Re: Unresponsive maintainer

2018-01-22 20:21 GMT+01:00 Matthew Miller : > > I saw him mention that he'll be at DevConf.cz, so maybe someone can > catch him there. That must have been last year. :-) Unfortunately I can't make it this time and only came last year to find new maintainers for my

Re: Unresponsive maintainer

2018-01-22 1:23 GMT+01:00 Greg Evenden : > you might even be better to catch him over on the SUSE IRC channels, it might > be worth a shot to see if anyone in SUSE Packages those packages an are up to > date an Grab the Source RPM's from there Good idea, but this shouldn't

Re: Unresponsive maintainer

2018-01-22 0:38 GMT+01:00 Tao Zhao : > Hi Mamoru, > > Thanks for the information! I've pinged his gmail. Let's see how it goes. Hi Alick, sorry, I missed that mail. I have given up looking after individual packages, so make sure to use a meaningful subject if you want to

Re: Help with mypaint package

2017-12-06 12:39 GMT+01:00 Sergey Avseyev : > Hi everyone > > I found that package "mypaint" is almost abandoned. Upstream has released > several new stable versions. There are open tickets on bugzilla, which hang > without attention (one is almost two years old): > >

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-15 9:13 GMT+02:00 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com: Recently we had discussion here about the queue of package reviews with FE-NEEDSPONSOR flag. I suggested to write some script which would query db and reveal those sponsors who does not make his duty. Here comes this script:

Re: Obsoleting ConsoleKit once and for all

Am Montag, den 29.07.2013, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering: On Sun, 28.07.13 13:24, Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@gmail.com) wrote: and by pcmamfm and thunar for handling permissions of removable devices. I don't know what pcmamfm and thunar are, but why would they use

Re: Obsoleting ConsoleKit once and for all

Am Sonntag, den 28.07.2013, 04:03 -0700 schrieb Dan Mashal: Hi, After discussion on #fedora-devel, my MATE co-maintainer raveit65, Kalev, Misc, and previous conversations with Rex, I am ready to retire ConsoleKit. Others are not. I am pretty sure ConsoleKit is still needed by LXDM and slim

Orphaning gtkglextmm

Hi, I'm going to orphan gtkglextmm. I took over maintainership because it was a requirement of beldi, which is officially dead for a while now. gtkglextmm itself FTBFS since Fedora 19 [1], but I think Debian has a fix for this [2]. There also is a request for aarch64 support [3]. The only

Re: Receiving bugs from Crash Catcher with [faf] in the subject line

Am Montag, den 22.04.2013, 16:05 +0200 schrieb Richard Marko: More feedback is welcome. 1. Announce changes like this one in advance on devel-announce. 2. Provide some documentation about FAF. What do these bugs mean to developers and package maintainers. hat are we supposed

Re: Fedora 18 and new version of Gnome (3.7.x)

Am Dienstag, den 05.03.2013, 13:23 +0100 schrieb Dario Lesca: Il giorno mar, 05/03/2013 alle 19.33 +0800, Liang Suilong ha scritto: Please upgrade to Fedora 19. Thank Liang, someone can tell to me what is the best way to upgrade my Fedora 18 x86_64 to F19? If you don't know how to do

Re: [emelfm2] remove vendor tag from desktop file. https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/247

Am Dienstag, den 05.03.2013, 03:56 + schrieb Rahul Sundaram: commit 0ed4b2cddfa74be4b66b3646aee4c5d0e3fe756f Author: Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org Date: Mon Mar 4 22:55:58 2013 -0500 remove vendor tag from desktop file. https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/247

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

Am Montag, den 18.02.2013, 23:34 + schrieb John5342: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@gmail.com wrote: Despite of the question whether it's right or wrong it's a manual process and we cannot rely it really happens. On the other hand changing

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

Am Montag, den 18.02.2013, 07:12 -0500 schrieb Jaroslav Reznik: - Original Message - Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež: On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12:02 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: I found that a couple of F16 bugs were closed by endoflife@fp.o

Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

Hi there, I found that a couple of F16 bugs were closed by endoflife@fp.o even though there were pending updates for F17 and F18 to fix them. As a result, the bugs are now closed WONTFIX even they were or are going to be fixed. Should we expect the bugzappers to not mass-close bugs that are in

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež: On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12:02 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: I found that a couple of F16 bugs were closed by endoflife@fp.o even though there were pending updates for F17 and F18 to fix them. As a result, the bugs are now

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 16:12 -0500 schrieb Orcan Ogetbil: On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež: On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12:02 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: I found that a couple of F16 bugs were closed

Re: retiring epdfview

Am Donnerstag, den 14.02.2013, 11:59 +0100 schrieb Michal Schmidt: Hello, epdfview, a light-weight PDF viewer, is not maintained upstream anymore. The upstream developer recommends to switch to evince-gtk (a build of evince with minimal dependencies, requested in BZ#906121) or zathura. I

Re: Proposed F19 Feature (exception): Kolab 3

Am Montag, den 11.02.2013, 13:38 + schrieb Jaroslav Reznik: This Feature has been submitted *after* Feature Submission Deadline and requires exception from FESCo to be accepted as Fedora 19 Feature. Owner(s), please, provide motivation why do you think the exception should be granted.

Re: Proposed F19 Feature (exception): Kolab 3

Am Montag, den 11.02.2013, 12:42 -0800 schrieb Toshio Kuratomi: On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 04:24:11PM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: Am Montag, den 11.02.2013, 13:38 + schrieb Jaroslav Reznik: 2. Even if we don't make it, there is absolutely zero impact on the release

Re: Fedora 18 laptop regression

Am Samstag, den 05.01.2013, 23:38 +0100 schrieb Lennart Poettering: On Sat, 05.01.13 09:14, alex...@hushmail.com (alex...@hushmail.com) wrote: Closing the laptop lid now suspends, without a visible option to disable it. You can edit /etc/systemd/logind.conf and your laptop won't suspend

Default grou membership for new users

Hi there, I am looking for a way how to add new users to a certain group upon creation. Do we have such a mechanism? /etc/default/useradd only is for useradd and can set a default group, but no additional default groups. Background: The 'Fedora Jam' spin [1] requires users to be in the groups

Last call for F19 naming proposals (deadline today 23:59 UTC!)

Hi everybody, this is the final reminder that the Fedora 19 naming collection ends today at 23:59 UTC. That means you have 5 hours left to propose a name at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Name_suggestions_for_Fedora_19 Before proposing a name, please read the guidelines at

Last call for F19 naming proposals (deadline today 23:59 UTC!)

Hi everybody, this is the final reminder that the Fedora 19 naming collection ends today at 23:59 UTC. That means you have 5 hours left to propose a name at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Name_suggestions_for_Fedora_19 Before proposing a name, please read the guidelines at

Questions about the new comps

In order to reduce the size of the F18 Xfce spin, I wanted to edit comps - but decided to not do so until I fully understand what is going on. I seem to have missed a lot since since last our discussion at Blacksburg, so have a lot of questions. Here we go: 1. How can a package maintainer

Re: Questions about the new comps

Hi there, one more question: How can one install something that is neither an 'environment' nor a minimal install install? Say I want openbox as window manager, how would I do that? openbox is in the group 'window-managers', but that group is not shown in anaconda. I guess we need to creae a

Confusing tracker bug naming

Currently Blocker bugs are named Freleasemilestone: * FXXAlpha * FXXBeta * FXXBlocker To indicate whether something was accepted as a blocker or not the whiteboard is used: AcceptedBlocker or RejectedBlocker Nice-to-have bugs are named Freleasemilestone-accepted: *

Xfce tracker bug

Hi there, if you find any bugs in Xfce or the Xfce spin, please let them block the 'F18Xfce' tracker bug [1] so we can look into them ASAP. Kind regards, Christoph [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863722 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Xfce tracker bug

Am Sonntag, den 07.10.2012, 02:10 +0200 schrieb Christoph Wickert: Hi there, if you find any bugs in Xfce or the Xfce spin, please let them block the 'F18Xfce' tracker bug [1] so we can look into them ASAP. Sorry, I forgot to mention that this bug is *only* for Xfce on F18 or F19, maybe even

Re: Confusing tracker bug naming

Am Samstag, den 06.10.2012, 23:47 + schrieb Andre Robatino: Here was my proposal: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Trackers For the list: Robin's proposal is * 15Alpha, 15Beta and 15Final (or alternatively 15) * 15AlphaNTH, 15BetaNTH and 15FinalNTH

Please use the announce list (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18)

Something with [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] in the subject line should probably go to devel-announce list. Best regards, Christoph -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Size of official media handouts (was Re: Proposed F18 feature: MiniDebugInfo)

Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2012, 11:57 -0400 schrieb Adam Jackson: On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 11:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 13:35 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: Alexander Larsson wrote: The feature page lists some of the background and statistics. It also lists some

Re: Broken dependencies: parcellite

Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 18:30 +0100 schrieb Thomas Spura: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 12:52 + schrieb build...@fedoraproject.org: parcellite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree

Re: Broken dependencies: parcellite

Am Donnerstag, den 22.03.2012, 14:53 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:41:37 +0100, CW (Christoph) wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 18:30 +0100 schrieb Thomas Spura: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Christoph Wickert christoph.wickert wrote: Am Mittwoch, den

Re: Broken dependencies: parcellite

Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 12:52 + schrieb build...@fedoraproject.org: parcellite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On i386: parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires

Rework package groups (was: Summary minutes for today's FESCo meeting...)

Am Montag, den 19.03.2012, 14:46 -0500 schrieb Jon Ciesla: * #824 F18 Feature: Rework Package Groups -- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ReworkPackageGroups (limburgher, 18:10:57) * AGREED: F18 Rework Package Groups is passed (+6,-:0,0:2) (limburgher, 18:12:42) Did FESCO

Re: [kde, lxde, xfce] Removing ModemManager dep from NM, adding to comps instead

Am Donnerstag, den 26.01.2012, 14:54 -0600 schrieb Dan Williams: People who don't have 3G modems and know they wont in the future have no need of installing or running MM. Thus I'd like to remove the RPM dep from NetworkManager, and instead add ModemManager to the default comps installs of

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2011, 19:50 -0800 schrieb Eric Smith: I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of GNOME 2. MATE is just replacing gnome with mate everywhere, whether or not it was

Re: Fesco membership policies

Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 12:31 -0500 schrieb Clyde E. Kunkel: Multidisciplinary membership is good. However, please keep a balance in that no one group is over represented. Also, how about a non-technical member from the general user community? I'd say no. Not only because I think

Re: Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Gary T. Giesen

Am Dienstag, den 01.11.2011, 19:36 +0100 schrieb Sven Lankes: On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:15:20PM +0200, Sven Lankes wrote: I'm following the procedure at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers No really. You should have done this in the bug reports in

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 11:34 +0200 schrieb drago01: On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote: Since Mozilla switched to the new rapid release model, Firefox in Fedora is no longer fun: Every 6 weeks a new major version hits our stable

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

Am Samstag, den 08.10.2011, 23:51 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 08.10.2011 23:43, schrieb Christoph Wickert: Since Mozilla switched to the new rapid release model, Firefox in Fedora is no longer fun: Every 6 weeks a new major version hits our stable release and breaks Firefox horribly

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 12:58 +0200 schrieb drago01: On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote: Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 11:34 +0200 schrieb drago01: On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 17:56 +0200 schrieb Matej Cepl: Dne 8.10.2011 23:43, Christoph Wickert napsal(a): * My favorite extensions (and actually the only thing that keeps me using FF) stop working. In the last 7 weeks I had to pitch in three times and update

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 19:15 +0200 schrieb Matej Cepl: Dne 9.10.2011 18:20, Christoph Wickert napsal(a): I already gave a reason why we should maintain these packages as RPM, but unfortunately you have trimmed that part of my mail: There is no way to install and manage extensions

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 11:14 -0600 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen: On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 05:28, Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote: Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 12:58 +0200 schrieb drago01: On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Christoph Wickert christoph.wick

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 12:59 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald: problem is that the packaged extensions for FF/TB are NOT updated as rapidly they should, but this is not a problem of firefox itself No, but it's a problem of Fedora and we should address it instead of just throwing it over the

Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

Since Mozilla switched to the new rapid release model, Firefox in Fedora is no longer fun: Every 6 weeks a new major version hits our stable release and breaks Firefox horribly: * My favorite extensions (and actually the only thing that keeps me using FF) stop working. In the last 7

Re: Responsibility for rebuilding dependent components, was: F-16 Branched report: 20110920 changes

Am Dienstag, den 20.09.2011, 15:39 +0200 schrieb Sven Lankes: Didn't we have the time an update had to stay in -testing changed to three days during the F15 stabilization phase? Could we implement this again for F16 to mitigate the issue? I think we should. Please file a bug against bodhi

Re: Responsibility for rebuilding dependent components, was: F-16 Branched report: 20110920 changes

Am Dienstag, den 20.09.2011, 16:06 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Chauvet: I'm the maintainer of opencv here. quick answear: I have no right to submit a bodhi update for packages I do not own. Given that I'm no in the provenpackager group. So as I cannot expect every single maintainers to respond in

Re: Responsibility for rebuilding dependent components, was: F-16 Branched report: 20110920 changes

Am Dienstag, den 20.09.2011, 22:25 +0200 schrieb Ralf Corsepius: In a nutshell: Fedora's QA process is cause of many of these broken deps complaints. Please make a proposal to improve the situation and submit it to FESCo. TIA, Christoph -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Why was the design-suite group added to comps?

Hi, I wonder why the 'design-suite' group was added to comps. According to the wiki the idea of the feature was to *rename* the 'graphics' group [1] but now we have two apps with graphic apps. Looks kind of off in gpk-application's group view. Adding the feature owner and the committer to CC.

Re: GNOME and Xfce terminal entries not distinguishable in menus

Am Montag, den 19.09.2011, 12:30 -0600 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:16:57 +0200 Jos Vos j...@xos.nl wrote: And the other way around, when starting a GNOME terminal in Xfce, the GNOME terminal immdiately shrinks itself (you see it shrinking!) horizontally to a width of 28

FUDCon EMEA travel subsidies are open

(I just sent the following mail to the ambassadors list and then figured out, that we may want to have developers at Milan, so I think it's a good idea to send this to this list, too) Hi there, if you are planing to attend FUDCon Milan 2011 and need travel subsidies, the ticket system is now

FUDCon EMEA travel subsidies are open

(I just sent the following mail to the ambassadors list and then figured out, that we may want to have developers at Milan, so I think it's a good idea to send this to this list, too) Hi there, if you are planing to attend FUDCon Milan 2011 and need travel subsidies, the ticket system is now

Re: nonresponsive package maintainer (gget)

Am Samstag, den 09.07.2011, 08:29 + schrieb Andre Robatino: Does anyone know how to contact the maintainer (Ant Bryan)? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711629 Did you try to contact Anthony directly or just through bugzilla? Anthony, please let us know if you are around or

Re: nonresponsive package maintainer (gget)

Am Sonntag, den 17.07.2011, 12:38 + schrieb Andre Robatino: Christoph Wickert christoph.wickert at googlemail.com writes: Am Samstag, den 09.07.2011, 08:29 + schrieb Andre Robatino: Does anyone know how to contact the maintainer (Ant Bryan)? https://bugzilla.redhat.com

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages in F-16

Am Dienstag, den 12.07.2011, 17:10 -0400 schrieb Bill Nottingham: Orphan tango-icon-theme Orphan tango-icon-theme-extras I have taken these. Regards, Christoph -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: pyxfce package

On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 21:16 +0200, Raphael Groner wrote: FYI, since nobody seems to show any interest at Xfce upstream http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2011-July/000630.html I don't think it should be in Fedora then. We should focus on well maintained software. Regards,

Re: Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Jeroen van Meeuwen

Am Freitag, den 17.06.2011, 14:37 +0200 schrieb Farkas Levente: On 06/17/2011 02:01 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: I'm following the procedure at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers Does anyone know how to contact Jeroen van Meeuwen? He is not

Re: Security updates for Firefox 4 in F-15

Am Sonntag, den 26.06.2011, 17:08 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler: Felix Miata wrote: FF5 is the security update to FF4.0.1, which incorporates an upstream versioning policy change. The funny thing is that Firefox is going exactly the opposite way of us with their update policies, They

Re: Security updates for Firefox 4 in F-15

Am Sonntag, den 26.06.2011, 13:25 -0300 schrieb Evandro Giovanini: On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote: Am Sonntag, den 26.06.2011, 17:08 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler: Felix Miata wrote: FF5 is the security update to FF4.0.1, which

Re: Packages that will be orphaned

Am Montag, den 20.06.2011, 10:34 -0700 schrieb Toshio Kuratomi: Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of last week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be removed from the packager group soon. Have these packager been contacted directly in time,

Re: SYSTEMD: Give us a option for upstart

Am Montag, den 13.06.2011, 01:47 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 13.06.2011 00:54, schrieb Christoph Wickert: Am Sonntag, den 12.06.2011, 23:23 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald: PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum NOT USING systemd and force upstart as before systems

Re: OT: Fedora MulitiLiveCD, Current Status?

Am Sonntag, den 12.06.2011, 10:57 +0100 schrieb Frank Murphy: What is the status of the MultiLiveCD, that was being mooted last year. It is available for download at http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/releases/15/Multi/ AFAIK the NA ambassadors have received their media already while EMEA is

Re: OT: Fedora MulitiLiveCD, Current Status?

Am Sonntag, den 12.06.2011, 13:55 +0200 schrieb Jan Kratochvil: I was trying to push it since 2009: [Fedora-livecd-list] auto-biarch (x86_64 + i686) LiveDVD patch + ISO https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-livecd-list/2009-June/msg00018.html

Re: SYSTEMD: Give us a option for upstart

Am Sonntag, den 12.06.2011, 23:23 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald: PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum NOT USING systemd and force upstart as before systems upgraded with yum still have upstart installed (I did it myself) and you can select the init as a kernel parameter, so

Re: Provenpackager help for razertool removal

Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2011, 13:19 +0200 schrieb Nicola Soranzo: razertool package is dead upstream razercfg [1] it the successor of razertool. If somebody packages it up, it would be nice to have the package properly obsolete razertool. Regards, Christoph [1]

Re: Orphaning Slim

Am Donnerstag, den 09.06.2011, 13:40 +0400 schrieb Lucas: What kind of relation between Xfce maintainers and SLIM. The Fedora Xfce SIG considered SLIM but we didn't use it because (at least at that time) it had some problems with ConsoleKit. We are still trying to get rid of GDM but we are

Re: [OT] Xfce/LXDE wiki page seems outdated

Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2011, 23:39 -0100 schrieb Athmane Madjoudj: Hello, Sorry for posting this here, I'm not subscribed to Xfce and LXDE lists. As of Fedora 15, Xfce/LXDE are included in DVD (I checked on x86_64 DVD), but wiki pages [1] and [2] still mention about not being available

Re: A new comps group for fedora medical

Am Mittwoch, den 04.05.2011, 00:11 +0530 schrieb Ankur Sinha: Hello, Just a heads up to the list. I'm going to be adding a fedora-medical[1] group to comps in the coming few days. Please follow the instructions from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Comps.xml#New_groups and submit a patch to

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

Am Samstag, den 09.04.2011, 05:32 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler: Will Woods wrote: The solution is simple: ASK FOR HELP. The solution is simple: The red tape on update pushing needs to be repealed. As someone who is still suffering from the KDE 4.6.1 update and who has not received notable

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

Am Sonntag, den 10.04.2011, 23:12 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler: Christoph Wickert wrote: As someone who is still suffering from the KDE 4.6.1 update and who has not received notable support from your or the KDE SIG I object to lowering the test requirements for updates. Uh, we're doing

Re: Review swap request: dexter and postler

Am Mittwoch, den 06.04.2011, 02:11 +0200 schrieb Michel Alexandre Salim: These are part of the Elementary OS project, and were recently featured in OMG Ubuntu: Dexter -- http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/12/meet-dexter-elementarys-new-address-book-app/

Re: Orphaned packages by leigh123linux

Am Freitag, den 01.04.2011, 16:14 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: The following have been orphaned by leigh123linux. Sending on his behalf since his is not subscribed to this list libdesktop-agnostic, avant-window-navigator, awn-applets-extras, gmixer, torium and html2text gmixer should

Re: Firefox 4 for f14?

Am Donnerstag, den 24.03.2011, 14:48 -0700 schrieb Henrique Junior: It may sound a little off-topic to this thread, but since we are talking about bring new stuff into F14 I would like to know the opinion of you, guys, about the new openSUSE's tumbleweed [1] [2] repo, that tries to bring to

Re: Firefox 4 for f14?

Am Mittwoch, den 23.03.2011, 22:46 +0100 schrieb Jochen Schmitt: Perhaps, we have luck and get a so-called 'Feature Repository'. I'm working on that... If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use the private firefox4 repository on

Re: Orphaning some packages

Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 16:41 +0100 schrieb Dominic Hopf: Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 11:04 -0400 schrieb Brian Pepple: * meld I have already applied for commit access. * tagtool Seems to be dead, at least the homepage disappeared. Regards, Christoph -- devel mailing

Re: Orphaning some packages

Am Montag, den 14.03.2011, 01:10 +0530 schrieb Ankur Sinha: On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 20:15 +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote: Anyway, I still find it the best tool for editing MP3 tags around, so, is there any reason to not maintain it anymore from Fedora's point of view? Nope. None that I can

Re: Orphaning some packages

Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 23:13 +0100 schrieb Matej Cepl: Dne 13.3.2011 20:39, Christoph Wickert napsal(a): easytag? Unfortunately, it is not a separate package. $ rpm -qi easytag Name: easytag Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2.1.6

Orphaning some GNOME packages

(CC'ing desktop list, perhaps somebody is interested in these packages) I am orphaning all my GNOME panel applets because I don't use GNOME any longer and I doubt that panel applets will have a future after GNOME 3.0 is released. * gnome-netstatus: Doesn't build with latest gnome-panel and

Re: gnome-disk-utility default in admin-tools

Am Dienstag, den 01.03.2011, 18:25 +0100 schrieb Kevin Kofler: Christoph Wickert wrote: Next time you a change like this one, please announce it to the lists because it has a large impact on the spins. Even better: Ask *before* making this change. FYI, if your complaint is about Nautilus

gnome-disk-utility default in admin-tools

Am Montag, den 07.02.2011, 19:49 + schrieb Bill Nottingham: commit f2cb3971ffb2a53b9f0fdc536cdcc4f9c3a87876 Author: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com Date: Fri Jan 28 16:24:54 2011 -0500 Move system-config-* tools from base-x to appropriate desktops. In Admin tools,

Re: gnome-disk-utility default in admin-tools

Am Montag, den 28.02.2011, 15:59 -0500 schrieb Bill Nottingham: Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@googlemail.com) said: While we are at it: I'd like to suggest that non-desktop groups like 'admin-tools' should be desktop-agnostic. g-d-u is the maintained replacement for s-c-lvm

Re: gnome-disk-utility default in admin-tools

Am Montag, den 28.02.2011, 15:56 -0500 schrieb Bill Nottingham: Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@googlemail.com) said: Next time you a change like this one, please announce it to the lists because it has a large impact on the spins. Even better: Ask *before* making this change. I

Boards trac now open for ticket submissions

Hi, there is a new way to contact the board now: Recently the board's trac instance was opened for ticket submissions by all FAS account holders. In order to bring something to the board's attention, just file a ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/board/newticket You'll need to login with your

Re: PolicyKit authentication agent changes

Hi Matthias, thanks for your quick response. I was busy, that's why I'm not so quick. Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2011, 20:08 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen: On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 00:14 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: Can you explain what the advantage of your approach is? From a packaging

Re: PolicyKit authentication agent changes

Am Samstag, den 26.02.2011, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Kevin Kofler: Christoph Wickert wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2011, 20:08 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen: Thats between you and the window managers... but as far as gnome is concerned, we don't want to depend on anything virtual

Re: PolicyKit authentication agent changes

Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2011, 15:55 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen: As of version 0.100 (which will land in F15 as a post-alpha update), the polkit-gnome package will no longer install an autostart file for polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1. Instead, each desktop environment is reponsible for

Re: Mass Rebuild and Mass branching status update

Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2011, 15:01 -0600 schrieb Dennis Gilmore: The first pass though the mass rebuild has been completed failures can be found at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/failed.html and the list of all things not built yet at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/rebuild.html This

Re: Mass Rebuild and Mass branching status update

Am Freitag, den 11.02.2011, 11:14 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:01:28 -0600, Dennis wrote: The first pass though the mass rebuild has been completed failures can be found at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/failed.html and the list of all things not built yet at

Re: Mass Rebuild and Mass branching status update

Am Freitag, den 11.02.2011, 10:34 -0600 schrieb Dennis Gilmore: On Friday, February 11, 2011 04:16:44 am Christoph Wickert wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2011, 15:01 -0600 schrieb Dennis Gilmore: The first pass though the mass rebuild has been completed failures can be found at http

Re: taking over maintenance of broken/abandoned packages

Am Freitag, den 07.01.2011, 23:56 -0700 schrieb Kurt Seifried: What is the process for taking over packages that haven't been maintained in a long time? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers Regards, Christoph -- devel mailing list

Re: firewalld - A firewall daemon with D-BUS interface providing a dynamic firewall (test version)

Am Montag, den 27.12.2010, 14:42 +0100 schrieb Thomas Woerner: On 12/24/2010 11:45 PM, Colin Walters wrote: On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Thomas Woernertwoer...@redhat.com wrote: - A simple tray applet (firewall-applet) Actively deprecated; please consider other interfaces. In

Re: Testing Xfce 4.8 pre 2 packages available

Am Montag, den 06.12.2010, 14:42 +0200 schrieb Gilboa Davara: On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 00:01 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: Hi there, I have packaged Xfce 4-8 pre 2 for Fedora 14 and Rawhide. You can find the packages at http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/cwickert/xfce-4.8

Testing Xfce 4.8 pre 2 packages available

Hi there, I have packaged Xfce 4-8 pre 2 for Fedora 14 and Rawhide. You can find the packages at http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/cwickert/xfce-4.8/ The repo is far from complete. ATM it is still rsyncing and Fedora 13 is still building. Also a couple of applications that need a rebuild

Re: gnome-guitar in f14?

Am Sonntag, den 28.11.2010, 18:27 +0530 schrieb lakshminaras2...@gmail.com: I would like to take up gnome-guitar package. The last update happened in October 2009. According to the wiki, it would be necessary to submit the package for re-review. Please confirm whether my understanding is

Re: rawhide report: 20101110 changes

Am Mittwoch, den 10.11.2010, 10:34 + schrieb Rawhide Report: Compose started at Wed Nov 10 08:15:17 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [...] gwget-1.0.4-4.fc14.x86_64 requires libnotify.so.1()(64bit) Fixed in GIT but cannot

Re: coming libnotify bump

Am Montag, den 01.11.2010, 21:12 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen: I am planning to push libnotify 0.7.0 into rawhide by the end of this week; Next time you are making an update that affects a large number of packages, please use devel-announce. TIA, Christoph -- devel mailing list

Re: bugzilla bugzappers?

Am Donnerstag, den 04.11.2010, 13:28 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:41:22 +0100, Bert wrote: So can someone please explain my why I should continue to try to improve Fedora by reporting bugs ? Glad you ask this. The bugzapping script is stupid. It asks the

Re: update-mime-database errors: /usr/share/mime/packages/openoffice.org.xml:749: parser error - when updating Fedora 14 packages

Am Montag, den 04.10.2010, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: The errors below happen several times during the yum update. Assuming that they must be generated by RPM %post scripts, I had a look at the affected packages (control-center, evolution-data-server, cheese, seahorse) and I

  1   2   >