client, so I want to keep it working all the time. 2) I needed to update a certificate every 6 months, now I need

Re: trying to install dictd-server and...

I'm not sure what dictd-server is, but I'd say if there is some issue with SELinux, it should be considered packaging bug and you should report it into bugzilla against the package (or alternatively against selinux-polixy). The INSTALL file typically comes from upstream, so it might not cover some

Re: Start packaging/maintaining in Fedora

Hi Sylvia, Just wondering, what were the places you were looking at to find the information how to start maintaining package in Fedora. Or what is the reason you want to package something into Fedora. I am asking, since there are various ongoing activities to make the process easier to newcomers

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Dne 12.12.2016 v 17:22 Dave Love napsal(a): > Dennis Gilmore writes: > >> Greetings. >> >> As previously announced, releng has made a number of changes as part of >> it's 2016 "flag day". >> >> All package maintainers will want to make sure they have updated to >> the >> following package ver

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Dne 12.12.2016 v 16:02 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > On 12/12/2016 04:53 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> So several questions: >> >> 1) When I have 2 domains I login to with kerberos, how to really make it >> work. I don't want to kswitch all the time. I am using Kerb

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Dne 12.12.2016 v 20:54 Christopher napsal(a): > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:03 AM Stephen Gallagher > mailto:sgall...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > 2) I needed to update a certificate every 6 months, now I need > to kinit > > every day. This is regression. How to make it work without kin

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Dne 12.12.2016 v 22:33 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:53:39 +0100 > Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> So several questions: >> >> 1) When I have 2 domains I login to with kerberos, how to really make >> it work. I don't want to kswitch all the time.

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Dne 13.12.2016 v 14:41 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > On 12/13/2016 03:52 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> Dne 12.12.2016 v 22:33 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): >>> On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:53:39 +0100 >>> Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> >>>> So several questio

Re: Start packaging/maintaining in Fedora

Dne 13.12.2016 v 21:00 Ms Sanchez napsal(a): > > > > On 12/12/16 13:38, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> Hi Sylvia, >> >> Just wondering, what were the places you were looking at to find the >> information how to start maintaining package in Fedora. Or what is &

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Dne 13.12.2016 v 22:40 David Woodhouse napsal(a): > On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 18:34 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> All package maintainers will want to make sure they have updated to >> the >> following package versions (some may be in testing as of this email): >> >> python-cccolutils-1.4-1 >

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Fontconfig cache directory change

Dne 21.12.2016 v 18:08 Matthew Miller napsal(a): > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:18:54AM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote: to move it to /usr/lib/fontconfig/cache. >>> This proposal likely is incompatible to the FHS. >>> >>> Files in directories below /usr/lib are supposed to static and not >>> to be

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Fontconfig cache directory change

Dne 21.12.2016 v 18:26 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > Dne 21.12.2016 v 18:08 Matthew Miller napsal(a): >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:18:54AM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote: >>>>> to move it to /usr/lib/fontconfig/cache. >>>> This proposal likely is incompatible to

Re: Strange koji failures

Dne 22.12.2016 v 09:27 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a): > On 12/22/2016 05:06 AM, Christopher wrote: >> The failure yesterday that I was thinking of was: >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004112 >> >> Re-submitting it 4 minutes later passed just fine: >> https://koji.fedoraproje

Re: Strange koji failures

Dne 22.12.2016 v 10:23 Tom Hughes napsal(a): > On 22/12/16 09:19, Michal Schorm wrote: >>> Honestly this is annoying misbehavior. How we can tell Koji to avoid >>> certain builders for certain noarch packages? Wouldn't be possible to >>> build noarch packages just on primary arch builders for exa

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >